On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:08 AM, amareshwarisr . amareshw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Seems the DESCRIPTION_AND_SCOPE of the project is set to the automated
and managed flow of information between systems.
I dont see any such on project website -
http://ignite.incubator.apache.org/
Looks like a
Hello!
Apache Ignite 1.3.0 release (RC2) has been accepted.
Here are the votes received:
- Justin Mclean (binding)
- Konstantin Boudnik (binding)
- Branko Cibej (binding)
- Sergey Khisamov
- Nick Tikhonov
- Ira Vasilinets
- Semyon Boikov
- Alex Kuznetsov
- Yakov
Hi Luke,
I’d be willing to act as a mentor to Kylin.
If that’s okay with the Kylin community, let me know and I’ll update
appropriate files.
-Taylor
On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:13 AM, Luke Han luke...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks Julian to step up, as previous advisor, you already give us a lot of
Signature file looks good
Hash files look good
LICENSE file looks good
NOTICE file looks good
DISCLAIMER file exist
Source compiled and passed tests
+1 (binding)
Good job guys
- Henry
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Terence Yim cht...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This is to call for a vote
It seems that 63% of the podling's PMC is affiliated to 1 organisation
(Gridgrain).
Have sufficient grounds been covered to ensure diversity and independece?
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services
Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation!
On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted
the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the
proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin
(incubating) codebase as a separate
Added. Thanks for the suggestion David.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:57 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Please consider using commits@ - that's a well known design pattern
that is used pervasively.
If you need notifications@ in addition, that's okay too, but there are
lots of things
Apache Ignite 1.3.0 released.
Maven artifacts released, sources and convenience binaries moved to
svn/~/release, site updated.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Yakov Zhdanov yzhda...@apache.org wrote:
Hello!
Apache Ignite 1.3.0 release (RC2) has been accepted.
Here are the votes received:
Thanks to Justin for his thorough review, as always.
I have pinged back the Apache Zeppelin community to see if we could
quickly address the issue.
- Henry
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Has the author of
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
If by this you mean the Incubator has taught the podling what it needs
to know, and the podling is following the best practices of the Apache
Way, then we are in full agreement. I don't see the need to single me
out
Hi,
Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that
this particular contribution is covered by
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53
(as we use the code from
https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not
merged to
Chris,
Thanks for bringing up the Tez discussion. I think that it was a great
example of a community responding to questions and criticisms in a very
open and evidence based manner.
I was strongly -1 on that proposal originally based on similar grounds to
what has been raised in this thread.
Apologies for not timely response.
Thank you Konstantin and Justin for your reviews - we have filed the
issues to track that your feedback is going to be addressed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-174
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-175
Regarding the issue raised by
The so-called diversity requirement has been discussed on this list for a
number of times. Most recent is the graduation of Flume project (back in
2012). Here's a quote from that thread (kudos to Roy; for those who want
to look it up in the archives MessageId is
Actually, given that this project was a spin-out of an internal project,
this is a stunningly low number to have achieved so quickly (assuming that
the 37% are actually active, that is).
Kudos.
+1
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:08 AM, amareshwarisr . amareshw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Seems the
I have seen top level projects, with majority of PMCs come from paid
employees of a single company, suffer of growth and development when
the employees of such company stop contributing to the project.
Going back to Apache Ignite, since it is the main core of GridGain I
doubt the project will be
Accusation of what exactly?
To the best of my knowledge, Roy has not been a part of the Ignite
discussion, nor is he quoting policy in that particular sentence, but
stating his opinion that the published Incubator policy should be
overlooked (to which I disagree). Yes, he explains in rigorous
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Accusation of what exactly?
Quoting Roy out of context.
Here's what you said: Quoting Roy out of context is not a Hail Mary you can
just throw out there when someone disagrees with you.
To the best of my knowledge, Roy
Thanks, Konstantin, for the enlighting quote. And the link leading to
nowhere.
If we take away the names of the mentors from the list (Branko, Roman and
yours) as well as those in other projects (Evans) from the list of intended
project members, the situation even grows worse. Then the number
FYI, Lens is currently VOTEing on a graduation resolution following
successful discussions thereof.
-Jakob
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com
Date: 21 July 2015 at 13:27
Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Lens from Incubator
To: d...@lens.incubator.apache.org
Present time diversity or lack of same is not a bar to graduation.
What is important is that the committers and PMC of the new project
understand how to make releases and are building community.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks, Konstantin,
While Roy is indeed a smart man, there is no BDFL in the ASF.
Quoting Roy out of context is not a Hail Mary you can just throw out
there when someone disagrees with you.
Several people, including several IPMC members have expressed concerns.
Address them properly instead of insisting on your
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Quoting Roy out of context
Daniel, unless you can substantiate the above claim I suggest
you retract your statement. In open communities an accusation
that you just threw at me carries a lot of weight and I will absolutely
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:44PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
A lot has changed in the period after the posting of Roy. Back then there
seemed to have been less concern regarding independence and diversity. We
now have a code of conduct (even though some are convinced that these are
mere guidelines
Another minor nitpick:
On the people page of the ignite website, some are tagged as PMC and there is
a tag for PMC Chair. Until official graduation, that should probably change
to PPMC and the PMC Chair tag be removed, since AFAIK podlings don't have
VPs.
-Taylor
On Jul 21, 2015, at 5:08
Sorry, which part of the quoted policy the 63% is allegedly scraping out?
For easy reference, here's the link
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
to the document containing the section of Creating an Open and Diverse
community. So far I haven't heard a single matter of fact
Is this a reply to me or to Pierre?
I have not mentioned 63% anywhere. I have stated that we have a policy
that states that a podling must have an open and diverse meritocratic
community. The link you put in your reply says exactly that.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-07-22 00:16,
On 21 July 2015 at 22:48, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/21/2015 10:39 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
Present time diversity or lack of same is not a bar to graduation.
So we should just scrap the bit in the Incubator policy that says A
major criterion for graduation is to have
Yet, the graduation of the projects like Apache Tez had happened with close to
100% PPMC employed by the same company. Shall IPMC first workout what
diversity means in numbers and then apply it to all podlings, instead of doing
this arbitrary?
And what that number should be? Would it need to be
It seems to me the spirit of the diversity statement is about project survival:
A healthy project should survive the departure of any single contributor
or employer of contributors.
So I would think satisfying that requirement wouldn’t necessarily involve a
percentage, but rather a simple
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:08PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Nitpicking time.
Your supposedly vendor-neutral web site says:
GridGain Community Edition is a binary build of Apache Ignite created
by GridGain, which includes optional LGPL dependencies, such as
Hibernate L2 cache integration and
Please re-read the quote from Roy:
There is no diversity requirement at the ASF. There is a behavior
requirement for graduation and a behavior requirement for TLPs.
We must not confuse the two.
and later
I'd urge folks to fix the docs, but I know where that leads ...
and I have no cycles to
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:30PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Thanks, Konstantin, for the enlighting quote. And the link leading to
nowhere.
Or, I didn't know that unique message Id isn't enough nowadays. Here's the
easier link for your convenience ;)
http://markmail.org/message/5l5hsygvntcx5fqb
On 21 July 2015 at 22:39, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Present time diversity or lack of same is not a bar to graduation.
Reading other lists, it seems to me that board is very concerned about TLPs
that are dominated by one company.
We (ASF) want to ensure that a project is not
Nitpicking time.
Your supposedly vendor-neutral web site says:
GridGain Community Edition is a binary build of Apache Ignite created
by GridGain, which includes optional LGPL dependencies, such as
Hibernate L2 cache integration and Geospatial Indexing. It benefits from
continued testing by
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:13PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
It seems to me the spirit of the diversity statement is about project
survival:
A healthy project should survive the departure of any single contributor
or employer of contributors.
So I would think satisfying that requirement
On 07/21/2015 10:39 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
Present time diversity or lack of same is not a bar to graduation.
So we should just scrap the bit in the Incubator policy that says A
major criterion for graduation is to have developed an open and diverse
meritocratic community.?
I think not.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:17AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Is this a reply to me or to Pierre?
I have not mentioned 63% anywhere. I have stated that we have a
policy that states that a podling must have an open and diverse
meritocratic community. The link you put in your reply says exactly
that.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:04 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
Another minor nitpick:
On the people page of the ignite website, some are tagged as PMC and
there is a tag for PMC Chair. Until official graduation, that should
probably change to PPMC and the PMC Chair tag be removed,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
The question of diversity in this case is not are we enough
men/women/whatever, the question here is is there a single corporate
entity with a deciding vote in the project?.
Actually, I would hope that the criterion is
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Nitpicking time.
Your supposedly vendor-neutral web site says:
GridGain Community Edition is a binary build of Apache Ignite created
by GridGain, which includes optional LGPL dependencies, such as
Hibernate L2 cache
On 2015-07-22 00:15, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Accusation of what exactly?
Quoting Roy out of context.
Here's what you said: Quoting Roy out of context is not a Hail Mary you can
just throw out there when someone
On 2015-07-22 00:41, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:17AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Is this a reply to me or to Pierre?
I have not mentioned 63% anywhere. I have stated that we have a
policy that states that a podling must have an open and diverse
meritocratic community. The
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:33AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 2015-07-22 00:15, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Accusation of what exactly?
Quoting Roy out of context.
Here's what you said: Quoting Roy out of context is not a
On 2015-07-22 00:47, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:33AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 2015-07-22 00:15, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Accusation of what exactly?
Quoting Roy out of context.
Here's what
The following page of the Incubator project states 'The project is not
highly dependent on any single contributor (there are at least 3 legally
independent committers and there is no single company or entity that is
vital to the success of the project)'.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:38AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 2015-07-22 00:41, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:17AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Is this a reply to me or to Pierre?
I have not mentioned 63% anywhere. I have stated that we have a
policy that states that a podling
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
The question of diversity in this case is not are we enough
men/women/whatever, the question here is is there a single corporate
entity with a
On 2015-07-22 01:17, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Nitpicking time.
Your supposedly vendor-neutral web site says:
GridGain Community Edition is a binary build of Apache Ignite created
by GridGain, which includes optional
Daniel-
This has been discussed recently in graduations for Tez [1], Drill
[2], and other projects whose continued incubation serves no purpose.
They've completed a curriculum that clears their IP and introduces
them to the ASF's infrastructure, procedures, and culture. The project
must be open,
(Sorry if the placement of this reply is wrong, but this thread is getting long
and tarting to branch a bit...)
Maybe the question we should be asking is:
Has the ignite podling demonstrated sufficient dedication to diversity that it
can survive as a TLP, and not be overly influenced by a
On 07/22/2015 01:36 AM, Chris Douglas wrote:
Daniel-
This has been discussed recently in graduations for Tez [1], Drill
[2], and other projects whose continued incubation serves no purpose.
If by this you mean the Incubator has taught the podling what it needs
to know, and the podling is
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
On 2015-07-22 01:17, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org
wrote:
Nitpicking time.
Your supposedly vendor-neutral web site says:
GridGain Community Edition
Thanks Julian to step up, as previous advisor, you already give us a lot of
help and guide.
Really appreciated to be Apache Kylin's official mentor.
If anyone else would like to help us, please also leave message here.
Thank you very much.
Luke
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Julian Hyde
This vote passes with 6 +1s and no 0 or -1 votes:
+1 Justin Mclean (binding)
+1 Henry Saputra (binding)
+1 Owen O'Malley (binding)
+1 Ted Dunning (binding)
+1 Julian Hyde (binding)
+1 Luke Han
Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors.
Luke Han, on behalf of Apache Kylin
Hi all,
This is to call for a vote on releasing Apache Twill 0.6.0-incubating.
This is the seventh release for Twill.
Apache Twill is an abstraction over Apache Hadoop YARN that reduces
the complexity of developing distributed applications.
Vote on twill-dev:
http://s.apache.org/ABI
Result on
Seems the DESCRIPTION_AND_SCOPE of the project is set to the automated
and managed flow of information between systems.
I dont see any such on project website - http://ignite.incubator.apache.org/
Looks like a copy from NIFI's graduation discussion -
Hello
The Apache Kylin team would like to announce the release of Apache Kylin
0.7.2-incubating.
Apache Kylin is an open source Distributed Analytics Engine, provides
SQL interface and multi-dimensional analysis (OLAP) on Hadoop
supporting extremely large datasets.
More details on Apache Kylin
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote:
* All of the java files are in org.apache.kylin package. Only exceptions
were in the
atopcalcite module:
* net.hydromatic.optiq.runtime
* org.eigenbase.sql2rel
Are those classes coming from a different
On 21.07.2015 03:26, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
Thanks for kicking off this discussion, Dmirtiy.
As one of the mentors I think this podling is ready to get graduated. The
process of indocrInating this group of people into the Apache Way was not
always a walk in a park and we had our share of
60 matches
Mail list logo
