As we are community over code and I haven't read anything about the
history we have with Freemarker, it is probably now the time to
mention it.
The first response on this proposal was Huh? They want to come to Apache ?
The Freemarker community was a fan of trolling the Apache Velocity
mailinglists
+1
Mvgr,
Martin
2012/2/5 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I find it unfortunate that the PMC chair nominations got turned into a
debate about the future of the Incubator, especially when the original
reason to consider a new chair were fairly minor issues in timely
handling of
Steitz (psteitz_at_apache_dot_org)
* Ian Gray (ian_dot_d_dot_gray_at_aexp_dot_com)
* Rahul Akolkar (rahul_at_apache_dot_org)
* Sebastian Bazley (sebb_at_apache_dot_org)
* Martin van den Bemt (mvdb_at_apache_dot_org)
* Henri Yandell (bayard_at_apache_dot_org)
Affiliations
gorillalogic_dot_com)
* Tony Ambrozie (tony_dot_a_dot_ambrozie_at_aexp_dot_com)
* Phil Steitz (psteitz_at_apache_dot_org)
* Ian Gray (ian_dot_d_dot_gray_at_aexp_dot_com)
* Rahul Akolkar (rahul_at_apache_dot_org)
* Sebastian Bazley (sebb_at_apache_dot_org)
* Martin van den Bemt
Did a review just now..
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
it's likely to be a
Have checked it (before I voted)
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 6/15/07, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/11/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Ok,
I am closing the vote now. Results:
Two +1's and no -1's or 0's. The vote passed
+1..
Sorry Petar for ignoring you, glad to see you want to get going !
Mvgr,
Martin
Petar Tahchiev wrote:
Hello everybody,
My name is Petar Tahchiev I donated a cactus maven2 build system. It is
registered under
Petar Tahchiev / Representing Self
Cactus Maven2 Build System ...
I think voting for a mentor is the good thing to do, at least on the dev / ppmc
(assuming it is
healthy) of the podling. At least that was my condition to be added as a Mentor
for Trinidad at that
time. I like the group that needs to work with you to make the final call (as a
general rule,
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
Paul Fremantle wrote:
$subject says it all.
Here is my +1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Dear Incubator,
The Wicket podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider
its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending
the attached draft board resolution.
The vote will end in 72 hours, 1900 hours CET sunday
I tend to use the private list as the place to look for decisions and actions
taken of things that
are PMC concerns, so I tend to cc private in most cases.
Mvgr,
Martin
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
In the doc's for voting in a new PPMC member [1] it is stated that a
message with the vote results
If I am not mistaken there is no relationship with the sponsoring PMC, which in
my view needs to
change (as you indirectly point out).
There are a couple of things :
1) The incubated project doesn't even need to know about the sponsoring project
2) The sponsoring project doesn't even have to
there is more than a
refactoring of source being donated (e.g. new mojos / m2 integration,
new docs etc).
Is there any way we can view the changes other than reading the entire
svn log?
I think we've fixed some licensing issues, which is good.
On 4/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 4/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happened here ?
Not that this doesn't need fixing, but this code donation is hardly a
new event (was announced on
February 3rd on the PMC list and the grant was discussed numerous
times on general
Dion Gillard wrote:
On 4/24/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happened here ?
Not that this doesn't need fixing, but this code donation is hardly a
new event (was announced on
February 3rd on the PMC list and the grant was discussed numerous
times on general.
I don't
What happened here ?
Not that this doesn't need fixing, but this code donation is hardly a new event
(was announced on
February 3rd on the PMC list and the grant was discussed numerous times on
general.
Would have been nice to caught this earlier.
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On
Hi everyone,
Petar Tahchiev donated a cactus related codebase to Jakarta Cactus.
Registered under
Petar Tahchiev / Representing Self
Cactus Maven2 Build System ...
http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus;
- The code is not attached to an issue tracker for review to make
+1 (mentor)
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Incubator PMC,
The Trinidad community believes that Trinidad is ready for graduation, as
evidenced by this vote (see [1]).
We would like to initiate a vote to graduate to be a subproject of the
Apache MyFaces project. There was a vote
+1.
Mvgr,
Martin
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
I think wadi withdrew from incubation. It seems
alive here: http://wadi.codehaus.org/
Correct.
+1 to formally retire it.
--- Noel
-
And people who want to stay in Amsterdam can also party all night..
See http://www.koninginnedagamsterdam.nl/?en for more info (yeah, Amsterdam has
an English page :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
It might be good to know that on 30th April, there is Queensday
(Dutch guys know how to
is Manfred Geiler (manolito at apache
dot org) and the three mentors are Martin van den Bemt (mvdb at apache
dot org), Carsten Ziegeler (cziegeler at apache dot org), and Henning
Schmiedehausen (henning at apache dot org).
Please cast your votes.
Thanks,
Omar Tazi
Maybe cool to give it some time at the hackathon ?
Don't if Martijn is going to be there ?
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 4/1/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We appreciate the effort!
i'm very sad to say that i'm afraid that i might not get the cycle's i
hoped
+1...
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Dear Incubator PMC
Several issues were found by Robert, with the previous release files
and have been
resolved:
1.) bad signatures for trinidad-api-1.0.0-incubating.jar and
trinidad-impl-1.0.0-incubating.jar
- Resolution: Update to newer
Let's then at least *mirror* the thing to other (maven) repo's..
Mvgr,
Martin
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We've discussed this many times before, and so far the consensus has been to
not conflate the Incubator artifacts with regular ASF artifacts. I am
still -1 to conflating ASF artifacts with
Can someone please have a look, we are still one vote short..
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
The Trinidad community voted to release the the maven
plugins as a 1.0.0-incubating release. These plugins are required for
the maven
build of the core code of the Trinidad Podling. To
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The reason to approach the existing PMC first, it seems to me, would be to
make sure the graduating project meets the standards and criteria of the
PMC already.
Isn't this the job of the mentors/champions to make sure it is up to those
standards ?
If it does
Hi everyone,
On the
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Exiting+the+Incubator
page
there is a Legal item with the content of :
No non ASL or ASL compatbile dependencies in the code base
Which kind of reads weird to me, it would probably read better as
No non ASL or
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
Dave wrote:
OK, let's try this again.
The Roller community believes that Roller is ready for graduation, as
evidenced by this vote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-roller-dev/200702.mbox/browser
We would like to initiate a vote to graduate to a top
I am +1 on this and the main reason for this is that people that become
committers through the
incubator don't necessarily have any experience with apache projects and how
issues like this are
normally handled. As a side effect it gives us the option to link to this
policy in case something
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
For example, rather than close the cat-herding the weekend before the report
is due (and, factually, finishing herding tardy projects the day that the
report is filed), we could set a cut-off of the second Monday of each month,
or similarly
Looks better..
Although a couple of things :
- No reference to any license in the pom (and therefor not on the generated
site). It's (at least
for me) a piece of vital data. I even heard talk about tooling around that
specific metadata, to be
able to detect eg unacceptable licenses. (probably
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
Yonik Seeley wrote:
The Solr community has voted and believes Solr is ready for graduation
from the Incubator and has met all incubation requirements, and the
Lucene PMC has voted to accept Solr.
The Solr podling is therefore requesting to graduate from the
Incubator to
If I am not mistaken, if it is a patch it is already handles by the apache license itself. If it
isn't a patch, I think it's best to ask for the granting specifically..
Mvgr,
Martin
kelvin goodson wrote:
Can anyone tell me if it's OK to put code into a sandbox that has been
attached to a JIRA
Became binding yesterday evening :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I am just wondering if there is anything new from here.
Is the vote of Martin now binding or not ?
If not, I guess we are not allowed to make a release.
If so, that would be a pity, because we all (the Trinidad
as a mentor, but I guess you best
have a vote about that on the PPMC list.
Mvgr,
Martin
Thanks!
Matthias
On 10/27/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Became binding yesterday evening :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I am just wondering if there is anything new from
out the positive view point :)
-Matthias
Mvgr,
Martin
Thanks!
Matthias
On 10/27/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Became binding yesterday evening :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I am just wondering if there is anything new from here
You need to be part of the incubator PMC to have a binding vote. Every member can request to do so
(which I did), but still waiting for the approval..
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
To summarize there are three votes and that from Martin is not
binding, as far as I understand it.
There is even a song about that :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
How about Qpid? It could mean Queuing Protocol for Information
Delivery or something like that.
or Qupid
Tom
The vote was public on the roller-dev list..
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
It's a good thing to notify [EMAIL PROTECTED];
I think the vote was not public, isn't it ?
Maybe we should put it to the guide lines; that for non-public votes
the result shouldn't posted only only the
+1 :)
And to second Leo, nice to see some more Dutch people :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Upayavira wrote:
The Wicket developers (http://wicket.sourceforge.net) have expressed a
desire to incubate their project within the ASF.
-
To
Hi everyone,
Yesterdat I fixed a type in the link to the Agila website, but the commits never turned up in the
commit maillist. Could it be that it is still in the mod queue ?
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Would probably also be a good idea to fix the tuscany page itself..It mentions that it is in the
incubator, but the page title and header is Apache Tuscany..
Mvgr,
Martin
Mike Edwards wrote:
Dion,
You're right. It should mention Incubator.
I apologise for this oversight and I'll get it
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal, we
feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we would
now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator for
consideration. The proposal can be found
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 7/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
(And I'll note now that I'm interested in participating, although can't
commit the time to be a mentor right now.)
this seems like a good opportunity to reintroduce an existing
David N. Welton wrote:
Hi,
*) Cleaning up the code - they're in the process of cleaning up the
code, getting rid of LGPL dependencies. This needs to happen prior to
the code touching our subversion repositories, correct?
Preferrably, though not a must. eg Roller has them..
Mvgr,
Martin
+1 (non binding)
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 (non binding)
Mvgr,
Martin
Sam Ruby wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KabukiProposal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would definitely like to get involved and help out with the
incubation effort.
Mvgr,
Martin
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
+1 (non binding)
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
Leo Simons wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:39:51PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Anyone on the PMC want to comment on this proposal?
It seems as if there is significant interest from ASF Members, a willingness
on the part of the donors to adopt The Apache Way, a number of ASF Members
Sam Ruby wrote:
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
How do you fit in / are going to fit in with
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/atf/ ?
Zimbra is mentioned there.
If you look closely, that proposal closely matches the diffs between the
first draft and second draft of the AJAX Toolkit Proposal
How do you fit in / are going to fit in with
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/atf/ ?
Zimbra is mentioned there.
Mvgr,
Martin
Andrew Clark wrote:
I have made a few modifications to the Ajax proposal
Wiki page[1] in an attempt to resolve a few of the
issues people have raised. The changes
The way I read them is that when a date is set, the task is completed.
Mvgr,
Martin
Henri Yandell wrote:
Dumb question. Are the completion dates on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/roller.html when the event
happened, or when it was marked as complete.
ie) to start ticking these things
I see roller already in SVN, is the development already going on in there ?
Based on the README.txt in SVN, you can scratch radeox as being LGPL. They
switched to BSD...
(at least one legal issue got solved automatically :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Henri Yandell wrote:
As many know, Roller releases have
I subscribed to the roller user and dev list (found it at the bottom of the status html file..), so
you can reply there if it's more appropiate..
Mvgr,
Martin
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
I see roller already in SVN, is the development already going on in there ?
Based on the README.txt in SVN
About Axion : the db PMC is going to request removal of Axion (at least I pinged them about Axion
and that was the reply)..
Mvgr,
Martin
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Tobago came through with its report.
--- Noel
-
To
Hi everyone,
I was under the impression that being a mentor was just for ASF members, but couldn't find that
written down anywhere.
If it is not just a thing for ASF Members, I wouldn't mind freeing up some time to help out with
mentoring.
Mvgr,
Martin
[ ] - Any new proposal should have 3 ASF Members / Officers as mentors
(without regard to affiliation)
Where 3 are responsible, it could be no one is responsible. Better have one main mentor with
possible backups (if the mentor is on holiday, etc..).
Mvgr,
Martin
Larry Meadors wrote:
3) Probaly will not make that change (and break all those apps) until 3.x
You are informing new adopters about this ? Since you are forcing them to
change quite quickly after their adoption, even though everyone needs to switch
to the new package naming eventually
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 07:51, hammett wrote:
Hiya,
I think MS already implemented this idea. Its called Passport.
Which has failed, so I read.
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
I will not vote on policy which makes no sense or is based on unproven
facts from the past.
I really do not see your point that this policy do not make sense!
I started this abstract thread to prevent that things from happening *in
the future*.
Rules don't prevent anything from
60 matches
Mail list logo
