Re: [Gen-art] [OSPF] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07

David & all: thank you very much for the reviews, discussion, and changes. I have placed a no-objection position on this draft for tonight’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis-04

Thanks for the review and the catch, Dan. Thanks for the update, Acee. I’m balloting no-obj for today. Jari On 09 Oct 2015, at 04:01, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for the review - please see inline. > > From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" >

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-03.txt

Thanks for your review, Francis. I see that the CDNI abbreviation has been expanded in a new draft version. Jari On 07 Oct 2015, at 17:26, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-04

Thanks Paul. Regards, B. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry-02

Indeed thank you for the review. And it was a good question. Jari On 11 Sep 2015, at 16:33, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > Hi, Roni, > > Thank you for the review - it's always helpful ... > > Spencer > > On Sep 10, 2015 16:35, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)"

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat-01

Thanks for your review, Christer! (For information, a fair number of I-Ds say that an empty IANA considerations section should be removed by the RFC Editor. Either way is fine.) Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam-01

* Jari Arkko > >When translating a packet between IPv4 and IPv6, an SIIT > >implementation MUST individually translate each IP address it > >encounters in the packet's IP headers (including any IP headers > >contained within ICMP errors) according to Section 3.3, except for > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam-01

Even better. Thanks. On 15 Oct 2015, at 11:26, Tore Anderson wrote: > * Jari Arkko > >>> When translating a packet between IPv4 and IPv6, an SIIT >>> implementation MUST individually translate each IP address it >>> encounters in the packet's IP headers

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-04

Thanks for your review, Paul. I agree that a reference would be nice. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-11.txt

Thanks for the review, the test, and the fixes. Much appreciated. (And let the RFC Editor worry about Acks; unlike the three of us, they are native speakers of English.) Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-02

Thanks for your review again, Christer! Jari On 05 Oct 2015, at 23:59, Christer Holmberg wrote: > Hi Tore, > > I am ok with your suggestions how to address my issues. And, if people are ok > with the cross-reference (Q2_1) I will not slow down the progress of

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-blanchet-ccsds-urn-00

Thanks for your review! On 09 Oct 2015, at 02:21, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam-01

Looks good to me. Thanks again for addressing my comment. Regards, Dan > -Original Message- > From: Tore Anderson [mailto:t...@redpill-linpro.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 11:27 AM > To: Jari Arkko > Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03

Brian, Jari, all, Some information on whether it should be update or extension: For the particular use case - supporting MVPN C-Bidir (Customer Bidirectional PIM) with Ingress Replication - the optimized procedures in this new specification should be used on all PEs for the involved VPN. The

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-pcp-port-set-11

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd

Hi Ralph - Thanks for your thorough review. Let me first address your major concern. As you point out, this draft builds on existing standards. We (authors and WG) had to carefully balance between the right amount of information and wanting to describe details of methods described in other

[Gen-art] Gen_ART review of draft-santesson-auth-context-extension-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:draft-santesson-auth-context-extension-10

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-15

John: With respect to your responses in [1] to my Gen-ART review, I am fine with your proposed resolutions. [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg12397.html Cheers, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville,

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-10-15

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer LC end Draft - Aaron Falk2015-11-09 draft-west-webappsec-csp-reg-03 Christer Holmberg 2015-10-27

Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-10-15

Update: Reviewer LC end Draft - Francis Dupont2015-10-23 draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09 Thanks! Jean On 10/15/15 4:04 PM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer

[Gen-art] Assignments for the 2015-10-22 Telechat

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: ReviewerLC end Draft -- Joel Halpern2015-10-22 draft-ietf-ace-usecases-09 Joel Halpern2015-09-23

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03

If that "should" is a formal SHOULD then I would say yes, it's an update, but that needs to be mentioned very explicitly ("This is a change to the requirements of Section X of RFC Y" or something like that.) That way an implementer is left in no doubt. Just IMHO, of course. Regards Brian On

[Gen-art] [Gen-Art] Review: draft-ietf-ace-usecases-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pcp-port-set-10

Hi, Thank you. Best, Meral > -Original Message- > From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com > [mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 10:27 PM > To: Meral Shirazipour > Cc: draft-ietf-pcp-port-set@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Gen-ART

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-15

Thanks for the review, Vijay. Answers in-line below. > On Oct 14, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > > Thanks for the review, Vijay. Good questions. Do the authors have an answer? > > Jari > > On 15 Oct 2015, at 00:49, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: