On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 02:15 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Thank you for the comment, Robert.
TO tell the truth, my original motivation to arise this
issue was concering to the upcoming newsletter.
I published the final Jakarta Newsletter in early
this month and I found I made some
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:02:57 +0100
Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was dead against this when Tetsuya first raised the issue,
I'm still dead against this, and likely to remain so until someone
can explain to me why it would be better than what we currently have.
1.
Current pages are
Hi Tetsuya,
What is wrong with the pages as they are? There are thousands of people who
have subscribed to the lists using the current method, and luckily there are
not too many misdirected posts.
Furthermore, a search for jakarta mailing lists
jakarta came round to having two pages for mail subscriptions after having
years of regular problems with people joining the lists who had no idea
about how to behave. the pages are user unfriendly but the old solution
(ie publically and vocally humiliating posters on list) was worse (since
it
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Michael Davey wrote:
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
No, my original intention was derived from just this simple question:
Why doesn't each subprojects' left-side navi point to the *appropriate*
section in mail2.html?
I was dead against this when Tetsuya first raised the
On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 06:19 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Hi all,
I am wondering how it might be if deleting
jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html and putting all
the contents to jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html
All the Apache TLPs (Top Level Projects) do not separate
the mail list
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 06:21:13 -0400
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that each subprojects can indicate the direct/appropriate
subscribe/unscribe section from each subprojects' pages.
(Now: e.g. http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#tomcat
future: e.g.
I believe the idea is to make people read the rules first, I wouldn't advise
changing it unless you have a good reason to, if it ain't broke don't fix
it.
d.
-Original Message-
From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 July 2003 11:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 11:19 AM, Danny Angus wrote:
I believe the idea is to make people read the rules first, I wouldn't
advise
changing it unless you have a good reason to, if it ain't broke don't
fix
it.
Yes, that's what i was trying to hint at :)
+1
d.
-Original Message-
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 11:33:20 -0400
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the idea is to make people read the rules first, I wouldn't
advise
changing it unless you have a good reason to, if it ain't broke don't
fix
it.
Yes, that's what i was trying to hint at :)
I
The nice thing about the current approach is that you can't get to see
the links w/o having to have read enough of the first page to
understand that you have to click through to the next page.
Otherwise, people will just skip down until they find what they want
and then have missed what is
Presently they give up reading it and email me personally.
-Andy
On 7/20/03 11:57 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The nice thing about the current approach is that you can't get to see
the links w/o having to have read enough of the first page to
understand that you have to
That's all very well and good. But why do I have to read the rules to go
look at the archives?
That frustrates me every time I want to search the archives.
Hen
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Danny Angus wrote:
I believe the idea is to make people read the rules first, I wouldn't advise
changing it
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 11:57:10 -0400
(Subject: Re: mail2.html - mail.html)
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The nice thing about the current approach is that you can't get to see
the links w/o having to have read enough of the first page to
understand that you have to click through
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
No, my original intention was derived from just this simple question:
Why doesn't each subprojects' left-side navi point to the *appropriate*
section in mail2.html?
I was dead against this when Tetsuya first raised the issue, but I think
I am coming round to Tetsuya's
I was dead against this when Tetsuya first raised the issue,
I'm still dead against this, and likely to remain so until someone can
explain to me why it would be better than what we currently have.
What we have is (as far as I'm aware) the result of responding to the
actions of people in
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:48:16 +0100
(Subject: Re: mail2.html - mail.html)
Michael Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
No, my original intention was derived from just this simple question:
Why doesn't each subprojects' left-side navi point to the *appropriate*
section
17 matches
Mail list logo
