Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi, This is a cool idea. Its like Apache TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/) but for data flow/stream systems as opposed to graph systems. Our tag line is "the JDBC for graphs." You would be "the JDBC for streams." :) You might be interested in looking TinkerPop's Gremlin

Re: [DISCUSS] S2Graph Incubator Proposal

Hi, I just added a ticket describing the benefits of providing Apache TinkerPop support for S2Graph. https://github.com/kakao/s2graph/issues/175 Just some thoughts in case you haven't considered TinkerPop. Good luck, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Nov 23, 2015, at 5:35 PM, Stack

Re: Apache Metrics, Not Apache Humans

PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>>

Apache Metrics, Not Apache Humans

Hi, I was talking with Daniel Gruno and wrote the following ideas to him. Note that these are just ideas and not based on any real momentary issue or concern -- though a more general concern about how Apache should evolve. Apache should NOT use a binary "podling" / "top-level" model. All

Re: Draft report November 2015 -- please review

Hello, >> TinkerPop > >> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be >> aware of? >> >> No. Recently, we have really appreciated Daniel Gruno's (mentor) efforts >> to get our development community more connected by setting up an Apache >> HipChat account for us and

Re: Mentor disengagement - a suggestion

Hello, I concur with this. Once we got one of our mentors engaged -- Daniel Gruno -- its been smooth sailing. You know how we got him engaged? HipChat. He set us up an account and now we can "@Humbedooh" with questions and get responses. No more "Hello?! Please answer our emails..." So yes,

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

Hi, > We hope and trust mentors to wear their hats well. This quote from a colleague of mine has always stuck with me: "Hope is not a strategy." Take care, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com > >> On Oct 9, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> >> Hi

Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

Hello, It appears that VOTEing in general@ is inefficient and biased. An Apache member will see a VOTE on the list and can choose whether to participate in that VOTE or not. I believe there are problems with this algorithm. The first has to do with efficiency. For instance, Groovy received

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

lem that so vexes you now. >> >> Participating in wider Apache activities is also its own reward. The >> Apache >> Software Foundation is a worthy institution contributing great value to the >> world at large. Helping out the Incubator, now or later, is both >

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

h TinkerPop. Why should they, they are using the software to solve their particular problems and could care less about the "TinkerPop community" as long as those releases (bug fixes/optimizations/features) keep coming. --- > >> If I'm not delivering softw

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

al mentors >> involved. >> >> Ultimately, this problem is just a preview of what happens when a project >> doesn't have enough active participation and needs to be handled using >> essentially the same community development methods. >> >> >>

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

marketing models currently being posited by the general@ list. Thoughts?, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Sep 14, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I suppose my concern is exactly what the two replies thus far espouse -- > &

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

Hi, > Thought 1: Who is "we" in this scenario? That is, whose budget do you imagine > the $60 coming out of? Me personally. > Thought 2: No, there's no chance that this kind of expenditure would be > permissible under our non-profit status. Of course. I'm mainly speaking as a devil's

[RESULT] [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.0-incubating Release

Hello, TinkerPop 3.0.0-incubating has passed VOTE with: +1 (3 -- Justin, Rich, Jan) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Jul 16, 2015, at 11:25 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) have fun jan i On Thursday, July 16, 2015,

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.0-incubating Release

Hi Incubators, Yes -- I even bug myself. Can any other binders review the release, please? Thank you very much, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Jul 13, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, +1 binding For the source releases I checked: - incubating

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.0-incubating Release

Hello Incubators, We are happy to announce TinkerPop 3.0.0-incubating is ready for release. The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tinkerpop/3.0.0-incubating/ The source distribution is provided by:

[RESULT] [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.0.M9-incubating Release

Hello Incubators, TinkerPop 3.0.0.M9-incubating votes are now tallied at: +1 (3) -- Justin, Jean-Babtiste, and Hadrian. 0 (0) -1 (0) We will proceed with the official release. Moreover, Justin, note that we see you final comment and will proceed as recommended. Thank

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.0.M9-incubating Release

Hello general@incubators, After 3 rounds of 3.0.0.M9-incubating-rc releases the last couple of weeks, the participating vendors articulated their confidence in Apache TinkerPop providing an M9 release. The dev@tinkerpop vote passed with: PMC: +1 (4), 0 (0), -1 (0) -- one from mentor.

Re: Helping Neo4j Release an Apache2 API for Apache Projects

TinkerPop. I hope this clears things up. Please ask more questions if not. Thank you, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Apr 30, 2015, at 3:35 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote: ...In short

Helping Neo4j Release an Apache2 API for Apache Projects

Hello, TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/), prior to being an Apache project, provided a tinkerpop-neo4j adaptor with each release. TinkerPop sees Neo4j as the reference OLTP implementation of TinkerPop. With TinkerPop's migration to the Apache Software Foundation, TinkerPop

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, We need one more +1 vote to release. A review would be much appreciated. Thank you, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Apr 23, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com wrote

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

, at 2:09 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Signature file good Hashes file good LICENSE file good NOTICE file exists and GOOD No 3rd part executables in source package. +1 binding Good job - Henry On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Marko Rodriguez okramma

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

Hello everyone, We need one more +1 vote to release. A review would be much appreciated. Thank you, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Apr 23, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com wrote: +1 binding On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM Justin Mclean

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

Hello, Thanks for voting Justin. Appreciate it. - I'm still not sure of the reason why some of the artefacts are named gremlin rather than tinkerpop TinkerPop is the project as a whole. Within TinkerPop, there are various components. gremlin-core gremlin-groovy

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8 Release

Apologies for any confusion, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Apr 20, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Sending CANCEL reply on behalf of Marko from TinkerPop PPMCs On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Apache

[VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

Hello, Apache TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/) would like to release TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating. We had a dev@ VOTE which resulted in a tally of +1 (3), 0 (0), and -1 (0). We now present our artifacts for vote by Incubator. The dev@ [VOTE] thread can be found here:

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8 Release

and confusing. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, Given the feedback, we have updated the release as follows: 1. The PGP signature is via an apache.org email address. 2. The DISCLAIMER has been added to the binary

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8 Release

Hello everyone, Given the feedback, we have updated the release as follows: 1. The PGP signature is via an apache.org email address. 2. The DISCLAIMER has been added to the binary distributions. 3. Fixed the Copyright Aurelius LLC issue in LICENSE. 4. Added Java

[VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8 Release

Hello, Apache TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/) would like to release TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8. We had a dev@ VOTE which resulted in a tally of +1 (3), 0 (0), and -1 (0). We now present our artifacts for vote by Incubator. The dev@ [VOTE] thread can be found here:

[RESULT][VOTE] Incubate TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

Hello, I would like to thank Apache on behalf of TinkerPop for allowing us to propose our project and providing us mentors able to bring the TinkerPop Proposal to a successful voting conclusion. Our mentor Hadrian asked me to tally the votes, so here goes: + 1 (6 votes) + 0 (1

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

think such would block incubation, but we should be fully aware of it if this is so. Regards, Dave Gav… On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com mailto:okramma...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, Over the last 2 weeks, TinkerPop's proposal has

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

Hello, TinkerPop3 is a complete re-write of TinkerPop2 and TP3 does not depend on TP2 in any way. TP3 was started November 2013 (1+ year ago). We have CLAs for every TP3 contributor. We do not have CLAs for every TP2 contributor. We are primarily interested in moving forward first with

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

targeted and things will go faster. My $0.02, Hadrian On 12/29/2014 03:30 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: On 12/17/2014 02:09 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: Hello, My name is Marko A. Rodriguez and am a co-founder of TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.com). There has been positive pressure on us

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

Hello, Here is how TinkerPop current runs it TinkerPop-Contributors. 1. If you are a vendor, you get one engineer from your organization to be on TinkerPop-Contributors who speaks on behalf of your organization/product. (~15 people) - e.g. That API addition will be

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

Hello, I had read somewhere that you needed 3 people at minimum for the PPMC. I ran the names (Marko,Stephen,James) by our TinkerPop-Contributors list and there was no pushback. Moving forward, if someone does provide sustained, beneficial work to TinkerPop, they are more than welcome to get

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

hardware. Please take a look at other proposals listed for an idea and if you have any questions please let us know Thanks -Jake On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I have put the proposal on the wiki page. https

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

Thanks, Roman. On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, My name is Marko A. Rodriguez and am a co-founder of TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.com). There has been positive pressure on us (both internally and externally) to move TinkerPop to The Apache

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

Hello everyone, I have put the proposal on the wiki page. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TinkerPopProposal As requested by Roman, I updated the Affiliations section. Note that I would love to tweak more but there is a 1 minute turn around time when I hit 'preview' or 'save