Re: [galaxy-dev] Merging BLAST database support into Galaxy?

2012-04-30 Thread Peter Cock
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Edward Kirton wrote: > your suggestion for blastdbn and blastdbp sounds fine. > it's okay if a few of our users need to edit the metadata of the dbs in > their history. thanks for asking and doing this. Great. Perhaps you can throw some light on the peek issue I

Re: [galaxy-dev] Merging BLAST database support into Galaxy?

2012-04-26 Thread Edward Kirton
your suggestion for blastdbn and blastdbp sounds fine. it's okay if a few of our users need to edit the metadata of the dbs in their history. thanks for asking and doing this. On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Peter Cock wrote: > Hi Edward, > > I've started work on this in earnest now. I see you o

Re: [galaxy-dev] Merging BLAST database support into Galaxy?

2012-04-26 Thread Peter Cock
Hi Edward, I've started work on this in earnest now. I see you only defined one new datatype, blastdb, which worked for nucleotide databases. I want to handle protein databases too, so I think two datatypes makes sense - which I am currently calling blastdbn and blastdbp. That won't be compatible

Re: [galaxy-dev] Merging BLAST database support into Galaxy?

2012-04-18 Thread Peter Cock
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Edward Kirton wrote: > sounds great, thanks peter.  i granted you access to my toolshed repo, but > perhaps we want only one tool in the toolshed when all done. Thanks - but given the tools currently live in the main repository with Galaxy itself, I'll be focussin

Re: [galaxy-dev] Merging BLAST database support into Galaxy?

2012-04-18 Thread Edward Kirton
sounds great, thanks peter. i granted you access to my toolshed repo, but perhaps we want only one tool in the toolshed when all done. On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Peter Cock wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Peter Cock > wrote: > > Hi Edward, > > > > We're now running BLAST+ searc

Re: [galaxy-dev] Merging BLAST database support into Galaxy?

2012-04-18 Thread Peter Cock
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Peter Cock wrote: > Hi Edward, > > We're now running BLAST+ searches on our local Galaxy via our cluster, > and some of the cluster nodes have relatively small amounts of RAM. > This means I've become more aware of limitations in the NCBI BLAST+ > tools' support f

[galaxy-dev] Merging BLAST database support into Galaxy?

2012-04-18 Thread Peter Cock
Hi Edward, We're now running BLAST+ searches on our local Galaxy via our cluster, and some of the cluster nodes have relatively small amounts of RAM. This means I've become more aware of limitations in the NCBI BLAST+ tools' support for using a subject FASTA file (instead of making a local BLAST d