it from the doc. The board can
always take its fiat out for a drive if some extraordinary
circumstance arises some day.
Cheers,
-g
On Sep 20, 2011 4:36 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
The default sponsor is the incubator PMC. if you just put that in a
proposal and offer it up
The default sponsor is the incubator PMC. if you just put that in a
proposal and offer it up, it just happens.
Board sponsorship happens for 'special' circumstances (like OO), and I
don't pretend to understand why it's important.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi...
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 September 2011 19:28, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
In an effort to reduce the number of procedures vying for neurons
I'd like to add a note to the template asking the initial contributors
to note their favorite email address. That way, when the inevitable
'subscribe' requests for the private list come along, the mentor
moderating the private list can identify the addresses as legitimate.
In an effort to reduce the number of procedures vying for neurons in
my memory, I think it would be good if we went ahead and CMS-ed the
incubator website. I'm willing to help Joe with this, and he suggested
that I post this message looking for other contributors to the effort.
You probably don't need BOTH an SGA or a CCLA. Just one. A CCLA allows
future contributions. The SGA would just cover this one thing.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/14/11 9:18 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
He worked on it during his day job and
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#request-mailing-lists
Can anyone explain what
IPMC Member
This needs to be executed by an IPMC member. Mentors are drafted on
the IPMC so this will typically
was trying to say? I've quoted it just as it is, which is to say,
ending in
!what! needs to be a mentor?
On Sep 13, 2011, at 6:47 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#request-mailing-lists
Can anyone explain what
+1 binding
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
Optimist that I am, I wonder if any of you would be willing to sign up
to join me as a mentor on accumulo on the assumption that it is
approved?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
I can help.
Would you please add yourself to the proposal on the wiki?
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 8, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Optimist that I am, I wonder if any of you would be willing to sign up
it?
On 9/6/11 8:27 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Doug Meil,
Top-posting is generally less than idea, but I want to respond to the
overall theme of your message, not to individual points and sentences.
The attitude of various chunks of the US government to Open Source has
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
A bit of back story of a slightly similar situation before. We have
had Axis/Axis2 projects in Apache for a long time and along came the
XFire proposal (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CeltiXfireProposal)
and
needless to say, but as a Mentor-in-waiting, I'm all in favor
of this proposal.
--benson margulies
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Agency
== Sponsors ==
* Champion: Doug Cutting
* Nominated Mentors: Benson Margulies, ?, ?
* Sponsoring Entity: Apache Incubator
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Legally I think that a tarball attached to a jira with the feather
checked is precisely the same as an svn commit. It all comes in under
the same paragraphs of the license and icla. I don't think an SGA is
relevant unless there is complexity in the provenance.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Tags are supposed to
out what needed to be fixed for
the release. =)
Ah, just what you were hoping for, contradictory direction. Sorry,
we're really good at that here at the incubator.
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew
Moving to general@...
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: Sunday, 21 August 2011 2:22 AM
To: priv...@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Gavin McDonald
Subject: Re:
I am a historical contributor to the toolkit: if you need something,
feel free to tag me.
On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
2011/8/9 Ying Chun Guo guoyi...@cn.ibm.com:
Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com 写于 08/09/2011 06:47:05 PM:
Nick Burch
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
Agree that the scope of Rat alone is limited. You mean if Rat proposed
to graduate as Apache Tools (or even Apache Infrastructure Tools)? Rat
could start as the TLP and later become a sub project once other tools
Svn dump private download for concerned party?
On Jul 21, 2011, at 12:23 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Er, have you explicitly told the Bluesky lists that the repo is about to
be deleted?
Alternatively,
You are welcome to make a copy on github.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Shanti Subramanyam (gmail)
shanti.subraman...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps. But the project is still useful and I see researchers using it (the
activity usually picks up during the summer months). If we can arrange for
the
I'm relatively new at mentoring, and I'm writing to solicit advice
from older hands on the early phases of community construction.
I'm looking at a podling with 7 initial contributors, running since
Nov 2010. No new contributors have been voted in, or even discussed.
Or even seen, I think, on the
to be 'not critical if everything else is OK'.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:40 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 7/5/2011 7:36 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Anyhow, what do other think? Should mentors be pushing early and often
on this subject, or is it reasonable wait for, oh, 18 months and a few
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
...If a project, during an 18 month incubation, cannot draw in new blood,
how can we believe that it will do so as a TLP?
Marketing of the
No secret here. It's OpenNLP.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 5 July 2011 14:07, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:52 PM
Based on the email trail recently, I'm in favor of completing the
vote. I think that there is sufficient evidence that this project has
'failed to launch' as an Apache community, and should go put itself on
github. If enough people disagree, they can vote -1.
My vote is +1 to retire.
On Fri, Jul
+1 (Binding)
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
+1 to retire Bluesky (binding)
I see no reason for suspending the vote. We've been round this
particular merry-go-round many times already. Each time we're told
we'll do better. The votes been called
There's another possible dimension to this, which is related to the
'Apache Key' suggestion.
The current mechanism gives a\ sophisticated/ consumer tools to get
some confidence that what they downloaded was, in fact, created by
someone in the Apache infrastructure.
If a dozen black hats create
Chris,
If my goal was to hoodwink you, I'd create a bogus key that claimed to
be owned by an Apache person, put it in a KEYS file, and include in
the release, and sign the release with it. If I was lucky, you'd just
verify the release with the embedded key, and I'd have succeeded. We
want people
Mirrors.
Lots of non-apache people work for all those many companies that
operate all those many, many, mirrors.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Benson,
On Jun 27, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Chris,
If my
I forgot to add (binding) to my +1, but I don't think I'm alone.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 6/10/2011 12:04 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
(Officially I'm on the incubator PMC I believe but I have not been active ..
so lets chalk this up
The expression 'land-grab' in here bothers me.
I understand (if not agree with) the 'deep philosophy justification'
of the FSF for a particular licensing strategy.
I understand the views of individuals who don't want to benefit
corporations without extracting, at least, some token cooperation in
convene and agree on the outlines of that family in
advance.
--benson margulies
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote on 06/03/2011 08:02:25 AM:
There is a meta-question here: what are the criteria by which the IPMC
should evaluate a proposal?
1. Are there enough people on the proposal to plausibly start out?
I think everyone
Here is a thread for some infrastructure implications of an OO podling.
Things to note:
1. OO is very large.
2. OO is a good-old C++ giant. It's not 'build once, run anywhere'. It
has to be built many times in many configurations to maintain
regression testing.
There is, in short, a detectable
Um, it seems to me that this discussion of builds and distribution
belongs on the dev list of the podling when/if there is a podling.
Unless someone feels that there's a problem so gigantic that it should
motivate -1 votes for the podling itself.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Christian
.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Of course it does... but we are discussing ways where
we can use all aspects of the existing communities to
give the IPMC a warm-and-fuzzy regarding voting +1
On Jun 3, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Um
Can we launch the Apache Sausage Project?
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/06/2011 16:09, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
This is why, inside the ASF, we expect individuals to
One main, significant difference between TDF and the ASF
is that the ASF just releases source; TDF fills a *huge*
and important part of the entire OOo end-user experience.
I sincerely hope this is an easy to agree to.
This is a concise capture of a critical point.
TDF could decide to ignore
We now have several running threads. They overlap in content, and
their subjects are, in some cases, rather uninformative.
I want to suggest some options to improve this situation to make it
easier for ipmc members (and others) to follow the discussion and
register their points of view.
Option
In my experience as a moderator of consensus process, I've learned
that, on tough topics, it's hard to achieve consensus without, well,
active moderation. My gambit was to suggest that this was a hat for
the champions, but it was just a gambit.
Option 2: we use the wiki to stack up comments and
instead of to the whole shebang.
Bah. Outdated concept. In Apache Subversion, we simply ask the
committer to constrain themselves to certain areas. No need to get
technical about it. The trust metric applies very well, *especially*
when it is version control and changes can be reverted :-P
I started the process by adding a couple of TBD's.
My little vision is that IPMC members might add notes of the form:
I cannot vote +1 for this proposal until this section addresses issue X'
When all those comments are gone, we have, in effect, voted.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Sam Ruby
Please do not turn this thread into *ANOTHER* however polite argument
the possible construction of the community.
So to be clear, the wiki page for the OOo proposal is open for anyone to
edit and not just Apache members or the project's proposers.
Yes: As Sam wrote:
. Defacement
of the
And if we split the page into separate proposals (not unlikely given the
clear differences of vision expressed on the list already), which one is
voted on? All of them?
Rob,
Splitting the page would be an extreme situation, and it would
indicate, to me, that the incubator PMC is faced with
This whole topic seems to suffer from malformed or uninformative subject lines.
I submit that it's not the purview of the ASF or the Incubator PMC to
achieve world peace, or whirled peas, or a single project for open
source document software.
Oracle has granted code to the ASF. A group of people
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 June 2011 22:42, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
The existing of TDF and the preference of its contributors for
copyleft is data, but for me it's not data that could persuade me to
vote -1 in this PMC. I
The proposal, as I read it, doesn't address the license status of
third party software dependencies.
The one time that I endeavoured to build OOo from source, it had a
long list of mandatory dependencies.
Reference http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html.
While some of them might qualify as
There are only two initial committers identified in the proposal. Why only
two for such a large codebase?
Not only is it a very large code base, it was a weakly maintained and
documented code base for quite some time before the
Sun-Oracle-LO-Split/Splat process.
We generally expect Apache
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/06/2011 19:51, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
dshdaniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 02:16:58 PM:
...
And is it generally held to be a criterion
for a podling to graduate or even initiate, that it
, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/06/2011 19:51, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
dshdaniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 02:16:58 PM:
...
And is it generally held to be a criterion
Is there a quick way to check the diversity of commits to a podling? I
mentor one where the ratio of commits between one individual and the
rest of the universe seems to be tending toward infinity, and I'd like
to check before pointing this out.
+1. Sorry, I got distrastracted from sending this.
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
Hadrian
On Apr 29, 2011, at 6:35 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Hi all,
please review and vote on approving our first release of Apache OpenNLP.
OpenNLP
Sorry to be off the thread, but I had an email mishap.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Let's say that I have an idea for some new open source initiative. How
would I proceed?
Well, I *won't* proceed by asking for an ASF lab. Why? Because an ASF
lab precludes me from collaboration with anyone except ASF committers,
and that's a completely arbitrary distinction.
So, these days, my
the org.apache
namespace for their bundles or package names.
My goal here is to foster and encourage the growth of brand new things
*inside* the ASF, but lowering the barrier to entry.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/11/11 5:13 PM, Benson Margulies
* what makes
Apache currently so valuable to us, as a client.
Not sure you want to dilute that.
-Eric.
On 2/11/11 8:44 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Those have zero oversight, and are supposed to be associated with
existing projects, no?
More seriously,
There are a number of things
hat's a completely arbitrary distinction.
As a Labs PMC member at least I would be open to a proposal to change
that rule, if that's the only thing preventing Labs from being used
for something like this.
In the interests of email economy:
A scheme to do this at the Lab would be fine with
http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account says
that PMC chairs grant hudson access.
Is this the process for the incubator, as well? Do others have karma
for this purpose?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
or motivator for their interest.
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
* Grant Ingersoll (gsingers AT apache DOT org)
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Gianugo Rabellino
* Stefan Bodewig
* Benson Margulies
=== Sponsoring Entity ===
'''Lucene.Net is currently sponsored by Lucene as a sub-project
I guess I could sign up as Mentor.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lombard, Scott
slomb...@kingindustries.com wrote:
Grant,
The proposal is done, how do you feel about putting Lucene.Net to a vote with
2 mentors?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll
River Community,
I am pleased to pass along the news that the ASF board unanimously
approved the resolution to establish the River TLP.
Time to get busy clearing away the eggshells and moving into your new svn home.
Best Regards,
Benson
I'm sure that it isn't a policy. It's a good practice avoiding
Subversion bloat. There are certainly Apache projects who still have a
trunk-load of checked-in jars.
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Please point me at a URL where it says this is Apache policy.
Gang,
Please be clear about when you are offering advice to podlings and
when you are conveying policy. The people in the podlings get
justifiably rattled when they get email that seems to suggest that
they are somehow not following some rule that isn't, apparently,
written down anywhere.
Eight binding +1 votes, no 0 or -1 vote, and one decorative
non-binding, assuming that http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html
is up to date.
BInding +1:
Benson Margulies (Mentor)
Chris Mattmann
Mohammed Nour El-Din
Bertrand Delacretaz
Jukka Zitting (Mentor)
Niclas Hedhman (Mentor)
Alan D
Did I misread the web page or is it out of date?
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Dec 22, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Eight binding +1 votes, no 0 or -1 vote, and one decorative
non-binding, assuming that http
It seems like we've run out of voters for River, and all of them are
+1. How does this get formalized?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Looks like the answer is 9 +1 votes and nothing else.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
+1 to graduation and congrats!
Minor typo below...
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...maintenance
, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
It seems like we've run out of voters for River, and all of them are
+1. How does this get formalized?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
conventional cross-post, or that the incubator PMC wants
to see the draft board resolution. If so, just let me know, and I'll
make the necessary repairs.
Otherwise, I invite your votes.
--benson margulies
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Benson,
Not sure that it's a strict rule, but seeing the board resolution is what I'd
like to see as an IPMC member if I'm VOTE'ing on something.
Cheers,
Chris
On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC,
The River
Empire has a mentor shortage, and River is about done with me. So I
guess I'll insert myself there.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
The River podling is cleaning up the list in preparation for (I hope)
a graduation soon.
Do they need to maintain 'emeritus' status across the graduation
boundary? They'd rather not. They have a long list of long-gone
people.
-
is not covered by an ICLA. A grant
is needed.
Craig
On Dec 1, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I've been thinking about Leo's email of the other day, and I think
that my edit to the mentor page is not right and some guidance I've
delivered to podlings is not right.
I'd like
I'm a bit up to my eyes in OpenNLP. Can one of you get the initial
status page going?
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Yay!! Thank you. I've been absolutely rammed with only phone access for the
vast majority of time. Thank you for taking the job on (I
To my pleasant surprise, Sam replied on legal-discuss that an icla is
just fine -- though it's better if the person signing it actually
reads it first. I plan to make some more tweaks to the web site to
places that seem to say the opposite.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Benson Margulies
I agree with Joe.
a) I've been involved in a number of such releases.
b) A podling can be evaluated for license compatibility like any
external dependency -- but I don't see how a podling has any business
making any releases before their IP clearance is pretty darn clear.
--benson
On Wed, Dec
Just about the most important thing a podling does is release. We
shouldn't need mechanisms to ease the use of unreleased podling code.
In my opinion.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
I've been thinking about Leo's email of the other day, and I think
that my edit to the mentor page is not right and some guidance I've
delivered to podlings is not right.
I'd like to float my logic here and see how it gets shot at.
As Leo pointed out, the CCLA has a specific section for granting
Sometimes I know that the very busy root@ batches up account requests.
My OpenNLP pod-people wonder when they might get their accounts. I've
counselled patience.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
It would be very much appreciated if we could at least get the mailing
lists going for OpenNLP.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3233
--benson
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
I made an edit to the incubator site. What do you think of it?
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Would you recommend that I edit the mentor page on the site with this
clarification, or should we wait for more polyphony?
If you really feel that there
the software grant
plus an acknowledgement that people in the company are going to work on
Apache projects, whether on their own time or company time.
So, if a CCLA is filed naming the software, a separate SGA is *not*
necessary.
Craig
On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Benson Margulies wrote
Well, this is going to depend on how the copyrights work, I guess. If
it's clear that HP owns the copyright (all the HP people were working
for hire), then a CCLA from HP will cover it. However, IANTL.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I can't find anything in [1] that states any conditions in which a
CCLA won't do and an SGA is required instead.
The Jena podling has asked me. Their situation is that an HP copyright
is thought to cover all the 'corporate' code, and they wonder if there
is any reason for them to chase an SGA on
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:16, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I am nothing if not chronically disingenuous.
My first concern in responding here is a process concern. As far as I
can tell
Instead of continuing this thread, I'd invite any of you to start
watching the isis dev list, and report in if you see evidence of a
failure to respect the core values that underly this argument.
Isis has several mentors. I am only one. The mentors, in general, felt
that the project had a strong
Some reading the thread on the ISIS podling's use of Skype may feel
that I am dismissing their opinions or disregarding an established
policy.
To do penance for any perceived slight, and to make it perfectly clear
that it is my intention to respect established policy, I am starting
this thread
I find myself, for the first time, in the position of being the go-to
mentor for a new launch. Last time around, the other mentors were so
enthusiastic that I didn't have to do anything except type up the
first three INFRA JIRAs.
I'm trying to get my head wrapped around the IP clearance process.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
The premise of this discussion is that running Apache projects are
*permitted* to engage in real-time communications, so long as they
take due care to avoid community problems of exclusion and closed
decision making.
As a mentor of ISIS, I'd like to ask everyone to give them a little
breathing room on this subject.
Many TLP's in good standing have active IRC channels. These have very
closely related risks to open communities. Many TLPs in good standing
hold in-person meetups from time to time.
This is not to
community - isn't shuffled under the rug. IMO,
we should be messaging about how to do it well if it's desired, not whether
or not to do it at all.
Thanks,
--Glen
On 11/22/2010 8:56 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
As a mentor of ISIS, I'd like to ask everyone to give them a little
breathing room
Simons (leosimons .at. apache.org)
* Dave Johnson (snoopdave .at. gmail.com)
* Benson Margulies (bimargulies .at. gmail.com)
=== Sponsoring Entity ===
Incubator PMC
--
rgard...@apache.org
@rgardler
-
To unsubscribe
+1 binding
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Andreas Kuckartz a.kucka...@ping.de wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation
at the Apache Incubator.
The proposal is on the wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal
and a copy is
+1 to the proposal.
What makes me uneasy about this is that, notwithstanding the one
mentor vote, we are basically saying that the bar for ASF
committership can now be defined solely by a group of people who might
have no knowledge, as yet, of the Apache way in general and the way
Carroll
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
Ross Gardler (rgardler .at. apache.org
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Bertrand Delacretaz (bdelacretaz .at. apache.org)
* Leo Simons (leosimons .at. apache.org)
* Dave Johnson (snoopdave .at. gmail.com)
* Benson Margulies (bimargulies .at. gmail.com
I signed off.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
I've updated the report [1] for Isis. It still needs to be reviewed by our
mentors (Mark Struberg did so last time) .
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2010
On 15/11/2010 20:03, Noel J.
The author of Saxon is in a public feud with Maven. He likes to claim
that Maven publication violates his license.
If you go the route you quote, you have to publish it under your own
groupId, and not his, and not Apache's.
However, Someone published:
dependency
groupIdnet.sf.saxon/groupId
501 - 600 of 665 matches
Mail list logo
