+1
Yours, Xuefeng Wu 吴雪峰 敬上
On 2014年2月11日, at 下午12:27, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least
+1
Doug
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks!
+1 (binding)
--David
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72
+1
On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks!
[ ]
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Mosharaf Chowdhury mosharafka...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
--
Mosharaf Chowdhury
http://www.mosharaf.com/
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Mosharaf Chowdhury
mosharafka...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
--
Mosharaf Chowdhury
http://www.mosharaf.com/
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:45 PM,
+1
Dan
On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
+1
-- Joyce
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
+1
Dan
On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the
+1
On 2/11/14, 5:08 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Mosharaf Chowdhury
mosharafka...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
--
Mosharaf Chowdhury
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72
+1
Craig
On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks!
[ ] +1 Graduate
+ 1 (binding).
Suresh
On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator.
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because..
+1 (binding)
Marvin Humphrey
+1 (binding)
-Jake
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks!
[ ] +1
+1
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks!
[
+1 !!!
On 2/10/14, 9:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks!
[ ] +1 Graduate
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Sean McNamara
sean.mcnam...@webtrends.comwrote:
+1 !!!
On 2/10/14, 9:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the
+1
To clarify to others, this is an IPCM vote so only the IPCM votes are binding :)
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Sandy Ryza sandy.r...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Mark Hamstra m...@clearstorydata.comwrote:
+1
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris
+1
On Feb 10, 2014 8:28 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks!
[ ] +1
+1
--
Mosharaf Chowdhury
http://www.mosharaf.com/
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from
+1!
2014-02-10 20:27 GMT-08:00 Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks!
[ ] +1
Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for everyone, I’ve
updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to INFRA, we also
now have both pull request postings and comments on them forwarded to the our
mailing list.
snip
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors
I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text.
Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different:
related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis
on clusters.
v.
related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation
and sharing across distributed
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 7:10 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated
Message-
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 7:10 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
I think it would
Ted and Henry: Thanks for the thoughtful replies and indulging my concerns.
+1 (binding)
--David
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
HI David Nalley,
Thank you for your comment and concern, really appreciate it.
As Patrick had mentioned in his
Thanks for describing this, Andrew. We’ll do it as well.
Matei
On Feb 6, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Andrew Phillips demob...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The other option would be to somehow subscribe dev@ through the standard
GitHub watcher framework by making it the notification address
jclouds does
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:05 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
...The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the
community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind
folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen
on the mailing list...
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:05 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
...The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the
community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind
folks that things like strategy
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
... Bertrand, you originally VOTEd +1 until Craig mentioned his concerns
about accounts not having been filed. Matei and others immediately
stepped up (including myself), and explained the situation, and
filed
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the
Incubator (was Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator)
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org
wrote:
... Bertrand, you originally VOTEd +1 until Craig mentioned his
+1
Agree with Ted here. I would write more but his input is succinct and
right on.
--Paul Ramirez
On 2/6/14 9:32 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue
with some committers not noticing that their
I'm happy to see that my concerns about Spark are being actively addressed in a
professional non-confrontational manner.
The mismatch between committers and proposed PMC members has been resolved. I
guess the only missing bit is updating the graduation resolution.
The use of git for pull
, 2014 2:28 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
I'm happy to see that my concerns about Spark are being actively
addressed in a professional non-confrontational manner.
The mismatch between committers
If you look at the GitHub code reviews
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pulls), you'll see that lots of
people are contributing to reviewing. But I agree that the new committer
onboarding process should include having them do a test commit.
Matei:
Reviews being done on github
How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review
Board? If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately
mirrored on the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me.
There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not
Having developer/committer comments from a github review automatically show up
on dev@ lists will ease my concern that the git activities somehow avoid the
if it isn't on the mail lists, it didn't happen requirement.
Craig
On Feb 6, 2014, at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote:
How is doing a
This got me to thinking.
If git is the working tool of the team, and actions from the git site are
automatically forwarded to dev, how about putting release votes on git?
Could an action item be created in git by the release manager to release, say,
version 3.4.5 of the code? Voting could be
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce jo...@apache.org wrote:
How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review
Board?
One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not.
If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately mirrored
The webhooks are in place to send pr notifications from github to the
dev@lists, the problem is that comments do not get sent only the
actions of
opening and closing of the pr are sent.
-Jake
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Michael Joyce jo...@apache.org wrote:
How is doing a review on
HI Marvin,
The automatic email to dev@ list for github mirror PR, does it happen
for all ASF github mirrors or each podling need to do some setup to
make it work?
- Henry
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael
Once the mirror is setup and synced to github (24hr window for this
potentially to occur) then one of the Github Apache org admins can setup
the webhook. The project just needs to put in an infra ticket asking for it
-Jake
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Henry Saputra
Let's try this again Marvin since you're jumping to the wrong conclusions
here.
If people are concerned about work on Github not being automatically
mirrored to ASF mailing lists that's an Infra problem. They should go talk
to them to help get it addressed, which includes the possibility of
On 02/06/2014 07:34 PM, Michael Joyce wrote:
Let's try this again Marvin since you're jumping to the wrong conclusions
here.
If people are concerned about work on Github not being automatically
mirrored to ASF mailing lists that's an Infra problem. They should go talk
to them to help get it
Matei
multiple TLPs using it as their main reviewing system? Outside of JClouds I
am unaware of any others using it currently.
I think this is a good discussion to have, but we should start another
thread with it so as to not hijack the Apache Spark graduation thread with
it.
-Jake
On Thu, Feb
: Thursday, February 6, 2014 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce jo...@apache.org wrote:
How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review
Board?
One is captured to Apache controlled
: Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce jo...@apache.org wrote:
How is doing
...@gmail.com
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org,
jfarr...@apache.org jfarr...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Matei
multiple TLPs using it as their main reviewing system? Outside of JClouds
I
am unaware of any others using
I like the idea of sending these to the dev list. I’m going to open an INFRA
ticket for it.
While it seems that the current web hook only sends events when a pull request
is opened or closed, GitHub *can* email watchers for comments as well. I’m
watching the project on GitHub and I get an
The other option would be to somehow subscribe dev@ through the standard
GitHub watcher framework by making it the notification address
jclouds does that for the jclouds-mirror user (which is the one that
periodically mirrors the ASF Git repos which are the source of truth to
GitHub). See
Hope this helps to ease your concern about Spark podling readiness to
become TLP.
I am a bit conflicted. Part of me is inclined to join Craig, Sebb, and
Bertand and issue a -1. At the same time, there exist many +1s here
from folks that I respect and trust, including the mentors of the
Hey All - chiming in as an active Spark committer.
The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the
community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind
folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen
on the mailing list. That's a pretty
+1 (binding)
These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue with
some committers not noticing that their accounts were live is actually due to a
better submission and review process than most tlp's exhibit.
The spark community has more of the apache spirit in it than
HI David Nalley,
Thank you for your comment and concern, really appreciate it.
As Patrick had mentioned in his reply, this is not a persistent problem.
The reminder I sent was about particular topic which could be
interpreted as design or roadmap topic rather than review for a patch.
Rather than
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:05 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the
community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind
folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen
on the mailing list.
+1 (binding)
Fully agree with Ted's view on the Spark community.
On 02/07/2014 06:32 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
+1 (binding)
These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue with
some committers not noticing that their accounts were live is actually due to a
better
+1 (binding)
--Andrew
On 2/6/14 10:51 PM, Sebastian Schelter wrote:
+1 (binding)
Fully agree with Ted's view on the Spark community.
On 02/07/2014 06:32 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
+1 (binding)
These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the
issue with some committers not
I agree with Ted that these minor issues can be ironed out especially if
the community is open to constructive criticism as these folks are. IMHO
the health of the community is much more important than minor insignificant
shortcomings. Social development is changing many things and causing
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
...Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not committers;
some have not
even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the original proposal but
have not contributed
to the project during
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the list, I’m following up with these folks to get them accounts. I
think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were thus
never added to the repo. A couple of questions:
- What do you mean by “does not appear to be a committer” — that they weren’t
On 4 February 2014 20:26, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the list, I'm following up with these folks to get them accounts.
I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were thus
never added to the repo. A couple of questions:
-
: Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 1:34 AM
To: Incubator General general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:12 PM
Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 9:05 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
Hi Matei,
On Feb 4, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the list, I¹m following up with these folks
Hi Matei,
On Feb 4, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the list, I’m following up with these folks to get them accounts.
I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were thus
never added to the repo.
This is a significant failure of the
Hi Craig,
I am one of the mentors for Spark podling.
Currently the Spark operates via the ASF Github mirror to do review
and commit requests.
The podling uses the Github pull requests mechanism, please see how to
contribute page [1]
By definition ASF committers are people who CAN commit code to
Thanks so much to sebb, Craig, Bertrand for catching the issue.
Will work with Apache Spark PPMCs to resolve it.
- Henry
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
...Some
Hi Craig,
On Feb 5, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the list, I’m following up with these folks to get them accounts.
I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were
thus never added to the repo.
This is a
What I meant by this is that all code is reviewed by another committer and
merged by them. Different projects operate differently, but I believe this is
a very normal way to operate. I’ve been a committer on Apache Hadoop, one of
the most active Apache projects, since 2009, and nearly all
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.orgwrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:06 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
...There is a mix of ASF e-mails and non-ASF e-mails above...
That's a problem indeed, please fix the resolution to use all
@apache.org addresses.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:06 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
...There is a mix of ASF e-mails and non-ASF e-mails above...
That's a
-1 for this resolution as written.
Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not committers; some
have not even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the original
proposal but have not contributed to the project during incubation.
Regards,
Craig
On Jan 31, 2014, at
On 1 February 2014 02:04, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:06 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
...There is a mix of ASF e-mails and non-ASF e-mails above...
That's a problem indeed, please fix the resolution to use all
@apache.org addresses. They are used for example to let
https://whimsy.apache.org/ validate the IDs.
+1 for
+1
best luck, guys!
On 01/02/14 03:04, Matei Zaharia wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as
+1
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE
+1 (already voted on the community thread)
On 02/01/2014 02:00 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
+1
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq,
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 02/01/2014 02:00 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
+1
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion
+ 1 (binding).
Suresh
On Jan 31, 2014, at 9:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I’m now calling an
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to
+1
Patrick
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I'm now calling an official
+2
On Feb 1, 2014 1:15 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1
Patrick
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache
incubator (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq,
+1
-Jake
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I'm now calling an official IPMC
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion
thread:http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE
+1 -C
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I'm now calling an official IPMC
On Jan 31, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to
86 matches
Mail list logo
