Philipp K. Janert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/03/2002 09:47:31 AM:
[snip]
I don't think documentation is marketing - and what I tried to
provide is simply documentation, not different in principle
than Javadoc, only at a higher level.
Except it also contained words such as immature,
- Audience and Marketing:
Specifically, it is directed towards users, who hope to find
something useful for their own projects. (Those users may turn
into contributors over time!)
It takes too much effort to support a user base for a project
that changes rapidly (ie any 'alpha' status code).
-Original Message-
From: acoliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-- I see a need for more integration documentation and top-down
documentation.
Jakarta isnt heirarchical, at all, and is in fact grossly federal, with
member projects able to petition to join, cecede, be expelled. There
Sun offered slightly more than we required by granting a large budget
for TCK support when we only required binary access. Sun did this
because they felt support was essential for success, given the current
test suites and their design. It may be the first time I've seen Sun
give more
*shrugs*
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 00:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/03/2002 11:58:20 PM:
Perhaps you should contribute to the project.
[snip]
No point really.
Your message to me suggests that you think I care whether you use
On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 17:47, Philipp K. Janert wrote:
Dear Friends!
First off, many thanks to Ted for posting my Draft Jakarta
Overview, thus allowing everyone to review it, and many thanks
to all who provided feedback on it, for or against.
I would like to comment on some of the
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 03:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philipp K. Janert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/03/2002 09:47:31 AM:
[snip]
I don't think documentation is marketing - and what I tried to
provide is simply documentation, not different in principle
than Javadoc, only at a higher
I should draw you a diagram of new federalism it would wreck your
mind... ;-)
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 05:07, Danny Angus wrote:
-Original Message-
From: acoliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-- I see a need for more integration documentation and top-down
documentation.
Hi,
Just wanted to point out that the POI site now works fine in Netscape
4.x. Sorry it took so long, somebody who will remain nameless forgot to
update the site in CVS after he changed it. (Same issue with the broken
images at the bottom)
-Andy
--
http://www.superlinksoftware.com
At 14:47 22.03.2002 -0800, you wrote:
- Audience and Marketing:
The document is directed towards people who may not be familiar
with all the projects that exist under the Jakarta umbrella.
Specifically, it is directed towards users, who hope to find
something useful for their own projects.
On 3/22/02 12:19 PM, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A thought struck me today which is probably totally obvious to folk but I
thought I'd share it anyways. Sun gets pots of cash from companies who
develop J2EE compliant software from the J2EE license fees. So its in Sun's
interest
Peter Donald wrote:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 16:00, Jason Hunter wrote:
Peter Donald wrote:
Wow this is absolutely fabulous - not what I expected to see - yea!!!
If some one would bug them to include JMX in their soon to be blessed
list then everything that we do at Apache would be
On 3/23/02 11:03 AM, Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:50 23.03.2002 -0500, you wrote:
On 3/22/02 12:19 PM, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A thought struck me today which is probably totally obvious to folk but I
thought I'd share it anyways. Sun gets pots of cash from
On 3/23/02 12:12 PM, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second, the price of the license will drop if independent
implementations are allowed. For App Servers, I think the barrier of
entry is in the difficulty implementating the spec not in the licensing.
It's going to be JBoss,
I'll break my no-me-too-posts rule for this occasion:
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you.
Did I miss anyone? Great job, guys.
Definately. Thanks.
- Leo
guess I can deinstall the .net development kit again...for now =)
(and in the line of 'met too's -- I
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/03/2002 12:39:09 AM:
'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless.
Commits/month would be a lot better.
Hummm...I'll put that comment in the pile of the most important
activity in software development is
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 17:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/03/2002 12:39:09 AM:
'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless.
Commits/month would be a lot better.
Hummm...I'll put that comment in the pile of the
Subject: Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)
From: Jon Carnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless.
Commits/month would be a lot better.
True.
/snip
I agree, but you need a purpose for a release.
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 21:25, Jakarta General Newsgroup wrote:
Subject: Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)
From: Jon Carnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless.
Commits/month would be a lot better.
on 3/22/02 11:36 PM, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, we need to make a decision, pronto! Let's meet at 21st Amendment (563
2nd Street) at 7:30pm on Monday. We can take the rest from there.
Martin.
I will be there.
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
20 matches
Mail list logo
