Re: release votes - should there be a minimum number of days that the vote is open for?
Hi PJ, If we look at the Release policy it states that it SHOULD remain open for at least 72 hours [1]. In case we are talking about an emergency release/patch the 72 hours rule can be ignored. Cheers, Hans [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval On 1 Jul 2023 at 13:14 +0200, general@incubator.apache.org, wrote: > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
Re: [QUESTION] are binary distributions/releases required?
Isn't staging for release on maven central the same as creating binary convenience artifacts? Staging to the ASF nexus to then be pushed to maven central is part of your release process [1] Cheers, Hans [1] https://infra.apache.org/publishing-maven-artifacts.html On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 20:15, PJ Fanning wrote: > Thanks Julian for clarifying the terminology. > > I think the general consensus in the Pekko team is that there is no call > for creating binary artifacts distributions (example [1]). > > The initial user base of Pekko are users who currently use Akka but > dislike the move to Business Source License 1.1. This user base are happy > with jars released to Maven Central and we will be providing these as a > convenience to our users. > > If and when the source releases are approved and released, jars built at > the same time as the source release will be published to Maven Central. > > [1] > https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/logging/log4j/2.19.0/apache-log4j-2.19.0-bin.zip > > > On 2023/02/08 16:46:03 Julian Hyde wrote: > > It’s useful to clarify the terminology. There’s no such thing as a > “binary > > release”. Release policy [1] says: > > > > > Every ASF release MUST contain one or more source packages > > > > > All releases are in the form of the source materials needed to make > > changes > > > to the software being released. > > > > > > As a convenience to users that might not have the appropriate tools to > > build a > > > compiled version of the source, binary/bytecode packages MAY be > > distributed > > > alongside official Apache releases.” > > > > The binary packages that may accompany a release are generally referred > to > > as “binary artifacts” of the release. > > > > Julian > > > > [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#artifacts > > > > On Feb 8, 2023, at 7:19 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > Hi PJ, > > > > Daffodil uses sbt and produces binary releases - > > https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.4.0/ > > - https://GitHub.com/Apache/daffodil/ > > > > Best, > > Dave > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Feb 8, 2023, at 6:33 AM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > The release management guide [1] only mentions 'source releases'. Every > > Apache project that I am familiar with also does binary releases. For > > applications, this makes sense - having a zip/tgz file that you can > > download and extract - that you can then readily start the application > > using a shell script. For libs, I'm sure these binary releases can be > > useful too but I'm wondering if they are strictly required. > > > > > > Apache Pekko is a set of libraries as opposed to an application. Our > build > > uses the sbt build tool and there isn't anything that I've come across > that > > would produce something like the binary releases that other Apache > projects > > release. This means we'd likely have to roll our own solution. > > > > > > In terms of prioritising work towards a v1.0.0 release, it's useful to > know > > if we have items that could be de-prioritised. > > > > > > If we do need to create binary releases, are there any guidelines to > follow > > - or do we just look at other Apache libs and use their binary releases > as > > a guide? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > PJ > > > > > > [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache MXNet (incubating) as a Top Level Project
+1 awesome project ! On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 at 14:59, Tianqi Chen wrote: > +1 Great to see it > > TQ > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 2:21 AM Jialin Qiao wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > +1 > > > > Good luck! > > — > > Jialin Qiao > > Apache IoTDB PMC > > > > > > Ziheng Jiang 于2022年6月2日周四 01:34写道： > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Looking forward to the graduation! > > > > > > - Ziheng > > > > > > On 2022/05/02 17:29:53 Joe Evans wrote: > > > > Hi Apache Incubator Community, > > > > > > > > Apache MXNet (incubating) recently held a community discussion[1] and > > > > vote[2] to graduate to a top level project. The community vote > > passed[3] > > > > and we would like to start a discussion with the incubator community > > > about > > > > graduating the project. > > > > > > > > Here is a brief overview of the progress of the Apache MXNet > > (incubating) > > > > project and community since entering the incubator: > > > > > > > > Community > > > > > > > >- > > > > > > > >37 new PPMC members were added, bringing the total number of PPMC > > > >members to 50 > > > >- > > > > > > > >56 new committers were added (which include new PPMC members), > > > bringing > > > >the total number of committers to 87 > > > >- > > > > > > > >The total number of contributors is now 870 and growing. > > > > > > > > Project > > > > > > > >- > > > > > > > >18 releases[4] by 13 different release managers. All compliance > > issues > > > >have been resolved with the 1.9.0 and 2.0.beta releases. > > > >- > > > > > > > >MXNet website[5] is now compliant with Apache Project Website > > > >requirements[6] > > > >- > > > > > > > >MXNet has completed the project maturity self assessment[7] > > > > > > > > > > > > I’ve also attached the proposed board resolution below. We welcome > any > > > > feedback or comments. > > > > > > > > This discussion will remain open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > References: > > > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/l9h2qgb2vqs2y0cm46wh83sgomr9w190 > > > > > > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/py1nw6whov78sch5kkm1gcg7cv3zb2sv > > > > > > > > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/b8bngc6qcb33n0jo6m1rw0ylwlqzkmgx > > > > > > > > [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases > > > > [5] https://mxnet.apache.org/ > > > > [6] https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs > > > > [7] > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+MXNet > > > > > > > > > > > > Proposed resolution: > > > > - > > > > > > > > Establish the Apache MXNet Project > > > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests > of > > > > > > > > the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to > > establish > > > > > > > > a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and > > maintenance > > > > > > > > of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, > > > > > > > > related to a flexible and efficient library for Deep Learning. > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee > > > > > > > > (PMC), to be known as the "Apache MXNet Project", be and hereby is > > > > > > > > established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache MXNet Project be and hereby is responsible > > for > > > > > > > > the creation and maintenance of software related to a flexible and > > > > > > > > efficient library for Deep Learning; and be it further > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache MXNet" be and > > > > > > > > hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the > > > > > > > > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache MXNet > > > > > > > > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the > > > > > > > > projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache MXNet > > Project; > > > > > > > > and be it further > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > > > > > > > > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache MXNet > Project: > > > > > > > > * Anirudh Subramanian > > > > > > > > * Bing Xu > > > > > > > > * Bob Paulin > > > > > > > > * Carin Meier > > > > > > > > * Chiyuan Zhang > > > > > > > > * Chris Olivier > > > > > > > > * Dick Carter > > > > > > > > * Eric Xie > > > > > > > > * Furkan Kamaci > > > > > > > > * Haibin Lin > > > > > > > > * Henri Yandell > > > > > > > > * Hongliang Liu > > > > > > > > * Indhu Bharathi > > > > > > > > * Jackie Wu > > > > > > > > * Jason Dai > > > > > > > > * Jian Zhang > > > > > > > > * Joe Spisak > > > > > > > > * Jun Wu > > > > > > > > * Leonard Lausen > > > > > > > > * Liang Depeng > > > > > > > > * Ly Nguyen > > > > > > > > * Madan Jampani > > > > > > > > * Marco de Abreu > > > > > > > > * Markus Weimer > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.1
I "think" it is ASF2 licensed [1] This location seems to be a copy from their original svn/cvs code. Cheers, Hans [1] https://github.com/codehaus/stax/blob/master/dev/ASF2.0.txt On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 12:52, Calvin Kirs wrote: > Justin Mclean 于2022年1月12日周三 18:18写道： > > > > > Hi, > > > > > stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a dependency > > of com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license > > > hi, Justin, that's what I'm worried about, stax: stax this version does > not have a relevant license, although it is used by many projects. > > > > > The license of stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is what is relevant here, just because > > it is a dependancy of a MIT licensed jar doesn’t make it acceptable. Do > we > > know how is it licensed? If it category A/B that fine, if it category X > > that would be an issue. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Justin > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > -- > Best wishes！ > CalvinKirs >
Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP
t; > > > wide range of data orchestration tools, including a visual > development > > > > environment, servers, metadata analysis, auditing services and so on. > > As > > > > a platform, Hop also wants to be a reusable library so that it can be > > > > easily reused by other software; and be it further > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Hop" be and > hereby > > > > is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction > of > > > > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Hop Project, and to > > > > have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the > > > > scope of responsibility of the Apache Hop Project; and be it further > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > > > > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Hop Project: > > > > > > > > * Bart Maertens > > > > * Brandon Jackson > > > > * Francois Papon > > > > * Hans Van Akelyen > > > > * Hiromu Hota > > > > * Julian Hyde > > > > * Kevin Ratnasekera > > > > * Matt Casters > > > > * Maximilian Michels > > > > * Nicolas Adment > > > > * Tom Barber > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Hans Van Akelyen be > > > > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Hop, to serve in > > > > accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of > Directors > > > > and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, > retirement, > > > > removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and > be > > > > it further > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Hop Project be and hereby is tasked with > the > > > > migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Hop podling; > and > > > > be it further > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator > > > > Hop podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter > > > > discharged. > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best wishes！ > > Calvin Kirs > > >
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 1..0.0-rc1
Hello Everyone, The vote to release Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0 - RC1 has passed. +1 (binding): - Julian Hyde - François Papon - Kevin Ratnasekera - Xun Liu - 朱辉 +1 (non-binding) - 独孤求败 Thank you for reviewing this release candidate. Cheers, Hans
Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0-rc1
The vote has now closed. I would like to thank everyone that has participated. Cheers, Hans On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 08:28, 独孤求败 wrote: > +1 > > > Thanks, > Zhuliuwu > > > > > At 2021-09-28 22:28:33, "朱辉" wrote: > >+1 (binding) > > > >Good job! > > > >Xun Liu 于2021年9月28日周二 上午10:35写道： > > > >> +1 (binding) from me, I have checked the following items: > >> > >> - Incubating in name > >> - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine > >> - DISCLAIMER exists > >> - All links are valid > >> - All ASF files have ASF headers > >> - PGP Signatures > >> - SHA512 Checksums > >> - rat-check > >> - Build from source code success > >> ./mvnw clean install -DskipTests > >> > >> Best regards > >> Xun Liu > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 5:33 PM Kevin Ratnasekera < > djkevincr1...@gmail.com > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 ( binding ) Forwarding my vote from the podling mailing list. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:48 PM Francois Papon < > >> > francois.pa...@openobject.fr> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 (binding) > >> > > > >> > > Good job! > >> > > > >> > > regards, > >> > > > >> > > François > >> > > fpa...@apache.org > >> > > francois.pa...@openobject.fr > >> > > > >> > > Le 27/09/2021 à 08:58, Hans Van Akelyen a écrit : > >> > > > Hi All, > >> > > > > >> > > > After a thorough testing period for Hop 0.99, we are ready to > release > >> > > > version 1.0.0 to the public. All issues raised during the previous > >> > > release > >> > > > have been resolved. Dubious code has either been rewritten or > removed > >> > > from > >> > > > this release. > >> > > > > >> > > > This release contains no new features, only further cleanup and > code > >> > > > hardening has been done. I would like to thank everyone that > >> > participated > >> > > > in filing, testing and resolving issues. > >> > > > > >> > > > Build instructions can be found in the README included. > >> > > > > >> > > > Hop community vote and result threads: > >> > > > Vote: > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r429a306535b933737fb93ea66a0d78420dc8f6abc30ce5eeb8cafd2d%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E > >> > > > > >> > > > Result: > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3e0605e7006aea3c03aba7d6a00eb3a748bb6662d47ba31c8348475a%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E > >> > > > > >> > > > The tag to be voted on is 1.0.0rc1 (commit 8a1fc96 ): > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/1.0.0-rc1 > >> > > > > >> > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > found > >> at: > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-1.0.0-incubating-rc1/ > >> > > > > >> > > > The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is: > >> > > > Source: > >> > > > >> > > >> > b7e2fdf14fcacaf937bf3e4ffedba6870a0b97965c97e0be0013acde308e161035fce5dfcb5254f96194cfe7a944bcfd5b3d8541b51435f732d0a5f61e498550 > >> > > > > >> > > > Client: > >> > > > >> > > >> > f9dd913c09a547a21e0c0c26ec71040dd34b753e83d4638982a1e5b525f4219e2e33c54989305461c793ecdd779ffab953f65872f5d809267938fd62ddf123c2 > >> > > > > >> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > >> > > > > >> > > https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e > >> > > > > >> > > > For more information about the contents of this release, see: > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324323=12350233 > >> > > > > >> > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) > >> 1.0.0! > >> > > > > >> > > > The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if > >> > > > a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > >> > > > > >> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0 > >> > > > [ ] +0 No opinion > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > >> > > > > >> > > > Best Regards, > >> > > > Hans > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > - > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
[VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0-rc1
Hi All, After a thorough testing period for Hop 0.99, we are ready to release version 1.0.0 to the public. All issues raised during the previous release have been resolved. Dubious code has either been rewritten or removed from this release. This release contains no new features, only further cleanup and code hardening has been done. I would like to thank everyone that participated in filing, testing and resolving issues. Build instructions can be found in the README included. Hop community vote and result threads: Vote: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r429a306535b933737fb93ea66a0d78420dc8f6abc30ce5eeb8cafd2d%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E Result: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3e0605e7006aea3c03aba7d6a00eb3a748bb6662d47ba31c8348475a%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E The tag to be voted on is 1.0.0rc1 (commit 8a1fc96 ): https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/1.0.0-rc1 The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-1.0.0-incubating-rc1/ The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is: Source: b7e2fdf14fcacaf937bf3e4ffedba6870a0b97965c97e0be0013acde308e161035fce5dfcb5254f96194cfe7a944bcfd5b3d8541b51435f732d0a5f61e498550 Client: f9dd913c09a547a21e0c0c26ec71040dd34b753e83d4638982a1e5b525f4219e2e33c54989305461c793ecdd779ffab953f65872f5d809267938fd62ddf123c2 Release artifacts are signed with the following key: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e For more information about the contents of this release, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324323=12350233 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0! The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Best Regards, Hans
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc4
Hello IPMC, The vote to release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99 - RC4 has passed. +1 (binding): - Julian Hyde - Justin Mclean - François Papon - Kevin Ratnasekera +1 (non-binding) - Xun Liu +0 -1 (binding) -1 (non-binding) Thank you for reviewing this release candidate. Cheers, Hans
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc4
HI Justin, Thanks for the check, we will look into it. In the client zip we have a THIRD-PARTY.txt which should list all dependencies and their licenses [1]. I suppose this should then be included in the LICENSE file and we should go over all the dependencies to see what needs to be included in the notice file? Just to make sure we get it right next release. Cheers, Hans [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/blob/master/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/THIRD-PARTY.txt On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 08:59, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) but LICENSE needs to be updated and there’s a few piece of > 3rd party code who licenses need to be clarified. Please fix these before > ether next release. > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - signatures and hashes are fine > - There is a 3rd party file here [1] that is not mentioned in LICENSE > - All file have ASF headers > - No unexpected binary files > - did not compile > > There is also code in here [2][3] that has been copied form [4] and is an > unknown license. My guess this is OK to use [5] but it should be mentioned > in LICENSE. There is also 3rd party code here [6]. How is this licensed? Is > there any other 3rd party code in the release? > > The LICENSE and NOTICE of apache-hop-client-0.99-incubating.zip are not > correct as they don’t reflect what is in that release artefact. The LICENSE > and NOTICE of binary files is often different to the source as they can > contain a lot more more 3rd party software. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > > 1. ./.mvn/wrapper/MavenWrapperDownloader.java > 2. > ./apache-hop-0.99-incubating/plugins/transforms/mailvalidator/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/pipeline/transforms/mailvalidator/MailValidation.java > 3. > ./apache-hop-0.99-incubating/plugins/actions/mailvalidator/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/workflow/actions/mailvalidator/MailValidation.java > 4. https://www.rgagnon.com/javadetails/java-0452.html > 5. https://www.rgagnon.com/varia/faq-e.html > 6 > ./apache-hop-0.99-incubating/core/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/core/util/Utils.java > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
[VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc4
Hi All, This release candidate resolves the issues around Imported Source code. As discussed in the following mail thread [1] we identified the code that was added from external sources after starting the incubator and removed it. This release candidate also includes all changes that were marked for the 1.0 release. For a detailed list on what was added after our initial 0.99 cutoff point and now you can see list [2]. Build instructions can be found in the README included. Hop community vote and result threads: Vote: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r43840a74ba1b126268915c1ae4afd42f8ef9cbfe77da84bf0adef21b%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E Result: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdb792ed9542758c0c430db8aa3e1494a28006a35d6f39b9d58b66e2c%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E The tag to be voted on is 0.99-rc4 (commit 069d67e): https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/0.99-rc4 The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.99-incubating-rc4/ The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is: Source: 38d3b318b8e7a19fe381be3727a467c0b842d5c46a7e534f8cc4671bed11e17124ad34af271e351101e54780b5084ad3366d0b8c2c06d1db11f608fada304804 Client: 97fccb1ac74b0198c1db63109a7374d48ff252eb8ffbe3721941229defcf0d136fb7185895bffcdfa096f111717d75770617f989e2b3fc4f73f55cf33419c333 Release artifacts are signed with the following key: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e For more information about the contents of this release, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12350036 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99! The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Best Regards, Hans [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3b04392a62d7bbe45fa214e6a4e3bd3ec1ec34b8e2db660508785a50%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HOP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.99%20AND%20resolved%20%3E%3D%202021-06-06%20AND%20resolved%20%3C%3D%202021-07-28
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc3
Hi All, After doing some more digging we found some other bits and pieces that still need to be sorted out first. We started a discussion on the dev list for further steps, consider this vote closed and we will not be releasing. Cheers, Hans On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 08:13, Bart Maertens wrote: > Hi Justin, > > We only used a small part of the code (sql parsing) in that repository, and > that code has been removed. > A discussion[1] was started to replace the code that was removed with a new > implementation. > > [1]: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfa656bd35ea5aa15c1ff51b3061a9f527f53cacd20f65f03922c32e0%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E > > Regards, > Bart > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 2:18 AM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This release has less changes than I expected. I thought the issue > > discussed in the last release involve 100 or 1000’s of files? Just > checking > > - have all the files from that un-donated repo been removed? > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
[VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc3
Hi All, This is the Third release candidate for version 0.99 changes made between the first candidate and this one: - remove code that was copied over from external repository - add header to hpl/hwf files - add maven version to README - include hpl/hwf to RAT checks - change naming of source code artifacts Changes between second and third candidate: - fixed the signatures used to sign the artifacts Build instructions can be found in the README included. Hop community vote and result threads: Vote: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r97a4e1a42386d44fe40a9ed69bd13d89bf6c5a74e11faa4e0996aa86%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E Result: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0f60a40723167d67218fb20247d57c8702494e1f2fe0bac5996de495%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E The tag to be voted on is 0.99-rc3 (commit 0f3e4fd): https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/0.99-rc3 The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.99-incubating-rc3/ The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is: code: 401db13e1c0666177dc6e5364384b1397c5aa8ef730579aceb9ce58603d952a22475ff30b057b69ad16d50fab42f3af27e4c69e8b270b72b349ff73dac7cd120 client: 7cbfb2b8044f6b7ee4f4f39bc2c979ac3115cf204e90004791fdf7f353a1d70be565ebc1ecdbde716386019cbfd19ff7e9fb8203d39df9061e42750c406b98c7 Release artifacts are signed with the following key: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e For more information about the contents of this release, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12350036 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99! The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Best Regards, Hans
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc1
Hello Team, The vote to release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99 - RC1 has failed. Although we have sufficient votes to create a release, the issues raised were too big to feel comfortable releasing the code. We would like to thank everyone participating in this vote. +1 (binding): - Julian Hyde - François Papon - Kevin Ratnasekera +1 (non-binding): - Xun Liu +0: -1 (binding): - Justin Mclean -1 (non-binding): Thank you for reviewing this release candidate. Cheers, Hans
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc1
Hi, The vote has ended, thank you all for the feedback. As you pointed out, were it only the header issue in hpl/hwf it would have been an option, the foreign code is a bigger problem. I will go back to the dev list to discuss creating rc2. Cheers, Hans On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 02:02, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I suggest you discuss this with you mentors and together come up with the > best approach. > > There's a higher bar for release without the work in progress disclaimer. > I had noticed the issue in a previous release but I didn’t say anything > about it on the assumption that it wold be corrected once the WIP > disclaimer was gone, apologies for that. > > Also I’d like to point out that my -1 vote is not a veto, a release only > needs 3 +1 votes and more +1 votes than -1 votes. As the vote currently > stands, the release manager can decide if the license and header issues are > serious enough to not release this. I would be more concerned abut the > files that have incorrect ASF headers and clarifying the license of those > files than the missing headers. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc1
Hi, That specific unit test can be found here [1], but we will strip out everything to move forward. Kind regards, Hans [1] https://github.com/pentaho/pdi-dataservice-plugin/blob/master/pdi-dataservice-client/src/test/java/org/pentaho/di/core/sql/SQLFieldsUnitTest.java On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 11:03, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the information. > > > There are more files that have altered headers (though all with apache > 2.0 > > license) and are adapted from the following repository [1], > > That is unfortunate, both in changing the headers and that code doesn't > have a clear license. 3rd party headers, even if they are Apache licensed > should not be altered and without a clear license that code should have > never been put into a release. > > Also From a quick glance I cannot see the code I noticed in the release in > there. I could have missed it, or is it from another repository? > > > If we were to list product and version it would point to the same > > product/version covered by our initial import. It has no separate > > LICENSE/NOTICE file as it was never released standalone. > > One way to deal with this would be to donate that code via a software > grant. > > > We could have a discussion to add the header to the code that > > generates these files but my opinion is that it would clutter the files > for > > our users and bloat the format. > > > I suggest you have that discussion. Files can get separated from their > releases, and if they have no header saying what license they are under it > can make things difficult. There are only few exceptions to this ASF policy > [1] > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc1
Hi Justin, There are more files that have altered headers (though all with apache 2.0 license) and are adapted from the following repository [1], bits and pieces were used and adapted to our needs, this repository is a module that was bundled with the original source we started from it has no separate release and versions though it was not in our initial code import we assumed it was covered. If we were to list product and version it would point to the same product/version covered by our initial import. It has no separate LICENSE/NOTICE file as it was never released standalone. For the hpl/hwf files, we could add a script to include the header in the files added to our repository. These files are not man-made but generated by our application. Compared to OpenOffice for example, these are our ".odf" files. We could have a discussion to add the header to the code that generates these files but my opinion is that it would clutter the files for our users and bloat the format. Kind regards, Hans [1] https://github.com/pentaho/pdi-dataservice-plugin On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 02:23, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi,’ > > Perhaps this will help: A software grant / initial donation consists of a > set of files, their 3rd party headers will be replaced with ASF ones and > that noted in the NOTICE file. If any other files 3rd party files, were > then copied into the same ASF repo they should retain their original 3rd > party header and their details mention in LICENSE. This may also requires > some changes to NOTICE but these would be different to changed needed from > the initial donation. > > Thanks, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc1
Hi Justin, It wasn't part of the software grant so we were just following the bundling apache licensed 2.0 code route as explained here [1]. No addition to the LICENSE was needed as the code already was Apache 2 licensed. As the necessary mentions already are in our notice file, no change was needed there either. Can you elaborate on what isn't done correctly as described in [1]? Kind Regards, Hans [1] https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 14:51, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > > That file should be switched to the standard ASF header and is part of > the > > original code and covered by the notice file. > > Except it wasn’t in the previous release and I assume wasn’t part of the > original software grant. > > Thanks, > Justin > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc1
Hi Justin, That file should be switched to the standard ASF header and is part of the original code and covered by the notice file. As for the no header in hpl and hwf files, these are files created using the application and are used for samples and for our integration testing framework. This framework is an extension on our unit tests mainly used to see if all functionality is working and that we have no regressions. As they are created using the application no header is included, they are not manually created files. Cheers, Hans On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 09:36, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > -1 (binding) > > This 3rd party file [1] is not mentioned in LICENSE. While this is just > one file my concern is that that this may indicate a bigger issue where > headers of 3rd party files have been changed. > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - signatures and hash are fine > - LICENSE is missing a mention from a 3rd party file > - No unexpected binary files > - There is quite a number of files without ASF headers I assume it could > be added to some of these (e.g. .hpl or .hwf files) > - Didn't compile from source > > Kind Regards, > Justin > > 1. ./core/src/test/java/org/apache/hop/core/sql/SqlFieldsUnitTest.java > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
[VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc1
Hi All, This will be our preview 1.0 release, this release contains both the source code and binary to run the client. This will also be our first release without DISCLAIMER-WIP but the regular disclaimer. This release aims to get as much feedback as possible so we can remove some final bugs before releasing 1.0. Build instructions can be found in the README included. Hop community vote and result threads: Vote: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra0cb8d9286e3cabf3348f3544a6dc0e60dcdd87a58918a7c1a413d36%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E Result: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra6e1e447f5611bea927e8b41558d5ff790e8475e8e44629b7e872a14%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E The tag to be voted on is 0.99-rc1 (commit a29e5a7) https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/0.99-rc1 The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.99-incubating-rc1/ The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is: code: ab62b90b311097fde622884cbcd3c67ccec75cfe0be2c70c7dd773528f34290994a0c3a166a1cecb04a5342d5eccb6953f258b87c0497e90e2ffd2c5f31723a3 client: 99f28e78d4795c19ae686094bcef6e75e875fcd213c967c868108afcf3fc0bcd83a268e2566aee122ae74c0dc54cffdd1a7e43bfcf7fcf23f3dda50487d5b644 Release artifacts are signed with the following key: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e For more information about the contents of this release, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12350036 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99! The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Best Regards, Hans
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.2rc1-INCUBATING
Aren't both (L)GPL Category X [1]? Cheers, Hans [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 10:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Good catch. AFAIR chardet is LGPL based (not GPL), and LGPL is Cat B (not > X). > > @Liminal team, do you confirm LGPL license for chardet (on Pypi) ? > > Regards > JB > > > Le 20 avr. 2021 à 08:43, Justin Mclean a > écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > Sorry it’s -1 (binding) form me. If issue re the dependancy is clarified > I’ll change my vote. > > > > I checked: > > - incubating in name > > - signatures and hashes are fine > > - DISCLAIMER exists > > - LICENSE and NOTICE fine > > - no expected binary files > > - All source files have ASF headers > > > > I was looking the dependancies and noticed one with Category X GPL > license - chardet > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70-rc1
Hi Justin, Thanks for the thorough check, at compile time we have quite a lot of category X licensed dependencies, most JDBC drivers are not category A/B, all these dependencies are optional and need to be included by the user if he wants to connect to this specific database. We also have Transient category X dependencies from other projects (and raised at least one ticket in another project and will continue to do so if we bump into more) Because of our large list of 3rd party dependencies either our own, or transient dependencies from platforms we create connectors for I did a full check and listed all dependencies that are included in the binary release [1]. Currently this is maintained manually but we are looking at automating the process and warn us when dependencies that are not allowed are added. The Exasol dependency and license will be removed in the next release, at first glance it seemed it would be allowed. For the CC-BY issue, how does one remove it from a source release and include it in a binary release if the binary release can only be created from the sources you are releasing? Thanks, Hans [1] ./assemblies/static/src/main/resources/THIRD-PARTY.txt On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 06:01, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) because of DISCLAIMER-WIP > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - signature and hash s fine > - WIP disclaimer exists > - no unexpected binary files > - all source files have ASF headers > - can compile from source > > There some issues: > - Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 content can’t be included > in a source release in text form [1] > - Dependancy on a category X licensed code (see other email) > - Possible dependancies on [2][3][4] which look to be category X licenses. > here may be some more I had a quick skim through the rather large list of > dependancies. > > Thanks, > Just8in > > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#cc-by > 2. mysql:mysql-connector-java:8.0.19 > 3. org.mariadb.jdbc:mariadb-java-client:2.5.1 > 4. org.json:json:20200518 > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70-rc1
Thank you to everyone who participated in the vote. The voting is now closed and it has passed. The issues raised during the voting process have been added to Jira and will be resolved by the next release [1][2] Binding votes: 3: +1 votes - François Papon - Kevin Ratnasekera - Zhenxu Ke 0: 0 votes 0: -1 votes. Non-binding 0: +1 votes 0: 0 votes 0: -1 votes. Thank you, The Apache Hop (Incubating) Team [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-2721 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-2744
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70-rc1
Hi Dave, That license has to be removed, no dependencies are LGPL my excuses for the confusion on that part. We used to have some that were included in the DISCLAIMER-WIP but they have been removed between the previous release and now. Cheers, Hans On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 20:15, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > You need to avoid required dependencies that are licensed in Category X > like LGPL. Please review the Legal resolved page. [1] > > If Hop is using the DISCLAIMER-WIP you can proceed, but if not then you’ll > need to remove those. > > Regards, > Dave > > [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > > > On Apr 1, 2021, at 3:22 AM, Hans Van Akelyen > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We are also planning on distributing a "fat client" that contains all > > dependencies needed to run the application, so we listed all dependencies > > in > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/blob/master/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/THIRD-PARTY.txt > > > > > > For easy reference we added the license files there to include in the > > client zip file. > > > > As http://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html states that > > "Convenience binaries need to follow licensing policy" I thought this > > implies that you also have to list the licenses. > > > > Cheers, > > Hans > > > > On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 12:13, Juan Pan wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> I am curious what the following licenses file existing in > >> `apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies` are for? > >> They are different from the licenses in the root directory, aren't they? > >> > >> > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-BSD2 > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-BSD3 > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-CC0 > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-CDDL11 > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-CPL10 > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-EPL10 > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-EPL20 > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-EXA > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-IBM10 > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-LGPL21 > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-MPL11 > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-MPL20 > >> > >> > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-NCSA > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Juan Pan (Trista) > >> > >> Senior DBA & PMC of Apache ShardingSphere > >> E-mail: panj...@apache.org > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 03/30/2021 22:43，Hans Van Akelyen wrote： > >> Hi Incubator team, > >> > >> We are proud to announce that we have a new release candidate ready for > >> release and would like your review and vote. > >> > >> Build instructions can be found in the README included. > >> > >> Hop community vote and result threads: > >> Vote: > >> > >> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r24f1435c891c11d87d20d87d832b5de2613a37cda5e92c3587f058d1%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E > >> Result: > >> > >> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/red37c2870bd3c366426579ffdd1c33c845eaf13801fd81bc0bd74539%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E > >> > >> The tag to be voted on is 0.70-rc1 (commit > >> f16b78f1a16feac5021f4556b30ee0a9609dbc1a) > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/0.70-rc1 > >> > >> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.70-incubating-rc1/ > >> > >> The SHA5
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70-rc1
Hi, We are also planning on distributing a "fat client" that contains all dependencies needed to run the application, so we listed all dependencies in https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/blob/master/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/THIRD-PARTY.txt For easy reference we added the license files there to include in the client zip file. As http://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html states that "Convenience binaries need to follow licensing policy" I thought this implies that you also have to list the licenses. Cheers, Hans On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 12:13, Juan Pan wrote: > Hi, > > > I am curious what the following licenses file existing in > `apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies` are for? > They are different from the licenses in the root directory, aren't they? > > > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-BSD2 > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-BSD3 > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-CC0 > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-CDDL11 > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-CPL10 > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-EPL10 > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-EPL20 > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-EXA > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-IBM10 > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-LGPL21 > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-MPL11 > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-MPL20 > > apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-NCSA > > > > > > > -------- >Juan Pan (Trista) > > Senior DBA & PMC of Apache ShardingSphere > E-mail: panj...@apache.org > > > > > On 03/30/2021 22:43，Hans Van Akelyen wrote： > Hi Incubator team, > > We are proud to announce that we have a new release candidate ready for > release and would like your review and vote. > > Build instructions can be found in the README included. > > Hop community vote and result threads: > Vote: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r24f1435c891c11d87d20d87d832b5de2613a37cda5e92c3587f058d1%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E > Result: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/red37c2870bd3c366426579ffdd1c33c845eaf13801fd81bc0bd74539%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E > > The tag to be voted on is 0.70-rc1 (commit > f16b78f1a16feac5021f4556b30ee0a9609dbc1a) > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/0.70-rc1 > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.70-incubating-rc1/ > > The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is: > > bbf9357801d9bdd0560a6788c7e51d469777d9dbf483be10d67e674552da28848edfba8533bab280afb97949ec55454ec5e147b73ce733010efa57af1997ef3d > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e > > For more information about the contents of this release, see: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12349578 > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70! > > The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if > a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70 > [ ] +0 No opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > Best Regards, > Hans >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70-rc1
Hi, Yes, a mistake on my part: the 2 binding votes are Mentor/IPMC votes, we have 3 PPMC votes in non-binding, Bart ,Matt and myself are PPMC. I put them as non-binding as they do not count for an actual Incubator release. Cheers, Hans On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 16:55, Kris Calvin wrote: > Sorry, there seem to be only two binding votes from the community vote. Are > some PPMC votes incorrectly calculated as non-binding? > > Hans Van Akelyen 于2021年3月30日周二 下午10:43写道： > > > Hi Incubator team, > > > > We are proud to announce that we have a new release candidate ready for > > release and would like your review and vote. > > > > Build instructions can be found in the README included. > > > > Hop community vote and result threads: > > Vote: > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r24f1435c891c11d87d20d87d832b5de2613a37cda5e92c3587f058d1%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E > > Result: > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/red37c2870bd3c366426579ffdd1c33c845eaf13801fd81bc0bd74539%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E > > > > The tag to be voted on is 0.70-rc1 (commit > > f16b78f1a16feac5021f4556b30ee0a9609dbc1a) > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/0.70-rc1 > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.70-incubating-rc1/ > > > > The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is: > > > > > bbf9357801d9bdd0560a6788c7e51d469777d9dbf483be10d67e674552da28848edfba8533bab280afb97949ec55454ec5e147b73ce733010efa57af1997ef3d > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e > > > > For more information about the contents of this release, see: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12349578 > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70! > > > > The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if > > a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70 > > [ ] +0 No opinion > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > Best Regards, > > Hans > > > > > -- > Best wishes！ > CalvinKirs >
[VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70-rc1
Hi Incubator team, We are proud to announce that we have a new release candidate ready for release and would like your review and vote. Build instructions can be found in the README included. Hop community vote and result threads: Vote: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r24f1435c891c11d87d20d87d832b5de2613a37cda5e92c3587f058d1%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E Result: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/red37c2870bd3c366426579ffdd1c33c845eaf13801fd81bc0bd74539%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E The tag to be voted on is 0.70-rc1 (commit f16b78f1a16feac5021f4556b30ee0a9609dbc1a) https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/0.70-rc1 The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.70-incubating-rc1/ The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is: bbf9357801d9bdd0560a6788c7e51d469777d9dbf483be10d67e674552da28848edfba8533bab280afb97949ec55454ec5e147b73ce733010efa57af1997ef3d Release artifacts are signed with the following key: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e For more information about the contents of this release, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12349578 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70! The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Best Regards, Hans
Re: Bluemarlin Migration
Hi Reza, The incubator.apache.org website contains most of the info you need and helped us a lot during the first stages. Disclaimer information can be found here: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers Cheers, Hans On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 22:40, Reza Adibnia wrote: > Thanks Hans. I found the instructions for the Notice File in the link you > sent as well. That was helpful. > > > > Can you please let me know how to get the DISCLIAMER File? > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Reza. > > > > *From:* Hans Van Akelyen > *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2021 11:40 PM > *To:* general@incubator.apache.org > *Cc:* Reza Adibnia ; Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > jbono...@yupiik.com>; Wenjing Chu ; > d...@bluemarlin.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Bluemarlin Migration > > > > Hi Reza, > > > > The header can be found here: > https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fsrc-headers.html=04%7C01%7Creza.adibnia%40futurewei.com%7C828d6f58279e485f5e5208d8daf2db42%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637500083905260483%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000=tNsJ%2FkgUR3FhS%2F4JTw9%2BWuQlx%2BB2eVl32Oiq7IDuaEQ%3D=0> > > > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 20:55, Xun Hu wrote: > > + Wenjing > > From: Reza Adibnia > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 11:50 AM > To: Jean-Baptiste Onofré > Cc: d...@bluemarlin.apache.org; Xun Hu ; > general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Bluemarlin Migration > > Hi JB, > > Can you please give an update on bluemarlin migration? > > The existing code repository of blue-marlin project is > https://github.com/Futurewei-io/blue-marlin > <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFuturewei-io%2Fblue-marlin=04%7C01%7Creza.adibnia%40futurewei.com%7C828d6f58279e485f5e5208d8daf2db42%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637500083905270477%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000=P3LLwc7Z4fY%2BbugJ3XdVgmNQIbAH%2Fw32u9a1kyYocWQ%3D=0> > < > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFuturewei-io%2Fblue-marlin=04%7C01%7Cxun.hu%40futurewei.com%7C25373d89756c40b6a02408d8da8fa23b%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637499657742215610%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000=sP29DvbjrRntYTG%2F453LTeB%2FtaqcSfyUb5nHiel1fUg%3D=0 > <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFuturewei-io%2Fblue-marlin=04%7C01%7Creza.adibnia%40futurewei.com%7C828d6f58279e485f5e5208d8daf2db42%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637500083905270477%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000=P3LLwc7Z4fY%2BbugJ3XdVgmNQIbAH%2Fw32u9a1kyYocWQ%3D=0> > > > > I can help you with the migration. I have created a new branch called > apache-migration from master. > > If you send me ASF headers, I will modify the individual files. I think > this part will take the most time. > Here are the list of tasks we need to work on as you mentioned before: > > - check license (JB will do) > - add ASF headers in all files (Reza will do, I need the header.) > - add DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE files (JB will do) > - eventually rename packages/artifacts to org.apache.bluemarlin (Done for > IMS-Service) > - prepare a source artifact containing all and named with > version-incubator (I don't know about this one, please advise) > > I am under pressure to finish this migration ASAP, please work with me to > finish this process. > > Can we have a meeting with google hangouts early next week? > > Best Regards, > > Reza. > > >
Re: Bluemarlin Migration
Hi Reza, The header can be found here: https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 20:55, Xun Hu wrote: > + Wenjing > > From: Reza Adibnia > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 11:50 AM > To: Jean-Baptiste Onofré > Cc: d...@bluemarlin.apache.org; Xun Hu ; > general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Bluemarlin Migration > > Hi JB, > > Can you please give an update on bluemarlin migration? > > The existing code repository of blue-marlin project is > https://github.com/Futurewei-io/blue-marlin< > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFuturewei-io%2Fblue-marlin=04%7C01%7Cxun.hu%40futurewei.com%7C25373d89756c40b6a02408d8da8fa23b%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637499657742215610%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000=sP29DvbjrRntYTG%2F453LTeB%2FtaqcSfyUb5nHiel1fUg%3D=0 > > > > I can help you with the migration. I have created a new branch called > apache-migration from master. > > If you send me ASF headers, I will modify the individual files. I think > this part will take the most time. > Here are the list of tasks we need to work on as you mentioned before: > > - check license (JB will do) > - add ASF headers in all files (Reza will do, I need the header.) > - add DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE files (JB will do) > - eventually rename packages/artifacts to org.apache.bluemarlin (Done for > IMS-Service) > - prepare a source artifact containing all and named with > version-incubator (I don't know about this one, please advise) > > I am under pressure to finish this migration ASAP, please work with me to > finish this process. > > Can we have a meeting with google hangouts early next week? > > Best Regards, > > Reza. > > > >
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60-rc1
Thank you to everyone who participated in the vote. The voting is now closed and it has passed. Binding votes: 4: +1 votes - Julian Hyde - Justin Mclean - François Papon - Kevin Ratnasekera 0: 0 votes 0: -1 votes. Non-binding 0: +1 votes 0: 0 votes 0: -1 votes. Thank you, The Apache Hop (Incubating) Team
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60-rc1
Thank you all for voting, I was able to reproduce the issue, we usually use the install phase so we did not notice. We will make sure the compile phase works in the future releases. On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 8:55 AM Kevin Ratnasekera wrote: > +1 ( binding ) > > I checked the following. > > - Incubating in name. > > - PGP Signatures. > > - SHA512 Checksums. > > - DISCLAIMER-WIP exists. > > - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine. > > - Maven Build passes on MacOS. ( Maven - 3.6.3 JAVA - AdoptOpenJDK Java > 1.8.0_252 ). > > > > Regards > > Kevin > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 6:35 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > > > PS More environment info: > > > > $ mvn -version > > Apache Maven 3.5.3 (3383c37e1f9e9b3bc3df5050c29c8aff9f295297; > > 2018-02-24T11:49:05-08:00) > > Maven home: /usr/local/apache-maven-3.5.3 > > Java version: 1.8.0_271, vendor: Oracle Corporation > > Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/jdk1.8.0_271/jre > > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 > > OS name: "linux", version: "5.4.0-64-generic", arch: "amd64", family: > > "unix" > > > > $ java -version > > java version "1.8.0_271" > > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_271-b09) > > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.271-b09, mixed mode) > > > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 5:03 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > > > > > > FWIW, I get the same error. Ubuntu 20.04, Java 8, "mvn clean compile". > > > > > > ... > > > [INFO] Hop Assemblies Plugins Dist SUCCESS [ > > 17.172 s] > > > [INFO] Hop Assemblies Static Assets ... SUCCESS [ > > 0.272 s] > > > [INFO] Hop Assemblies Demo SUCCESS [ > > 0.007 s] > > > [INFO] Hop Assemblies Libraries ... FAILURE [ > > 3.737 s] > > > [INFO] Hop Client . SKIPPED > > > [INFO] Hop Assemblies Core SKIPPED > > > [INFO] Hop Assemblies Core Libraries .. SKIPPED > > > [INFO] Hop Assemblies Debug 0.60 .. SKIPPED > > > [INFO] > > > > > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE > > > [INFO] > > > > > [INFO] Total time: 03:52 min > > > [INFO] Finished at: 2021-01-23T17:01:00-08:00 > > > [INFO] > > > > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > > > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin:3.1.0:copy-dependencies > > > (copy-libs) on project hop-assemblies-libs: Artifact has not been > > > packaged yet. When used on reactor artifact, copy should be executed > > > after packaging: see MDEP-187. -> [Help 1] > > > [ERROR] > > > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with > > > the -e switch. > > > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. > > > [ERROR] > > > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, > > > please read the following articles: > > > [ERROR] [Help 1] > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException > > > [ERROR] > > > [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with > the > > command > > > [ERROR] mvn -rf :hop-assemblies-libs > > > > > > Julian > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 4:18 PM Justin Mclean < > jus...@classsoftware.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > It's failing for me at: > > > > [INFO] Hop Assemblies Plugins Dist FAILURE [ > > 33.371 s] > > > > > > > > When I do an “mvn compile” but it works with a “man package”. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Justin > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60-rc1
Hi Justin, Thanks for the vote! If you have some time to spare could you provide us with your maven/java version and the error you get while building? The software should build and work on all 3 major platforms, I'm also an OSX user and can build without errors. Thanks, Hans On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 7:18 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > it contains Category B source code but is using the WIP disclaimer and > what is contains is clearly stated. > > I checked: > - Incubating in name > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE and NOTICE look OK > - Source files have correct headers > - No unexpected binary files > - Unable to compile on OSX (as mentioned before) > > Thanks, > Justin > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
[VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60-rc1
Hi IPMC, This is a call for vote to release Apache Hop (Incubating) 0.60-rc1. The main changes in this release are fixing the issues brought up by the IPMC: - Added DISCLAIMER-WIP - Align Apache headers in source files - Remove duplicate headers - Add non compliant source files to LICENSE file - Minimize RAT exclusions - Cleanup unused static (including fonts) As our main codebase was already diverging too far from the 0.50 release we have abandoned this release and combined all changes in 0.60 Thank you for checking and voting on this release. Hop community vote and result threads: Vote: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r55939c05bd25c4e970100a4e973be3ce7cfac35057e3641a157c32e5%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E Result: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4be6768898a92f19856a3261f4f667cce5da1c9e86538b3b77068f60%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E The tag to be voted on is 0.60-rc1 (commit 88720ff): https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/0.60-rc1 The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.60-incubating-rc1/ The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is: 7288bdc6b5bc4f98bd8b870211a369cee04b1d395baaf0613cbb713b803dd5e26361eaebbe84337d0db9216a493f928198a12c71989d0b905947d87e27cc8d3b Release artifacts are signed with the following key: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e For more information about the contents of this release, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12349498 This release will also include all changes done for release 0.50: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12349247 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60! The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Best Regards, Hans
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.50-rc2
Hello IPMC, The vote to release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.50 - RC2 has *failed*. Working items for next candidate: - add DISCLAIMER-WIP - cleanup headers - check if NOTICE needs update - try and minimize RAT excludes - remove Category B code or mention in DISCLAIMER/LICENSE +1 (binding): Julian Hyde -1 (binding) Justin Mclean +0 Thank you for reviewing this release candidate. Regards, Hans
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.50-rc2
Hi, Thanks for the valuable feedback, we will pick up these issues and work on a new release. Regards, Hans On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 2:59 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) as it contains Category B source code and > header issues and is not using the WIP disclaimer. [1] > > I suggest you use the work in progress disclaimer, and in it list the > issues that need to be fixed before graduation. Fixing some of teh header > issues would make it easier to review as well. > > I checked: > - Incubating in name > - DISCLAIMER exists but is not work in progress > - LICENSE is missing mention of 3rd party included software [2][3][5][6] > - NOTICE may need updating if the release contains code from Apache Hadoop > - There a large number of files that are missing ASF headers. This makes > it hard to review. > - There are a large number of files without correct headers copyright > Hitachi Vantara. > - Files incorrectly have the ASF header onto of anther license header e.g > [4] > - Includes Category B course code > - No unexpected binary files > - Unable to compile on OSX but not sure if that’s a supported platform. It > gets to step 467 out of 474. (Hop Assemblies Plugins Dist) > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. > https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#work_in_progress_disclaimer > 2. OpenSansLight font > 3. > ./plugins/actions/ftp/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/workflow/actions/ftpput/FtpClient.java > 4. > ./ui/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/ui/pipeline/transforms/tableinput/SqlValuesHighlight.java > 5. ./assemblies/static/src/main/resources/LICENSE ( Copyright (c) 2005, > European Commission project) > 6 > ./assemblies/static/src/main/resources/docs/English/welcome/css/bootstrap.css > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
[VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.50-rc2
Hi IPMC, This is a call for vote to release Apache Hop (Incubating) 0.50-rc2. This will be our first Apache incubator release and want to thank everyone involved in the process. Hop community vote and result threads: Vote: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r410e0f080772f33ea711197fa03cbf1f96902535636e69ce472efb43%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E Result: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5863968d1942ea5953f81ba107c4bcea993690c3d4d803ddc02d3b84%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E The tag to be voted on is 0.50-rc2 (commit 204da03): https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/commit/204da036e545441d36617906263c5a679ce6fbbc The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.50-incubating-rc2/ The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is: 128ca209f767aa150bdd4a222f7bda15afc01a34533cef4a204322733a99f7496ed1eb66f86a48a13a2723bae195fdf651b5d7608a70a39a1fc7313a8c48f5df apache-hop-0.50-incubating-rc2.tar.gz Release artifacts are signed with the following key: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e For more information about the contents of this release, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12349247 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop 0.50! The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop 0.50 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Best Regards, Hans
