. I suppose the same could be said
of weapons as well.
Anyway, that was just my opinion.
Thanks in advance for the help,
al
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Allen"
To: "Gamers Discussion list"
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 1:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] entomb
Hi.
I think dubeus is better than poor,, decent is better than dubeus, and good is
better than decent. Just my guess.
- Original Message -
From: Allan Thompson
To: gamers discussion list
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:09 PM
Subject: [Audyssey] entomb question
Hi,
Not
, March 03, 2009 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] entomb question
Hello,
Entombed is the game I'm currently programming. The effectiveness of armor
is intimately tied to the material's hardness. So all cloth-type armor
provides the least protection, then leather types, finally, the
Hello,
Entombed is the game I'm currently programming. The effectiveness of armor
is intimately tied to the material's hardness. So all cloth-type armor
provides the least protection, then leather types, finally, the metals. The
metals use their real-life values, so you can use these as a guide. C
Hi,
Not sure who to direct this too.
I have a question about armor and weapons. They are listed when examined as
dubiour, poor, decent and good, but is a good cloth tunic better then a dubious
bronze breastplate?
What is the level of progressive armor types? For example, what is wool,
compared
