On 3/9/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apologies for the top post. This puts us back to
square one, with noone, at least from Jakarta,
apparently interested in being champion, rendering the
whole discussion moot. ;) Is there an appropriate
next step other than simply forgetting abou
On 3/9/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Apologies for the top post. This puts us back to
> > square one, with noone, at least from Jakarta,
> > apparently interested in being champion,
>>
> All right,
>
> I get it now. Thank you Martin. Yes, It sounds now more reasonable to move
> in the incubator.
Sorry you didn't get it :) (probably me though, mailing too much today). I was
saying that I think
Cactus can gather enough votes in the current situation for eg a release (so
with
--- Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Apologies for the top post. This puts us back to
> > square one, with noone, at least from Jakarta,
> > apparently interested in being champion, rendering
> the
> > whole discussion moot. ;) Is
On 3/9/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apologies for the top post. This puts us back to
square one, with noone, at least from Jakarta,
apparently interested in being champion, rendering the
whole discussion moot. ;) Is there an appropriate
next step other than simply forgetting abou
Apologies for the top post. This puts us back to
square one, with noone, at least from Jakarta,
apparently interested in being champion, rendering the
whole discussion moot. ;) Is there an appropriate
next step other than simply forgetting about
incubating?
-Matt
--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PR
On 3/9/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I know that you are busy, but I have another idea that came to me
reading
>> the Matt Benson's post. In fact the guys are
>> dealing with a project that seems to be inspired the jakarta commons
>> Convert
>> project and so it would
>>
>> I know that you are busy, but I have another idea that came to me reading
>> the Matt Benson's post. In fact the guys are
>> dealing with a project that seems to be inspired the jakarta commons
>> Convert
>> project and so it would be possible to
>> accept the code without passing through the
On 3/9/07, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/9/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hence the reason I wanted to wait for a response till I had more time
> (still busy).. My approach for
> you would have been : get a software grant, ccla and icla on file and
> start
On 3/9/07, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/7/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> will come back to this on friday..
>
> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
> Petar Tahchiev wrote:
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > first of all let me introduce myself. My name is Petar Tahchiev and I am
> > f
On 3/9/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Matt Benson wrote:
>> > --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > [SNIP]
>> >> I didn't know whether this had been done before in
>> >> Com
On 3/9/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hence the reason I wanted to wait for a response till I had more time
(still busy).. My approach for
you would have been : get a software grant, ccla and icla on file and
start a vote on you being a
committer for cactus, I just failed hor
Hence the reason I wanted to wait for a response till I had more time (still
busy).. My approach for
you would have been : get a software grant, ccla and icla on file and start a
vote on you being a
committer for cactus, I just failed horribly to send out that mail (btw sending
in those document
On 3/7/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
will come back to this on friday..
Mvgr,
Martin
Petar Tahchiev wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> first of all let me introduce myself. My name is Petar Tahchiev and I am
> from Bulgaria.
>
> I wanted to enroll in the last-years Google Summer Of
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Matt Benson wrote:
>> > --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > [SNIP]
>> >> I didn't know whether this had been done before in
>> >> Commons - but seems
>> >> that it has for the Commons CSV comp
On 3/9/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
> --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [SNIP]
>> I didn't know whether this had been done before in
>> Commons - but seems
>> that it has for the Commons CSV component back in
>> December 2005:
>>
>>
> http:
> On another note : If there will be no mentors for the project from Jakarta, I
> don't see a reason
> that Jakarta be the sponsor of the project. Not that this is a documented
> Incubator policy however,
> but since 1) we have a lot of people who are allowed to be a member
Replace member with
Matt Benson wrote:
> --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [SNIP]
>> I didn't know whether this had been done before in
>> Commons - but seems
>> that it has for the Commons CSV component back in
>> December 2005:
>>
>>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jakarta-commons-csv.htm
18 matches
Mail list logo
