I remember asking this a few years back, but now I don't remember the
reason behind this - is there a particular reason why the spec file
automatically starts up the daemon upon installation? For gmond,
since the user does not have a chance to modify the configuration, the
daemon could be
Speaking of which, should we release what we have in SVN as 3.0.4?
I've been using the last RC with no noticeable problems.
Thanks,
Bernard
On 12/15/06, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Paul,
no, you are not doing anything wrong. It is just some people have not
been very active
I was just talking to Ian Cunningham regarding SVN access - Matt,
would it be possible to give him access?
And my excuse is pretty much ditto with Matt :-)
I hope there are more developers out there who are interested in
contributing code to the Ganglia project!!
Cheers,
Bernard
On 12/15/06,
:
ian-
what is your sourceforge id? i'd be happy to give you svn access...
-matt
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 11:08 -0800, Bernard Li wrote:
I was just talking to Ian Cunningham regarding SVN access - Matt,
would it be possible to give him access?
And my excuse is pretty much ditto with Matt
Hi Paul:
That's the right approach in submitting bugs, but I suppose the
developers are quite busy these days... Martin... hello?
:-)
Cheers,
Bernard
On 12/14/06, Paul Millar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've a quick query about bugs and getting code into ganglia.
I
Message-
From: Rick Mohr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 20/09/2006 14:49
To: Bernard Li
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Corrupted JPEG images ?!?
I checked the props on one of the images:
svn proplist -v
https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot
Hi Martin:
You're right, the images are corrupted - I wonder what happened there.
I still have the original repository tarball and could replace the image
files with the files from the tarball (I checked, they are good).
However, I wonder if there are other files that are corrupted in the
Message-
From: Jarod Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 12:04
To: Bernard Li
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Corrupted JPEG images ?!?
Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Martin:
You're right
As promised, here's the link to the RPMs built using the openSUSE Build
Service:
http://software.opensuse.org/download/OSCAR/
It's currently built for:
Fedora Core 4 x86
Fedora Core 5 x86
SLES 10 x86, x86_64
SUSE Linux 10.0 x86, x86_64
SUSE Linux 10.1 x86, x86_64
It is _not_ avaialble for
Message-
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 16:30
To: Bernard Li
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Adding gcc/g++ as requirement
Bernard,
your change to the spec file came just in. Good idea to add
gcc/g++ to
the build
-Original Message-
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 17/08/2006 09:40
To: Bernard Li; Jarod Wilson; Marcus Rueckert
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net; Adeyemi Adesanya
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse asshipped with ganglia
Bernard,
seems
I think they're looking at end of the year deadline for inclusion with SUSE
Linux 10.2.
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 17/08/2006 11:55
To: Marcus Rueckert; Martin Knoblauch
Cc: Adeyemi Adesanya; Bernard Li; ganglia
Says 404 for me...
BTW, I don't suppose there'll be any chance for it to get into RHEL5...?
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jarod Wilson
Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 09:28
To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers]
,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 15:30
To: Bernard Li; Jarod Wilson
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse asshipped with ganglia
Folks,
this is certainly not what
for another official
release.
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 15:52
To: Bernard Li; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jarod Wilson
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse
14/08/2006 10:42
To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse as shipped with ganglia
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 15:41 -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
Hi all:
In discussion with Marcus Rueckert (SUSE Linux packager), he suggested
a solution which
Matt, Martin, can you guys help Daniel push the mail through?
Daniel, alternatively, you can perhaps host the patch somewhere and link to it
instead...?
Thanks,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Richard G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 14/08/2006 13:38
To: Bernard Li
P.S. Perhaps filling bugs at bugzilla.ganglia.info is the preferred way for
patches :)
Thanks!
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bernard Li
Sent: Mon 14/08/2006 13:46
To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Ganglia-developers] FW: Ganglia
/07/2006 02:21
To: Bernard Li; Stu Teasdale; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse as shipped with ganglia
Hi Bernard,
sorry for note commenting earlier. If we were only talking about
Linux, I would say we should just throw away the 3rd
maintainer (do we have one?) here?
Thanks,
Bernard
From: Brooks Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 12/08/2006 16:28
To: Bernard Li
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stu Teasdale; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat
right the -devel package was missing.
Either I am dumb :-) or what ? AFAIK, usually when a *-devel is missing
the compilation fails at the configure stage so I was confused. Lesson
learned. :-)
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 22:38 -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
[...]
BTW, there are some ia64 RPMs available
, and the one I'm now maintaining for
Fedora Extras (and quite possibly specs for other rpm-based distros). At
the suggestion of Bernard Li, who maintains the upstream spec, I thought
we could start some discourse on how we might reduce the number of spec
files, or at least strive for more consistency
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/ganglia/trunk/monitor-core/srclib/libmetrics/
Is config.h.in~ cruft or is that needed? I noticed that Martin updated this
file...
Thanks,
Bernard
Hi Matt:
Just to reply back saying heard you loud and clear :-)
P.S. You should probably subscribe your other email address to the
mailing-lists and also go through the admin interface letting those mails
through - there might be some important messages from you being held by
SourceForge...
Hi guys:
Rather than having a separate spec file for AIX, does it make sense to see if
we can merge the Linux one with it?
Cheers,
Bernard
Hi Rick:
Thanks for building Ganglia for SUSE Linux 10.1 x86_64 and posting your files!
I believe most of the changes are already included in our SVN repository except
for the change to srclib/confuse/tests/Makefile.in. I currently don't have a
SUSE 10.1 test system, but it would be great
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:18
To: Bernard Li
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Unable to build gexe with ganglia 3
Bernard:
Just so we remember, in addition to the diffs, it would be
nice to make a
note somewhere
07, 2006 2:28
To: Bernard Li
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Fixing make distdir (was: Re: [Ganglia-developers]
write access for ganglia SVN)
Bernard,
thanks for reminding me that I had something sitting in my local copy
:-)
I just checked in svn2cl including
Can an admin please give me write access to the SVN repository? I guess
SourceForge must have locked down the access control:
https://sourceforge.net/project/admin/userperms.php?group_id=43021
I'm getting 403 Forbidden (https://svn.sourceforge.net) when trying to check
code in, see:
(
to ignore .svn directories when building the
distribution directory and tarball - anybody want to point me to the location
where I can fix this?
Thanks,
Bernard
From: matt massie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 06/06/2006 10:49
To: Bernard Li
Cc: ganglia
Guys:
I'd like to re-visit this old discussion thread. Would it be possible now to
dynamically link against distro supplied apr, expact and confuse? It sounds
like people have already been doing that without huge issues so perhaps we can
make the official change in the code repository?
Wha'ts the versions of Ganglia and the OS you're using? Did you build from
source or used the RPMs?
Cheers,
Bernard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ryan Herdian
Sent: Mon 22/05/2006 21:50
To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
Can the ganglia-cvs list be renamed ganglia-svn or a new list created? This is
in anticipation of migration to Subversion.
Thanks,
Bernard
Hi Yvan:
Thanks for volunteering!
Please feel free to send patches to this list (keep it small if possible) and
we'll review and test them. Once they're good we'll check that into our
repository.
BTW, please make sure you patch against trunk, or 3.0.3 (since there hasn't
been much code
Okay I'll volunteer to do this then - please consider the code
repository (CVS) frozen until further notice.
Thanks,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 2:39
To: Bernard Li; matt massie; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
I think it's just SourceForge...
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alex Balk
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:09
To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Ganglia-developers] Mail
Li
Cc: Ganglia Developers
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Migrate to SVN
On May 3, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Bernard Li wrote:
Matt, Martin:
Do you guys have any opinion regarding switching our repository
from CVS
- SVN? How about other developers?
i think moving to subversion
Matt, Martin:
Do you guys have any opinion regarding switching our repository from CVS
- SVN? How about other developers?
Thanks,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bernard Li
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 16:56
, it should be x86_64
rather than AMD64 :-)
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 24/04/2006 15:28
To: Bernard Li; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.3 RPMs
--- Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I can upload Ganglia RPMs to SourceForge for a bunch of distro/archs, would
that be helpful?
Also, should I follow what Martin did by renaming the files to state the distro
it was built on?
Cheers,
Bernard
Hey guys:
Here's a snippet from a build on SuSE 9.2 x86_64:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-lib64-linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: if you find problems with this script, drop me a note
/tmp/ganglia-3.0.3-buildroot/usr/lib/libganglia-3.0.3.so.0.0.0: file
format elf64-x86-64
Hey guys:
I suggest we go ahead and migrate our repository to SVN - what better
time to do so after a release has been made and before any heavy
development is taking place?
There is even an admin page for Subversion now in the SourceForge
project page.
Cheers,
Bernard
Hi Martin:
Thanks for the release.
What arguments did you use for rpmbuild such that the resulting RPMs have fc4
in their filenames?
Cheers,
Bernard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Martin Knoblauch
Sent: Mon 17/04/2006 08:29
To: ganglia general;
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 17/04/2006 17:55
To: Bernard Li; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.0.3 released
Hi Bernard,
hope the release fits OSCAR5. As for the RPMs, I just renamed them to
show fc4 in the name.
Martin
--- Bernard Li [EMAIL
:38
To: Bernard Li; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3
Bernard,
could you please test the following patch in web to solve this
really really big problem :-) You need to run ./configure to recreate
web
From: Gilad Raphaelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 14/04/2006 13:06
To: Bernard Li; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball
for ganglia-3.0.3
I'm actually seeing 100% disk busy under both
Raphaelli
Cc: Bernard Li; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball
for ganglia-3.0.3
I'm seeing reasonable load under FreeBSD 6.0 with 217 nodes.
I wouldn't expect ~100 nodes to be very functional
Just tested building and running on Fedora Core 4 x86, everything checks out
(minimal installation test) - did notice this minor issue though:
Gmetad Web Frontend version 3.0.3 Check for Updates.
Gmetad Web Backend (gmetad) version 3.0.3.200604102000 Check for Updates.
Notice the versions are
Martin:
Are you able to build SuSE x86_64 RPMs successfully with the tarball?
Cheers,
Bernard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Martin Knoblauch
Sent: Sat 08/04/2006 00:31
To: ganglia general; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
Thanks Martin.
Just a quick note saying that with this tarball, you should be able to
successfully build a working RPM on SuSE Linux (with correct init scripts and
such).
Cheers,
Bernard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Martin Knoblauch
Sent: Sat
a special request at SF to do that.
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 23:40
To: Bernard Li; Ganglia Developers
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.0.3 status
Hi Bernard,
Is there anything
Hey guys:
Any plans on when 3.0.3 will be officially released?
Cheers,
Bernard
Congrats Matt!
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of matt massie
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 10:31
To: Ganglia Developers
Subject: [Ganglia-developers] infoworld
guys-
it looks like infoworld is doing a
I'm still getting a bunch of PHP Notices in my httpd error_logs:
[client 10.1.1.1] PHP Notice: Use of undefined constant NAME - assumed
'NAME' in /var/www/html/ganglia/ganglia.php on line 166
[client 10.1.1.1] PHP Notice: Use of undefined constant HOSTS_UP -
assumed 'HOSTS_UP' in
Would anybody object if I add rrdtool-devel as a BuidRequires for the RPM? I
think this RPM is readily available so it would make it easier for folks to
rebuild the ganglia SRPM.
Cheers,
Bernard
Hi Chuck:
For the first issue - give it time, it should sort itself out. Alternatively,
you can find out which node is reporting incorrect information, and restart
gmond on it.
For the second issue, you can group nodes in different data_source via the
multicast port in /etc/gmond.conf.
Hey Ramon:
In the future, it would be nice to be able to mouse over on the little
job boxes (under Joblist) and get some tooltip info regarding details of
the job and which node the job is running on.
Just a suggestion.
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will keep
you posted.
Cheers,
Bernard
From: Ramon Bastiaans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 11/03/2006 06:28
To: Bernard Li
Cc: Ganglia General; Ganglia Developers
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] ANNOUNCE: Public release of Ganglia Job
Monarch v0.1.0
Hi
I vote to just include apr and libconfuse as tarballs if we do not need to
modify the source - even if we need to, we can apply patches so it is not
necessary to check the tree into CVS.
The reason is because right now I cannot do rpmbuild -ta on the ganglia tarball
because it is confused
: Chris Croswhite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 0:47
To: Bernard Li; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ganglia general; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ganglia-general] Re: [Ganglia-developers] First
prerelease of ganglia-3.0.3 ready for testing
I suppose
: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 13:41
To: Bernard Li
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ganglia general;
ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ganglia-general] Re: [Ganglia-developers] First
prerelease ofganglia-3.0.3 ready for testing
Hmm, well tell me how you want to run the test and I can put
Hi Chris:
Do you plan to also do RPM builds?
Thanks,
Bernard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Chris Croswhite
Sent: Tue 28/02/2006 18:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ganglia general; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Ganglia-general] Re:
directly.
Cheers,
Bernard
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 26/02/2006 03:39
To: Bernard Li; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] srclib
Bernard,
interesting. That never happened to me. At least I
...)
Cheers,
Bernard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jason A. Smith
Sent: Sat 25/02/2006 08:42
To: Bernard Li
Cc: Ole Turvoll; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] SuSE init scripts [was First prerelease
at it. But if somebody knows how the SuSE specific init script is
supposed to be included in the tarball, please let me know.
Cheers,
Bernard
From: Jason A. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 24/02/2006 05:41
To: Bernard Li
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Can somebody (Martin?) list the steps required to build the tarball from CVS
checkout? I know you're supposed to run ./bootstrap, ./configure (and make ?)
- is there something else I missed? For instance, I think my tarball was
missing gmond.conf.5 in the gmond/ directory.
Thanks,
Bernard
Is there any reason why the libraries in srclib are extracted by default?
Since we won't be modifying the code it might be easier to just include them as
tarballs and extract them during make.
The reason why I'm asking is right now I cannot do rpmbuild -ta on the ganglia
tarball because it
and then check my
modifications in.
Cheers,
Bernard
From: Ole Turvoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 24/02/2006 10:51
To: Bernard Li
Cc: Jason A. Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] SuSE init scripts
I'll let Martin and possibly Matt pitch in on the technical details, but
I was wondering if sqlite would be better suited than MySQL? I mean you
probably don't really need users accessing the data - do you?
Cheers,
Bernard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know of anybody who has attempted to implement a relational db
with Ganglia - I guess the biggest concern would be performance.
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Chris Croswhite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:47
To: Bernard Li
Cc
Hi Ole:
Not much to offer here, except to say Cool and keep us posted!.
I haven't had much time to play with Solaris containers - just played with it
briefly when it first came out - was using zones to create a virtual cluster
for testing Sun Grid Engine.
Cheers,
Bernard
Hi Yemi:
Although not exactly related, I assume you know about this:
http://www.cuddletech.com/code/toasterview/
I will be interested in trying out your patch. We use NetApp filers as
our main NFS servers and once in a blue moon we would have huge cluster
jobs that spike the NFS servers - at
As far as I know Matt is working on it. I am sure we will hear from him once
he has gotten it down.
Thanks,
Bernard
From: Ramon Bastiaans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 11/11/2005 04:43
To: Bernard Li
Cc: Brooks Davis; Brian Credeur; ganglia-developers
Hey guys:
Anybody on the list attending SC|05? I know Brooks will be there.
Cheers,
Bernard
Hey Martin:
Any luck getting a hold of Matt?
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Martin Knoblauch
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 4:42
To: Seth Alves; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
Does Ganglia want a wiki?
On a related note, we can probably make use of SourceForge's RFE -
Martin do you have access to create a new tracker or should I bug Matt?
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason A. Smith
Even RHEL3 ships with PHP4, I don't think we need to worry about PHP3. If this
breaks support for older distributions, I am sure somebody will volunteer to
fix it...
Should we try to come up with a list of bug-fixes we want in 3.0.2? For me it
will be the 'undefined variables' bugs, example
Should we try to aim for an official 3.0.2 release with at least the various
PHP fixes checked in?
Matt is quite busy with work and all, and I don't mind doing a bit of
co-ordination with releases (and personally would like to see a bugfix release
of Ganglia).
Cheers,
Bernard
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 11:25
To: Bernard Li; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] ganglia.spec.patch
--- Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Martin:
What if you change 'Fre' to 'Fri'?
BTW
This has the 64-bit fix right? BTW, if you are aware of them, it might
be good to list out the changes since 3.0.1.
Thanks,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 12:45
To: Bernard Li; ganglia-developers
Hey Matt:
We know you are busy and all, but any thoughts on this? :)
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 12:45
To: Bernard Li
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ganglia
Hi guys:
This is on Ganglia 3.0.1 on a server with 2 network cards:
eth0 - 192.168.0.2
eth1 - 192.168.22.1
eth0 is connected to the 'public' network and eth1 is connected to the private
network. I want Ganglia to monitor the private network, and not the public
network.
So my
Hi Martin:
I added the following route and it worked:
route add -net 224.0.0.0 netmask 240.0.0.0 dev eth1
Many thanks,
Bernard
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 24/07/2005 21:24
To: Bernard Li; ganglia-developers
Hey guys:
Currently the Ganglia webfrontend will not work with SELinux unless you:
1) Turn it off
2) Modify the default policies
Is option 2) the recommended approach? Or is there a better option 3)?
Thanks,
Bernard
Hi Matt:
Just out of curiosity, are there plans to make blastwave packages for
ganglia on Solaris? Also, have you tested ganglia on Solaris 10?
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Massie
Sent: Thursday,
Hi Matt:
Yes, it's fresh off the press - the more reason to test it out :-)
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Matt Massie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 7:37
To: Bernard Li
Cc: Ganglia Developers
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] sure
Hey Matt:
Are there supposed to be RPMs for ganglia-web as well?
Thanks,
Bernard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Matt Massie
Sent: Wed 02/02/2005 10:56 PM
To: Ganglia Developers
Subject: [Ganglia-developers] 64 bit rpms
just for kicks i built rpms
Hey Matt:
Looks good - were you planning on releasing a beta, or the real deal?
Also, what have you decided about the RPM issue? What happens if a user
has Ganglia 2.5.6 installed with /etc/gmond.conf and decides to do rpm
-Uvh?
Thanks,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi Matt:
Probably will be a good idea when you're doing RPM upgrade - however, you might
want to save a backup copy of the original config, just in case.
Cheers,
Bernard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Matt Massie
Sent: Sat 29/01/2005 5:17 AM
To:
Hey Matt and others:
IRC would be cool, in fact there is already a #ganglia channel on
freenode (though it's mostly for user-support).
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Massie
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005
Hi Matt:
Matt Massie wrote:
i want to share my current motivation with you to let you know where i'm
coming from. my primary funding is now coming from the planet-lab
project (http://www.planet-lab.org/). because of this, you're going to
see more effort put into making ganglia more robust,
601 - 691 of 691 matches
Mail list logo
