; From: Dan Romascanu <droma...@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, 25 November 2016 at 5:46 PM
> To: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-siprec-callflows.
> a...@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-siprec-callflows....@tools.ietf.org>
> Subject: Gen-
tf.org>, <draft-ietf-siprec-callflows@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
Resent-From: <alias-boun...@ietf.org>, <jari.ar...@piuha.net>
Resent-To: <rmoh...@cisco.com>, <par...@parthasarathi.co.in>,
<pk
..@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
Resent-From: <alias-boun...@ietf.org>, <droma...@gmail.com>
Resent-To: <rmoh...@cisco.com>, <par...@parthasarathi.co.in>,
<pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu>, <andrew.hut...@unify.com>,
Thank you very much for your review, Dan. Authors, have you taken a look at
Dan’s comments?
Jari
On 25 Nov 2016, at 14:16, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please