Hi all,
yesterday I have found metacommands in manual at
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.filter.input.html#zend.filter.input.metacommands.fields
I want to compare to password fields with the "Identical" validator. So I
build my form shown at http://paste2.org/p/532112
When I use this to
Dont know what docs you were reading:?
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.view.helpers.html#zend.view.helpers.initial.headtitle
Also, you dont have to learn everything about a componant to use it,
which it sounds like what you are trying to do.
The survive the deepend book goes through crea
Thanks for all the suggestions and the discussion.
I've been using ZF for probably over a year now, if not longer. But it's
been so on/off that I might miss a few big releases and then I find some big
changes.
For example, I started using and practicing with ZF before Zend_layout. I
bought som
On 25 Nov 2009, at 11:12, vb wrote:
>
> Hm, somehow, without any changes or reconfiguration, only several restarts in
> several days, it just started to work again. I see errorHandler pages again.
> So, maybe the solution is to let it "rest" for a while. ;-)
> --
> View this message in context:
Prompted by Fozzyuw's latest post, I will approach the issue from a different
tack.
I am looking open source projects that exemplify the best practice use of
the Zend Framework and its advanced features. Ideally these projects would:
+ be under active development
+ be based on ZF 1.9
+ leverage
No probs, thank you for the effort.
On 25 Nov 2009, at 18:02, Pádraic Brady
wrote:
Thanks, Daniel ;)
Survive The Deep End isn't complete but it covers almost anything
worth mentioning when starting out. I'll be kicking out more
chapters pretty soon - it's turned into a longer term proj
I have found it is just like learning anything that is semi complex, and
different than you are used to. It takes some time to build up your tool
set to both adapt how you currently do things to ZF, and ZF to how you do
things. Once you get a couple projects under your belt, you will have a
prett
Also, I find ZF teaches you about design patterns and principles
through implementation, i feel you are learning more than just
Framework, maybe this is part if the issue also?
On 25 Nov 2009, at 18:32, Rob Riggen wrote:
I've been very frustrated with ZF - specifically in regard to the
la
Personally speaking it's a case of practice, practice, practice. I
feel documentation can only get you so far and it won't be a panecea
or all your woes, like Sudheer says the best way is to get writing an
app. What I found useful was use this list ( or any of ) watch the
questions comin
I've been very frustrated with ZF - specifically in regard to the lack of
helpful how to and tutorial information. There is very little out there
that is even close to up-to-date. If the official documentation wants
developer to "connect the dots" on their own, it seems to leave a little too
much
I want to second this post. I have used ZF for some projects earlier this
year and I am right on the cusp of making a major decision: explore ZF 1.9
more deeply or abandon ZF and PHP altogether for Ruby on Rails.
ZF Documentation seems almost passive aggressive, providing examples to get
started,
So, as an experienced PHP programmer but someone who's looking wanting to
get the whole picture on how to best start utilizing ZF, where does one
begin?
Like Daniel pointed Surviving The Deep End is a good book. The book is
more a 'best practices' tutorial for the Zend Framework user. Being
Thanks, Daniel ;)
Survive The Deep End isn't complete but it covers almost anything worth
mentioning when starting out. I'll be kicking out more chapters pretty soon -
it's turned into a longer term project since it started.
Paddy
Pádraic Brady
http://blog.astrumfutura.com
http://www.survive
Antosan wrote:
>
> I cannot find setAction() declaration in a description.
> I did the same as the quickstart describes but get an error on Sign Our
> Guestbook clicking:
>
> Please use the form below to sign our guestbook!
> Fatal error: Call to a member function setAction() on a non-object i
Thats exactly how i have it in zf version 1.9.5
On 25 nov 2009, at 18:18, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
-- Jigal sanders wrote
(on Wednesday, 25 November 2009, 05:56 PM +0100):
Just created a project with zend tool.
In my bootstrap file I have :
protected function __initAutoload(){
-- Jigal sanders wrote
(on Wednesday, 25 November 2009, 05:56 PM +0100):
> Just created a project with zend tool.
>
> In my bootstrap file I have :
>
> protected function __initAutoload(){
>
> $autoloader = new Zend_Application_Module_Autoloader(array(
> 'namespace' =
Hi,
You might try these video tutorials.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xmyqf4cvKHE
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Fozzyuw wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been watching and playing with ZF for some time now. Never very
> deeply
> at any given time and often putting it down for extended period
Hello,
Just created a project with zend tool.
In my bootstrap file I have :
protected function __initAutoload(){
$autoloader = new Zend_Application_Module_Autoloader(array(
'namespace' => '',
'basePath' => APPLICATION_PATH,
));
return $autoloader
http://www.survivethedeepend.com/
Thanks.
2009/11/25 Fozzyuw
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been watching and playing with ZF for some time now. Never very
> deeply
> at any given time and often putting it down for extended periods of time
> (version releases).
>
> One thing that keeps happening is that
Hi all,
I've been watching and playing with ZF for some time now. Never very deeply
at any given time and often putting it down for extended periods of time
(version releases).
One thing that keeps happening is that ZF is growing quickly. Which is
good, but it's also hard to keep up.
I'm gett
>
> One such area is unit testing; it's far easier to test a plain old PHP
object than it is to test something that has couplings to the database
-- which is what happens when your entities extend from a base class.
This.
Also because Doctrine is established, has many users and wide acceptance
Still havent figured this out anyone have a clue?
asagala wrote:
>
>
> By the way you can set the locale string in the constructor. This works in
> the bootstrap file
>
> $locale = new Zend_Locale('en_US');
> Zend_Registry::set('Zend_Locale', $locale);
>
> I get
-- Arié Bénichou wrote
(on Wednesday, 25 November 2009, 03:21 AM -0800):
> Reading the
> http://www.doctrine-project.org/blog/php-5-3-and-doctrine-2-0-teaser
> doctrine 2.0 teaser , I noticed that Doctrine planned to eliminate the
> need for an entity to extend from a base class. Althought, it sou
-- Arié Bénichou wrote
(on Wednesday, 25 November 2009, 02:08 AM -0800):
> drm-4 wrote:
> > If you'd like integration for Xyster, write a proposal for it.
> Please Gerard, don't tell me what i'm supposed to do. You don't get the
> point here, the question is : why did'nt you use Xyster ORM?
Plain
So, no magic tricks there :)
Thanks.
Regards,
Saša Stamenković
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
> -- Саша Стаменковић wrote
> (on Wednesday, 25 November 2009, 09:51 AM +0100):
> > Thats ok, but I want to use Zend_Form_Element_* classes, don't want to
> > use myE
-- Саша Стаменковић wrote
(on Wednesday, 25 November 2009, 09:51 AM +0100):
> Thats ok, but I want to use Zend_Form_Element_* classes, don't want to
> use myElement. I want all elements have my new getFullyQualifiedName() method.
Two options:
* Copy the Zend_Form_Element class to your own tree,
Not knowing about Xyster is called being ignorant, not misinformed ;). I'm not
misinformed about Xyster - I never even knew it existed until now. The actual
failure, if there was one, dates back to the beginning of ZF when an ORM was
not actively pursued.
Pádraic Brady
http://blog.astrumfutu
I'm trying to use PHPUnit to test my Zend_Framework based SOAP server.
It's a simple application which has no controllers or views (too much
overhead), but it does use the Zend_Application and bootstrap model,
so I've been trying to use Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase as it
is Zend_App
Pádraic,
It's quite easy to call someone a 'troll'.
I admit the term 'failure' is probably not fair.
However, that's how your competitors, from the open source world, or not,
(it doesn't matter), could look at it. I sincerely did not mean to hurt or
blame Benjamin who where working on his own. It
Hi Gerard,
You completely misunderstood my post.
This post is not about how I'm looking at open source.
It's quite simple : why did'nt you use Xyster ORM?
Benjamin gave me a partial answer with the base class entity problem.
-Arié
drm-4 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Arié Bénichou wrote:
>> Please Gerar
>SensioLabs is not the devil, obviously, it's simply your main
competitor.
>It's a pity that you decided to reinvent the wheel, met a 'little blockade',
>resigned and decided to go for Doctrine on this
failure. You could have
>started by providing integration to the
popular Doctrine, then have a
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks for your reply.
Reading the
http://www.doctrine-project.org/blog/php-5-3-and-doctrine-2-0-teaser
doctrine 2.0 teaser , I noticed that Doctrine planned to eliminate the need
for an entity to extend from a base class. Althought, it sounds like writing
an entity class is a littl
Hi,
Arié Bénichou wrote:
Please Gerard, don't tell me what i'm supposed to do. You don't get the
point here, the question is : why did'nt you use Xyster ORM?
Indeed I don't get the point. And I think that is because your reasoning
is flawed. You are basically saying we should use Xyster, bec
Hm, somehow, without any changes or reconfiguration, only several restarts in
several days, it just started to work again. I see errorHandler pages again.
So, maybe the solution is to let it "rest" for a while. ;-)
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Apache-returning-404-instea
Hi,
drm-4 wrote:
>
> If you'd like integration for Xyster, write a proposal for it.
>
Please Gerard, don't tell me what i'm supposed to do. You don't get the
point here, the question is : why did'nt you use Xyster ORM?
drm-4 wrote:
>
> And Sensio is the devil...? What's your point? Let al
Hello,
Its not a failure to recognize that a proposal generates lots of "duplicate
code", which is currently better solved in other projects. This also
has nothing to do with Zend, since the component was approved
under the premise that its community contributed. An ORM is a huge
undertaking and
Hi Arié
Arié Bénichou wrote:
I don't understand why you did not use http://xyster.libreworks.net/ Xyster
ORM
It makes use of the Data Mapper Pattern and comes with a Unit of Work.
Doctrine is shifting to this approach for the version 2.0, but it's still an
alpha release.
If you'd like in
I don't understand why you did not use http://xyster.libreworks.net/ Xyster
ORM
It makes use of the Data Mapper Pattern and comes with a Unit of Work.
Doctrine is shifting to this approach for the version 2.0, but it's still an
alpha release.
It's a pity for you to have failed this way, because,
Thats ok, but I want to use Zend_Form_Element_* classes, don't want to
use myElement.
I want all elements have my new getFullyQualifiedName() method.
Regards,
Saša Stamenković
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Jigal sanders wrote:
> I suppose something like:
>
> Class myElement extends Zend_Form
I suppose something like:
Class myElement extends Zend_Form_Element{
protected function getFullyQualifiedName(){
// your code here
}
}
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Саша Стаменковић wrote:
> How? :)
>
> Regards,
> Saša Stamenković
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Jigal sanders wr
How? :)
Regards,
Saša Stamenković
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Jigal sanders wrote:
> I suppose so
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:18 AM, umpirsky wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Is there a way to override Zend_Form_Element methods?
>>
>> I have extended Zend_Form and subform, now I want to overr
I suppose so
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:18 AM, umpirsky wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Is there a way to override Zend_Form_Element methods?
>
> I have extended Zend_Form and subform, now I want to override
> Zend_Form_Element::getFullyQualifiedName(). Is there a way to do it without
> need to extend all Zen
Hi.
Is there a way to override Zend_Form_Element methods?
I have extended Zend_Form and subform, now I want to override
Zend_Form_Element::getFullyQualifiedName(). Is there a way to do it without
need to extend all Zend_Form_Element_* classes?
Regards,
Saša Stamenković.
--
View this message in
The right way is to put layouts in application root and keep view helpers in
your default module.
Regards,
Saša Stamenković
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Саша Стаменковић wrote:
> Is there a way to share helpers and layouts between modules?
>
> I did this by creating view subfolder in the ap
44 matches
Mail list logo