Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Petteri Räty
On 01/25/2010 02:02 AM, Dale wrote: Is there something that I am missing here? For me, system should include the things needed for booting and for the package manager to work. If it can't contain python then portage has a problem. As I pointed out in another reply, portage won't let you

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Dale
Petteri Räty wrote: On 01/25/2010 04:28 AM, Dale wrote: Well put. I would agree that a simple warning should be given before removing a system package or a package that system must have, especially portage. Maybe what portage needs is a reverse -n feature. Instead of adding something to

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-01-24 22:15:17 Mike Frysinger napisał(a): On Sunday 24 January 2010 00:12:39 Benny Pedersen wrote: it removes python-wrapper and this remove python link from /usr/bin/python linked to /usr/bin/python-wrapper so all portage does not work after this, but i solved it with a quickpkg from

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Petteri Räty
On 25.1.2010 13.02, Dale wrote: Petteri Räty wrote: On 01/25/2010 04:28 AM, Dale wrote: Well put. I would agree that a simple warning should be given before removing a system package or a package that system must have, especially portage. Maybe what portage needs is a reverse -n feature.

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Petteri Räty
On 25.1.2010 13.30, Petteri Räty wrote: So there is already a option that is the reverse of -n ? Dale :-) :-) You would first have to define the reverse to avoid misunderstanding. --noreplace (-n) Skips the packages specified on the command-line that have already been installed. Reverse:

Re: [gentoo-dev] LibGL.la removal news item for =eselect-opengl-1.1.1-r2 going stable

2010-01-25 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2010/1/17 Krzysiek Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org: On 01/17/10 18:20, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Please: When you run tools which break checksums/dates of the database, give the user the possibility to decide whether he really wants this. Good point, I didn't realize that. However, I'd rather fix

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Dale
Petteri Räty wrote: On 25.1.2010 13.30, Petteri Räty wrote: So there is already a option that is the reverse of -n ? Dale :-) :-) You would first have to define the reverse to avoid misunderstanding. --noreplace (-n) Skips the packages specified on the command-line that have already been

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Jacob Godserv
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:32, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: I should also add that this is not a user support mailing list as there's gentoo-user for that purpose. I think the original purpose of the thread was already fulfilled. So then how was the original problem resolved?

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Patrick Nagel
Hi, (although this is no user support list...) On 2010-01-25 11:02 UTC Dale wrote: So there is already a option that is the reverse of -n ? See `man emerge`: --depclean (-c) [...] Depclean serves as a dependency aware version of --unmerge. When given one or more atoms, it will unmerge

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Petteri Räty
On 25.1.2010 18.20, Jacob Godserv wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:32, Petteri Rätybetelge...@gentoo.org wrote: I should also add that this is not a user support mailing list as there's gentoo-user for that purpose. I think the original purpose of the thread was already fulfilled. So then

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Petteri Räty
On 25.1.2010 18.06, Dale wrote: I am subscribed to -user as well. I been using Gentoo since the 1.4 days. This is about improving portage which is a good thing to talk about here. The devs do it, not the user. ;-) Also, I already know how to use portage pretty good. I'm not asking for support

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Dale
Petteri Räty wrote: On 25.1.2010 18.20, Jacob Godserv wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:32, Petteri Rätybetelge...@gentoo.org wrote: I should also add that this is not a user support mailing list as there's gentoo-user for that purpose. I think the original purpose of the thread was already

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Petteri Räty
On 01/25/2010 07:07 PM, Dale wrote: Petteri Räty wrote: On 25.1.2010 18.20, Jacob Godserv wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:32, Petteri Rätybetelge...@gentoo.org wrote: I should also add that this is not a user support mailing list as there's gentoo-user for that purpose. I think the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3

2010-01-25 Thread Petteri Räty
On 01/17/2010 11:12 PM, David Leverton wrote: On Sunday 17 January 2010 20:38:48 Petteri Räty wrote: With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Anyone

[gentoo-dev] Re: emerge -C eselect-python disaster

2010-01-25 Thread Duncan
Dale posted on Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:06:06 -0600 as excerpted: I am subscribed to -user as well. I been using Gentoo since the 1.4 days. This is about improving portage which is a good thing to talk about here. The devs do it, not the user. ;-) Also, I already know how to use portage

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: ccc.eclass

2010-01-25 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:29:48 +0200 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: On 01/12/2010 12:23 AM, Brian Harring wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:25:51PM +0100, Raaal Porcel wrote: scarabeus told me that the eclass can't be removed until two years since the deprecation date, so...