Está quedando muy bien
Salva
-
Lo escuché y lo olvidé, lo vi. y lo entendí, lo hice y lo aprendí
http://open-office.es
http://salva.sbsnet.es
Antes de imprimir, piensa en tu entorno
Before
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:56PM +0100, RGB ES wrote:
Salvo por un pequeño typo ya corregido (noticas en lugar de noticias) no
veo cosas que falten en esas páginas. ¡Han quedado muy bien!
Falta traducir Release Notes! Soy pésimo traduciendo, así que si
alguien se anima a encontrar una
El 1 de noviembre de 2012 15:46, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.orgescribió:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:56PM +0100, RGB ES wrote:
Salvo por un pequeño typo ya corregido (noticas en lugar de noticias) no
veo cosas que falten en esas páginas. ¡Han quedado muy bien!
Falta traducir
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 06:43:10PM +0100, Juan C. Sanz wrote:
Lo malo de estos editores on line y también del CMS es que no
aplican los estilos.
Esta página me gustó como guía de inicio, ¡y está en español!. Lo
malo es que ninguna explica los truquillos esos de nuestro markdown,
y creo que
Hi folks,
We need one more IPMC member vote for us to be able to ship this. Can
someone please take a look when you get a chance?
I will be glad to answer any questions or concerns you may have.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After our
I was waiting this since a long time, especially since guiceyfruit is
not officially update to guice3.
It's great time to do this, as more well-known 3rd parties provide their
own extensions [1]. With such a good code base coming from 99soft
foundation, we will be good on track.
Big +1 and
Hi Simone
I like the idea pretty much and I would like to be a mentor of this
project. But I can't edit the wiki page at the moment would u please add me
:)
Thanks for bringing the project to ASF
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3
Apologies for any typos
On Nov 1, 2012 10:30 AM, Eric Charles
Hi
I noticed that the code is hosted on github but u r asking for an svn rep
while we can have a git repo, or u don't want to continue using git ?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3
Apologies for any typos
On Nov 1, 2012 11:59 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Simone
I tried to add myself to the 'Other interested people' on the wiki, but
I have not the right to edit the page.
Can you please add me?
Unfortunately, I have not enough free slots atm to commit anything, but
if you miss one mentor to reach the quorum, you can add me. I will be
able to follow
On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the Apache
Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
single-click installation of the
Hello OmPrakash,
I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache License:
1. The second entry for Apache license.
2. Something like BSD license.
The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
So
I have also found the following line of code:
./installer/src/InstallApacheFlex.mxml: var
licenseWindow:AdobeLicense = new AdobeLicense();
Shouldn't you use new ApacheLicense() here?
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
Hi Mohammad !
cool!!! this is really good news, thanks a lot and welcome aboard!!!
have a nice day, all the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:59 AM,
Hi Mohammad,
what about having SVN+Git mirror? I personally just need a SCM, don't
have a strong preference, so recommendations are more than welcome!
What do you suggest?
Many thanks in advance, all the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
Hi Eric!
sure I added you, I wonder why you guys don't have enough karma to
edit that page :(
Mentors are allowed to commit, please just let me know what you would
prefer! Having you aboard, even if not really active, would still be
fine; to be a mentor IIUC you have to be part of the IPMC.
Hi folks,
I actually wanted to go emeritus but I'm a f** idiot and therefore
would like to help here and volunteer as JSPWiki Mentor ... :-)
I'm a bit familiar with JSPWiki since a maintain a JSPWiki On A Stick
distribution and we use JSPWiki in my company on a daily base. So I have
a
On 29.10.2012 15:22, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the second release of
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
Bloodhound PPMC.
The result of the vote is summarised here:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Siegfried Goeschl sgoes...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi folks,
I actually wanted to go emeritus but I'm a f** idiot and therefore would
like to help here and volunteer as JSPWiki Mentor ... :-)
I'm a bit familiar with JSPWiki since a maintain a JSPWiki On A Stick
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are already an IPMC member, just get to work. Add yourself to
the project's metadata.
If not, and you are a foundation member, Jukka just needs to send you
off to the board for an ACK and then give you
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Eric Charles e...@apache.org wrote:
I tried to add myself to the 'Other interested people' on the wiki, but I
have not the right to edit the page.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
But I can't edit the wiki page
Hi Marvin
It is not a login problem I only have my smart phone for now and don't have
access to any computer atm that's why I couldn't
Sorry for not explaining in details :)
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3
Apologies for any typos
On Nov 1, 2012 4:15 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
Hi Marvin,
Definitively need to take more time to read the doc.
My userid for the incubator wiki is EricCharles. Can you please add me
to the ContributorsGroup?
Thx, Eric
On 01/11/2012 14:15, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Eric Charles e...@apache.org wrote:
I
I am +1 for git.
Eric
On 01/11/2012 12:04, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Mohammad,
what about having SVN+Git mirror? I personally just need a SCM, don't
have a strong preference, so recommendations are more than welcome!
What do you suggest?
Many thanks in advance, all the best!
-Simo
Hi Simo,
oh, I forgot that mentors need to be part of IPMC.
Mohammad has stepped in, so I suppose you have the quorum.
Ping me if you miss one day some mentor, I would then apply to the IPMC.
Thx, Eric
On 01/11/2012 12:09, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Eric!
sure I added you, I wonder why you
I'd prefer git myself.
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*
Hello,
I would prefer GIT, even when I am not a GIT guru. The reason is simple:
there is no way to save history when moving from git to svn. At least two
or three incubating projects had to fight with that recently (Wave, Cordova
i think). Somebody from the Apache committers started an effort to
As part of Helix incubation, we migrated to Apache Git from github and we
havent faced any problems till now and we were able to maintain the
history.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I would prefer GIT, even when I am not a GIT guru. The
On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hello,
I would prefer GIT, even when I am not a GIT guru. The reason is
simple:
there is no way to save history when moving from git to svn. At
least two
or three incubating projects had to fight with that recently (Wave,
Cordova
i
I've been participating in three different projects that were moving from SVN
to git (flume, sqoop, mrunit) and we did not experienced any issues with that
process.
Jarcec
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:09:43PM -0700, Craig L Russell wrote:
On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier
Cool.
Personally I have not the competence to do anything with git except using
it (referencing to Craigs mail).
Now... how did you do the history transition from svn to git?
Cheers
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.orgwrote:
I've been participating in three
On 11/1/12 7 :43AM, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have also found the following line of code:
./installer/src/InstallApacheFlex.mxml: var
licenseWindow:AdobeLicense = new AdobeLicense();
Shouldn't you use new ApacheLicense() here?
No, AdobeLicense is
No no no. It's migrating from git to svn that
we don't know how to do, going the other way
is largely trivial with git-svn.
From: Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, November
On 11/1/12 7 :36AM, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello OmPrakash,
I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache License:
1. The second entry for Apache license.
2. Something like BSD license.
The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one
On 11/1/12 7 :16AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the
Apache
Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application
On 1 November 2012 20:03, Carol Frampton cfram...@adobe.com wrote:
On 11/1/12 7 :16AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the
Apache
Flex SDK Installer
Carol,
There are usually two licenses - for a source release and for binary
distribution. Was the agreement you mentioned about source release
license?
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Eric Charles e...@apache.org wrote:
My userid for the incubator wiki is EricCharles. Can you please add me to
the ContributorsGroup?
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 11/1/12 1:16 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
public PGP key servers.
I presume you would like Om to publish his key.
Yes, that is required so end users can fetch it if required.
Also AIUI it is used by Nexus.
On 11/1/12 3 :59PM, Carol Frampton cfram...@adobe.com wrote:
On 11/1/12 7 :36AM, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello OmPrakash,
I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache
License:
1. The second entry for Apache license.
2. Something like BSD license.
I mention ./LICENSE file from the source release and naturally assume
this is the source release license.
Then I assume Apache source release should be generally Apache
licensed. This is not necessarily true for a binary release which can
contain compatibly licensed components.
--
With best
On 11/1/12 2:50 PM, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
I mention ./LICENSE file from the source release and naturally assume
this is the source release license.
Then I assume Apache source release should be generally Apache
licensed. This is not necessarily true for a binary
First, I'm not a lawyer. More experienced guys will tell us more.
In our project (Openmeetings) we keep the files which are not Apache
licensed in different places, e.g. at googlecode, and collect them
during the build process via wget. We do not include them into a
source release.
--
With best
Yes, I was mistyping of course.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
No no no. It's migrating from git to svn that
we don't know how to do, going the other way
is largely trivial with git-svn.
From: Christian
As was written - the repository was moved in direction SVN - GIT using git-svn
including entire history, all branches and tags. Without any issues.
We've luckily did not have to do the other way around (GIT - SVN), so I do
have no experience there.
Jarcec
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:11:15PM
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.orgwrote:
As was written - the repository was moved in direction SVN - GIT using
git-svn including entire history, all branches and tags. Without any issues.
We've luckily did not have to do the other way around (GIT - SVN), so
I'm sorry, I probably miss understood the intention here.
Jarcec
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:21:22PM +0100, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.orgwrote:
As was written - the repository was moved in direction SVN - GIT using
git-svn
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote:
I'm sorry, I probably miss understood the intention here.
Made sense to me as a response to Not sure about the entry criteria
for the GIT experiment right now, but I think it should be pretty
stable - lets ask infra?
On 11/1/12 3:04 PM, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
First, I'm not a lawyer. More experienced guys will tell us more.
In our project (Openmeetings) we keep the files which are not Apache
licensed in different places, e.g. at googlecode, and collect them
during the build
Thanks for explaining, I finally got Carol's point on installer.
I still cannot fully understand the licensing. I have checked that
installer/src/com/adobe/utils/IntUtil.as (which is mentioned in LICENSE
file as Adobe licensed) contains Apache license header.
Why do you need any additional
On 11/1/12 4:08 PM, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for explaining, I finally got Carol's point on installer.
I still cannot fully understand the licensing. I have checked that
installer/src/com/adobe/utils/IntUtil.as (which is mentioned in LICENSE
file as Adobe
Thank you, Alex
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 11/1/12 4:08 PM, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for explaining, I finally got Carol's point on installer.
I still cannot fully understand the licensing. I have checked that
On 1 November 2012 21:05, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 11/1/12 1:16 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
public PGP key servers.
I presume you would like Om to publish his key.
Yes, that is required so end users can
52 matches
Mail list logo
