On 3/7/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Definitely in favour of turning things like Velocity, POI, Turbine into
> groupings if at all possible. Less likely with POI I suspect. I'd hope
> that this would mean:
>
> SVN Auth - everyone in Jakarta has write permissions
> SVN structure - jakarta/dvsl, jakarta/velocity/, jakarta/anakia (not sure
>                  how much tools differs from engine)

jakarta/tools is (and will always be) very different from engine.

> Mailing lists - Encouraged to use general@ for the more administrative
>                  issues
> Website - Existence of a velocity grouping
>
> One option would be to discuss a Jakarta Scripting Components or something
> group, but that seems like it'd be going too far.

definitely too far.  Velocity is about "templates", not scripts. 
trust me, there is a difference. :)  i'd be ok with a Jakarta Template
Components group.

> Hen
>
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
>
> >> From the Velocity perspective, this sounds a little like our subproject.
> > We've discussed this and aren't ready to move to TLP status.  (we're not a
> > framework!).  But there are a couple of different efforts under the Velocity
> > umbrella, specifically "Velocity Engine", "Velocity Tools", "DVSL".  Maybe
> > Anakia as well (though it's current distributed with the Velocity jar).  If
> > we flatten out Jakarta, I'd definitely like to see a "Velocity group".
> >
> > Best,
> > WILL
> >
> > On 3/7/06, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/7/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> DbUtils and DBCP to db.apache.org sounds like a win to me; DBCP would
> >>> point back to Jakarta for a dependency on [pool], but that helps to
> >> foster
> >>> intra-project involvement.
> >>>
> >>> Betwixt, Digester and JXPath strike me as a bit more to swallow and XML
> >>> might not want to taking such bites. You want to go ahead and ask them?
> >>
> >> Well, yes, JXPath migh be a bit much, but Digester and Betwixt IMO
> >> would fit nicely.
> >> And obviously the component developers should agree first whether they
> >> think this is a good idea. And if they are interested, I can ask the
> >> DB PMC if they agree, as well.
> >> However, I have no direct connections to XML PMC, and since I'm not an
> >> comitter on Digester/Betwixt/JXPath, it would feel a bit strange to me
> >> (though I would if you want me to).
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > _______________________________________
> > Forio Business Simulations
> >
> > Will Glass-Husain
> > phone (415) 440-7500 x89
> > mobile (415) 235-4293
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > www.forio.com
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to