Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans (incubating) parent 1

2019-02-28 Thread Mick Semb Wever


> Please vote accordingly:
> 
>  
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> 
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> 
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason


+1


Hi Eric,
 I'm a long time user of NetBeans, my involvement the past decade has been 
minimal, but I am very excited about seeing Apache NetBeans.

I was keen to try out the little tool that the Zipkin podling community wrote 
to help verify the basics on staged releases: 
https://github.com/openzipkin-contrib/apache-release-verification

Unfortunately the tool isn't 100% for use on different projects due to little 
things like folder layouts and naming.

But in the process a few things were unclear to me are:
 - what's the git sha to this release?
 - what's the gpg key used to sign?

I had to go hunt and figure them out.
I have no idea if the Incubator wishes/enforces that this information is 
provided in the vote email? 

regards,
Mick

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 2/28/2019 4:37 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> What about Bava? Blockchain Java and no offensive meanings that I can find.
>
No trademark concerns I see or commercial / OSS uses that conflict that
I see.

Note: From the USPTO TESS: "*BAVA*" is an Italian word that means
"slobber" or "drool".  Not sure if this will permalink:
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4804:rx7o71.2.7

So I'm totally +1 for Apache Slobber :-)

-- 
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171



Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 2/28/2019 4:28 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am aware of various members of the LGBT+ community being offended by 
> companies
> trying to *co-opt* the rainbow *symbol* specifically and explicitly in 
> relation to a cheap
> and easy way to show "support" or a way to be "hip" or "cool"... heck, I'm 
> offended by it as well.
>
> But that's not what we're talking about.

A) I don't speak for the LGBTQ community and hence I can only say it's a
concern and not how much of a concern it is.  Just that I'm aware of the
issue in general.

B) I think the Apache Rainbow project would inevitably have a Rainbow in
it's logo which is where I see a possible concern but again see A)

As I mentioned, I've asked if an ASF member with a better grasp of the
potential issue to weigh in.  Not much else I can say about the issue.


-- 
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

2019-02-28 Thread Markus Weimer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:57 AM Henry Saputra  wrote:
> Hope you do not mind but I have edited the proposal to reflect the changes.

Thanks!

Markus

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 3:44 PM Markus Weimer  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:57 AM Henry Saputra  
> wrote:
> > Hope you do not mind but I have edited the proposal to reflect the changes.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Markus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

2019-02-28 Thread Markus Weimer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:57 AM Henry Saputra  wrote:
> Hope you do not mind but I have edited the proposal to reflect the changes.

Thanks!

Markus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

2019-02-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

> Ask the Board to remove them. To participate on the IPMC, you should be 
> subscribed to private@

At first glance you would be asking to remove yourself btw :-)

However I assume some IPMC members use lists.apache.org or perhaps are listed 
under a different email (which is your case I think). 

And most probably do not participate. Would asking for those 100 odd people to 
be removed come across as friendly?

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Antoine Toulme
Usage check:

https://github.com/search?o=desc&q=obiwarn
No repo using the name or active. One user named obiwarn.

Google code:
https://opensource.google.com/projects/search?q=obiwarn
No hits

Sourceforge:
https://sourceforge.net/directory/os:mac/?q=obiwarn
No hits

Openhub:
https://www.openhub.net/p?ref=homepage&query=obiwarn
No hits

Trademarks:
https://www.trademarkia.com/trademarks-search.aspx?tn=obiwarn
No hits

https://trademarks.justia.com/search?q=obiwarn
No hits

USPTO:
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=toc&state=4801%3Azgp26q.1.1&p_search=searchss&p_L=50&BackReference=&p_plural=yes&p_s_PARA1=&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA1%24LD&expr=PARA1+AND+PARA2&p_s_PARA2=obiwarn&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA2%24COMB&p_op_ALL=AND&a_default=search&a_search=Submit+Query&a_search=Submit+Query
No records.

Web presence:

https://www.google.com/search?q=obiwarn&oq=obiwarn
27,000 results

No matches except for that github user.

StackOverflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/search?q=obiwarn
0 results

LinkedIn: No hits

No matches in Oxford dictionary:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/search?filter=dictionary&query=obiwarn

No matches on Spotify.

> On Feb 28, 2019, at 3:07 PM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:
> 
> I’ll change my vote.
> 
> +1 to Obiwarn.
> 
>> On Feb 28, 2019, at 3:04 PM, jonathan.r...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> -1 to Bava
>> How about Obiwarn. it is an anagram for rainbow and it sounds cool. 
>> 
>> On 2019/02/28 22:20:00, Kenneth Knowles  wrote: 
>>> +1 to Bava
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:11 PM Antoine Toulme  wrote:
>>> 
 +1 for Bava. Checking usage now.
 
 https://github.com/search?o=desc&q=bava
 No repo using the name or active. Most repos hobbyists.
 
 Google code:
 https://opensource.google.com/projects/search?q=bava
 No hits
 
 Sourceforge:
 https://sourceforge.net/directory/os:mac/?q=bava
 No hits
 
 Openhub:
 https://www.openhub.net/p?ref=homepage&query=bava
 2 hits. But https://www.openhub.net/p/bava is empty with no code.
 
 Trademarks:
 https://www.trademarkia.com/trademarks-search.aspx?tn=bava
 No hits in computer science domain
 
 https://trademarks.justia.com/search?q=bava
 No hits in computer science. Mostly sparkling wine.
 
 USPTO:
 
 http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=toc&state=4805%3Avniyw0.1.1&p_search=searchss&p_L=50&BackReference=&p_plural=yes&p_s_PARA1=&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA1%24LD&expr=PARA1+AND+PARA2&p_s_PARA2=bava&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA2%24COMB&p_op_ALL=AND&a_default=search&a_search=Submit+Query&a_search=Submit+Query
 9 records found, 5 live. None about computer science.
 
 Web presence:
 
 https://www.google.com/search?q=bava&oq=bava
 12,100,000 results
 
 Mostly about Mario Bava. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Bava Created
 the horror “slasher” film.
 
 Bava also means god in Sri Lanka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bava
 
 Finally, Bava is a conjugation of the verb to drool in French.
 https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bava
 
 StackOverflow:
 https://stackoverflow.com/search?q=bava
 14 results because a user’s last name is Bava.
 
 LinkedIn: I found one company named Bava International Ltd. They
 specialize in apparel and fashion.
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/bava-international-ltd/about/
 
 No matches in Oxford dictionary:
 https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/search?filter=dictionary&query=bava
 
 No matches on Spotify.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Antoine
 
 
> On Feb 28, 2019, at 1:37 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> What about Bava? Blockchain Java and no offensive meanings that I can
 find.
 
 
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

2019-02-28 Thread Greg Stein
Ask the Board to remove them. To participate on the IPMC, you should be
subscribed to private@


On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 15:19 Justin Mclean  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> >> Aren't podlings still required to subscribe to general@incubator?
>
> Hopefully at the very least their mentors are. Perhaps that would be good
> to check as well?
>
> 101 IPMCs members out of 295 are not signed up to the incubator private
> list. Easier this year I tried to improve that my sending each IPMC member
> not subscribed an email asking them to subscribe, a couple decided to step
> down from the IPMC and a couple signed up but it mostly made no difference.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Antoine Toulme
I’ll change my vote.

+1 to Obiwarn.

> On Feb 28, 2019, at 3:04 PM, jonathan.r...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> -1 to Bava
> How about Obiwarn. it is an anagram for rainbow and it sounds cool. 
> 
> On 2019/02/28 22:20:00, Kenneth Knowles  wrote: 
>> +1 to Bava
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:11 PM Antoine Toulme  wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 for Bava. Checking usage now.
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/search?o=desc&q=bava
>>> No repo using the name or active. Most repos hobbyists.
>>> 
>>> Google code:
>>> https://opensource.google.com/projects/search?q=bava
>>> No hits
>>> 
>>> Sourceforge:
>>> https://sourceforge.net/directory/os:mac/?q=bava
>>> No hits
>>> 
>>> Openhub:
>>> https://www.openhub.net/p?ref=homepage&query=bava
>>> 2 hits. But https://www.openhub.net/p/bava is empty with no code.
>>> 
>>> Trademarks:
>>> https://www.trademarkia.com/trademarks-search.aspx?tn=bava
>>> No hits in computer science domain
>>> 
>>> https://trademarks.justia.com/search?q=bava
>>> No hits in computer science. Mostly sparkling wine.
>>> 
>>> USPTO:
>>> 
>>> http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=toc&state=4805%3Avniyw0.1.1&p_search=searchss&p_L=50&BackReference=&p_plural=yes&p_s_PARA1=&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA1%24LD&expr=PARA1+AND+PARA2&p_s_PARA2=bava&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA2%24COMB&p_op_ALL=AND&a_default=search&a_search=Submit+Query&a_search=Submit+Query
>>> 9 records found, 5 live. None about computer science.
>>> 
>>> Web presence:
>>> 
>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=bava&oq=bava
>>> 12,100,000 results
>>> 
>>> Mostly about Mario Bava. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Bava Created
>>> the horror “slasher” film.
>>> 
>>> Bava also means god in Sri Lanka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bava
>>> 
>>> Finally, Bava is a conjugation of the verb to drool in French.
>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bava
>>> 
>>> StackOverflow:
>>> https://stackoverflow.com/search?q=bava
>>> 14 results because a user’s last name is Bava.
>>> 
>>> LinkedIn: I found one company named Bava International Ltd. They
>>> specialize in apparel and fashion.
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/company/bava-international-ltd/about/
>>> 
>>> No matches in Oxford dictionary:
>>> https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/search?filter=dictionary&query=bava
>>> 
>>> No matches on Spotify.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Antoine
>>> 
>>> 
 On Feb 28, 2019, at 1:37 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
 
 What about Bava? Blockchain Java and no offensive meanings that I can
>>> find.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread jonathan . rhea
-1 to Bava
How about Obiwarn. it is an anagram for rainbow and it sounds cool. 

On 2019/02/28 22:20:00, Kenneth Knowles  wrote: 
> +1 to Bava
> 
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:11 PM Antoine Toulme  wrote:
> 
> > +1 for Bava. Checking usage now.
> >
> > https://github.com/search?o=desc&q=bava
> > No repo using the name or active. Most repos hobbyists.
> >
> > Google code:
> > https://opensource.google.com/projects/search?q=bava
> > No hits
> >
> > Sourceforge:
> > https://sourceforge.net/directory/os:mac/?q=bava
> > No hits
> >
> > Openhub:
> > https://www.openhub.net/p?ref=homepage&query=bava
> > 2 hits. But https://www.openhub.net/p/bava is empty with no code.
> >
> > Trademarks:
> > https://www.trademarkia.com/trademarks-search.aspx?tn=bava
> > No hits in computer science domain
> >
> > https://trademarks.justia.com/search?q=bava
> > No hits in computer science. Mostly sparkling wine.
> >
> > USPTO:
> >
> > http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=toc&state=4805%3Avniyw0.1.1&p_search=searchss&p_L=50&BackReference=&p_plural=yes&p_s_PARA1=&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA1%24LD&expr=PARA1+AND+PARA2&p_s_PARA2=bava&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA2%24COMB&p_op_ALL=AND&a_default=search&a_search=Submit+Query&a_search=Submit+Query
> > 9 records found, 5 live. None about computer science.
> >
> > Web presence:
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=bava&oq=bava
> > 12,100,000 results
> >
> > Mostly about Mario Bava. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Bava Created
> > the horror “slasher” film.
> >
> > Bava also means god in Sri Lanka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bava
> >
> > Finally, Bava is a conjugation of the verb to drool in French.
> > https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bava
> >
> > StackOverflow:
> > https://stackoverflow.com/search?q=bava
> > 14 results because a user’s last name is Bava.
> >
> > LinkedIn: I found one company named Bava International Ltd. They
> > specialize in apparel and fashion.
> > https://www.linkedin.com/company/bava-international-ltd/about/
> >
> > No matches in Oxford dictionary:
> > https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/search?filter=dictionary&query=bava
> >
> > No matches on Spotify.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Antoine
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 28, 2019, at 1:37 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> > >
> > > What about Bava? Blockchain Java and no offensive meanings that I can
> > find.
> >
> >
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Kenneth Knowles
+1 to Bava

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:11 PM Antoine Toulme  wrote:

> +1 for Bava. Checking usage now.
>
> https://github.com/search?o=desc&q=bava
> No repo using the name or active. Most repos hobbyists.
>
> Google code:
> https://opensource.google.com/projects/search?q=bava
> No hits
>
> Sourceforge:
> https://sourceforge.net/directory/os:mac/?q=bava
> No hits
>
> Openhub:
> https://www.openhub.net/p?ref=homepage&query=bava
> 2 hits. But https://www.openhub.net/p/bava is empty with no code.
>
> Trademarks:
> https://www.trademarkia.com/trademarks-search.aspx?tn=bava
> No hits in computer science domain
>
> https://trademarks.justia.com/search?q=bava
> No hits in computer science. Mostly sparkling wine.
>
> USPTO:
>
> http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=toc&state=4805%3Avniyw0.1.1&p_search=searchss&p_L=50&BackReference=&p_plural=yes&p_s_PARA1=&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA1%24LD&expr=PARA1+AND+PARA2&p_s_PARA2=bava&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA2%24COMB&p_op_ALL=AND&a_default=search&a_search=Submit+Query&a_search=Submit+Query
> 9 records found, 5 live. None about computer science.
>
> Web presence:
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=bava&oq=bava
> 12,100,000 results
>
> Mostly about Mario Bava. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Bava Created
> the horror “slasher” film.
>
> Bava also means god in Sri Lanka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bava
>
> Finally, Bava is a conjugation of the verb to drool in French.
> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bava
>
> StackOverflow:
> https://stackoverflow.com/search?q=bava
> 14 results because a user’s last name is Bava.
>
> LinkedIn: I found one company named Bava International Ltd. They
> specialize in apparel and fashion.
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/bava-international-ltd/about/
>
> No matches in Oxford dictionary:
> https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/search?filter=dictionary&query=bava
>
> No matches on Spotify.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
>
> > On Feb 28, 2019, at 1:37 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> > What about Bava? Blockchain Java and no offensive meanings that I can
> find.
>
>


Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Antoine Toulme
+1 for Bava. Checking usage now.

https://github.com/search?o=desc&q=bava
No repo using the name or active. Most repos hobbyists.

Google code:
https://opensource.google.com/projects/search?q=bava
No hits

Sourceforge:
https://sourceforge.net/directory/os:mac/?q=bava
No hits

Openhub:
https://www.openhub.net/p?ref=homepage&query=bava
2 hits. But https://www.openhub.net/p/bava is empty with no code.

Trademarks:
https://www.trademarkia.com/trademarks-search.aspx?tn=bava
No hits in computer science domain

https://trademarks.justia.com/search?q=bava
No hits in computer science. Mostly sparkling wine.

USPTO:
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=toc&state=4805%3Avniyw0.1.1&p_search=searchss&p_L=50&BackReference=&p_plural=yes&p_s_PARA1=&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA1%24LD&expr=PARA1+AND+PARA2&p_s_PARA2=bava&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA2%24COMB&p_op_ALL=AND&a_default=search&a_search=Submit+Query&a_search=Submit+Query
9 records found, 5 live. None about computer science.

Web presence:

https://www.google.com/search?q=bava&oq=bava
12,100,000 results

Mostly about Mario Bava. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Bava Created the 
horror “slasher” film.

Bava also means god in Sri Lanka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bava

Finally, Bava is a conjugation of the verb to drool in French. 
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bava

StackOverflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/search?q=bava
14 results because a user’s last name is Bava.

LinkedIn: I found one company named Bava International Ltd. They specialize in 
apparel and fashion.
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bava-international-ltd/about/

No matches in Oxford dictionary:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/search?filter=dictionary&query=bava

No matches on Spotify.

Cheers,

Antoine


> On Feb 28, 2019, at 1:37 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> What about Bava? Blockchain Java and no offensive meanings that I can find.



Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Antoine Toulme
FWIW I am very happy I received strong signal that this was not going to work, 
in a timely manner.

No worries and let’s move on.

> On Feb 28, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Feb 28, 2019, at 3:26 PM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
>> 
>> On 2/28/2019 3:24 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
 
 It also seems to imply that usage of the name rainbow would somehow
 be offensive or insensitive. Again, I'm not sure how. Nor am I aware
 of situations where the LGBT+ community "has expressed concerns"
 about usage *of the name* Rainbow.
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Anyone could hypothetically be offended by anything, I could list a
>>> large number of theoretical offenses in project names. Let's please
>>> stick to *actual* feedback and not preemptively censor ourselves. If
>>> such feedback exists, fair enough, but I am also not aware of any such. 
>> 
>> I have asked off-list for someone I trust in the LGBTQ community who is
>> also an ASF member to weigh in on this but I am aware that this is a
>> concern.  I just can't articulate how much of a concern it is.  I will
>> work to get that better clarified for the podling.
> 
> I am aware of various members of the LGBT+ community being offended by 
> companies
> trying to *co-opt* the rainbow *symbol* specifically and explicitly in 
> relation to a cheap
> and easy way to show "support" or a way to be "hip" or "cool"... heck, I'm 
> offended by it as well.
> 
> But that's not what we're talking about.
> 
> And yeah, "just figure out a new name if there is any possible doubt" is
> a safe strategy, but it does edge us closer to a slippery slope.
> 
> --
> Signed Jim (who recalls the debate long ago about the Apache "Jakarta" name)
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org 
> 


Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

2019-02-28 Thread Timothy Chen
+1 (binding).

Tim

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:23 AM Cihad Guzel  wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> 28 Şub 2019 Per 11:08 tarihinde Felix Cheung  şunu
> yazdı:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:17 PM kellen sunderland <
> > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 10:15 PM Furkan KAMACI 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > 28 Şub 2019 Per, saat 08:40 tarihinde Henry Saputra <
> > > > henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> > > > şunu yazdı:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Markus Weimer 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The
> > proposal
> > > > > > itself can
> > > > > > be found on the wiki [2].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to
> > accept
> > > > the
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > TVM project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority
> > > vote.
> > > > > > Everyone
> > > > > > is welcome to vote, only Incubator PMC member votes are binding. It
> > > > would
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > helpful (but not required) if you could add a comment stating
> > whether
> > > > > your
> > > > > > vote
> > > > > > is binding or non-binding.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This vote will run for at least 72 hours (but I expect to keep it
> > > open
> > > > > for
> > > > > > longer). Please VOTE as follows:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Accept TVM into the Apache Incubator
> > > > > > [ ] +0 Abstain
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not accept TVM into the Apache Incubator because ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you for everyone who decided to join in in the past
> > > discussions!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Markus
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2b1fe9ca76422ec80b146a6b120091f2419e2f1c27d57080f39cf6f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [2]: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TVMProposal
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [3]: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#the_vote
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > -
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Jim Jagielski



> On Feb 28, 2019, at 3:26 PM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
> 
> On 2/28/2019 3:24 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>> 
>>> It also seems to imply that usage of the name rainbow would somehow
>>> be offensive or insensitive. Again, I'm not sure how. Nor am I aware
>>> of situations where the LGBT+ community "has expressed concerns"
>>> about usage *of the name* Rainbow.
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Anyone could hypothetically be offended by anything, I could list a
>> large number of theoretical offenses in project names. Let's please
>> stick to *actual* feedback and not preemptively censor ourselves. If
>> such feedback exists, fair enough, but I am also not aware of any such. 
> 
> I have asked off-list for someone I trust in the LGBTQ community who is
> also an ASF member to weigh in on this but I am aware that this is a
> concern.  I just can't articulate how much of a concern it is.  I will
> work to get that better clarified for the podling.

I am aware of various members of the LGBT+ community being offended by companies
trying to *co-opt* the rainbow *symbol* specifically and explicitly in relation 
to a cheap
and easy way to show "support" or a way to be "hip" or "cool"... heck, I'm 
offended by it as well.

But that's not what we're talking about.

And yeah, "just figure out a new name if there is any possible doubt" is
a safe strategy, but it does edge us closer to a slippery slope.

--
Signed Jim (who recalls the debate long ago about the Apache "Jakarta" name)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
What about Bava? Blockchain Java and no offensive meanings that I can find.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

2019-02-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

>> Aren't podlings still required to subscribe to general@incubator?

Hopefully at the very least their mentors are. Perhaps that would be good to 
check as well?

101 IPMCs members out of 295 are not signed up to the incubator private list. 
Easier this year I tried to improve that my sending each IPMC member not 
subscribed an email asking them to subscribe, a couple decided to step down 
from the IPMC and a couple signed up but it mostly made no difference.

Thanks,
Justin 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Changes to Website and Marking As Obsolete SVN Version of Incubator Website

2019-02-28 Thread Lars Francke
Yes please, thank you!

I asked about this a few weeks ago as this had me very confused!
<
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/42cd652f4621d55d5de51c5e84b39c1677ef92310e6f626a3b794574@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
>

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:

> Hi -
>
> I’ve been reviewing the incubator’s svn repository. In order to avoid
> confusion I am going to add README.txt files to directories (eg. [1]) which
> are now obsolete, but not obviously so.
>
> I’ve been doing so since there is no documentation on maintaining the
> content/podling/${podling}.yml files which are used by Whimsy to display
> licensing progress. I see now that in the git repos [2] that mentor.ad
> and website.ad will need to be updated.
>
> I’m planning to look at this next week and am giving the community a heads
> up. If there are suggestions for these and other changes to these pages
> then let me know.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/guides
> 
> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator.git;a=summary <
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator.git;a=summary>
>
>


Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Kenneth Knowles
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:26 PM Kevin A. McGrail 
wrote:

> On 2/28/2019 3:24 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> >>
> >> It also seems to imply that usage of the name rainbow would somehow
> >> be offensive or insensitive. Again, I'm not sure how. Nor am I aware
> >> of situations where the LGBT+ community "has expressed concerns"
> >> about usage *of the name* Rainbow.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Anyone could hypothetically be offended by anything, I could list a
> > large number of theoretical offenses in project names. Let's please
> > stick to *actual* feedback and not preemptively censor ourselves. If
> > such feedback exists, fair enough, but I am also not aware of any such.
>
> I have asked off-list for someone I trust in the LGBTQ community who is
> also an ASF member to weigh in on this but I am aware that this is a
> concern.  I just can't articulate how much of a concern it is.  I will
> work to get that better clarified for the podling.
>

But this is just a random name out of many choices. I don't think it is
even worth this amount of discussion. If there's any arbitrary, possibly
spurious, reason to avoid it, there's plenty of other names. Regardless of
this issue, I wouldn't want a name that causes people to talk about
anything other than the project.

Kenn


>
> --
> Kevin A. McGrail
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>
>


Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 2/28/2019 3:24 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>
>> It also seems to imply that usage of the name rainbow would somehow
>> be offensive or insensitive. Again, I'm not sure how. Nor am I aware
>> of situations where the LGBT+ community "has expressed concerns"
>> about usage *of the name* Rainbow.
>
> +1
>
> Anyone could hypothetically be offended by anything, I could list a
> large number of theoretical offenses in project names. Let's please
> stick to *actual* feedback and not preemptively censor ourselves. If
> such feedback exists, fair enough, but I am also not aware of any such. 

I have asked off-list for someone I trust in the LGBTQ community who is
also an ASF member to weigh in on this but I am aware that this is a
concern.  I just can't articulate how much of a concern it is.  I will
work to get that better clarified for the podling.

-- 
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171



Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Daniel Gruno

On 2/28/19 8:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

Hmm... in less than 20mins the request for Rainbow was shut down...

I'm not sure how I feel about this... The justification seems a real stretch to 
me:

 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/PODLINGNAMESEARCH/issues/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-164?filter=allissues

It also seems to imply that usage of the name rainbow would somehow be offensive or 
insensitive. Again, I'm not sure how. Nor am I aware of situations where the LGBT+ 
community "has expressed concerns" about usage *of the name* Rainbow.


+1

Anyone could hypothetically be offended by anything, I could list a 
large number of theoretical offenses in project names. Let's please 
stick to *actual* feedback and not preemptively censor ourselves. If 
such feedback exists, fair enough, but I am also not aware of any such.




But, I guess another name needs to be found...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
Hmm... in less than 20mins the request for Rainbow was shut down...

I'm not sure how I feel about this... The justification seems a real stretch to 
me:


https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/PODLINGNAMESEARCH/issues/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-164?filter=allissues

It also seems to imply that usage of the name rainbow would somehow be 
offensive or insensitive. Again, I'm not sure how. Nor am I aware of situations 
where the LGBT+ community "has expressed concerns" about usage *of the name* 
Rainbow.

But, I guess another name needs to be found...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Antoine Toulme
Thanks Kevin, your help and guidance are appreciated.

> On Feb 28, 2019, at 11:02 AM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
> 
> A rose by any other name would still be as sweet so I am +1 on the
> proposal.  Just trying to help with the naming issue and to save the
> project and infra grief of it needs to change.
> 
> But I am here to support and feel bad to throw any gunk in your sprockets.
> 
> Best, KAM
> 
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 13:59 Antoine Toulme  
>> For context Jim is the champion of the Cava proposal.
>> 
>> The point of rough consensus is to bring about strong objections and move
>> past non-votes.
>> I believe we are at that point, and I will move forward to consider this
>> thread closed with the name Rainbow.
>> I will open a pooling namecheck and move to the next step there.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Antoine
>> 
>>> On Feb 28, 2019, at 7:41 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Well, I have no doubt that the proposal is going to pass, so we might as
>> well progress on w/ that assumption. ;)
>>> 
 On Feb 28, 2019, at 10:09 AM, Kevin A. McGrail 
>> wrote:
 
 Jim, I don't read https://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html to
>> lead
 me to believe we are at that stage yet.  I think we want to have
 discussions about a provisional name first.  Specifically, "A podling
 needs to discover whether a name is suitable."
 
 Regards,
 KAM
 
 On 2/28/2019 9:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> We should simply file a standard Jira request for a podling namecheck.
> 
>> On Feb 28, 2019, at 9:36 AM, Kevin A. McGrail 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Not an objection per se but two comments:
>> 
>> 1 - Rainbow is associated with LGBTQ communities and there have been
>> concerns about it being co-opted for other uses.  For example,
>> 
>> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/02/brands-rainbow-queasy-but-bring-lgbt-lives-into-mainstream-skittles-gay
>> 
>> 2 - I cannot speak for the LGBTQ community and I support them so I
>> would
>> say rainbow would be something I would avoid.
>> 
>> In the business world I often recommend people consider made up
>> words.
>> Less chance of conflictions.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> KAM
>> 
>> On 2/28/2019 3:28 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>>> Hey folks, just checking in.
>>> 
>>> I would like to establish rough consensus. If you’re still
>> following, we have narrowed down the list to rainbow, sprocket and winch.
>>> 
>>> We have one vote for rainbow, and one for winch.
>>> 
>>> When establishing rough consensus, it’s a good idea to push
>> proposals to hear objections.
>>> 
>>> At this time, I’d like to push for the name rainbow. Any objections?
>>> 
 On Feb 26, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Antoine Toulme 
>> wrote:
 
 I ran searches for rainbow, sprocket and winch and didn’t find OSS
>> projects with those names.
 
 I personally would like to vouch for Rainbow. It does fit the
>> whimsical requirement of Apache project names.
 
> On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Kevin A. McGrail 
>> wrote:
> 
> On 2/26/2019 6:24 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>> I searched for "Jal" and came up with Japan Air Lines, which is
>> clearly a
>> really different field of use.
>> 
>> I also found the Wikipedia article on JAL but was hasty in
>> presuming it
>> described a historical language. If it is an active open source
>> project,
>> let's not collide.
>> 
>> So I'll change my vote to "Winch". I again did a quick search,
>> but sounds
>> like someone should check my work...
> Re: JAL, the airline is just not an issue.  The programming
>> language I
> think is as there are books on Amazon less than 6 years old on PAL
> (
>> https://www.amazon.com/PIC-Microcontroller-Programming-captivating-lessons/dp/190792017X)
>> 
> I don't think it's legacy just perhaps mature and things like
>> Raspberry
> Pi's overtaking the field.
> 
> Re: Winch, might be a common name and undefendable as a trademark,
>> etc.
> Otherwise, though, I couldn't find much relevant in OSS spaces
>> except a
> company called winch gate.
> 
> http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/ might help
> 
> Regards,
> 
> KAM
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Kevin A. McGrail
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
> 
> 
> 
>> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
 
>> -

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
A rose by any other name would still be as sweet so I am +1 on the
proposal.  Just trying to help with the naming issue and to save the
project and infra grief of it needs to change.

But I am here to support and feel bad to throw any gunk in your sprockets.

Best, KAM

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 13:59 Antoine Toulme  For context Jim is the champion of the Cava proposal.
>
> The point of rough consensus is to bring about strong objections and move
> past non-votes.
> I believe we are at that point, and I will move forward to consider this
> thread closed with the name Rainbow.
> I will open a pooling namecheck and move to the next step there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antoine
>
> > On Feb 28, 2019, at 7:41 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> > Well, I have no doubt that the proposal is going to pass, so we might as
> well progress on w/ that assumption. ;)
> >
> >> On Feb 28, 2019, at 10:09 AM, Kevin A. McGrail 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Jim, I don't read https://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html to
> lead
> >> me to believe we are at that stage yet.  I think we want to have
> >> discussions about a provisional name first.  Specifically, "A podling
> >> needs to discover whether a name is suitable."
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> KAM
> >>
> >> On 2/28/2019 9:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>> We should simply file a standard Jira request for a podling namecheck.
> >>>
>  On Feb 28, 2019, at 9:36 AM, Kevin A. McGrail 
> wrote:
> 
>  Not an objection per se but two comments:
> 
>  1 - Rainbow is associated with LGBTQ communities and there have been
>  concerns about it being co-opted for other uses.  For example,
> 
> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/02/brands-rainbow-queasy-but-bring-lgbt-lives-into-mainstream-skittles-gay
> 
>  2 - I cannot speak for the LGBTQ community and I support them so I
> would
>  say rainbow would be something I would avoid.
> 
>  In the business world I often recommend people consider made up
> words.
>  Less chance of conflictions.
> 
>  Regards,
>  KAM
> 
>  On 2/28/2019 3:28 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> > Hey folks, just checking in.
> >
> > I would like to establish rough consensus. If you’re still
> following, we have narrowed down the list to rainbow, sprocket and winch.
> >
> > We have one vote for rainbow, and one for winch.
> >
> > When establishing rough consensus, it’s a good idea to push
> proposals to hear objections.
> >
> > At this time, I’d like to push for the name rainbow. Any objections?
> >
> >> On Feb 26, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Antoine Toulme 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I ran searches for rainbow, sprocket and winch and didn’t find OSS
> projects with those names.
> >>
> >> I personally would like to vouch for Rainbow. It does fit the
> whimsical requirement of Apache project names.
> >>
> >>> On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Kevin A. McGrail 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 2/26/2019 6:24 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>  I searched for "Jal" and came up with Japan Air Lines, which is
> clearly a
>  really different field of use.
> 
>  I also found the Wikipedia article on JAL but was hasty in
> presuming it
>  described a historical language. If it is an active open source
> project,
>  let's not collide.
> 
>  So I'll change my vote to "Winch". I again did a quick search,
> but sounds
>  like someone should check my work...
> >>> Re: JAL, the airline is just not an issue.  The programming
> language I
> >>> think is as there are books on Amazon less than 6 years old on PAL
> >>> (
> https://www.amazon.com/PIC-Microcontroller-Programming-captivating-lessons/dp/190792017X)
>
> >>> I don't think it's legacy just perhaps mature and things like
> Raspberry
> >>> Pi's overtaking the field.
> >>>
> >>> Re: Winch, might be a common name and undefendable as a trademark,
> etc.
> >>> Otherwise, though, I couldn't find much relevant in OSS spaces
> except a
> >>> company called winch gate.
> >>>
> >>> http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/ might help
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> KAM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Kevin A. McGrail
> >>> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> >>> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> >>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> > --

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Antoine Toulme
For context Jim is the champion of the Cava proposal.

The point of rough consensus is to bring about strong objections and move past 
non-votes.
I believe we are at that point, and I will move forward to consider this thread 
closed with the name Rainbow.
I will open a pooling namecheck and move to the next step there.

Thanks,

Antoine

> On Feb 28, 2019, at 7:41 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Well, I have no doubt that the proposal is going to pass, so we might as well 
> progress on w/ that assumption. ;)
> 
>> On Feb 28, 2019, at 10:09 AM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
>> 
>> Jim, I don't read https://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html to lead
>> me to believe we are at that stage yet.  I think we want to have
>> discussions about a provisional name first.  Specifically, "A podling
>> needs to discover whether a name is suitable."
>> 
>> Regards,
>> KAM
>> 
>> On 2/28/2019 9:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> We should simply file a standard Jira request for a podling namecheck.
>>> 
 On Feb 28, 2019, at 9:36 AM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
 
 Not an objection per se but two comments:
 
 1 - Rainbow is associated with LGBTQ communities and there have been
 concerns about it being co-opted for other uses.  For example,
 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/02/brands-rainbow-queasy-but-bring-lgbt-lives-into-mainstream-skittles-gay
 
 2 - I cannot speak for the LGBTQ community and I support them so I would
 say rainbow would be something I would avoid.
 
 In the business world I often recommend people consider made up words. 
 Less chance of conflictions.
 
 Regards,
 KAM
 
 On 2/28/2019 3:28 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Hey folks, just checking in.
> 
> I would like to establish rough consensus. If you’re still following, we 
> have narrowed down the list to rainbow, sprocket and winch.
> 
> We have one vote for rainbow, and one for winch.
> 
> When establishing rough consensus, it’s a good idea to push proposals to 
> hear objections.
> 
> At this time, I’d like to push for the name rainbow. Any objections?
> 
>> On Feb 26, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:
>> 
>> I ran searches for rainbow, sprocket and winch and didn’t find OSS 
>> projects with those names.
>> 
>> I personally would like to vouch for Rainbow. It does fit the whimsical 
>> requirement of Apache project names.
>> 
>>> On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Kevin A. McGrail  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 2/26/2019 6:24 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
 I searched for "Jal" and came up with Japan Air Lines, which is 
 clearly a
 really different field of use.
 
 I also found the Wikipedia article on JAL but was hasty in presuming it
 described a historical language. If it is an active open source 
 project,
 let's not collide.
 
 So I'll change my vote to "Winch". I again did a quick search, but 
 sounds
 like someone should check my work...
>>> Re: JAL, the airline is just not an issue.  The programming language I
>>> think is as there are books on Amazon less than 6 years old on PAL
>>> (https://www.amazon.com/PIC-Microcontroller-Programming-captivating-lessons/dp/190792017X)
>>>  
>>> I don't think it's legacy just perhaps mature and things like Raspberry
>>> Pi's overtaking the field.
>>> 
>>> Re: Winch, might be a common name and undefendable as a trademark, etc. 
>>> Otherwise, though, I couldn't find much relevant in OSS spaces except a
>>> company called winch gate. 
>>> 
>>> http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/ might help
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> KAM
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Kevin A. McGrail
>>> Member, Apache Software Foundation
>>> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
 -- 
 Kevin A. McGrail
 Member, Apache Software Foundation
 Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
 https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
 
 
 -
>>

Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

2019-02-28 Thread Henry Saputra
Thanks, Markus.

Hope you do not mind but I have edited the proposal to reflect the changes.
Since the people did not actually change, I think we can continue with the
VOTE


- Henry

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:20 AM Markus Weimer  wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:36 AM Henry Saputra 
> wrote:
>
> > > What I can do instead is to restructure the proposal to have PPMC to
> > > include mentors and the PMC members from TVM.
> > > And the rest of committers from TVM will invited from VOTE from PPMC.
> >
>
> Yes, that is what I should have done in the final edits of the Proposal,
> but did not do. This is how all other incubator projects I've been in have
> done it: PPMC is mentors + leaders / founders / members of the inbound
> project. For TVM, the most appropriate thing is to have the PPMC be mentors
> + TVM's current PMC.
>
> If we agree on that, I'd like to make the change in the proposal, and leave
> the vote open.
>
> Thanks for spotting this, Henry!
>
> Markus
>


[VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.1.0 RC0

2019-02-28 Thread Seunghyun Lee
Hi all,

This is a call for vote to the release Apache Pinot (incubating) version
0.1.0.

Apache Pinot (incubating) is a distributed columnar storage engine that can
ingest
data in realtime and serve analytical queries at low latency.

Pinot community has voted and approved this release.

Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f136d3eaa9dfbab6e17b262a5542813099f2b128465d9d17ef69defd@%3Cdev.pinot.apache.org%3E

Result thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ce58034678349f82afc5f8ed2edd435875301183554f964778dffb7a@%3Cdev.pinot.apache.org%3E

The release candidate:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pinot/apache-pinot-incubating-0.1.0-rc0

Git tag for this release:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/tree/release-0.1.0-rc0

Git hash for this release:
bbf29dc6e0f23383948f0db66565ebbdf383dd0d

The artifacts have been signed with key: 44BA03AD164D961B, which can be
found in the following KEYS file.
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/pinot/KEYS

Release notes:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/releases/tag/release-0.1.0-rc0

Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepinot-1002

Documentation on verifying a release candidate:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PINOT/Validating+a+release+candidate


The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
votes are reached.

Please vote accordingly,

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason

Thanks,
Apache Pinot (incubating) team


Changes to Website and Marking As Obsolete SVN Version of Incubator Website

2019-02-28 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi -

I’ve been reviewing the incubator’s svn repository. In order to avoid confusion 
I am going to add README.txt files to directories (eg. [1]) which are now 
obsolete, but not obviously so.

I’ve been doing so since there is no documentation on maintaining the 
content/podling/${podling}.yml files which are used by Whimsy to display 
licensing progress. I see now that in the git repos [2] that mentor.ad and 
website.ad will need to be updated.

I’m planning to look at this next week and am giving the community a heads up. 
If there are suggestions for these and other changes to these pages then let me 
know.

Regards,
Dave

[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/guides 

[2] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator.git;a=summary 




Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

2019-02-28 Thread Markus Weimer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:36 AM Henry Saputra 
wrote:

> > What I can do instead is to restructure the proposal to have PPMC to
> > include mentors and the PMC members from TVM.
> > And the rest of committers from TVM will invited from VOTE from PPMC.
>

Yes, that is what I should have done in the final edits of the Proposal,
but did not do. This is how all other incubator projects I've been in have
done it: PPMC is mentors + leaders / founders / members of the inbound
project. For TVM, the most appropriate thing is to have the PPMC be mentors
+ TVM's current PMC.

If we agree on that, I'd like to make the change in the proposal, and leave
the vote open.

Thanks for spotting this, Henry!

Markus


Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

2019-02-28 Thread Henry Saputra
Hi TIanqi,

Actually for the initial committers, I believe can onboard them as part of
bootstrapping of project.

Any member of IPMC could keep me honest here too =)

Reference for Incubator PPMC for info:
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html

Thanks,

- Henry

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:36 AM Henry Saputra 
wrote:

> HI Tianqi,
>
> What I can do instead is to restructure the proposal to have PPMC to
> include mentors and the PMC members from TVM.
> And the rest of committers from TVM will invited from VOTE from PPMC.
>
> Would that work?
>
> - Henry
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:13 AM Tianqi Chen 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Henry:
>>
>> Because the TVM community already adopts Apache meritocracy and has a
>> separation of PMC and committers. Every new member(PMC and committers) are
>> formally discussed and we welcome each member in the community by
>> summarizing their contributions.
>> If possible,  we would like to keep the same structure during incubation.
>> The current PMC members are actively proposing new committers and PMC
>> members from different organizations in the past few months and will
>> continue doing so after the incubation.
>>
>> Tianqi
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:07 PM Henry Saputra 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Bit more clarifications, as new podling in Apache, the initial members
>> of
>> > PPMC consist of mentors and initial commiters of the project.
>> >
>> > I understand TVM already work mirroring ASF meritoracy [1] but we need
>> to
>> > change the proposal to follow Apache guidelines to help us cross check
>> > membership later for onboarding.
>> >
>> > If it is OK with you I will change the proposal to merge the "Initial
>> PPMC
>> > Members" and "Initial Committers", minus the mentors from ASF, to be
>> just
>> > Initial Committers.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > - Henry
>> >
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.md
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:56 AM Markus Weimer 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks everyone for the discussion thus far. Based on it, I have
>> uploaded
>> > > an updated proposal here:
>> > >
>> > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TVMProposal
>> > >
>> > > The changes made are:
>> > >
>> > >1. Rectify the language around PMC vs. PMC member. Thanks Greg, for
>> > >pointing that out!
>> > >2. Adding Furkan, Timothy and Henry as additional mentors. We can
>> use
>> > >all the help :)
>> > >
>> > > Assuming there are no further discussion points, I'd like to move
>> forward
>> > > with a [VOTE]. I'll let this sit here and simmer for another 24h to
>> make
>> > > sure we are done with the discussion phase.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Markus
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 1:08 PM Tianqi Chen 
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Thanks, everyone for helpful feedbacks. I would like to clarify a
>> few
>> > > > points being raised so far on behalf of the current TVM PMC.
>> > > >
>> > > > > PMC vs PMC member
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for pointing it out. This is something we overlooked and will
>> > > update
>> > > > the proposal to make the change accordingly.
>> > > >
>> > > > > Champion
>> > > >
>> > > > Markus has been actively engaging with the TVM community and helped
>> the
>> > > > community start the incubation process. These efforts include:
>> > > > - Introduce the Apache way to in the TVM conference last Dec
>> > > >-
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://sampl.cs.washington.edu/tvmconf/slides/Markus-Weimer-TVM-Apache.pdf
>> > > > - Help the community to start the incubation conversation(also
>> Thanks
>> > to
>> > > > Sebastian and Gon)
>> > > >- https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/2401
>> > > > - Watch the pre-incubation private list, and give helpful feedback
>> > > >
>> > > > While we do not expect our mentor to actively watch the community on
>> > the
>> > > > daily basis(many of our committers only contribute a few days in a
>> > week),
>> > > > he has been very responsive and helped us to shape the incubation
>> > > proposal
>> > > > and most importantly be a strong advocate of the Apache way. I
>> > personally
>> > > > think he is more than qualified as our champion:)
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hardware artifact
>> > > >
>> > > > INAL, however, given that Apache only releases source code and our
>> > source
>> > > > code is in the form of software source code (HLS C and we are
>> moving to
>> > > > Chisel-(scala) ). Then anyone can take the software source code and
>> > > > generate unofficial hardware release.
>> > > >
>> > > > Tianqi
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:44 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
>> > > > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:44 AM Justin Mclean <
>> > > jus...@classsoftware.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > If the Apache License works for those artifacts I think that's
>> > > > fine...
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > It probably doesn’t, but it's complex and INAL, but I have
>> touched
>> > on
>>

Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

2019-02-28 Thread Henry Saputra
HI Tianqi,

What I can do instead is to restructure the proposal to have PPMC to
include mentors and the PMC members from TVM.
And the rest of committers from TVM will invited from VOTE from PPMC.

Would that work?

- Henry

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:13 AM Tianqi Chen 
wrote:

> Hi Henry:
>
> Because the TVM community already adopts Apache meritocracy and has a
> separation of PMC and committers. Every new member(PMC and committers) are
> formally discussed and we welcome each member in the community by
> summarizing their contributions.
> If possible,  we would like to keep the same structure during incubation.
> The current PMC members are actively proposing new committers and PMC
> members from different organizations in the past few months and will
> continue doing so after the incubation.
>
> Tianqi
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:07 PM Henry Saputra 
> wrote:
>
> > Bit more clarifications, as new podling in Apache, the initial members of
> > PPMC consist of mentors and initial commiters of the project.
> >
> > I understand TVM already work mirroring ASF meritoracy [1] but we need to
> > change the proposal to follow Apache guidelines to help us cross check
> > membership later for onboarding.
> >
> > If it is OK with you I will change the proposal to merge the "Initial
> PPMC
> > Members" and "Initial Committers", minus the mentors from ASF, to be just
> > Initial Committers.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.md
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:56 AM Markus Weimer  wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks everyone for the discussion thus far. Based on it, I have
> uploaded
> > > an updated proposal here:
> > >
> > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TVMProposal
> > >
> > > The changes made are:
> > >
> > >1. Rectify the language around PMC vs. PMC member. Thanks Greg, for
> > >pointing that out!
> > >2. Adding Furkan, Timothy and Henry as additional mentors. We can
> use
> > >all the help :)
> > >
> > > Assuming there are no further discussion points, I'd like to move
> forward
> > > with a [VOTE]. I'll let this sit here and simmer for another 24h to
> make
> > > sure we are done with the discussion phase.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Markus
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 1:08 PM Tianqi Chen  wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks, everyone for helpful feedbacks. I would like to clarify a few
> > > > points being raised so far on behalf of the current TVM PMC.
> > > >
> > > > > PMC vs PMC member
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for pointing it out. This is something we overlooked and will
> > > update
> > > > the proposal to make the change accordingly.
> > > >
> > > > > Champion
> > > >
> > > > Markus has been actively engaging with the TVM community and helped
> the
> > > > community start the incubation process. These efforts include:
> > > > - Introduce the Apache way to in the TVM conference last Dec
> > > >-
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://sampl.cs.washington.edu/tvmconf/slides/Markus-Weimer-TVM-Apache.pdf
> > > > - Help the community to start the incubation conversation(also Thanks
> > to
> > > > Sebastian and Gon)
> > > >- https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/2401
> > > > - Watch the pre-incubation private list, and give helpful feedback
> > > >
> > > > While we do not expect our mentor to actively watch the community on
> > the
> > > > daily basis(many of our committers only contribute a few days in a
> > week),
> > > > he has been very responsive and helped us to shape the incubation
> > > proposal
> > > > and most importantly be a strong advocate of the Apache way. I
> > personally
> > > > think he is more than qualified as our champion:)
> > > >
> > > > > Hardware artifact
> > > >
> > > > INAL, however, given that Apache only releases source code and our
> > source
> > > > code is in the form of software source code (HLS C and we are moving
> to
> > > > Chisel-(scala) ). Then anyone can take the software source code and
> > > > generate unofficial hardware release.
> > > >
> > > > Tianqi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:44 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
> > > > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:44 AM Justin Mclean <
> > > jus...@classsoftware.com
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > If the Apache License works for those artifacts I think that's
> > > > fine...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It probably doesn’t, but it's complex and INAL, but I have
> touched
> > on
> > > > > this about this in IoT talks at previous ApacheCons...
> > > > >
> > > > > FWIW the prior discussions that I mentioned are linked below - from
> > > > > board@ so accessible for ASF Members of Officers only, but we can
> > > > > distill them as needed if a concrete need appears with TVM.
> > > > >
> > > > > We didn't go past the discussions stage at that time (2011) but if
> > > > > there's another case of hardware at the ASF I'm willing to help
> > > > > restart those discussions t

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
Well, I have no doubt that the proposal is going to pass, so we might as well 
progress on w/ that assumption. ;)

> On Feb 28, 2019, at 10:09 AM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
> 
> Jim, I don't read https://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html to lead
> me to believe we are at that stage yet.  I think we want to have
> discussions about a provisional name first.  Specifically, "A podling
> needs to discover whether a name is suitable."
> 
> Regards,
> KAM
> 
> On 2/28/2019 9:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> We should simply file a standard Jira request for a podling namecheck.
>> 
>>> On Feb 28, 2019, at 9:36 AM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Not an objection per se but two comments:
>>> 
>>> 1 - Rainbow is associated with LGBTQ communities and there have been
>>> concerns about it being co-opted for other uses.  For example,
>>> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/02/brands-rainbow-queasy-but-bring-lgbt-lives-into-mainstream-skittles-gay
>>> 
>>> 2 - I cannot speak for the LGBTQ community and I support them so I would
>>> say rainbow would be something I would avoid.
>>> 
>>> In the business world I often recommend people consider made up words. 
>>> Less chance of conflictions.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> KAM
>>> 
>>> On 2/28/2019 3:28 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
 Hey folks, just checking in.
 
 I would like to establish rough consensus. If you’re still following, we 
 have narrowed down the list to rainbow, sprocket and winch.
 
 We have one vote for rainbow, and one for winch.
 
 When establishing rough consensus, it’s a good idea to push proposals to 
 hear objections.
 
 At this time, I’d like to push for the name rainbow. Any objections?
 
> On Feb 26, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:
> 
> I ran searches for rainbow, sprocket and winch and didn’t find OSS 
> projects with those names.
> 
> I personally would like to vouch for Rainbow. It does fit the whimsical 
> requirement of Apache project names.
> 
>> On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Kevin A. McGrail  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> On 2/26/2019 6:24 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>>> I searched for "Jal" and came up with Japan Air Lines, which is clearly 
>>> a
>>> really different field of use.
>>> 
>>> I also found the Wikipedia article on JAL but was hasty in presuming it
>>> described a historical language. If it is an active open source project,
>>> let's not collide.
>>> 
>>> So I'll change my vote to "Winch". I again did a quick search, but 
>>> sounds
>>> like someone should check my work...
>> Re: JAL, the airline is just not an issue.  The programming language I
>> think is as there are books on Amazon less than 6 years old on PAL
>> (https://www.amazon.com/PIC-Microcontroller-Programming-captivating-lessons/dp/190792017X)
>>  
>> I don't think it's legacy just perhaps mature and things like Raspberry
>> Pi's overtaking the field.
>> 
>> Re: Winch, might be a common name and undefendable as a trademark, etc. 
>> Otherwise, though, I couldn't find much relevant in OSS spaces except a
>> company called winch gate. 
>> 
>> http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/ might help
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> KAM
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Kevin A. McGrail
>> Member, Apache Software Foundation
>> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 
>>> -- 
>>> Kevin A. McGrail
>>> Member, Apache Software Foundation
>>> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Kevin A. McGrail
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Jim, I don't read https://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html to lead
me to believe we are at that stage yet.  I think we want to have
discussions about a provisional name first.  Specifically, "A podling
needs to discover whether a name is suitable."

Regards,
KAM

On 2/28/2019 9:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> We should simply file a standard Jira request for a podling namecheck.
>
>> On Feb 28, 2019, at 9:36 AM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
>>
>> Not an objection per se but two comments:
>>
>> 1 - Rainbow is associated with LGBTQ communities and there have been
>> concerns about it being co-opted for other uses.  For example,
>> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/02/brands-rainbow-queasy-but-bring-lgbt-lives-into-mainstream-skittles-gay
>>
>> 2 - I cannot speak for the LGBTQ community and I support them so I would
>> say rainbow would be something I would avoid.
>>
>> In the business world I often recommend people consider made up words. 
>> Less chance of conflictions.
>>
>> Regards,
>> KAM
>>
>> On 2/28/2019 3:28 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>>> Hey folks, just checking in.
>>>
>>> I would like to establish rough consensus. If you’re still following, we 
>>> have narrowed down the list to rainbow, sprocket and winch.
>>>
>>> We have one vote for rainbow, and one for winch.
>>>
>>> When establishing rough consensus, it’s a good idea to push proposals to 
>>> hear objections.
>>>
>>> At this time, I’d like to push for the name rainbow. Any objections?
>>>
 On Feb 26, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:

 I ran searches for rainbow, sprocket and winch and didn’t find OSS 
 projects with those names.

 I personally would like to vouch for Rainbow. It does fit the whimsical 
 requirement of Apache project names.

> On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
>
> On 2/26/2019 6:24 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>> I searched for "Jal" and came up with Japan Air Lines, which is clearly a
>> really different field of use.
>>
>> I also found the Wikipedia article on JAL but was hasty in presuming it
>> described a historical language. If it is an active open source project,
>> let's not collide.
>>
>> So I'll change my vote to "Winch". I again did a quick search, but sounds
>> like someone should check my work...
> Re: JAL, the airline is just not an issue.  The programming language I
> think is as there are books on Amazon less than 6 years old on PAL
> (https://www.amazon.com/PIC-Microcontroller-Programming-captivating-lessons/dp/190792017X)
>  
> I don't think it's legacy just perhaps mature and things like Raspberry
> Pi's overtaking the field.
>
> Re: Winch, might be a common name and undefendable as a trademark, etc. 
> Otherwise, though, I couldn't find much relevant in OSS spaces except a
> company called winch gate. 
>
> http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/ might help
>
> Regards,
>
> KAM
>
>
>
> -- 
> Kevin A. McGrail
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>> -- 
>> Kevin A. McGrail
>> Member, Apache Software Foundation
>> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-- 
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Apache OpenWhisk Composer 0.10.0 (incubating) Released

2019-02-28 Thread sebb
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 14:37, David P Grove  wrote:
>
>
> The Apache OpenWhisk project is happy to announce the release of Apache
> OpenWhisk Composer 0.10.0 (incubating).
>
> Apache OpenWhisk Composer is a new programming model for composing cloud
> functions built on Apache OpenWhisk.
> Key features of the 0.10.0 release of Composer include:
> + New parallel and map combinators to run compositions in parallel
> using a Redis instance to store intermediate results.
> + New dynamic combinator to invoke an action with a name chosen at
> run time.
>
> For download links, please see the Apache OpenWhisk Project Downloads page
> at http://openwhisk.incubator.apache.org/downloads.html

Announce mails should include the standard incubation disclaimer; see
for example:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d94b89e6c4e83f2364607b47020ca715aaa7fae1a3b97b374b93ca7f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ec3d6b90a2b0054eb2f0a2e4ba2e09a594463720e2b28e75b315c693@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8993ecb33e0f73e69faabba8c1f07d3a9965a178df1698c42fc9f4b2@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

2019-02-28 Thread sebb
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 14:54, Myrle Krantz  wrote:

> Aren't podlings still required to subscribe to general@incubator?

Whimsy could check if all PPMC members are subscribed to general.
Should it?

If so, please raise an enhancement request via JIRA.

S.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates

2019-02-28 Thread Myrle Krantz
Hey Justin,

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:33 AM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> How do we make podling aware they can do this? Obvious people who follow
> this list may know, and we can ask mentors to pass it on to their podling
> lists, on document on the website and perhaps mention it in Dave’s welcome
> package idea. But would that be enough?
>

Important question!

Aren't podlings still required to subscribe to general@incubator?  I don't
know how the rest of the world figures these things out, but I mostly
followed the examples I saw here.  So we need to get a few podlings doing
this to create visibility.  We could do some combination of:

* notify all the dev lists for all the podlings
* notify just those podlings still doing releases outside of the ASF (which
you have helpfully identified)
* ask mentors to suggest it to their podlings when a release is imminent
and the mentor thinks its a good candidate for this approach.
* if a podling approaches you for feedback, ask if you can do so on the
general@incubator list.
* document it (probably the most obligatory and least effective item on the
list. ; o)

I'd also like to read Mick's feedback:
Do you think replacing release voting with release discussing at podling
request as I've suggested would be an improvement?  If so, do you have
ideas for ways to communicate this to podlings?

Best,
Myrle


Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
We should simply file a standard Jira request for a podling namecheck.

> On Feb 28, 2019, at 9:36 AM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
> 
> Not an objection per se but two comments:
> 
> 1 - Rainbow is associated with LGBTQ communities and there have been
> concerns about it being co-opted for other uses.  For example,
> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/02/brands-rainbow-queasy-but-bring-lgbt-lives-into-mainstream-skittles-gay
> 
> 2 - I cannot speak for the LGBTQ community and I support them so I would
> say rainbow would be something I would avoid.
> 
> In the business world I often recommend people consider made up words. 
> Less chance of conflictions.
> 
> Regards,
> KAM
> 
> On 2/28/2019 3:28 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>> Hey folks, just checking in.
>> 
>> I would like to establish rough consensus. If you’re still following, we 
>> have narrowed down the list to rainbow, sprocket and winch.
>> 
>> We have one vote for rainbow, and one for winch.
>> 
>> When establishing rough consensus, it’s a good idea to push proposals to 
>> hear objections.
>> 
>> At this time, I’d like to push for the name rainbow. Any objections?
>> 
>>> On Feb 26, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I ran searches for rainbow, sprocket and winch and didn’t find OSS projects 
>>> with those names.
>>> 
>>> I personally would like to vouch for Rainbow. It does fit the whimsical 
>>> requirement of Apache project names.
>>> 
 On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
 
 On 2/26/2019 6:24 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> I searched for "Jal" and came up with Japan Air Lines, which is clearly a
> really different field of use.
> 
> I also found the Wikipedia article on JAL but was hasty in presuming it
> described a historical language. If it is an active open source project,
> let's not collide.
> 
> So I'll change my vote to "Winch". I again did a quick search, but sounds
> like someone should check my work...
 Re: JAL, the airline is just not an issue.  The programming language I
 think is as there are books on Amazon less than 6 years old on PAL
 (https://www.amazon.com/PIC-Microcontroller-Programming-captivating-lessons/dp/190792017X)
  
 I don't think it's legacy just perhaps mature and things like Raspberry
 Pi's overtaking the field.
 
 Re: Winch, might be a common name and undefendable as a trademark, etc. 
 Otherwise, though, I couldn't find much relevant in OSS spaces except a
 company called winch gate. 
 
 http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/ might help
 
 Regards,
 
 KAM
 
 
 
 -- 
 Kevin A. McGrail
 Member, Apache Software Foundation
 Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
 https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Kevin A. McGrail
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Apache OpenWhisk Composer 0.10.0 (incubating) Released

2019-02-28 Thread David P Grove

The Apache OpenWhisk project is happy to announce the release of Apache
OpenWhisk Composer 0.10.0 (incubating).

Apache OpenWhisk Composer is a new programming model for composing cloud
functions built on Apache OpenWhisk.
Key features of the 0.10.0 release of Composer include:
+ New parallel and map combinators to run compositions in parallel
using a Redis instance to store intermediate results.
+ New dynamic combinator to invoke an action with a name chosen at
run time.

For download links, please see the Apache OpenWhisk Project Downloads page
at http://openwhisk.incubator.apache.org/downloads.html


Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Not an objection per se but two comments:

1 - Rainbow is associated with LGBTQ communities and there have been
concerns about it being co-opted for other uses.  For example,
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/02/brands-rainbow-queasy-but-bring-lgbt-lives-into-mainstream-skittles-gay

2 - I cannot speak for the LGBTQ community and I support them so I would
say rainbow would be something I would avoid.

In the business world I often recommend people consider made up words. 
Less chance of conflictions.

Regards,
KAM

On 2/28/2019 3:28 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Hey folks, just checking in.
>
> I would like to establish rough consensus. If you’re still following, we have 
> narrowed down the list to rainbow, sprocket and winch.
>
> We have one vote for rainbow, and one for winch.
>
> When establishing rough consensus, it’s a good idea to push proposals to hear 
> objections.
>
> At this time, I’d like to push for the name rainbow. Any objections?
>
>> On Feb 26, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:
>>
>> I ran searches for rainbow, sprocket and winch and didn’t find OSS projects 
>> with those names.
>>
>> I personally would like to vouch for Rainbow. It does fit the whimsical 
>> requirement of Apache project names.
>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/26/2019 6:24 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
 I searched for "Jal" and came up with Japan Air Lines, which is clearly a
 really different field of use.

 I also found the Wikipedia article on JAL but was hasty in presuming it
 described a historical language. If it is an active open source project,
 let's not collide.

 So I'll change my vote to "Winch". I again did a quick search, but sounds
 like someone should check my work...
>>> Re: JAL, the airline is just not an issue.  The programming language I
>>> think is as there are books on Amazon less than 6 years old on PAL
>>> (https://www.amazon.com/PIC-Microcontroller-Programming-captivating-lessons/dp/190792017X)
>>>  
>>> I don't think it's legacy just perhaps mature and things like Raspberry
>>> Pi's overtaking the field.
>>>
>>> Re: Winch, might be a common name and undefendable as a trademark, etc. 
>>> Otherwise, though, I couldn't find much relevant in OSS spaces except a
>>> company called winch gate. 
>>>
>>> http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/ might help
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> KAM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Kevin A. McGrail
>>> Member, Apache Software Foundation
>>> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-- 
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Starting at the incubator and releases

2019-02-28 Thread Christofer Dutz
Or/and the existing mentors could concentrate more on helping the podling they 
handle to become a TLP and not stay in the incubator for too long.

Even if that sometimes requires becoming more a PITA to the podlings that are 
sort of living in the incubator forever ...

And in the end we should also think about releasing (in the sense of kicking 
them out) podlings that are obviously not actively adopting the Apache way. (Of 
course after a quite large grace-period)

After all we mentors are investing our time and therefore we could also expect 
them to work on their end. 
If they don't, we could then invest the time we are wasting on them on other 
projects that might be more in need of active mentoring.

Chris


Am 28.02.19, 13:55 schrieb "Mark Thomas" :

On 25/02/2019 19:22, Dave Fisher wrote:



> To me the main Incubator problem is most podlings do not have three fully 
engaged mentors.

+1

> 52 or 53 Incubating podlings may be too many.

+1

> The Incubator may be too lenient in (a) allowing podlings in with minimal 
mentors

+1

The tricky part in all of this is that it isn't the podlings fault if 
the mentors don't engage.

We need more engaged mentors per podling. The obvious solutions to that 
are recruit more mentors (where from?) or accept fewer podlings (seems 
unfair to prospective podlings).

I think the IMPC has some tough decisions ahead.

Mark

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





Re: Starting at the incubator and releases

2019-02-28 Thread Mark Thomas

On 25/02/2019 19:22, Dave Fisher wrote:




To me the main Incubator problem is most podlings do not have three fully 
engaged mentors.


+1


52 or 53 Incubating podlings may be too many.


+1


The Incubator may be too lenient in (a) allowing podlings in with minimal 
mentors


+1

The tricky part in all of this is that it isn't the podlings fault if 
the mentors don't engage.


We need more engaged mentors per podling. The obvious solutions to that 
are recruit more mentors (where from?) or accept fewer podlings (seems 
unfair to prospective podlings).


I think the IMPC has some tough decisions ahead.

Mark

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

2019-02-28 Thread Tianqi Chen
Hi Henry:

Because the TVM community already adopts Apache meritocracy and has a
separation of PMC and committers. Every new member(PMC and committers) are
formally discussed and we welcome each member in the community by
summarizing their contributions.
If possible,  we would like to keep the same structure during incubation.
The current PMC members are actively proposing new committers and PMC
members from different organizations in the past few months and will
continue doing so after the incubation.

Tianqi

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:07 PM Henry Saputra 
wrote:

> Bit more clarifications, as new podling in Apache, the initial members of
> PPMC consist of mentors and initial commiters of the project.
>
> I understand TVM already work mirroring ASF meritoracy [1] but we need to
> change the proposal to follow Apache guidelines to help us cross check
> membership later for onboarding.
>
> If it is OK with you I will change the proposal to merge the "Initial PPMC
> Members" and "Initial Committers", minus the mentors from ASF, to be just
> Initial Committers.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Henry
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.md
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:56 AM Markus Weimer  wrote:
>
> > Thanks everyone for the discussion thus far. Based on it, I have uploaded
> > an updated proposal here:
> >
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TVMProposal
> >
> > The changes made are:
> >
> >1. Rectify the language around PMC vs. PMC member. Thanks Greg, for
> >pointing that out!
> >2. Adding Furkan, Timothy and Henry as additional mentors. We can use
> >all the help :)
> >
> > Assuming there are no further discussion points, I'd like to move forward
> > with a [VOTE]. I'll let this sit here and simmer for another 24h to make
> > sure we are done with the discussion phase.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Markus
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 1:08 PM Tianqi Chen  wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, everyone for helpful feedbacks. I would like to clarify a few
> > > points being raised so far on behalf of the current TVM PMC.
> > >
> > > > PMC vs PMC member
> > >
> > > Thanks for pointing it out. This is something we overlooked and will
> > update
> > > the proposal to make the change accordingly.
> > >
> > > > Champion
> > >
> > > Markus has been actively engaging with the TVM community and helped the
> > > community start the incubation process. These efforts include:
> > > - Introduce the Apache way to in the TVM conference last Dec
> > >-
> > >
> >
> https://sampl.cs.washington.edu/tvmconf/slides/Markus-Weimer-TVM-Apache.pdf
> > > - Help the community to start the incubation conversation(also Thanks
> to
> > > Sebastian and Gon)
> > >- https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/2401
> > > - Watch the pre-incubation private list, and give helpful feedback
> > >
> > > While we do not expect our mentor to actively watch the community on
> the
> > > daily basis(many of our committers only contribute a few days in a
> week),
> > > he has been very responsive and helped us to shape the incubation
> > proposal
> > > and most importantly be a strong advocate of the Apache way. I
> personally
> > > think he is more than qualified as our champion:)
> > >
> > > > Hardware artifact
> > >
> > > INAL, however, given that Apache only releases source code and our
> source
> > > code is in the form of software source code (HLS C and we are moving to
> > > Chisel-(scala) ). Then anyone can take the software source code and
> > > generate unofficial hardware release.
> > >
> > > Tianqi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:44 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
> > > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:44 AM Justin Mclean <
> > jus...@classsoftware.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > If the Apache License works for those artifacts I think that's
> > > fine...
> > > > >
> > > > > It probably doesn’t, but it's complex and INAL, but I have touched
> on
> > > > this about this in IoT talks at previous ApacheCons...
> > > >
> > > > FWIW the prior discussions that I mentioned are linked below - from
> > > > board@ so accessible for ASF Members of Officers only, but we can
> > > > distill them as needed if a concrete need appears with TVM.
> > > >
> > > > We didn't go past the discussions stage at that time (2011) but if
> > > > there's another case of hardware at the ASF I'm willing to help
> > > > restart those discussions to move this forward. Either to define
> which
> > > > additions to the Apache License are required, or to clarify that it's
> > > > ok as is.
> > > >
> > > > So unless there are specific objections about accepting a project
> > > > which includes hardware as a software artifact I'm in favor of
> > > > accepting TVM and sorting out these things during incubation.
> > > >
> > > > -Bertrand
> > > >
> > > > Prior board@ discussions at https://s.apache.org/hw2011_1 and
> > > > https://s.apache.org/hw2011_2
> > > >
> > > > ---

[VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans (incubating) parent 1

2019-02-28 Thread Eric Barboni
Hello Incubator Community

 

The Apache NetBeans community has voted and approved a proposal to release
Apache NetBeans (incubating) parent version 1.

 

We request the incubator PMC members to vote for release

 

This artefact is needed in order to prepare release of Apache NetBeans
(incubating) maven Artefacts

(RELEASE100 and RELEASE090)  as well as Apache NetBeans (incubating)

mavenutilities (incubating)  such as nbm-maven-plugin.

This is a maven pom containing the basic information needed like mailing

list, licence.

 

PPMC Voting thread

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1e7d7cb4f430d7f3a0fe0426eb872ba0a9ccc92
4a735dda368cf671f@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E

 

PPMC Result

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6a89d921712f7a30a1afb36c05fd7695c713891
d011eaa54aadc7099@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E

 

GIT Tag

Tag in https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-mavenutils is

org-apache-netbeans-parent-1-vc1

 

 

The release is staged at the following place:

folder
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbean
s-mavenutils/apache-netbeans-parent-1/

item   incubating-apache-netbeans-parent-1-source-release.zip

 

Staged maven repository exists at the following url:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenetbeans-1009/

 

sha512 is 

incubating-apache-netbeans-parent-1-source-release.zip.sha512

dfdf51ecaea0bc4481effd0184c52ebb371ea190b073d8ea147f4bb19b19210c89909c06a76e
8da672457b98e4f3bafac58a984ca090685e19f420c738437235

 

We have one +1 binding from Ate Douma (one of our mentor)

 

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

 

Please vote accordingly:

 

[ ] +1 approve

[ ] +0 no opinion

[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason

 

Thanks,

Eric (skygo) in behalf The Apache NetBeans (Incubating) Team



Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

2019-02-28 Thread Antoine Toulme
Hey folks, just checking in.

I would like to establish rough consensus. If you’re still following, we have 
narrowed down the list to rainbow, sprocket and winch.

We have one vote for rainbow, and one for winch.

When establishing rough consensus, it’s a good idea to push proposals to hear 
objections.

At this time, I’d like to push for the name rainbow. Any objections?

> On Feb 26, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:
> 
> I ran searches for rainbow, sprocket and winch and didn’t find OSS projects 
> with those names.
> 
> I personally would like to vouch for Rainbow. It does fit the whimsical 
> requirement of Apache project names.
> 
>> On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Kevin A. McGrail  wrote:
>> 
>> On 2/26/2019 6:24 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>>> I searched for "Jal" and came up with Japan Air Lines, which is clearly a
>>> really different field of use.
>>> 
>>> I also found the Wikipedia article on JAL but was hasty in presuming it
>>> described a historical language. If it is an active open source project,
>>> let's not collide.
>>> 
>>> So I'll change my vote to "Winch". I again did a quick search, but sounds
>>> like someone should check my work...
>> 
>> Re: JAL, the airline is just not an issue.  The programming language I
>> think is as there are books on Amazon less than 6 years old on PAL
>> (https://www.amazon.com/PIC-Microcontroller-Programming-captivating-lessons/dp/190792017X)
>>  
>> I don't think it's legacy just perhaps mature and things like Raspberry
>> Pi's overtaking the field.
>> 
>> Re: Winch, might be a common name and undefendable as a trademark, etc. 
>> Otherwise, though, I couldn't find much relevant in OSS spaces except a
>> company called winch gate. 
>> 
>> http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/ might help
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> KAM
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Kevin A. McGrail
>> Member, Apache Software Foundation
>> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

2019-02-28 Thread Cihad Guzel
+1 (non-binding)

28 Şub 2019 Per 11:08 tarihinde Felix Cheung  şunu
yazdı:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:17 PM kellen sunderland <
> kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 10:15 PM Furkan KAMACI 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > 28 Şub 2019 Per, saat 08:40 tarihinde Henry Saputra <
> > > henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> > > şunu yazdı:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Markus Weimer 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The
> proposal
> > > > > itself can
> > > > > be found on the wiki [2].
> > > > >
> > > > > According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to
> accept
> > > the
> > > > > new
> > > > > TVM project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
> > > > >
> > > > > A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority
> > vote.
> > > > > Everyone
> > > > > is welcome to vote, only Incubator PMC member votes are binding. It
> > > would
> > > > > be
> > > > > helpful (but not required) if you could add a comment stating
> whether
> > > > your
> > > > > vote
> > > > > is binding or non-binding.
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will run for at least 72 hours (but I expect to keep it
> > open
> > > > for
> > > > > longer). Please VOTE as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Accept TVM into the Apache Incubator
> > > > > [ ] +0 Abstain
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not accept TVM into the Apache Incubator because ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for everyone who decided to join in in the past
> > discussions!
> > > > >
> > > > > Markus
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2b1fe9ca76422ec80b146a6b120091f2419e2f1c27d57080f39cf6f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > > >
> > > > > [2]: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TVMProposal
> > > > >
> > > > > [3]: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#the_vote
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

2019-02-28 Thread Felix Cheung
+1 (binding)

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:17 PM kellen sunderland <
kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 10:15 PM Furkan KAMACI 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > 28 Şub 2019 Per, saat 08:40 tarihinde Henry Saputra <
> > henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> > şunu yazdı:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Markus Weimer 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal
> > > > itself can
> > > > be found on the wiki [2].
> > > >
> > > > According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept
> > the
> > > > new
> > > > TVM project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
> > > >
> > > > A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority
> vote.
> > > > Everyone
> > > > is welcome to vote, only Incubator PMC member votes are binding. It
> > would
> > > > be
> > > > helpful (but not required) if you could add a comment stating whether
> > > your
> > > > vote
> > > > is binding or non-binding.
> > > >
> > > > This vote will run for at least 72 hours (but I expect to keep it
> open
> > > for
> > > > longer). Please VOTE as follows:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Accept TVM into the Apache Incubator
> > > > [ ] +0 Abstain
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not accept TVM into the Apache Incubator because ...
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for everyone who decided to join in in the past
> discussions!
> > > >
> > > > Markus
> > > >
> > > > [1]:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2b1fe9ca76422ec80b146a6b120091f2419e2f1c27d57080f39cf6f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > >
> > > > [2]: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TVMProposal
> > > >
> > > > [3]: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#the_vote
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>