[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, pleas

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-14

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, pleas

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-15

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, pleas

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-holmberg-dispatch-pani-abnf-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, pleas

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10

Hi Peter, Sorry for the late reply. Was not doing well.. Once again, thanks a lot for the detailed review comments. I will address them very soon.. Thanks -Pushpasis On 5/4/16 2:32 AM, Peter Yee wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-AR

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03

Hi Russ, sorry for missing this. I have a pull request open against my spec with the changes I've made. https://github.com/martinthomson/drafts/pull/31 On 19 April 2016 at 05:35, Russ Housley wrote: > Minor Concerns: > > I think it would really help > the reader to say at the beginning somethi

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-04

Thanks for your review, Pete! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-bess-multicast-damping-04

Thanks for your review. Authors, did you note Joel’s suggestion? Jari On 28 Mar 2016, at 08:08, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Plea

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03 (Was: Re: Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03)

Thanks for your review, Russ! > In several places, the document says: "These confidentiality protections > do not apply to data that is sent using data channels." It took me a > moment to figure out what was being said. I think it would really help > the reader to say at the beginning something

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange-05

Hi Deborah, > To help the reader, I'd say section 6's and section 7's headers should be > more clearly labelled "An Abstraction Solution for Optical Domains and > Networks" and for section 7 "Abstraction in the User-to-Network Interface". > And these titles will align better with Section 8 "Abs

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dime-drmp-04

Jari, I believe that all of the comments have been addressed in the latest version of the draft. Regards, Steve On 5/4/16 5:11 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: Thanks for your review, Meral. Steve et al — have the comments been addressed & closed? Jari

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange-05

Hi Brian, Yes, much thanks for your careful read. I can understand your confusion on our chosen track as we (authors, chairs, myself) went back and forth on it though we debated if it should be standards track or BCP (or Applicability Statement). https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/YEv-68

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dime-drmp-04

Thanks for your review, Meral. Steve et al — have the comments been addressed & closed? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10

Thanks for your review, Peter. I do agree with this: > Page 5, section 4.2, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: The sentence states: > "Being part of the Router CAPABILITY TLV, the node administrative tag > sub-TLV MUST be reasonably small and stable." If you're going to make this > a MUST, you've got t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-13

Thanks for your review! jari On 07 Mar 2016, at 19:28, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like an

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05

I am going through the Gen-ART reviews related to documents on tomorrow’s IESG telechat agenda. For this document, thanks a lot for your review, Roni. Going to the comment and response from Lorenzo: > The intent here is to say that while the DHCPv6 PD RFC uses the words > "requesting router" t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-pta-flags-02

Thanks! On 27 Apr 2016, at 19:30, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD befo

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator-05

Thanks for the review & fixes, all! jari On 27 Apr 2016, at 13:41, Elwyn Davies wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your >

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-avtext-sdes-hdr-ext-05.txt

Thanks for your review! Jari On 24 Mar 2016, at 05:44, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any ot

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami-12

Thanks for your review, Christer! Jari On 29 Apr 2016, at 05:57, Christer Holmberg wrote: > Hi, > > Please see my follow-up e-mail. It shall be standards track. > > Sorry for the mess :) > > Regards, > > Christer > > > On 29/04/16 12:53, "peter van der Stok" wrote: > >> Hi Christer, >>

Re: [Gen-art] Geb-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-04

Thanks for the review & update, Dan & Carlos, Alvaro! Jari On 04 May 2016, at 12:06, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > Thanks – if the AD is happy, than I am happy as well. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) [mailto:cpign...@cisco.com] > Sent: יום ד 04 מאי 2016 18:59 >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-13

Meral, Alvaro — thanks for the review & updates. Jari On 30 Apr 2016, at 20:23, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote: > On 4/28/16, 4:24 PM, "Meral Shirazipour" > wrote: > > Meral: > > Hi! > > Thank you for your review! > > I just posted version –14. > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > >> I am the a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base-09

Thank you for the review & updates, and rechecking! Jari On 04 May 2016, at 11:19, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote: > Thank you for your follow-up note, Dan! > > — Carlos. > >> On May 4, 2016, at 6:30 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange-05

Hi Adrian, Just a few comebacks in line: On 04/05/2016 23:05, Adrian Farrel wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thanks for the time. Actually I read it with some interest, as I was wondering whether it also provides a use case for the Anima WG. It probably could. > >> Major issues: >> - >> >>>

Re: [Gen-art] Late comment on draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-04

Hi, Elwyn, Thanks for the re-review of a different document :-) All comments welcome and help, thanks. > On May 4, 2016, at 4:43 AM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > > Hi. > > While reviewing draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator-05 for gen-art, I came > across a > 'common mode' issue with multiple dis

Re: [Gen-art] Geb-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-04

Thanks – if the AD is happy, than I am happy as well. Regards, Dan From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) [mailto:cpign...@cisco.com] Sent: יום ד 04 מאי 2016 18:59 To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) Cc: General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: Geb-ART Telechat revie

Re: [Gen-art] Geb-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-04

Hi, Dan, Thanks for following up. Alvaro, as responsible AD, responded as you can see here: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg13149.html Thanks, — Carlos. > On May 4, 2016, at 6:46 AM, Romascanu, Dan

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base-09

Thank you for your follow-up note, Dan! — Carlos. > On May 4, 2016, at 6:30 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-06.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange-05

Hi Brian, Thanks for the time. > Major issues: > - > > > 5. Building on Existing Protocols > > I find it hard to read the introduction to this section and understand > why the draft is proposed for BCP rather than Informational. I will punt this question direct to the responsible

[Gen-art] Geb-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, plea

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, plea

[Gen-art] Late comment on draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-04

Hi. While reviewing draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator-05 for gen-art, I came across a 'common mode' issue with multiple discriminators that lead me to check the various other seamless BFD drafts. In the process I noticed the last paragraph in Section 5.1.1 of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-