At 05:22 AM 6/03/2003, you wrote:
this page contains more detailed advice about setting up the mirroring:
http://cvs.apache.org/~bodewig/mirror.html
Thanks for that. I'll look into it when I have some spare cycles.
-- Glen
-
this page contains more detailed advice about setting up the mirroring:
http://cvs.apache.org/~bodewig/mirror.html
- robert
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 03:59 AM, Kurt Schrader wrote:
Google says:
http://www.apache.org/dev/mirrors.html
-Kurt
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Than
IMHO it's quite a bit more involved that preparing a old-style release.
i'm currently preparing a revised release procedure document for commons.
this will contain detailed instructions on how i mirrored the recent
releases i cut.
- robert
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 02:38 AM, Andrew C. Ol
Glen, Is that sufficient?
--- Begin Message ---
Google says:
http://www.apache.org/dev/mirrors.html
-Kurt
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Thanks for trying but it doesn't exactly say HOW does one prepare a
> release such that it will/can be mirrored.
>
> -Andy
>
> Magesh Umasankar
Google says:
http://www.apache.org/dev/mirrors.html
-Kurt
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Thanks for trying but it doesn't exactly say HOW does one prepare a
> release such that it will/can be mirrored.
>
> -Andy
>
> Magesh Umasankar wrote:
>
> >Glen can find some pointers here:
>
Thanks for trying but it doesn't exactly say HOW does one prepare a
release such that it will/can be mirrored.
-Andy
Magesh Umasankar wrote:
Glen can find some pointers here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=103578980325833&w=2
Not trying to be picky, but in addition to poi-d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrew C. Oliver" writes:
>Next, I measure the success of it by two other things: Microsoft's
...
>Microsoft sort of way) and the final crux will be the day this
>http://www.tidestone.com/index.jsp goes out of business. The first clue
I don't think this is an
The primary advantage of doing this was to simply to avoid confusion.
When people say they are using 1.9 it's obvious that it was a nightly
and not the milestone build.
makes sense. Thats why you're the man.
PS: Announcement to the announcement list is coming.
cool. Note that I sent this
March 04, 2003 6:42 PM
> To: 'Jakarta General List'
> Subject: RE: Jakarta-POI 1.10.0-dev released
>
>
> I'm looking for a bit of advice.
>
> People keep asking me "how many people are using Tapestry"
> ... and I honestly have no idea. Insuffic
At 09:58 AM 5/03/2003, you wrote:
Why we skipped a release number, only Glen would know. :-)
I guess we really need to write this down.
To clarify my (maybe flawed) thinking:
We were running a nightly build called 1.9-dev. The milestone build before
that was 1.8-dev. In order to avoid confusi
I'm looking for a bit of advice.
People keep asking me "how many people are using Tapestry" ... and I
honestly have no idea. Insufficient feedback.
Do you have a way of determining the user base of POI? Any guidelines based
on downloads?
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Co
Glen can find some pointers here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=103578980325833&w=2
Not trying to be picky, but in addition to poi-dev and poi-user,
an announcement sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be
more appropriate and target the right audience, IMHO.
Congrats on the rele
While I was on my Western US tour, Glen cut the next "dev" release of
POI. You may find it here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-poi/dev/src/ and
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-poi/dev/bin/
Why we skipped a release number, only Glen would know. :-)
We do not yet follow whate
13 matches
Mail list logo
