Re: [Gajim-devel] Licence incompatibility -- GPL and OpenSSL

2009-01-27 Thread Yavor Doganov
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: We do not ship with py-OpenSSL. We do not include any of the code from py-OpenSSL. I never said you did. I don't see where we are violating any license. You are violating your own license, the GPL. OpenSSL is loaded at

Re: [Gajim-devel] [commit-gajim] r10863 - branches/gajim_0.12/po

2008-12-17 Thread Yavor Doganov
Yann Leboulanger wrote: That's true, but from a user point of view, having a 40% completed translation is very unpleasant. This is certainly only your opinion. Why impose your view to all users? Let every user decide -- if it's unpleasant and annoying, there are various ways for the end

Re: [Gajim-devel] [commit-gajim] r10863 - branches/gajim_0.12/po

2008-12-17 Thread Yavor Doganov
Yann Leboulanger wrote: I could return you this argument. No, that is not equivalent, really. (no, don't ask users to remove a po file, or set environment variables for Gajim, it's not user friendly) How is setting an environment variable (or a wrapper created only with a few clicks) less

Re: [Gajim-devel] [commit-gajim] r10863 - branches/gajim_0.12/po

2008-12-16 Thread Yavor Doganov
At Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:07:47 +0100, aste...@gajim.org wrote: Author: asterix Date: 2008-12-16 21:07:47 +0100 (Tue, 16 Dec 2008) New Revision: 10863 Removed: branches/gajim_0.12/po/br.po branches/gajim_0.12/po/el.po branches/gajim_0.12/po/nl.po branches/gajim_0.12/po/pt.po

Re: [Gajim-devel] [commit-gajim] r10863 - branches/gajim_0.12/po

2008-12-16 Thread Yavor Doganov
Jonathan Schleifer wrote: No translation is better than a wrong and unmtaintained translation. Really? Unmaintained translations just accumulate more fuzzy and untranslated strings, which are *not* displayed at runtime. So basically, you are removing all translated strings that should be

Re: [Gajim-devel] round 2, OSX

2007-05-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
James Newton wrote: If you know of a way to support both OS/X and GNUstep then I will help out from my side. 99% of the GNUstep apps run on OS/X and on all platforms that GNUstep supports (all variants of GNU, *BSD, Windows and proprieatary Unix variants). So basically porting an application

Re: [Gajim-devel] gajim ncurses interface

2007-05-18 Thread Yavor Doganov
Thomas Prochaska wrote: because of the lack of an real good terminal jabber client This is my impression as well, with the exception of jabber.el, which is quite good and actively developed (actually my default client at home where it's not healthy to run Gajim). But I guess it's not an

Re: [Gajim-devel] Ideas about a Gajim moto

2006-10-03 Thread Yavor Doganov
Nikos Kouremenos wrote: Make your suggesstions please Gajim The freedom to chat Gajim Free speech and chat for GNOME Gajim Towards freedom and jabberization ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org

Re: [Gajim-devel] Gmail emoticons

2006-06-18 Thread Yavor Doganov
, but also on the developers' decision), some of us prefer to use free software and free data only. On 6/18/06, Yavor Doganov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 16:06:14 ERROR 403: Forbidden. I see what the problem is now. My CMS requires modrewrite rules so you'd have to use a switch with wget or maybe