]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 3:53 AM
Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval
Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lists to moderate:
- slide-dev (Remy)
- slide-user (Remy)
Email address? Er, I'll let you deal with it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :) He's one of my
Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding cactus :
I think we should leave a few more days for other committer to vote. I don't
know what the standard number of days to leave. Why don't we say until
monday 12:00 PM GMT. Then we submit the proposition to the PMC for their
blessing.
-
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval
Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had a look at http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html
on 9/8/01 5:26 AM, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok for doing the website but I would have preferred someone who has already
done it and has everything set up on his machine (I don't and will have to
learn the mechanism before so it'll take a some time). To summarise, there
are 2
- Original Message -
From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval
on 9/8/01 5:26 AM, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok for doing the website
- Original Message -
From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval
on 9/8/01 5:26 AM, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok for doing the website
Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, don't take me wrong here :-)
I don't :) :) :)
I just jumped in because I saw some post on this newsgroup saying that you
wanted to homogeneise mailing lists ... I probably misunderstood the intent
which was maybe only to standardise on the
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Currently, the following lists have -MU set, and really should be
reconsidered:
bugs
Hmmm... This is unused... I would suggest converting it to an alias to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Done.
jakarta-commons (which should be renamed to commons, btw)
Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lists to moderate:
- slide-dev (Remy)
- slide-user (Remy)
Email address? Er, I'll let you deal with it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :) He's one of my fellow bandwidth stealers :)
(I contacted him and he agreed, in exchange for WebMail on betaversion.org.
Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this didn't seem to go through yesterday
It did :)
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 19:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lists that don't require subscriber
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:44, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Things I also noticed:
- cactus-user
I don't know what this is all about... There is no archive, cactus is
related to the commons project, so, it should be really a
commons-user@jakarta...
I think when it was initially voted on it was to be
- Original Message -
From: Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:44, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Things I also noticed
Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just sent a request for vote now on [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
:)
Since you're at it already, can you please also tell them that I'm going to
change the mailing list name from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ? :)
Let me know...
Pier
on 9/6/01 7:45 AM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. Perhaps the right fix here is to create a jakarta-cactus subproject.
Agreed... I would kindly ask to the Jakarta-Commons people, to vote on
making Cactus become a top-level subproject of
14 matches
Mail list logo
