Merge is complete, and both Jenkins build projects, xmlgraphics-commons [1]
and xmlgraphics-commons-maven [2], are enabled and building without error.
[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/xmlgraphics-commons/
[2] https://builds.apache.org/job/xmlgraphics-commons-maven/
I'm now moving my attention
There have been no objections, and all comments have been resolved AFAIK;
therefore, I will proceed with merging ^/xmlgraphics/commons/branches/maven
into ^/xmlgraphics/commons/trunk.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> I would like to start a vote on
ginal Message-
> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
> Sent: 23 February 2016 17:56
> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge from xmlgraphics/commons/branches/maven to trunk.
>
> Given the various input, I've deci
[mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
Sent: 23 February 2016 17:56
To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge from xmlgraphics/commons/branches/maven to trunk.
Given the various input, I've decided to go with the following artifact ids:
- commons-xmlgraphics
- batik
>>> - batik
>>>>> - fop
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that of our 3 current projects built by ant, only
>>>> xmlgraphics-commons
>>>>> has a prefix, while batik and fop do not. If they had all used an
>>>>> 'xmlgraphics-' pr
nd fop do not. If they had all used an
>>>> 'xmlgraphics-' prefix, then we would probably want to include that prefix
>>>> in our maven artifact identifiers. However, since 2 don't use a prefix
>>> and
>>>> 1 does, we are inconsistent in our present names, and should normaliz
a prefix
>> and
>>> 1 does, we are inconsistent in our present names, and should normalize
>> this
>>> by removing the prefix on commons.
>>>
>>> Do you anticipate a problem arising from this change? I expect that
>>> external users that want to
ing maven
dependencies, they will use the maven artifact naming conventions to pull
in xmlgraphics artifacts.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Reischenbacher [mailto:matthias8...@gmx.at]
Sent: 22 February 2016 12:36
To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge fr
Hi,
+1
great job, Glenn
2016-02-21 8:00 GMT+01:00 Glenn Adams :
> I would like to start a vote on merging
> from xmlgraphics/commons/branches/maven to trunk. Please respond by
> Wednesday, 02/24, 1700Z. Lack of a response will be interpreted as +0.
>
> In addition to adding a
. If they are using maven
> > dependencies, they will use the maven artifact naming conventions to pull
> > in xmlgraphics artifacts.
> >
> >
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Matthias Reischenbacher [mailto:
nal Message-
> From: Matthias Reischenbacher [mailto:matthias8...@gmx.at]
> Sent: 22 February 2016 12:36
> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge from xmlgraphics/commons/branches/maven to trunk.
>
> I tested successfully with Java 7 on Windows
t; Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Reischenbacher [mailto:matthias8...@gmx.at]
> Sent: 22 February 2016 12:36
> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge from xmlgraphics/commons/branches/maven to trunk.
>
> I tested successfully
Hi,
Ant naming is: xmlgraphics-commons-svn-trunk.jar
Mvn naming is: commons-2.2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Reischenbacher [mailto:matthias8...@gmx.at]
Sent: 22 February 2016 12:36
To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge from xmlgraphics
Hi,
Some files are missing from META-INF directory inside commons-2.2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Reischenbacher [mailto:matthias8...@gmx.at]
Sent: 22 February 2016 12:36
To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge from xmlgraphics/commons
I tested successfully with Java 7 on Windows 10. With Java 8 the
findbugs target doesn't work, but this is the same for ant and maven.
+1
Btw... I also tried to import the maven project in eclipse 4.4. The main
source and test folders are recognized correctly, but additionally a
source folder
Hi Glenn,
Thanks for preparing this. I did a checkout and confirmed I could use
Maven to build commons without issue. Therefore I'm +1 to this merge
Thanks,
Chris
On 21/02/2016 07:00, Glenn Adams wrote:
I would like to start a vote on merging
from xmlgraphics/commons/branches/maven to
s
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
> Sent: 22 February 2016 08:53
> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge from xmlgraphics/commons/branches/maven to trunk.
>
> Thanks for checki
ater, we use findbugs 2.0.3
> with ant CI job:
> 3.0.1
> 1.7
>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
> Sent: 21 February 2016 07:00
> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] M
I would like to start a vote on merging
from xmlgraphics/commons/branches/maven to trunk. Please respond by
Wednesday, 02/24, 1700Z. Lack of a response will be interpreted as +0.
In addition to adding a Maven POM, this merge will begin the process of
migrating to the typical maven directory
19 matches
Mail list logo