[Bug fortran/80945] Invalid code with allocatable character array in READ/WRITE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80945 --- Comment #8 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Thomas, It doesn't just ring bells, it lets off sirens and sets the marching bands to marching! I can only find rather old sources on the web but I seem to remember that the new dt

[Bug other/82368] [8 regression] with r253275 several new test cases in libbacktrace fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 14 14:19:36 2018 New Revision: 257658 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257658&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR other/82368 * elf.c (EM_PPC64, EF_PPC64_ABI): Undefine

[Bug c++/84368] [8 Regression] return type of generic lambda in variadic lambda in template is not deduced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84368 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/84368] [8 Regression] return type of generic lambda in variadic lambda in template is not deduced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84368 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/84322] -fstrong-eval-order violated on assignment with function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84322 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/83789] __builtin_altivec_lvx fails for powerpc for altivec-4.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789 --- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #7) > See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00031.html -- I think > Kaushik > is still looking at this? Ah, ok. I do agree with your comment to use t

[Bug debug/84317] [8 regression] SEGV in dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_source_line)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84317 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva --- > The corrected patch, that I emailed you just after I got your email and > realized I'd posted the patch without that fix, has been in the trun

[Bug debug/84317] [8 regression] SEGV in dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_source_line)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84317 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- >> --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE > Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > [...] >> I'm currently

[Bug c++/84357] [8 Regression] Incorrect 'foo' is used uninitialized with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84357 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Feb 14 13:14:51 2018 New Revision: 257657 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257657&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Check array indices in object_address_invariant_in_loop_

[Bug c++/84322] -fstrong-eval-order violated on assignment with function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84322 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81930] [meta-bug] Issues with -Weffc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81930 Bug 81930 depends on bug 55836, which changed state. Bug 55836 Summary: Weffc++: warning: base class 'class std::list >' has a non-virtual destructor https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55836 What|Removed

[Bug c++/55836] Weffc++: warning: base class 'class std::list >' has a non-virtual destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55836 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84364] [8 Regression] -Weffc++ warns on "return *this" in template after r253599

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84364 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > > Insert obligatory "we should fix -Weffc++ or deprecate it" comment. > > Insert obligatory statement of my pre

[Bug c++/84374] placeholder decltype(auto) accepted when it's not the placeholder alone in trailing-return-type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84374 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83990] [7 Regression] Spurious "potential null pointer dereference" warning regression from 7.1 onwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990 --- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Wed Feb 14 12:55:47 2018 New Revision: 257656 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257656&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix location handling in ipa_modify_call_arguments 2018-02-14 Martin

[Bug target/83831] [RX] Unused bclr,bnot,bset insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83831 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Wed Feb 14 12:33:37 2018 New Revision: 257655 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257655&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/83831 * config/rx/rx-protos.h (rx_reg_dead_o

[Bug fortran/84313] [F08] reject procedure pointers in COMMON blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84313 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 14 12:12:15 2018 New Revision: 257654 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257654&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/84313 * testsuite/libgomp.fortran/threadprivate

[Bug c++/84378] New: Misleading diagnostics when using ambiguous names for ptr to memfun args in member fn

me. In both cases there is some misleading 'noise' in the diagnostics. Errors for the free standing function: 20180214-pmf.cpp: In function ‘void foo()’: 20180214-pmf.cpp:25:19: error: cannot declare pointer to ‘void’ member void(Bar::*mfpf)(MyFoo, bool, const char*);

[Bug target/82005] [8 regression] early lto debug creates invalid assembly on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 --- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 > > --- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > For completeness here is a fixed

[Bug target/83789] __builtin_altivec_lvx fails for powerpc for altivec-4.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00031.html -- I think Kaushik is still looking at this?

[Bug target/82005] [8 regression] early lto debug creates invalid assembly on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 --- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > For completeness here is a fixed diff: With the patch the failures (-m32/-m64) went down from 1059 to 467.

[Bug target/84377] gcc-7.3.0 miscompiles truncf128@@GLIBC_2.26 in libm.so

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84377 --- Comment #2 from Andreas K. Huettel --- > > but it doesn't fail for me, does it for you? Yes it fails here. (~amd64 chroot) pinacolada ~/test # gcc -m32 -O2 -std=gnu11 -fgnu89-inline -fno-strict-aliasing -frounding-math -fstack-protector

[Bug target/82005] [8 regression] early lto debug creates invalid assembly on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 --- Comment #26 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #25) > On February 13, 2018 5:35:22 PM GMT+01:00, simon at pushface dot org > wrote: > >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 > > > >--- Comment #24

[Bug debug/84342] [8 Regression] Location views breaks cross builds of arm including gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva --- That's the hook, yes. But if you return 1, then the view-computing logic will behave just as if it noticed a nonzero length for the insn. If the branch is eliminated and no code it generated for that insn

[Bug debug/84342] [8 Regression] Location views breaks cross builds of arm including gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342 --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina --- Jeff: ccfsm is indeed the problem here, as it does indeed decide quite late to remove a branch. Though we've tried emitting a nop instead of nothing just to test and this fixes the branch but causes another

[Bug debug/84342] [8 Regression] Location views breaks cross builds of arm including gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug debug/84317] [8 regression] SEGV in dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_source_line)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84317 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva --- The corrected patch, that I emailed you just after I got your email and realized I'd posted the patch without that fix, has been in the trunk since yesterday, FWIW.

[Bug rtl-optimization/83723] [8 Regression] ICE: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:1010

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83723 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/84363] [8 Regression] Assembler error in stage1/libgcc: Error: view number mismatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84363 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/84037] [8 Regression] Speed regression of polyhedron benchmark since r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/84376] [7/8 Regression] ICE with missing template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84376 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/84375] [8 Regression] ICE with friend in local class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84375 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/84368] [8 Regression] return type of generic lambda in variadic lambda in template is not deduced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84368 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/84350] [7/8 Regression] ICE with new and auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84350 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/84350] [7/8 Regression] ICE with new and auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84350 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com

[Bug rtl-optimization/83723] [8 Regression] ICE: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:1010

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83723 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug tree-optimization/84037] [8 Regression] Speed regression of polyhedron benchmark since r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037 --- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek --- Is this fixed now or is there more work to do?

[Bug c/84377] gcc-7.3.0 miscompiles truncf128@@GLIBC_2.26 in libm.so

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84377 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug other/82368] [8 regression] with r253275 several new test cases in libbacktrace fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43412 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43412&action=edit gcc8-pr82368.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/83965] [8 Regression] ICE in vectorize_fold_left_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6154

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83965 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

<    1   2