On Nov 18, 2007 1:10 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...
Jukka's graph shows committer cross-polination, not *codebase*
cross-polination (as I
On Nov 18, 2007 1:14 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 1:10 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...
Jukka's graph shows
I would LOVE to have something like this for Apache projects. Looks
much more useful than ViewVC. I particularly like that the source
code view would be able to plug right into PMD reports to make those
more useful too.
On 9/1/07, Alf Høgemark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have a number of
request a zone/set theirs up based on the Velocity config.
WILL
On 9/1/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would LOVE to have something like this for Apache projects. Looks
much more useful than ViewVC. I particularly like that the source
code view would be able to plug right
On 9/1/07, Sriram Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. I'll put learn how to set up OpenGrok on Velocity's Solaris
zone on my things-i-would-like-to-find-time-to-do-someday list. Of
course, if someone more familiar with OpenGrok
+1
On 4/28/07, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Turbine project has been discussing a proposal to the board that the
Turbine projects leave the Jakarta umbrella and become their own top
level project. We are now at the point in the process that calls for a
vote to take place.
The
intervention. That would be great and would
bring me back to where I already was. ;)
On 3/19/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipped
the actual bits that are distributed as an officially endorsed release
do not have the luxury of diffs sent to the development lists, nor are
they easily
On 3/19/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
Those sites provide infrastructure, but absolutely no legal protection.
Who says there is no way to combine legal protection and non-absurd procedures?
For example: community votes for a release, RM tags a release (and
On 3/9/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apologies for the top post. This puts us back to
square one, with noone, at least from Jakarta,
apparently interested in being champion, rendering the
whole discussion moot. ;) Is there an appropriate
next step other than simply forgetting about
On 3/9/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/9/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apologies for the top post. This puts us back to
square one, with noone, at least from Jakarta,
apparently interested in being champion, rendering
://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/changes.html
VelocityTools 1.3 is available in either source or binary form at:
http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi#tools
For more information about VelocityTools go to:
http://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/index.html
Nathan Bubna,
on behalf of the Velocity
On 9/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna wrote:
On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna wrote:
On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm +1 and -1.
I'm +1 as I do think that Velocity as a TLP
Looks like the Velocity community is ready to head out on its own...
+1 votes:
Nathan Bubna
Martin van den Bemt
James Mitchell
Henri Yandell
Jorg Schaible
Henning P. Schmiedehausen
Will Glass-Husain
Torsten Curdt
Rony G. Flatscher
Jesse Kuhnert
Dion Gillard
Daniel Rall
Matthijs
in those discussions and
decisions.
But putting anything that uses Velocity into a TLP is like using things
that use log4j into the same TLP (which would re-create Jakarta... :)
Yep, good thing that's not the plan! :)
geir
Nathan Bubna wrote:
Looks like the Velocity community is ready
On 8/14/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Torsten Curdt wrote:
I am not really sure how to solve this. I am just ranting. For a few
projects I think they should go toplevel. For the ones I am involved
in at least jakarta commons surely deserves it (not looking
This sounds great, Martin. But if i may be forgiven a little
semantic nitpicking, my understanding of previous discussions is that
JWC would be a grouping rather than a sub-project. So Tiles would
be directly a Jakarta sub-project, rather than a sub-sub-project (i.e.
becoming Jakarta Tiles, not
On 4/8/06, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
-1 on these points
1. There should not be an escape from the pain of the incubator. All
new projects must go through the incubator and endure. Commons
sandbox
+1
On 3/26/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vote to remove the SVN barriers within Jakarta such that all jakarta-*
groups are merged into the one jakarta group with the exception of
jakarta-hivemind, jakarta-slide, jakarta-cactus and jakarta-jmeter under
the assumption that they
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Nah, we're into a realm where legitimacy is defined by whatever we decide
to do. Technically our charter says we need a 75% of the PMC vote to
remove someone - we're not going to get that and it's not a rule that
scopes.
We probably
On 3/7/06, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Reposted (edited) from original commons proposal.
Currently this proposal has general, though not unanimous, support.
A vote thread may follow this thread if the mood remains positive.
...
Jakarta
On 3/7/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Definitely in favour of turning things like Velocity, POI, Turbine into
groupings if at all possible. Less likely with POI I suspect. I'd hope
that this would mean:
SVN Auth - everyone in Jakarta has write permissions
SVN structure -
On 3/6/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 10:14 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/6/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/6/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(feel free to keep discussing names etc, but for the moment I'm going
On 3/6/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/6/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Active Development
Maintenance Mode
Unsupported
My preference would be:
Active Development: not really named though, the implied default
Hibernating: not active but will wake up as
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started to write a long email on the problems in Jakarta, on umbrellas,
on the lack of a Jakarta community and existence only of subcommunities
and on how it should be there is no Jakarta Xxxx, you are members of
Jakarta - not a subproject;
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Rainer Klute wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 05.03.2006, 15:03 + schrieb sebb:
Might be worth distinguishing the Mature/Stable projects - e.g. ORO.
[We're happily using that in JMeter]
Yes, I second that. Inactive,
On 3/5/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/5/06, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola,
Martin, I agree with almost everything you've said, except this:
But why? If I'm a user looking for something to help me out in my
development, I don't really care that much if
+1 if the vendors wanna be on our Wiki, i say we let 'em do it.
On 2/8/06, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we did with Lucene was to move the hard-coded committer
maintained list of projects and products that use Lucene to the wiki.
Let the community self-maintain this sort of
Struts is no longer under the jakarta umbrella.
you'll find what you need at
http://struts.apache.org
FYI, it's usually quicker to try asking Google about such things first. :)
http://www.google.com/search?q=struts
oh, and since java is platform and operating system independent, there
is only
On 2/7/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move
Tapestry to an Apache top level project. Pending the approval of the
Jakarta PMC, we'll be submitting the
web
site (http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/velocity-tools/KEYS) when downloading
from a mirror.
Please see the Velocity Tools website
(http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/tools/index.html) for more information.
Nathan Bubna
[EMAIL PROTECTED
30 matches
Mail list logo
