Re: [Audyssey] entomb question

2009-03-04 Thread Allan Thompson
. I suppose the same could be said of weapons as well. Anyway, that was just my opinion. Thanks in advance for the help, al - Original Message - From: "Jason Allen" To: "Gamers Discussion list" Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 1:48 AM Subject: Re: [Audyssey] entomb

Re: [Audyssey] entomb question

2009-03-04 Thread Valiant8086
Hi. I think dubeus is better than poor,, decent is better than dubeus, and good is better than decent. Just my guess. - Original Message - From: Allan Thompson To: gamers discussion list Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:09 PM Subject: [Audyssey] entomb question Hi, Not

Re: [Audyssey] entomb question

2009-03-04 Thread lelia
, March 03, 2009 11:48 PM Subject: Re: [Audyssey] entomb question Hello, Entombed is the game I'm currently programming. The effectiveness of armor is intimately tied to the material's hardness. So all cloth-type armor provides the least protection, then leather types, finally, the

Re: [Audyssey] entomb question

2009-03-03 Thread Jason Allen
Hello, Entombed is the game I'm currently programming. The effectiveness of armor is intimately tied to the material's hardness. So all cloth-type armor provides the least protection, then leather types, finally, the metals. The metals use their real-life values, so you can use these as a guide. C

[Audyssey] entomb question

2009-03-03 Thread Allan Thompson
Hi, Not sure who to direct this too. I have a question about armor and weapons. They are listed when examined as dubiour, poor, decent and good, but is a good cloth tunic better then a dubious bronze breastplate? What is the level of progressive armor types? For example, what is wool, compared