The knox incubation status page website link generates a 404.
On 7 February 2014 04:49, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
The Apache Knox Incubating podling has VOTEd to graduate from the
Incubator.
The community VOTE has passed below with the provided tallies. The
On 8 February 2014 16:49, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these files?
It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for
licensing information and then generates a valid disclaimer, notice, etc.
On 9 February 2014 03:26, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Any idea why Sebb?
This page exists:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/kno
x.xml
This includes:
a
href=http://incubator.apache.org/knox/;http://incubator.apache.org/knox//a
which does
On 9 February 2014 06:47, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
WDYT?
Non-trivial; maintaining the meta-data needed to accurately generate
the NOTICE file is likely to require more effort than writing the
NOTICE file itself
I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text.
Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different:
related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis
on clusters.
v.
related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation
and sharing across distributed
On 9 February 2014 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Thanks Matei and sebb.
Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be
time consuming.
So?
Better to than being confusing, as the current thread has become.
Also it may
NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
On 13 February 2014 01:06, Dave Brondsema d...@brondsema.net wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.1.0 incubating. This will be our
second release in the incubator. Allura is forge software for the development
of software
On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6
binding, 3
to downstream
consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
required.
On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas sur...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1 (binding) from me.
Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
think while it may not be necessary
On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi sebb,
What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
file(s) involved.
Thanks
On 16 February 2014 08:24, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 1.0.0.incubating
This release has already been approved by:
+1 Marcel Offermans (marrs) (binding)
+1 Karl Pauls (pauls) (binding)
+1 Gerrit Binnenmars (non-binding)
On 22 February 2014 01:12, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating. Phoenix is a
SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a
JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase
The Incubation status page has one incomplete section:
Verify distribution rights
Seems to me it is fundamental to ensure that this has been done before
considering graduation.
On 22 February 2014 03:44, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Everyone,
After a
BTW, the copy to the dev@tajo list bounced, as I'm not subscribed.
On 22 February 2014 10:24, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Incubation status page has one incomplete section:
Verify distribution rights
Seems to me it is fundamental to ensure that this has been done before
considering
On 23 February 2014 06:58, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Sebb,
Thank you for your checking. We updated the incubation status of Tajo as
follows:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/tajo.xml
The first item of distribution rights was verified
On 23 February 2014 19:31, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Hello folks,
I have created a tez-0.3.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). This is the
second release for Tez.
GIT source tag:
On 24 February 2014 18:25, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Henry Saputra
henry.sapu...@gmail.comwrote:
Are you saying it is ok to contain compiled executed binaries if they
were signed?
I did not take a position on that.
The how-to-release
On 28 February 2014 19:48, Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1
One note is that the signatures given say sha1, but you actually have use
openssl sha to get the same values. If you do sha1sum (which was my first
assumption anyway) you get a different non-matching values. You might
On 28 February 2014 21:44, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, Sebb. I went ahead and moved the original SHA into
.sha file and re-generated the SHA1 into the .sha1 file.
@Alan, @sebb, would either of you mind verifying the modified files?
.sha1 now looks OK
On 5 March 2014 19:26, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
The ODF Toolkit website [1] does not indicate which ones are the mentors.
Do you mind just listing them in this thread for quick FYI?
The canonical location for podling status is here:
On 7 March 2014 20:16, Dave Brondsema d...@brondsema.net wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Apache Allura podling has discussed and voted to graduate from the
incubator. We've made two releases, added several PPMC members, have been
working with Infra to set up forge-allura.a.o, etc. We would now like
The Allura website does not appear to follow the branding guidelines.
The page footer does not mention Apache Allura and Allura as trademarks
Also the footer date is still 2011
The License link must point to http://www.apache.org/licenses/ - not
to a local copy of the license.
The intro.
Also, the podling status page is not complete.
On 13 March 2014 18:34, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Allura website does not appear to follow the branding guidelines.
The page footer does not mention Apache Allura and Allura as trademarks
Also the footer date is still 2011
The License
The website does not appear to have a License link.
This must link to http://www.apache.org/licenses/
On 13 March 2014 12:41, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi (I flipped the reply-to to be general@i.a.o)
+1 (binding, Mentor)
Regards,
Dave
On Mar 13, 2014, at 2:17 AM, Florian
, it may be difficult to defend Allura as a trademark of
the ASF.
--
Rich Bowen, mobile edition
rbo...@rcbowen.com
Please forgive top posting.
On Mar 13, 2014 2:35 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Allura website does not appear to follow the branding guidelines.
The page footer does
-
its back up now).
Roman and sebb had similar comments to yours, so I'll respond in a
single email.
We are self-hosting at http://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura so that
is really our home page. It has a clear download link, and git browse
link, and the text doesn't equate the project
, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The website does not appear to have a License link.
This must link to http://www.apache.org/licenses/
On 13 March 2014 12:41, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi (I flipped the reply-to to be general@i.a.o)
+1 (binding, Mentor)
Regards,
Dave
On Mar 13
.
On 14 March 2014 13:22, Klevenz, Stephan stephan.klev...@sap.com wrote:
Ok, it's all changed. Can you please have a look again?
-- Stephan
On 14.03.14 13:35, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, but although the license is an ASF license, what's important
to end-users is the license
All looks good now.
Sorry, it was a cache issue.
Thanks for the very prompt attention to these matters.
On 14 March 2014 14:06, Klevenz, Stephan stephan.klev...@sap.com wrote:
Hi Sebb,
see my comments below.
Stephan
On 14.03.14 14:46, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Home page looks good
that are missing from the site.
See http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html
In particular
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#navigation
With these changes, we are hopeful that we can proceed with and pass the
graduation vote.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:18 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 16 March 2014 03:43, Dave Brondsema d...@brondsema.net wrote:
On 3/14/14 8:19 PM, sebb wrote:
On 14 March 2014 20:16, Cory Johns john...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I think we've addressed all of the issues. Namely:
* The status page (http://incubator.staging.apache.org/projects/allura.html
On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
HI,
Just a minor thing (IMO). I was just taking a look at [1] and what strikes me
is a lack of ASF branding.
While it's clear in the text and from the domain that the project is an ASF
one, the subtitles Forge software
On 17 March 2014 15:17, Cory Johns john...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:58 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
While it's clear in the text and from the domain that the project is an
ASF one, the subtitles
that:
1) Apache wouldn't want to have SourceForge branding on Apache
infrastructure
2) SourceForge wouldn't want Apache to have SourceForge branding on Apache
infrastructure.
Are folks sure this is ok?
-Alex
On 3/17/14 9:09 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 March 2014 15:17, Cory
ASF theme started.)
That looks much better, thanks.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:06 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 March 2014 16:53, Cory Johns john...@gmail.com wrote:
Alex,
The project is Allura, which does power the developer tools at
SourceForge,
and we're using an Allura
Just wondering whether it might be useful to add a RETIRED marker file
to the top-level SVN directory of podlings that have retired?
It could just be an empty file, or it could contain a link to the
retired summary status, for example:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html#agila
I'm
On 19 March 2014 15:05, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
what has been with the rule that an ipmc must forward the VOTE to the
incubator pmc when it gets started, and those members can also cast a binding
-1 ?
IPMC votes are the only ones that are binding.
However, even a binding -1
On 20 March 2014 01:12, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I may just be missing something but I don't see any MD5 or signed files in
the release area from the mirror the download page took me to. [1] they do
seem to be in RC4 [2] so it may be they just not been copied over
On 21 March 2014 00:03, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, at 07:09 AM, sebb wrote:
Just wondering whether it might be useful to add a RETIRED marker file
to the top-level SVN directory of podlings that have retired?
Good idea.
Add that as another step to:
http
I wanted an easy way to get a summary list of podlings with their
status, so I created another stylesheet [1] to process podlings.xml
and generate 4 CSV files, and added a new target to the build script.
The command ant generate-summary will generate the following files in target/
current.txt
The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings
past and present in a single rather long page.
It might be better to have individual pages for the
current/graduated/retired podlings, with a much simpler one-line
summary of all the podlings on the existing page.
The summary
There is still a large SVN tree under
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/callback/
Callback was originally PhoneGap and is now Cordova
Anyone know whether this SVN tree should be kept - in which case maybe
it should be renamed to cordova - or deleted?
At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that
podlings.xml has been updated.
Some podlings may include a note on their status page (Alois), others
(Awf) don't.
Neither Alois nor Awf have any indication on their web-pages that the
podling has been retired.
As well as
On 24 March 2014 21:09, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:17 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that
podlings.xml has been updated.
Some podlings may include a note on their status page
On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings
past and present in a single rather long page.
It might be better to have individual pages
On 25 March 2014 01:18, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 12:06 PM, sebb wrote:
On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project List [1] currently shows full
On 25 March 2014 01:46, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
sebb:
Not always, for example
OpenOffice.org = ooo
The usecase for the resourcename (perhaps resourceAlias) is to access SVN
Repositories are linked from the podling status page, though it is admittedly
On 25 March 2014 06:14, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 01:14 PM, sebb wrote:
On 25 March 2014 01:46, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
sebb:
Not always, for example
OpenOffice.org = ooo
The usecase for the resourcename (perhaps
On 25 March 2014 18:11, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you update your notice file? [1]
Please don't; that does not look like a correct NOTICE file.
See
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#simple (et seq.)
- John
[1]:
On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix
is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed
as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables
=025a07c64d8f4a68d1c13b3022fe7375bbacfbb4
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:31 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2014 18:11, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you update your notice file? [1]
Please don't; that does not look like a correct NOTICE file.
See
http://www.apache.org/dev
On 25 March 2014 21:56, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
[...]
The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
https
to
the source code control system.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2014 21:56, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote
The 4.0.0 release has the same problems as the 3.0.0 release.
Spurious files in source bundle
Incorrect NOTICE file in binary bundle
Source bundle does not agree with Git tag even after allowing for the
spurious RAT files - some other files have differences from the tag.
There are also some files
On 25 March 2014 22:27, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the detailed review, Sebb. We really appreciate you spending
your time going through this. Here's the list of TODOs for us:
1) In the binary bundle:
a) Fix the copy/paste error for the URL to SQLLine
,
James
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2014 22:27, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the detailed review, Sebb. We really appreciate you spending
your time going through
On 25 March 2014 23:48, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
Ah, I see. Thanks, Sebb. So we should modify our LICENSE file as indicated
in http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps instead
of listing these in our LICENSE file. Since all licenses are either Apache
On 26 March 2014 00:23, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:07 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
HBase is ASF code surely?
So why does it need mentioning? - unless its NOTICE file has some
attributions that relate to what you are bundling
Yes, HBase is ASF
On 26 March 2014 00:39, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:28 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 March 2014 00:23, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
I think I was confused by the
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps
On 26 March 2014 22:45, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
Marvin -
The one example in that email thread (airavata), has a bunch of copyright
notices in there NOTICE file:
https://github.com/apache/airavata/blob/master/modules/distribution/airavata-server/src/main/resources/NOTICE
Is
On 26 March 2014 19:59, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
Below is our updated NOTICE (which includes the copyright for the bundled
bits) and LICENSE (minus the standard Apache 2.0 part).
Would appreciate a review.
Thanks,
James
* NOTICE
On 26 March 2014 23:55, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting a release ready for Apache Phoenix (incubating) and have a
question about where copyright information should go for our binary
distribution. It seems that there's quite a bit of variation, as all
projects
On 27 March 2014 00:52, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
Where does the copyright information go in our case?
What copyright information?
Where was it originally?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 March 2014 23:55, James Taylor jamestay
On 29 March 2014 04:08, Sravya Tirukkovalur sra...@cloudera.com wrote:
I cherry-picked the above commit (Sentry-119) into the 1.3.0 local release
branch.
Now the size of the artifact is 335K and it also has the required files
like DISCLAMIER. I can go ahead and push the change if thats ok.
On 30 March 2014 09:03, Siddharth Seth ss...@apache.org wrote:
I have created a tez-0.4.0-incubating release candidate (rc0).
GIT source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-tez.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-0.4.0-incubating-rc0(commit
hash
On 30 March 2014 12:46, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 March 2014 09:03, Siddharth Seth ss...@apache.org wrote:
I have created a tez-0.4.0-incubating release candidate (rc0).
GIT source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-tez.git;a=log;h=refs/tags
On 31 March 2014 02:51, Siddharth Seth ss...@apache.org wrote:
Sebb, Thanks for taking a look at the release.
Will use a newline for the git/svn revision next time around.
Generated the hashes using openssl dgst -sha512 fileName. I'll change
the format on the next release.
The jar files
On 31 March 2014 20:55, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:31 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The jar files are also distributions and must therefore have embedded
NOTICE and LICENSE files, e.g. in the META-INF directory.
Does this warrant a new RC
On 2 April 2014 02:44, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
HI,
While Apache Flex is not an incubating project I think this discussion may be
useful for incubating projects in a similar situation.
We just getting together the first release of Apache Flex FlexUnit4. In
Apache Flex
On 2 April 2014 12:03, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
What do you mean by correct?
The have the correct copyright and licence header. ie the Adobe files have a
BSD license and are copyright Adobe.
The LICENSE file must include the text - or provide a pointer to a
local
There have been a couple of graduations recently where (I think) the
podling expected to be able to specify the initial list of committers
as different from the PMC. In at least one case the podling did not
realise that the names on the board resolution comprise the initial
PMC.
I think there are
On 3 April 2014 06:04, Terence Yim cht...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
This is to call for a vote for releasing twill-0.2.0-incubating. This
is the second release for Twill.
Vote on twill-dev:
http://s.apache.org/ZJP
Result on vote on twill-dev:
http://s.apache.org/ksD
The source tarball,
I made a start adding RETIRED markers to retired podlings, but stalled
because updates are needed to the svn mailer configuration and then
authorization.
However it now occurs to me that it might be easier to navigate the
incubator svn tree if the retired podling svn trees were moved under
On 7 April 2014 15:43, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
On Apr 7, 2014, at 2:39 AM, sebb wrote:
I made a start adding RETIRED markers to retired podlings, but stalled
because updates are needed to the svn mailer configuration and then
authorization.
However it now occurs
This reminds me:
I assume the podling is aware that the names listed in the proposed
board resolution will become the initial PMC?
i.e. everyone listed in the resolution will become a PMC member (and committer).
There was at least one recent graduation where this was not understood.
They
On 1 May 2014 15:16, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
Since there were no issues raised on the DISCUSS thread, I will start the
graduation vote now.
There was 1 issue:
Mohammad Noureldin does not want to be part of the initial PMC
Also I asked if the podling is aware that the initial
Done
On 11 May 2014 07:03, Gary Helmling ghelml...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I need write access to the incubator wiki to post the Twill report for the
board.
My username is GaryHelmling.
My apologies if this message shows up twice. I originally sent a request
during the mail outage, but
On 19 May 2014 22:09, Seetharam Venkatesh venkat...@innerzeal.com wrote:
Hello folks,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Falcon 0.5 incubating release.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 8 +1's.
Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/xtf
Results thread: Apache mail is
On 3 June 2014 22:19, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm
think users@ can be used quickly. Is it really an issue?
Incubation should be used to build up the developer community.
Adding a user list may lead to fragmentation.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog:
On 16 June 2014 08:56, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-06-16 0:36 GMT+02:00 Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net:
On 06/13/2014 05:17 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Personally, I don't feel this is a big deal. The PMC size is appropriate
given the overall project size. That
On 29 June 2014 01:02, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is vote for Samza's 0.7.0 release. The PPMC vote passed 6x+1 6
(Martin, Jakob, Yan, Sriram, Zhijie, Garry):
http://bit.ly/samza070releasevote
The release candidate can be downloaded from here:
On 1 July 2014 05:16, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Hello folks
Tez entered incubation in February, 2013. Since then, we have made progress
towards graduation[1]. The Tez community recently voted positively towards
graduation[2] with 27 +1s.
Of the 27, there were 5 IPMC votes from
On 17 July 2014 15:20, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess it is about mvn dependency:tree analysis.
No, that just shows the run-time dependencies.
What's important is what is actually included (bundled) in the release
archives (source and binary).
The NOTICE and LICENSE
On 8 August 2014 18:12, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Hi Ted,
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I think that it is important that *all* dependency licenses be
documented in the source release. Speaking as a consumer, I need to know
On 11 August 2014 01:42, ti...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tillw
Date: Mon Aug 11 00:42:15 2014
New Revision: 1617185
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617185
Log:
fix VXQuery incubation status page
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/vxquery.xml
Modified:
On 11 August 2014 15:26, Till Westmann westm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 Aug 2014, at 5:31, sebb wrote:
On 11 August 2014 01:42, ti...@apache.org wrote:
/section
section id=Description
titleDescription/title
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
section id=News
titleNews/title
ul
On 8 June 2011 07:47, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Can the people below be added to the incubator group so they can
update the ONGL website? I have hear our inc-chair is ooo (wow, that
acronym got somehow hijiacked in this list) - do we have a deputy
handling it?
On 14 June 2011 19:39, Richard Frovarp rfrov...@apache.org wrote:
On 06/14/2011 12:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:43:21PM -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote:
Please vote on the release cndidate for Apache Droids Incubating,
version 0.1-incubating. I've received one
On 12 June 2011 04:43, Richard Frovarp rfrov...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote on the release cndidate for Apache Droids Incubating, version
0.1-incubating. I've received one binding IPMC +1 votes and 2 non-binding +1
votes.
PPMC release vote thread:
On 16 June 2011 17:29, Richard Frovarp rfrov...@apache.org wrote:
On 06/15/2011 08:47 PM, sebb wrote:
On 12 June 2011 04:43, Richard Frovarprfrov...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote on the release cndidate for Apache Droids Incubating, version
0.1-incubating. I've received one binding IPMC +1
On 18 June 2011 02:12, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Also, is there a retired-podlings url that the Attic can link to?
There is a default link generated from the section title.
However i just created explicit links. So after rsync
it will be:
On 22 June 2011 06:04, dan haywood d...@haywood-associates.co.uk wrote:
This is the first release of Apache Isis (incubating).
We have already received 3 binding IPMC votes during the PPMC voting
[1,2], so I'm requesting a 72 hour lazy consensus before releasing
the artifacts.
Please vote
On 23 June 2011 10:37, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi Sebb!
Txs for catching this!
Just to make sure we are looking at the same source distribution. I took the
one I reviewed from here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheisis-070/org/apache/isis/isis
On 16 August 2011 01:24, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Christian,
The referenced guide now contains this language:
After root creates the new account, the new committer needs to added to both
the committer-? section and the podling section of the
On 16 August 2011 04:07, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Sebb,
Please feel free to update the document as you see fit. CTR.
OK, I'll give that a try;
However not sure I have enough karma (I'll find out).
Turns out the incubator group is also set up by infra if the incubator
On 16 August 2011 12:25, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 August 2011 04:07, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Sebb,
Please feel free to update the document as you see fit. CTR.
OK, I'll give that a try;
However not sure I have enough karma (I'll find out).
I've updated
On 17 August 2011 00:54, David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I just uploaded the second release candidate for Deltacloud 0.4.0. The rc is
available from http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.4.0/rc2/
Is there an SVN tag that corresponds with the release?
Also, what
On 15 August 2011 19:20, Richard Frovarp rfrov...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote on the release candidate for Apache Droids Incubating, version
0.1-incubating. I've received one binding IPMC +1 votes and 4 non-binding +1
votes.
PPMC release vote thread:
The incubator LDAP unix group is used to allow podling committers to
update the incubator websites (the html files are owned by the
incubator group).
The group is supposed to be updated when new accounts are created
(Infra for new incubator accounts) or when existing committers are
added to a
On 17 August 2011 18:35, Richard Frovarp rfrov...@apache.org wrote:
On 08/17/2011 10:41 AM, sebb wrote:
On 15 August 2011 19:20, Richard Frovarprfrov...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote on the release candidate for Apache Droids Incubating,
version
0.1-incubating. I've received one binding
201 - 300 of 1541 matches
Mail list logo
