Philipp K. Janert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/03/2002 09:47:31 AM:
[snip]
I don't think documentation is marketing - and what I tried to
provide is simply documentation, not different in principle
than Javadoc, only at a higher level.
Except it also contained words such as immature,
- Audience and Marketing:
Specifically, it is directed towards users, who hope to find
something useful for their own projects. (Those users may turn
into contributors over time!)
It takes too much effort to support a user base for a project
that changes rapidly (ie any 'alpha' status code).
On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 17:47, Philipp K. Janert wrote:
Dear Friends!
First off, many thanks to Ted for posting my Draft Jakarta
Overview, thus allowing everyone to review it, and many thanks
to all who provided feedback on it, for or against.
I would like to comment on some of the
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 03:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philipp K. Janert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/03/2002 09:47:31 AM:
[snip]
I don't think documentation is marketing - and what I tried to
provide is simply documentation, not different in principle
than Javadoc, only at a higher
At 14:47 22.03.2002 -0800, you wrote:
- Audience and Marketing:
The document is directed towards people who may not be familiar
with all the projects that exist under the Jakarta umbrella.
Specifically, it is directed towards users, who hope to find
something useful for their own projects.
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/03/2002 12:39:09 AM:
'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless.
Commits/month would be a lot better.
Hummm...I'll put that comment in the pile of the most important
activity in software development is
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 17:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/03/2002 12:39:09 AM:
'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless.
Commits/month would be a lot better.
Hummm...I'll put that comment in the pile of the
Subject: Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)
From: Jon Carnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless.
Commits/month would be a lot better.
True.
/snip
I agree, but you need a purpose for a release
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 21:25, Jakarta General Newsgroup wrote:
Subject: Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)
From: Jon Carnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless.
Commits/month would be a lot better
Dear Friends!
First off, many thanks to Ted for posting my Draft Jakarta
Overview, thus allowing everyone to review it, and many thanks
to all who provided feedback on it, for or against.
I would like to comment on some of the issues raised.
- Purpose and Redundancy:
To clarify the intended
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[*]
Anyway, my point being that I'm really getting tired of being misread,
misunderstood and being considered the general pain in the ass around here.
My being here isn't helpful for me and it certainly isn't helpful for the
community.
[elegy]
So
Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
So long and thanks for all the fish.
You're not only a pain in the ass Jon, but an inconsistent pain
in the ass. What's the point in saying goodbye and then keep on
posting?
I admit that I have a history of being obtuse, but the above sequence of
words strikes
And Tomcat 3.3 probably wouldn't have a ratified release plan or nearly as
many volunteers to support it.
+1.
Costin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 2/11/01 7:31 AM, "Jan-Henrik Haukeland" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're not only a pain in the ass Jon, but an inconsistent pain in the
ass. What's the point in saying goodbye and then keep on posting?
Go back and read my email again.
What I said is that I was not going to take part in
eady kicked that off in earnest, so I'll follow
up in that thread.
- Rod
-Original Message-
From: Steve Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 4:23 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: What is Jakarta?
It may not be easier, but it's certainly more fun
Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:29 AM GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I'm +1 with Arieh Markel about
. Jakarta Base Network Utilities
. Jakarta Base JSP Utilities
. Jakarta XML Utilities
. Jakarta SMTP Utilities
. Jakarta Tools
How do you make the tools so that they don't tie
into applications too
Costin Manolache wrote:
What's wrong with having multiple thread pools or db pools, each
having special characteristics and working best in different
situations ?
Different, plug compatible, db pools would be great.
Having each project early bind to a specific one is not.
If I wanted to
Since Java-Apache has apparently never actually been charted by the
ASF, why not ask the board go ahead and charter it like the recent PMCs
for PHP, Perl, and TCL, e.g.
" ... the Apache Java Committee be and hereby is responsible for the
creation and maintenance of software related to the Java
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/2001 at 11:26 AM Delagrange, Morgan wrote:
Right, but the Jakarta PMC chairman objects to that
definition.
I'm not sure if Sam Ruby has actually "objected" or
not. It is evident
that Roy Fielding has objected to the scope of the
Jakarta
At 16:01 06.02.2001 -0500, you wrote:
On 2/6/2001 at 9:13 PM Ceki Glc wrote:
What would be gained by refining the charter of Jakarta and pruning
projects?
Roy Fielding has indicated that some action is necessary. His two
suggestions were to either ask the board to create additional PMCs, or
to
on 2/6/01 5:04 PM, "Ted Husted" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still don't quite get why this is such an issue. The efficiency of a
pool comes from sharing connections that use the same login to the same
database. It would be likely that Jetspeed, Turbine, and Struts may all
want to connect to
21 matches
Mail list logo
