eir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:19:04 -0500
Subject: Re: Indemnification of the PMC
Is it my mailer that's making a mess here, or is something else going
on? This is the second message I've
gt;
Received: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:19:04 -0500
Subject: Re: Indemnification of the PMC
>Is it my mailer that's making a mess here, or is something else going
>on? This is the second message I've seen today that is attributed to
>Ted but was written by someone els
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is it my mailer that's making a mess here, or is something else going
on? This is the second message I've seen today that is attributed to
Ted but was written by someone else (in this case me, in the previous
case Stephen)
The two messages from "Ted Husted" that concern you
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Is it my mailer that's making a mess here, or is something else going
> on? This is the second message I've seen today that is attributed to
> Ted but was written by someone else (in this case me, in the previous
> case Stephen)
The two messages from "Ted Husted" that
Is it my mailer that's making a mess here, or is something else going
on? This is the second message I've seen today that is attributed to
Ted but was written by someone else (in this case me, in the previous
case Stephen)
geir
On Dec 28, 2003, at 11:13 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
On Dec 28, 2003,
On Dec 28, 2003, at 8:43 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
> * We need to put *all* the decision-markers on the PMC. At Jakarta,
> that means *all* the committers, and
No, it doesn't. We need to put as many as possible, hopefully all, but
it's not required to be all. We can also have people that aren't
co
On Dec 28, 2003, at 8:43 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
* We need to put *all* the decision-markers on the PMC. At Jakarta,
that means *all* the committers, and
No, it doesn't. We need to put as many as possible, hopefully all, but
it's not required to be all. We can also have people that aren't
commi
- Original message >
From: Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 22:58:55 +0000
Subject: RE: Indemnification of the PMC
>Seems to me that part of the reason it is diffic
Stephen wrote,
> For example, am I in writing this email, acting in the capacity of a PMC
> member, a committer, or an individual?
Seems to me that part of the reason it is difficult to resolve the issues confronting
Jakarta is that several initial assumptions are required, and that these are
- Original message >
From: Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 06:48:59 +0100
Subject: Re: Indemnification of the PMC
>If I understand correctly, the opinions of
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote:
If I understand correctly, the opinions of an individual are not the
same as a motion passed by the BOD.
Correct.
In fact, my understanding is that the role of PMC implies
no rights at all - just extra responsibility.
Is there
Stephen McConnell wrote:
> If I understand correctly, the opinions of an individual are not the
> same as a motion passed by the BOD.
Correct.
> In fact, my understanding is that the role of PMC implies
> no rights at all - just extra responsibility.
> Is there anything concrete to suggest othe
Geir :
If I understand correctly, the opinions of an individual are not the
same as a motion passed by the BOD. It is my understanding the BOD has
not passed any resolution that grants a PMC member any of the rights
implied by the message quoted below. In fact, my understanding is that
the r
Oh, and thanks to Noel for the links...
On Dec 23, 2003, at 6:49 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Here is the clearest description I've found. It's by Roy Fielding, ex
chair and board member of the ASF, and from all appearances, extremely
knowledgeable in these matters. It was posted here :
h
14 matches
Mail list logo