On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Flex podling from Apache
Incubator...
+1
-Bertrand (Flex mentor)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
...In their meeting yesterday the ASF board appointed Benson Margulies as
the new VP, Apache Incubator. Congratulations!...
Congrats Benson, and thanks Jukka for setting the bar very high for
him to have fun here!
[X] +1 Graduate Wink podling from Incubator
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[X] -1 Do not retire the project, because ...
As others have said in this thread there's no clear consensus.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Eric Yang eric...@gmail.com wrote:
...With respect to the voting result, but it leaves me
puzzled that why should Chukwa be retired. When there are contributors,
and there are activities for growth...
Note that there's several -1s in the [VOTE] thread on
Le 26 nov. 2012 21:06, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com a écrit :
For those voting -1, I'd like to see, on another thread, some
discussion about just how we handle podlings where there are
longstanding issues but no consensus on the PPMC
Based on the mentors additional info, and
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...growing communities is really, really, hard,
and I don't know that anyone at Apache has a recipe. If anyone does,
it might be the comdev committee...
I agree with this, the incubator is busy enough helping
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:55 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...I still think forced retirement doesn't seem the right thing in this case
so my -1 stands. In the other thread Alan now seems open to giving them
another try, i've offered to help with that (any other offers of help?),
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
While I think that it's laudable for IPMC members to step in and offer to
mentor, we should remember the danger of becoming a crutch...
Definitely - the goal of an incubation mentor should be to become
redundant, as
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...I will remind the IPMC that seven months ago the specter of retirement was
raised. A lengthy discussion ensued.
Consensus was garnered. We even added committers with the hopes of infusing
new energy into the
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Nov 27, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...URLs? My brain's too small to remember all these discussions ;-)
It's on the private Chukwa list. How can I get these URLs?...
Message-ID is fine in this case
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:24 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...Slow poddlings don't use much ASF resource so aren't a burden...
I disagree: podlings do use mentor's energy - graduating or retiring
them is a way to free up mentors for other incoming podlings.
-Bertrand
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...I'm wondering if it makes sense to do away with the diversity and vibrant
dictum and merely state that at least one person is reasonably active and that
all the PMC members are trustworthy
I wouldn't want to
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012, Greg Reddin wrote:
...What difference does it make to
the ASF if a project is very small or very slow?...
IMO, as long as there's three or more active PMC members who react when
needed, and provide the quarterly board reports, a small/slow project is
fine and
On Monday, November 26, 2012, Andy Seaborne wrote:
...One of the mentors is not yet formally a member of IPMC so
we're waiting until we have three formal mentors before calling
the proposal vote
IMO you can go forward with the vote and indicate that having Fabian as a
mentor is pending
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
...Please cast your votes on whether to accept the Apache Marmotta proposal...
+1 with a small caveat:
... = Nominated Mentors
Fabian Christ (fchrist at apache dot org)...
Fabian is not currently a member of the
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
... Would you also add the three or more active PMC members requirement? What
constitutes active?...
IMO the bare minimum is being able to find three PMC members to vote
on things when needed.
Once a project gets below
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
...Some caveats not documented there are:
- The PMC chair is still responsible for using modify_unix_group...
I've fixed the not documented bit by adding that info to
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Hence my idea to do away with the rule of thumb and stick to at least one
responsible PMC member
How will that work? IIUC your idea, the resulting PMC cannot get 3 PMC
votes so it cannot operate.
I don't want to
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Nov 30, 2012, at 12:56 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...I'd say you need at least five
active PMC members at graduation time...
...Maybe that could be a requirement, if the mentors think that the podling
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe it's been a long day, but I'm puzzled about how my predecessors
have added new years to the table on the front page without some very
fiddly text editing...
Just did it for you,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
...I didn't know announce@inc did exist...
Me neither, +1 for disabling.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
...We already started discussing a new name candidate, my question is:
what is the best procedure to vote and notify the community graduation
and the podling name change?...
IMO you need votes from Incubator
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
...Yes, changes to the SVN source cause buildbot to run the Ant build
script
AFAIK, that happens via
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/build_cms.sh
using the CMS' external build interface described at
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...2. Historically, podlings have *not* maintained this distinction, but
have waited for graduation to sort out the initial PMC members
FWIW, Flex recently started electing people as committers only as a
first
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
2. Historically, podlings have *not* maintained this distinction, but
have waited for graduation to sort out the initial PMC
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
...Not all TLDs do the same...
s/TLD/TLP/ (inheriting Christian's typos ;-)
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
...Making someone a C without PPMC gives them the power to evolve the code,
but not to help make decisions about how can maintain it, or when to
release it. Something about that, I just don't find
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Having received no traffic on the discussion thread, and in particular
no traffic at all from the PPMC, I hereby call a vote to retire
photark.
+1
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Federico Strati fede.str...@gmail.com wrote:
...I would like to know if I may explain in a short way my proposal
here and be helped and redirected in case of overlap with existing projects...
You're welcome to describe an incubation proposal here. Being
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Federico Strati fede.str...@gmail.com wrote:
...Thanks, I'll prepare a short email then.
(is it possible to attach examples in code, say a zip file?)...
URLs to code repositories are much better IMO.
-Bertrand
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Federico Strati fede.str...@gmail.com wrote:
say to put the documents and code on sourceforge, for instance ?
anywhere that has a stable public URL is fine.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
Doing some cleanup/checks for the graduated Flex podling, I noticed a
number of users at http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html who
are just members of the incubator group, and no other group (starting
from the top: acs, acymbalak, aditzel, etc.)
Is there a valid use case for this?
Hi Jukka,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
...Have you considered cutting a release with the code you already have
in place? That might help bring over some people who are now using
OpenDDR
That's probably the best thing to do right now - I'll
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Sergio Fernández
sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at wrote:
...
$ svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/marmotta
...
done.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi Christian,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
...Can we somehow find a way to highlight currently running votes?...
Isn't the [VOTE] tag in subject sufficient?
You could filter those threads to a different mail folder to make sure
you don't miss
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
...I'm opening the vote
for the below Apache Clerezza TLP graduation resolution...
+1
-Bertrand (Clerezza mentor)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
nandana@gmail.com wrote:
We know that Apache Project Branding Requirements [1] applies to
top-level projects. Does the podling have to follow the same ?...
Yes of course - if only so that the branding is ok once the podling
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
...should i cancel and re open the vote with the
updated paragraph?...
I suggest that you just reply to this message with the modified
version of that first paragraph that you suggest, and wait 24 hours in
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
...the current results are here:
http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator-votes.html
That page (should) get updated every 4 hours...
Cool - it might make sense to integrate with https://whimsy.apache.org/
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Federico Strati fede.str...@gmail.com wrote:
...Maybe you may suggest me the appropriate forum as well
As you don't seem to have code or a community yet, and there was
apparently no interest in your original proposal, it's probably better
to start
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...While I may disagree with the concept, I have no real opposition to people
attempting to spin up projects here
Me neither, I'm not opposing, just suggesting a way that might be more
efficient.
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Since we have some new proposals in flight, I was wondering about
finding some polite way to ask proposed champions and mentors about
their level of time commitment...
We could simply ask mentors to indicate on
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
...we just need one more vote, please anyone?...
You do have 3 IPMC members vote in this thread: yourself, Fabian and myself.
-Bertrand
-
To
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kevin Minder
kevin.min...@hortonworks.com wrote:
...Currently all of the mentors are affiliated with Hortonworks as well. We
can reach out to a number of other people and organizations that are
interested in the project to diversify if this is an important
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
...I'm -1 on this graduation...
-1 from me as well, I agree with Chris' points.
This looks either like an umbrella project (which we don't want
anymore) or a PMC not trusting its committers.
IMO
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Kevin Minder
kevin.min...@hortonworks.com wrote:
...Our sponsor reached out to Chris Douglas (Microsoft) and Chris Mattmann
(NASA) and they have agreed to be mentors. I have updated the proposal wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/knox to reflect
Hi Antonio,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Antonio Sanso asa...@adobe.com wrote:
...this might seems a bit off topic here but I have noticed that
http://pulse.apache.org/ is not working anymore
(and when it was working it was out of date)
That's a known issue, I have just created
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...I'd like to suggest two changes:
1) Incubation is for new TLPs only. Turn off the graduate-into-TLP option.
2) Move the short form IP clearance to Legal Affairs, to clarify that
we're only talking IP, rather than other
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
...
+1 to both, assuming Legal Affairs accepts 2)
Guys, this was my point a few weeks ago, and the question I posed to
the board
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
...I suppose if a new product + its community want to become part of a PMC,
coding could happen under that PMC (so for example: in a branch of their
repository, releases require 3 +1's by that PMC), but with IPMC or
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Andrei Savu as...@apache.org wrote:
I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Provisionr into the Apache
Incubator.
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote:
== Champion ==
* Edward J. Yoon edwardyoon AT apache DOT org
== Nominated Mentors ==
* Alex Karasulu akarasulu AT apache DOT org
...
Is Edward going to stay on as a mentor as well?
Two (active) mentors is the
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
...After spamming the private@i.a.o list, and being asked to stop it, I'd
like to suggest the following changes to the PPMC guide...
+1, and +1 to Daniels comment, you could point to the private@ thread
where this
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Kevin Minder kmin...@apache.org wrote:
...I'm asking this from the perspective of the Knox podling. We
have an umbrella Jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5913)...
Did you check http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact#requesting-podling
? It
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Nicolas Lalevée
nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org wrote:
...The EasyAnt community would like to graduate as an subproject of Ant.
The Ant PMC has just accepted:
Hi Christian,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
...I would like to commit that. Any objections? (spelling corrections
welcome, right now or after the commit)...
I like it, just a nitpick: I'd say Good examples are instead of
they should look like.
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
...in the previous discussions were no objections against the graduation
of Apache Onami...
Was there a community vote indicating a desire to graduate?
I didn't find that in the previous discussion thread.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.orgwrote:
We're also missing Ant Elder from the Nominated Mentors list no?
Fixed...
I have pasted the current version of the proposal below, so
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
...This is the community vote. It's a bit confusing that it's also cc:'d to
general@
ah sorry I missed that - CCing is not a good thing in this case, if
someone wants to notify another list of an ongoing vote they should
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
...I followed this:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-community-vote
It is wise to copy the incubator general list when the vote is proposed
Ok - I have now changed that to it is wise to
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
... I was encouraged by your change and changed a bit:...
Great, thanks!
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:56 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...I believe the following is is the current version following
the vote and discussion. If there are any further personnel changes
can we please have the discussion on private@ to make sure there is
consensus before posting
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan
srikanth.sundarra...@inmobi.com wrote:
...I am assuming it won't be an issue as Falcon used within the
Adobe/Apache Flex isn't related to Hadoop...
I agree with that - if the Flex PMC thinks otherwise they should speak up now.
-Bertrand
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan
srikanth.sundarra...@inmobi.com wrote:
...Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on Falcon
(formerly Ivory). I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Apache
Falcon into the Incubator...
I hate to slow down things, but
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan
srikanth.sundarra...@inmobi.com wrote:
...Since the VOTE is already out, I will leave it so.
However, we will continue to watch out for any serious objections/concern
with the name Falcon
Ok, fine with me - just make sure there's
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...I would offer a compromise process. If someone does not even sign off the
report for two or three months running, send an email to that person,
copying general@, asking, politely, if they wish to remain a
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
...Simple rule. If mentors don't sign two reports in a row,
shepherd checks they are subscribed to the dev list, and then contacts
them asking if they still want to be involved. If they don't answer,
then the shepherd goes to
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
...We also have 172 IPMC members to date (according committer index).
Most of the people are not seen often; we have many awol mentors.
Currently becoming an IPMC member is necessary to become a Mentor. It
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
...We already have a Apache wide announce list, which is used for release
announcements and probably can or is already used for the other things
you mentioned
Yes, see
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
...As to whether such lists should be encouraged for new podlings (probably by
putting a stub in the proposal template alongside the other lists), I can't
say that I have a strong opinion
IIUC Noah's proposal
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:35 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:52 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...Your second suggestion sounds like the thing to do to me - separating
IPMC-ship and Mentor-ship...
...I'd like to
try this, perhaps as a sort of
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@gmail.com wrote:
...As an aside it seems (and please correct me if I'm mistaken) in order to
become
a IPMC member you first need to be an Apache member (see bottom of [1])...
you don't - Apache members can become IPMC members just
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
...We now kindly ask the IPMC to review our findings and vote on the
Onami graduation...
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Bertrand, yes, I am not sold on the idea of doing it by default. But
perhaps sort of advisory, highlighting it as an option, and giving reasons
why it might be a good idea for some projects?
Yes, sounds good to me if it's
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it should be 3/4 majority.
I agree that supermajority would be better than simple majority here.
Moving to simple majority seems
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:29 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...With this new supermajority approach you'd need 75% or more of voters
to agree with you to get me gone.
Alternatively, you could say enough is enough and to end the debate
you're going to call a vote to demonstrate i've
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
...Why is it so hard to see that the board is already watching those 22
nascent projects in the same manner they watch the 137 TLPs?...
It's not.
Well, maybe it is, but up to a point. The good thing
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...Does anyone know how to cross-check this file and ldap?...
The real question might be why this needs to be duplicated (I assume)
between LDAP and a file - any advice from infra?
IIUC,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
... The real question might be why this needs to be duplicated (I assume)
between LDAP and a file - any advice from infra?
It is not strictly duplicated. committee-info.txt contains
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...Chris proposes that this
committee recommend its own demise to the board, to be replaced, in
large part, by the board itself. Every board member who has been heard
from so far has been less than enthusiastic...
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...How about the following more incremental experiment: we do what
Upayavira says: we set a higher bar for mentors at podling start time.
We ask them to make a public statement of commitment that for some
period
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
...If Mentors fall away after phase 1 ends, it's less of a problem.
Replacing
Mentors is less consequential once the code base has reached the known good
state of having made it through the release process
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...The amount of email on this list has grown beyond ridiculousness. I
propose a new required process on this list whereby anyone who starts a new
thread is required to diligently
monitor it and post a summary at the
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
...Or to create a bulldozer detector tool...
My bulldozer detector is that I stop reading. I'm probably not alone ;-)
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe,
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...What I am more worried about is where some new procedure or policy is
enacted and there's no official notice...
We could use an [IMPORTANT] tag in the subject lines for such things -
but all policy changes require a
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
You could add an {acl} entry to the top of the page restricting write
access to AdminGroup - that'd achieve making it read-only
Fow now, I've added a ''' REPORT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED - DO NOT EDIT
ANYMORE ''' warning to
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Rebecca Wood silky...@gmail.com wrote:
...I am calling a VOTE for acceptance of jclouds into the Apache Incubator
+1
-Bertrand
P.S. 10 mentors...I'll know where to look when other podlings need help ;-)
On 7/27/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As releases marked as incubated will probably
raise an eyebrow or two, what are our options?...
Seen from another angle, releases marked incubating are a great way
to help make your community aware of what's happening. Along with a
On 7/26/06, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Wicket developers (http://wicket.sourceforge.net) have expressed a
desire to incubate their project within the ASF
Big +1 here. I've been looking at Wicket recently, and from a
technical point of view I like what I see *a lot*.
Your
On 7/26/06, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Wicket developers (http://wicket.sourceforge.net) have expressed a
desire to incubate their project within the ASF
BTW, if it's useful I'd be happy to help as an additional mentor.
I'm not (yet) using Wicket though, so others might be
On 8/3/06, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...BTW, if it's useful I'd be happy to help as an additional mentor...
...We welcome you. There can never be enough mentors.
ok, so feel free to add my name to the list!
-Bertrand
On 8/11/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I think recent discussion has shown quite clearly that there is quite a bit
of disagreement on various aspects of incubation relevant to (among others) the
wicket community...
Just to make sure this is not misinterpreted: I think Leo means
On 8/24/06, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...Not sure if binding or not, I've signed up as a mentor for Wicket but
didn't participate in incubator activities before.
Currently non-binding. But, as an ASF member, you should ask the
Incubator PMC to join
On 10/12/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...The only requirements ASF should enforce on projects is that they
comply with the basic principles of the ASF in a legal and community
sense. Anything else should be handled by the community/project
itself, including how to compose a
On 10/23/06, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I and all the Ivy team and user community hope you will consider this
proposal carefully, and accept the project to join the foundation...
Late but warm +1
(assuming a +1 can be *warm* ;-)
-Bertrand
On 12/20/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...The Solr community has voted to release apache-solr-1.1.0-incubating
We now ask the Incubator PMC to approve this release
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 1/12/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Please send in your +1/0/-1 to approve/abstain/disapprove...
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/17/07, Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I have attached the updated board resolution to this
message...
+1, with this updated resolution.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On 2/2/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I'm proposing the following policy become explicit across the incubator;..
I'm +1 on the idea, with a suggestion below.
...committers may commit code they personally authored,
or with proper attribution, commit patches posted
501 - 600 of 1652 matches
Mail list logo
