Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
On 5/9/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Henri Yandell wrote on Tuesday, May 08, 2007 7:20 PM: Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name yet. [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Voting will close in one week. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I am not a Jakarta commiter, and also vote is not binding, but I want to ask something. What are the benefits for commons of moving to a TLP? Also as I read the official commons intro, it states that commons is a project focused on all aspects of reusable Java components. So as we all know Jakarta is a devision of Apache, that deals with the Java open-source projects in the foundation, therefore, as I see it, it would be better for commons to stay in the Jakarta. So, maybe I am wrong, but I don't see any direct benefit for commons to move to a TLP. That's why, I have to vote: -1 and ask you to prove me wrong. Thank you all. -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria. Public PGP Key at: http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1A15B53B761500F9 Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 10:20 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote: Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name yet. [X] +1 I support the proposal Cheers Jean-Frederic [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Voting will close in one week. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TLP proposal Turbine POI for this board meeting and todo items.
Turbine vote is finished and we are ready to go. Our TLP proposal is on the Turbine Wiki, it is the same as the template (except that we have a single superflous is in it. Everyone who finds it, can keep it). POI vote is still running AFAIK. So please, add the Turbine TLP proposal to the board agenda. Thanks. If it needs reformatting, ping me. Best regards Henning Martin van den Bemt schrieb: Hi everyone, The 16th of May is the next board meeting, so I was wondering if you were all ready to go TLP at this stage or if you prefer to wait for next months board meeting ? Getting the approval done will not mean you have to move over everything immediately (we are still volunteers) and gives us a better time-line to help out with moving things over, set up redirects, etc.. There are a couple of things I like to see (re) checked : - Have all people added their name to the TLP proposal ? - Is the proposal setup according to https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates/subproject-tlp-resolution.txt ? (this was just changed recently) If everything is ok, ping me, so I can add it to the boards agenda.. Please remember that everything that is added to the agenda needs to be 80 characters on a line :) Mvgr, Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person Open Source Consulting, Development, Design| Velocity - Turbine Save the cheerleader. Save the world. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
[X] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... diffing the Wiki text against the template in SVN (https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates/subproject-tlp-resolution.txt) shows significant differences. I'd like you to update the proposal accordingly. As this proposal will not make the next board meeting anyway, there is plenty of time to do so. If this is done, then my vote will be +1. Best regards Henning Henri Yandell schrieb: Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name yet. [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Voting will close in one week. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person Open Source Consulting, Development, Design| Velocity - Turbine Save the cheerleader. Save the world. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mspowerpoint parser
Hello, I have to use mspowerpoint parser plugin of the nutch. How can I build it in eclipse. I tried to build it but I can't link the hadoop jar file from the nutch lib directory to eclipse. I am very much confused. Please help me. Thanks and Regards Revathy -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mspowerpoint-parser-tf3714730.html#a10391193 Sent from the Jakarta - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TLP proposal Turbine POI for this board meeting and todo items.
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Martin van den Bemt wrote: The 16th of May is the next board meeting, so I was wondering if you were all ready to go TLP at this stage or if you prefer to wait for next months board meeting ? I think we are. The only thing is that our vote doesn't finish until Friday, so will that be cutting it a bit fine? - Have all people added their name to the TLP proposal ? I believe we have everyone on our list - Is the proposal setup according to subproject-tlp-resolution.txt It almost was... I've attached an updated version, which has the required few tweaks made to it. NickEstablish the Apache POI project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project, to be known as Apache POI Project, relating to the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to the continued implementation of the library for manipulating files in various business formats currently known as Apache Jakarta POI, for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC) is hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache POI PMC be and hereby is charged with the creation and maintenance of Apache POI; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache POI be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache POI PMC, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache POI PMC; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache POI PMC: * Nick Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Amol S. Deshmukh [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Jason Height [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Marc Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Rainer Klute [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Yegor Kozlov [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Danny Muid [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Avik Sengupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Glen Stampoultzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Nick Burch be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache POI, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache POI Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Jakarta Project's POI; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the Apache POI sub-project and encumbered upon the Apache Jakarta PMC are hereafter discharged. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
On 5/9/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... diffing the Wiki text against the template in SVN (https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates/subproject-tlp-resolution.txt) shows significant differences. I'd like you to update the proposal accordingly. As this proposal will not make the next board meeting anyway, there is plenty of time to do so. If this is done, then my vote will be +1. Yeah, there was recent activity in changing that. Turbine/POI ones might have the same problem. I'll get it fixed (unless someone else hops in and does it). Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
Don't know about POI, Turbine is fine, Scott used the right template. Best regards Henning Henri Yandell schrieb: On 5/9/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... diffing the Wiki text against the template in SVN (https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates/subproject-tlp-resolution.txt) shows significant differences. I'd like you to update the proposal accordingly. As this proposal will not make the next board meeting anyway, there is plenty of time to do so. If this is done, then my vote will be +1. Yeah, there was recent activity in changing that. Turbine/POI ones might have the same problem. I'll get it fixed (unless someone else hops in and does it). Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person Open Source Consulting, Development, Design| Velocity - Turbine Save the cheerleader. Save the world. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
+1 On 5/8/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Niall On 5/8/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name yet. [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Voting will close in one week. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
This came up on commons-dev when we were discussing the idea: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-dev/200704.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] My reply was: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-dev/200704.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] The hard part, as you pointed out, is that we all know that Jakarta means open source Java. It still shows up on job specs every now and then as its own technology. However from a community point of view, Jakarta is still in many ways the same copy of the Apache it was many years ago and that doesn't fit well into the structure at Apache. Individual communities should be tlps and not be within tlps. The extremely loose direction we're moving in is for the remaining active sub-communities within Jakarta to move to TLP, any nearly active parts to be discussing whether there is a possible new home (for example, Regexp/ORO - Commons has long been discussed) and for inactive projects to be managed in some way (many of the Taglibs while maybe still used have no future and no development activity for years; ECS is also very maintenance and Slide seems to be slowly heading the same way afaik). That still leaves people stuck in a grey area, and we'll need to figure out what to do there. As we're a bunch of subcommunities, we'll continue to do this in our slow galactic-council way. From what I've heard - discussion at ApacheCon in Amsterdam was that we want to continue to do something with the Jakarta name, possibly an open source Java at Apache portal/federation so the old 'Jakarta equals open source Java at Apache' viewpoint can come back :) Of course we might not convince the board on a commons.apache.org, there was something there before and we do have Java in our tlp resolution which may be considered bad. Hope that helps, Hen On 5/8/07, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/9/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Henri Yandell wrote on Tuesday, May 08, 2007 7:20 PM: Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name yet. [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Voting will close in one week. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I am not a Jakarta commiter, and also vote is not binding, but I want to ask something. What are the benefits for commons of moving to a TLP? Also as I read the official commons intro, it states that commons is a project focused on all aspects of reusable Java components. So as we all know Jakarta is a devision of Apache, that deals with the Java open-source projects in the foundation, therefore, as I see it, it would be better for commons to stay in the Jakarta. So, maybe I am wrong, but I don't see any direct benefit for commons to move to a TLP. That's why, I have to vote: -1 and ask you to prove me wrong. Thank you all. -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria. Public PGP Key at: http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1A15B53B761500F9 Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Henri Yandell wrote: [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Bye, Thomas. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkZCAcQACgkQLrlGgoiBdALLHACfXHNOdEknt8KassAOg1Zw0aDS wrkAniK1x6C21S7olNH9xu5HRrvWFzxS =i6z1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
It would be nice if the proposal allowed for some flexibility as to language. We do have several ASF products written in C#, and the notion of starting a C# commons has come up a couple of times in discussions between open source C# developers. -Ted. On 5/8/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name yet. [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Voting will close in one week. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
Hi, I think this was discussed before and the consensus was we will change the charter if a C# project actually shows up. Jakarta is dying because there is not enough adhesion between the projects. The binding element of the commons TLP is currently we are developing Java components. If there is significant mass in any other language/technology, it is simple to update the charter later, not to over-engineer it at inception. Best regards Henning On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 15:44 -0400, Ted Husted wrote: It would be nice if the proposal allowed for some flexibility as to language. We do have several ASF products written in C#, and the notion of starting a C# commons has come up a couple of times in discussions between open source C# developers. -Ted. On 5/8/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name yet. [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Voting will close in one week. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux, |gls 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person |eau Open Source Consulting, Development, Design| Velocity - Turbine guy |rwc |m k INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG Fuerth, HRB 7350 |a s Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning Schmiedehausen |n - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
+1 Oliver 2007/5/8, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name yet. [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Voting will close in one week. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
Henri Yandell wrote: Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name yet. [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Voting will close in one week. +1 ---rony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
I am not a Jakarta commiter, and also vote is not binding, but I want to ask something. What are the benefits for commons of moving to a You are a Jakarta committer :) Mvgr, Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
On 5/10/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not a Jakarta commiter, and also vote is not binding, but I want to ask something. What are the benefits for commons of moving to a You are a Jakarta committer :) Mvgr, Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry about that :-( I meant to say I am not a Jakarta Commons comitter. -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria. Public PGP Key at: http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1A15B53B761500F9 Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP
+1 Scott Henri Yandell wrote: Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name yet. [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Voting will close in one week. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
