Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

On 2018-05-03 01:10, Antonio Roberts wrote: >>> Back in January and February there was talk of funding development for >>> GEM. Did anything ever come of this? >> >> >> no. > Somehow I'm not surprised but also disappointed :-( > >> Sure, I guess it's up to anyone to pick it up. I'd like to see

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

2018-05-02 9:43 GMT-03:00 Antonio Roberts : > Back in January and February there was talk of funding development for > GEM. Did anything ever come of this? > no. > I know there was discussion of which platform to use but it appears to > have stalled. Any way to pick

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

2018-01-23 17:16 GMT-02:00 cyrille henry : > > I want to go forward, but we need to do things right. And I'm not 100% > sure that it's the good time with bountysource. > what do other think? Why not go forward? I think this should move on ASAP. I'd like to see my money being

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

hello, Le 20/01/2018 à 19:21, me.grimm a écrit : so did this one get fixed? looks like someone can claim bounty: https://www.bountysource.com/issues/3303967-any-h-broken-on-osx-64bit right? according to the discussion on the page you send, Antoine test and noticed that it was working, so

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

hello, So, this is a proposition of mail to announce this bounty. fell free to correct it Dear PD and Gem users, Gem is a Pd library for Pd that allow images and video processing and generation. It depend on OpenGL and various other library to decode images, film, movie etc. Maintaining such

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Since the "any.h brocken" issue have been closed, we have "only" this bounty left. https://www.bountysource.com/issues/4185729-native-film-reading-on-osx-64bit : 2000$ https://www.bountysource.com/issues/4185679-native-video-capturing-on-osx-64bit : 1500$

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

So it seems to be fine with current git. Detailed report on the github issue. Let me know if you need more test. Cheers Antoine -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2017-12-06 18:17 GMT+01:00 Antoine Villeret : > hi all, > > I'll try to build the

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

hi all, I'll try to build the current master from scratch and see if there what happen + a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2017-12-06 16:27 GMT+01:00 cyrille henry : > > > Le 05/12/2017 à 18:56, IOhannes m zmölnig a écrit : > > i don't currently have access to

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

On 12/05/2017 10:58 PM, Antoine Rousseau wrote: >> >> Can porres, ant1r and kim do the same? > > > Of course I will do whatever you think it has to, but I don't understand, i'm not sure that *i* understand what you mean by this. > as IOhannes said: > >> you cannot fix any filmDS issues if you

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

> > Can porres, ant1r and kim do the same? Of course I will do whatever you think it has to, but I don't understand, as IOhannes said: > you cannot fix any filmDS issues if you don't have a working W32 build > Antoine Rousseau http://www.metalu.net __

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Le 05/12/2017 à 19:54, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit : Can porres, ant1r and kim do the same? I can ;) thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience. ___ GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

2017-12-05 16:49 GMT-02:00 cyrille henry : > > > Le 05/12/2017 à 18:56, IOhannes m zmölnig a écrit : > >> On 12/05/2017 06:08 PM, cyrille henry wrote: >> >>> https://www.bountysource.com/issues/3383537-w32-build-msvc >>> >> >> could we undo that? (despite the bountyhunter who

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Le 05/12/2017 à 18:56, IOhannes m zmölnig a écrit : On 12/05/2017 06:08 PM, cyrille henry wrote: https://www.bountysource.com/issues/3383537-w32-build-msvc could we undo that? (despite the bountyhunter who already asks for 150€)? there is 2 way : each bounty contributor can contact the

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

On 12/05/2017 06:08 PM, cyrille henry wrote: > https://www.bountysource.com/issues/3383537-w32-build-msvc could we undo that? (despite the bountyhunter who already asks for 150€)? > https://www.bountysource.com/issues/3303967-any-h-broken-on-osx-64bit i don't currently have access to an OSX

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

ok, so I put money on 2 other issues. For now, the most important issues are : https://www.bountysource.com/issues/4185729-native-film-reading-on-osx-64bit https://www.bountysource.com/issues/4185679-native-video-capturing-on-osx-64bit

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

On 12/05/2017 04:06 PM, cyrille henry wrote: > thanks Iohannes, > > what about the W32 build (both MSVC and minggw)? > should we ask for this build or does "make filmDS consistent #180" will > make things easier on this side? > (Should I ask to move the bounty from the mingW bug to the filmDS

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Le 30/11/2017 à 18:40, me.grimm a écrit : >> I'm aware that thing moves slowly, but at least they are moving! agree So, don't worry about the money already in the bounty system : it will not be useless. so do we then keep lobbying for bountysouce funding? again, we could have

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Hello William, Iohannes is still organizing things concerning the bugs to fix before to make a release. So the idea is to wait a bit before to announce the link. You can follow this thread if you want uptodate infos. n http://nimon.org Le 30/11/2017 à 19:16, William Huston a écrit : > Hi, > > I

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

>> I'm aware that thing moves slowly, but at least they are moving! agree >> So, don't worry about the money already in the bounty system : it will not be useless. so do we then keep lobbying for bountysouce funding? again, we could have this pinned on the facebook group (12k

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

hello, sorry for being unresponsive. I don't have lot's of free time. All money put on a bounty can be moved to an other bug, and there are lot's of bugs to fix : https://www.bountysource.com/trackers/1046360-umlaeute-gem So, don't worry about the money already in the bounty system : it will

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Hi, so, what's up? we already have 385$ thrown at bountysource, ditching it would mean throwing about 40$ in the thrash, plus taxes to paypal... it'd be weird and silly, not to mention a disrespect to some who felt like they wanted to help (I, for one, would feel like that and regretful I

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

> and also what might prevent multiple funding sources? Depending on how the money is being used maybe that wouldn't be a bad thing. Using this Patreon as an example https://www.patreon.com/pippin the funding is to support the developer, not necessarily the GIMP software (even though the

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

We can get our money back, if necessary, of course leaving 10% fee to bountysource, plus 3.4% (IMO) to paypal. Anyway I personally don't mind to change for an other way if it's worth it. Antoine Rousseau http://www.metalu.net __ http://www.metaluachahuter.com/

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

hello, I'm in discussion with joe deken from newblankets around an other/better way to deal with donation. So maybe we should wait a bit before making a wider announce of this bounty. cheers c Le 22/11/2017 à 21:45, me.grimm a écrit : >> Are these going to be posted in the general pd

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Le 21/11/2017 à 23:04, Jaime Oliver La Rosa a écrit : Sorry, just saw the pages in the email chain. Are these going to be posted in the general pd mailing list as well? as soon as I have time to write a polite and convincing mail! feel free to do it before me! cheers c thanks for your

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

I am getting errors in the bountysource page when trying to pay. I'll try again later with other browsers and report back. error says: {"error":"Internal server error."} best, J On 11/21/2017 05:04 PM, Jaime Oliver La Rosa wrote: Sorry, just saw the pages in the email chain. Are these going to

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Sorry, just saw the pages in the email chain. Are these going to be posted in the general pd mailing list as well? thanks for your work! J On 11/21/2017 04:41 PM, me.grimm wrote: +1 On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:22 AM, cyrille henry > wrote: As I

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

+1 On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:22 AM, cyrille henry wrote: > As I said in earlier mail, my aim is (for now) to be able to release a Gem > version that incorporate the development made in the last 5 years. > Time is not to add functionalities, but to keep Gem alive. > > Starting

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Le 20/11/2017 à 16:58, Jack a écrit : Or for all platforms ? In vertex processing with have : - vertex shader - geometry shader What about tesselation shader ? can you please add all freature request on Gem github? thx I use Gem a lot so i will be happy to participate financially if that

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Yes sure ! ++ Jack Le 21/11/2017 à 10:22, cyrille henry a écrit : > As I said in earlier mail, my aim is (for now) to be able to release a > Gem version that incorporate the development made in the last 5 years. > Time is not to add functionalities, but to keep Gem alive. > > Starting new

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

On 2017-11-21 10:22, cyrille henry wrote: > As I said in earlier mail, my aim is (for now) to be able to release a > Gem version that incorporate the development made in the last 5 years. > Time is not to add functionalities, but to keep Gem alive. > > Starting new development now is, imo, a

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Or for all platforms ? In vertex processing with have : - vertex shader - geometry shader What about tesselation shader ? I use Gem a lot so i will be happy to participate financially if that can help to add functionality to it. ++ Jack Le 20/11/2017 à 12:27, Max a écrit : > What about

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

What about something for linux? Generally support a new release? On 2017년 11월 17일 18:07, cyrille henry wrote: it appear that pledgie is dedicatad to find money for your work, better than financing other work. i.e, if I crete a project, I'll receive the donation. So, I went with bounty

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

On 2017-10-17 10:38, Antoine Villeret wrote: > We can setup some deployment rules to automatically upload binary to github > release page and/or to deken. travis builds are already deployed automatically to http://git.puredata.info/cgit/deployment/Gem-snapshots/ this is not deken, and that's

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

I known it's not the saviour of everything, but I have seen several open source softwares (Synfig, GIMP) use Patreon to help fund development. I've tried bountysource in the past with limited (i.e. no) result. On 12 October 2017 at 09:34, cyrille henry wrote: > hello Max > > Le

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

hello Max Le 12/10/2017 à 10:04, Max a écrit : Bonjour Cyrille, This sounds good, there was the idea of some bounty system years ago too. I think it's crucial for this process to 1. break up the job in small manageable parts yes, that's the idea of using the github bug tracker. Spiting jobs

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Bonjour Cyrille, This sounds good, there was the idea of some bounty system years ago too. I think it's crucial for this process to 1. break up the job in small manageable parts 2. well define their scope and define what "job completed" entails 3. set up a system that doesn't come with a huge

[GEM-dev] financing Gem development

Hello, Since the "get money, paid a developer" idea arise on the mailing list, I spend last weeks trying to think how to organize the last bit of development that need to be done. I think we need a clear roadmap : a list of all object / platform that need to be fixed. My proposition is to