Hi PJ,
If we look at the Release policy it states that it SHOULD remain open for at
least 72 hours [1].
In case we are talking about an emergency release/patch the 72 hours rule can
be ignored.
Cheers,
Hans
[1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
On 1 Jul 2023 at
Isn't staging for release on maven central the same as creating binary
convenience artifacts?
Staging to the ASF nexus to then be pushed to maven central is part of your
release process [1]
Cheers,
Hans
[1] https://infra.apache.org/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 20:15,
+1 awesome project !
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 at 14:59, Tianqi Chen wrote:
> +1 Great to see it
>
> TQ
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 2:21 AM Jialin Qiao wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Good luck!
> > —
> > Jialin Qiao
> > Apache IoTDB PMC
> >
> >
> > Ziheng Jiang 于2022年6月2日周四
I "think" it is ASF2 licensed [1]
This location seems to be a copy from their original svn/cvs code.
Cheers,
Hans
[1] https://github.com/codehaus/stax/blob/master/dev/ASF2.0.txt
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 12:52, Calvin Kirs wrote:
> Justin Mclean 于2022年1月12日周三 18:18写道：
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > >
esponsible
> for
> > > > the creation and maintenance of software related to short for the Hop
> > > > Orchestration Platform. Written completely in Java it aims to
> provide a
> > > > wide range of data orchestration tools, including a visual
> developm
Hello Everyone,
The vote to release Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0 - RC1 has passed.
+1 (binding):
- Julian Hyde
- François Papon
- Kevin Ratnasekera
- Xun Liu
- 朱辉
+1 (non-binding)
- 独孤求败
Thank you for reviewing this release candidate.
Cheers,
Hans
, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:48 PM Francois Papon <
> >> > francois.pa...@openobject.fr>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > +1 (binding)
> >> > >
> >> > > Good job!
> >> > >
> >> > > regards,
>
Hi All,
After a thorough testing period for Hop 0.99, we are ready to release
version 1.0.0 to the public. All issues raised during the previous release
have been resolved. Dubious code has either been rewritten or removed from
this release.
This release contains no new features, only further
Hello IPMC,
The vote to release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99 - RC4 has passed.
+1 (binding):
- Julian Hyde
- Justin Mclean
- François Papon
- Kevin Ratnasekera
+1 (non-binding)
- Xun Liu
+0
-1 (binding)
-1 (non-binding)
Thank you for reviewing this release candidate.
Cheers,
Hans
HI Justin,
Thanks for the check, we will look into it.
In the client zip we have a THIRD-PARTY.txt which should list all
dependencies and their licenses [1].
I suppose this should then be included in the LICENSE file and we should go
over all the dependencies to see what needs to be included in
Hi All,
This release candidate resolves the issues around Imported Source code.
As discussed in the following mail thread [1] we identified the code that
was added from external sources after starting the incubator and removed
it.
This release candidate also includes all changes that were marked
Hi All,
After doing some more digging we found some other bits and pieces that
still need to be sorted out first.
We started a discussion on the dev list for further steps, consider this
vote closed and we will not be releasing.
Cheers,
Hans
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 08:13, Bart Maertens wrote:
Hi All,
This is the Third release candidate for version 0.99 changes made between
the first candidate and this one:
- remove code that was copied over from external repository
- add header to hpl/hwf files
- add maven version to README
- include hpl/hwf to RAT checks
- change naming of source
Hello Team,
The vote to release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99 - RC1 has failed.
Although we have sufficient votes to create a release, the issues raised
were too big to feel comfortable releasing the code. We would like to thank
everyone participating in this vote.
+1 (binding):
- Julian Hyde
-
Hi,
The vote has ended, thank you all for the feedback.
As you pointed out, were it only the header issue in hpl/hwf it would have
been an option, the foreign code is a bigger problem.
I will go back to the dev list to discuss creating rc2.
Cheers,
Hans
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 02:02, Justin
Hi,
That specific unit test can be found here [1], but we will strip out
everything to move forward.
Kind regards,
Hans
[1]
https://github.com/pentaho/pdi-dataservice-plugin/blob/master/pdi-dataservice-client/src/test/java/org/pentaho/di/core/sql/SQLFieldsUnitTest.java
On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at
Hi Justin,
There are more files that have altered headers (though all with apache 2.0
license) and are adapted from the following repository [1], bits and pieces
were used and adapted to our needs, this repository is a module that was
bundled with the original source we started from it has no
Hi Justin,
It wasn't part of the software grant so we were just following the bundling
apache licensed 2.0 code route as explained here [1].
No addition to the LICENSE was needed as the code already was Apache 2
licensed. As the necessary mentions already are in our notice file, no
change was
Hi Justin,
That file should be switched to the standard ASF header and is part of the
original code and covered by the notice file.
As for the no header in hpl and hwf files, these are files created using
the application and are used for samples and for our integration testing
framework. This
Hi All,
This will be our preview 1.0 release, this release contains both the source
code and binary to run the client. This will also be our first release
without DISCLAIMER-WIP but the regular disclaimer.
This release aims to get as much feedback as possible so we can remove some
final bugs
Aren't both (L)GPL Category X [1]?
Cheers,
Hans
[1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 10:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
> Good catch. AFAIR chardet is LGPL based (not GPL), and LGPL is Cat B (not
> X).
>
> @Liminal team, do you confirm LGPL license for chardet
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the thorough check, at compile time we have quite a lot of
category X licensed dependencies, most JDBC drivers are not category A/B,
all these dependencies are optional and need to be included by the user if
he wants to connect to this specific database. We also have
Thank you to everyone who participated in the vote. The voting is now
closed and it has passed.
The issues raised during the voting process have been added to Jira and
will be resolved by the next release [1][2]
Binding votes:
3: +1 votes
- François Papon
- Kevin Ratnasekera
- Zhenxu Ke
0:
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>
> > On Apr 1, 2021, at 3:22 AM, Hans Van Akelyen
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are also planning on distributing a "fat client" that contains all
> > dependencies needed to run the applica
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------
>Juan Pan (Trista)
>
> Senior DBA & PMC of Apache ShardingSphere
> E-mail: panj...@apache.org
>
>
>
>
> On 03/30/2021 22:43，Hans Van Akelyen wrote：
> Hi Incubator t
rry, there seem to be only two binding votes from the community vote. Are
> some PPMC votes incorrectly calculated as non-binding?
>
> Hans Van Akelyen 于2021年3月30日周二 下午10:43写道：
>
> > Hi Incubator team,
> >
> > We are proud to announce that we have a new release candidat
Hi Incubator team,
We are proud to announce that we have a new release candidate ready for
release and would like your review and vote.
Build instructions can be found in the README included.
Hop community vote and result threads:
Vote:
Adibnia
wrote:
> Thanks Hans. I found the instructions for the Notice File in the link you
> sent as well. That was helpful.
>
>
>
> Can you please let me know how to get the DISCLIAMER File?
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Reza.
>
>
>
> *From:* Ha
Hi Reza,
The header can be found here: https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 20:55, Xun Hu wrote:
> + Wenjing
>
> From: Reza Adibnia
> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 11:50 AM
> To: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Cc: d...@bluemarlin.apache.org; Xun Hu ;
>
Thank you to everyone who participated in the vote. The voting is now
closed and it has passed.
Binding votes:
4: +1 votes
- Julian Hyde
- Justin Mclean
- François Papon
- Kevin Ratnasekera
0: 0 votes
0: -1 votes.
Non-binding
0: +1 votes
0: 0 votes
0: -1 votes.
Thank you,
The Apache
Thank you all for voting,
I was able to reproduce the issue, we usually use the install phase so we
did not notice.
We will make sure the compile phase works in the future releases.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 8:55 AM Kevin Ratnasekera
wrote:
> +1 ( binding )
>
> I checked the following.
>
> -
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the vote!
If you have some time to spare could you provide us with your maven/java
version and the error you get while building?
The software should build and work on all 3 major platforms, I'm also an
OSX user and can build without errors.
Thanks,
Hans
On Fri, Jan 22,
Hi IPMC,
This is a call for vote to release Apache Hop (Incubating) 0.60-rc1.
The main changes in this release are fixing the issues brought up by the
IPMC:
- Added DISCLAIMER-WIP
- Align Apache headers in source files
- Remove duplicate headers
- Add non compliant source files to LICENSE file
-
Hello IPMC,
The vote to release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.50 - RC2 has *failed*.
Working items for next candidate:
- add DISCLAIMER-WIP
- cleanup headers
- check if NOTICE needs update
- try and minimize RAT excludes
- remove Category B code or mention in DISCLAIMER/LICENSE
+1 (binding):
Julian
Hi,
Thanks for the valuable feedback, we will pick up these issues and work on
a new release.
Regards,
Hans
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 2:59 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> HI,
>
> Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) as it contains Category B source code and
> header issues and is not using the WIP disclaimer.
Hi IPMC,
This is a call for vote to release Apache Hop (Incubating) 0.50-rc2.
This will be our first Apache incubator release and want to thank everyone
involved in the process.
Hop community vote and result threads:
Vote:
36 matches
Mail list logo
