Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

2013-06-20 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:39:59AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-06-20, o godz. 15:56:09 > William Hubbs napisał(a): > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:16:36PM +0200, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > > > There is a new version of eselect-init in the systemd-love overlay to > > > play with. > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

2013-06-20 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2013-06-20, o godz. 15:56:09 William Hubbs napisał(a): > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:16:36PM +0200, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > > There is a new version of eselect-init in the systemd-love overlay to play > > with. > > The new version saw the following major changes: > > > > - the /sbin/init (

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

2013-06-20 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:16:36PM +0200, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > There is a new version of eselect-init in the systemd-love overlay to play > with. > The new version saw the following major changes: > > - the /sbin/init (aka the symlink that eselect-init handles) can be > changed to whatever on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eselect init

2013-06-20 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:10:27PM +0100, Steven J. Long wrote: > Fabio Erculiani wrote: > > - only init is currently handled by eselect-init, which is now using a > > very small wrapper POSIX shell script to redirect the calls to the > > currently running init > > How does say, switching inittab

Re: [gentoo-dev] Introduce global dmalloc USE flag?

2013-06-20 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 13/06/13 01:05 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-06-13, o godz. 09:35:54 "Dennis Lan (dlan)" > napisał(a): > >> also 4) app-admin/conserver 5) net-nds/ypbind 6) net-fs/samba 7) >> net-analyzer/scli 8) net-analyzer/traceproto 6) net-misc/siprox

[gentoo-dev] Re: eselect init

2013-06-20 Thread Steven J. Long
Fabio Erculiani wrote: > - only init is currently handled by eselect-init, which is now using a > very small wrapper POSIX shell script to redirect the calls to the > currently running init How does say, switching inittab format, work under this setup? -- #friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-20 Thread hasufell
On 06/20/2013 05:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:56 AM, hasufell wrote: >> On 06/20/2013 04:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber wrote: On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I'm all for having fun, but I think the

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-20 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:56 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 06/20/2013 04:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber wrote: >>> On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: I'm all for having fun, but I think the intent was to keep the multilib-build eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-20 Thread hasufell
On 06/20/2013 04:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber wrote: >> On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> I'm all for having fun, but I think the intent was to keep the >>> multilib-build eclass usage to a minimum. >> Sorry, I've missed that agreement,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Thanks for the offer, I appreciate it, but I have to decline this time. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-20 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber wrote: > On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> I'm all for having fun, but I think the intent was to keep the >> multilib-build eclass usage to a minimum. > Sorry, I've missed that agreement, can you point me to it, please? > Just something

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/20/2013 04:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually > graduates from kindergarten :-) > And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the recruiting, > mentoring process. > Fabio, How

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-20 Thread Michael Weber
On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I guess the follow-up question is this: > > Are there any consumers of these libraries which require the 32-bit > (x86) ABI to be installed? No ... t jet. And not that likely to arise, but I'm out of crystal balls ;-) . > I'm all for having fun, but I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Michael Weber wrote: > > And it's not fair to pick on the candidates by putting them under > close watch (mentor ship, probation already in place) and let the > established ones walk away. Tend to agree, and I don't think it is as productive either. Set policies

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Matthew Thode
On 06/20/2013 08:32 AM, Michael Weber wrote: > [talking about recruiting] > > Please don't focus on new arrivals, we should all be under investigation. > > I don't know the distribution of dev-ship-duration, but (hopefully) > it's long enough to justify a look at the stock. > > And it's not fair

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Michael Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 [talking about recruiting] Please don't focus on new arrivals, we should all be under investigation. I don't know the distribution of dev-ship-duration, but (hopefully) it's long enough to justify a look at the stock. And it's not fair to pick on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Petteri Räty
On 20.6.2013 16.07, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 06/20/2013 07:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: >> On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote: >>> On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually graduates from kindergarten :-) And

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Matthew Thode
On 06/20/2013 08:11 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 06/20/2013 03:07 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: >> On 06/20/2013 07:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: >>> On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote: On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread hasufell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/20/2013 03:07 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 06/20/2013 07:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: >> On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote: >>> On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Matthew Thode
On 06/20/2013 07:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: > On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote: >> On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >>> The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually >>> graduates from kindergarten :-) >>> And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Petteri Räty
On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually >> graduates from kindergarten :-) >> And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the recruiting, >> mentoring process. >> > As an emplo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Matthew Thode
On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually > graduates from kindergarten :-) > And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the recruiting, > mentoring process. > As an employee that works for a company that requires a cult

[gentoo-dev] Re: Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Duncan
Roy Bamford posted on Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:21:07 +0100 as excerpted: > On 06/19/13 18:35:49, Markos Chandras wrote: >> >> It is unfortunate to observe constant bullying, insults and trolling >> across our public media. Developers have been warned over and over that >> such behaviour is not accepta

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

2013-06-20 Thread Fabio Erculiani
There is a new version of eselect-init in the systemd-love overlay to play with. The new version saw the following major changes: - the /sbin/init (aka the symlink that eselect-init handles) can be changed to whatever one wants through make.conf [1] (this is a compile time option, as documented in

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman commit unexpectedly drops FEATURES="sign" on error

2013-06-20 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 19:59:08 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" napisał(a): > I was surprised by repoman just dropping FEATURES="sign" . I'm aware > that at that time it has to commit an updated Manifest to prevent > breakages, so if gpg fails it proceeds, but is there something it could > do to check gp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Fabio Erculiani
The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually graduates from kindergarten :-) And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the recruiting, mentoring process. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Markos Chandras
On 20 June 2013 04:53, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Does this mean the QA lead finally gets to suspend people who are patently > not suited for developing a stable distribution without asking devrel? > Because last time we got into the same judge, jury, and executioner > argument, which I guess was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Luca Barbato
On 06/20/2013 05:53 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Does this mean the QA lead finally gets to suspend people who are > patently not suited for developing a stable distribution without > asking devrel? Because last time we got into the same judge, jury, > and executioner argument, which I guess was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Roy Bamford
On 06/19/13 18:35:49, Markos Chandras wrote: > Hi, > > It is unfortunate to observe constant bullying, insults and trolling > across our public media. Developers have been warned over and over > that > such behaviour is not acceptable and they should try to behave > properly. However, people have