[gentoo-dev] stepping out

2014-10-12 Thread Angelo Arrifano
to rethink my role in the embedded team. I'm going to see this with them. Thank you, - Angelo Arrifano packages: - * gpe-* We should probably talk about removal of the gpe category. GPE made sense when Linux in cellphones was still on its infancy. Nowadays I doubt anymore is using it anymore

Re: [gentoo-dev] TrueCrypt and it's lovely license

2011-04-26 Thread Angelo Arrifano
all the data again into another encryption format. - Angelo -- Angelo Arrifano (miknix) Developer / GPE maintainer http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix http://miknix.homelinux.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] no more time for SynCE

2011-04-12 Thread Angelo Arrifano
have the time. Regards, -- Angelo Arrifano (miknix) Developer / GPE maintainer http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix http://miknix.homelinux.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: New global USE flag called ios, not same as ipod ?

2011-03-29 Thread Angelo Arrifano
and not necessarily present on all iPods (with iOS). So yeah, the ios use flag makes sense to cover all devices with iOS ipod or iphone. Regards, -- Angelo Arrifano (miknix) Developer / GPE maintainer http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix http://miknix.homelinux.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: New global USE flag called ios, not same as ipod ?

2011-03-29 Thread Angelo Arrifano
and not necessarily present on all iPods (with iOS). So yeah, the ios use flag makes sense to cover all devices with iOS ipod or iphone. Regards, -- Angelo Arrifano (miknix) Developer / GPE maintainer http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix http://miknix.homelinux.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: New global USE flag called ios, not same as ipod ?

2011-03-29 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On Ter, 2011-03-29 at 14:16 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 03/29/2011 02:07 PM, Angelo Arrifano wrote: On Ter, 2011-03-29 at 06:23 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: The magic number is often 5, this is 4 but it's only magic! ios (gnome-base/gvfs): ios (media-libs/libgpod): ios (media

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: New global USE flag called ios, not same as ipod ?

2011-03-29 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On Ter, 2011-03-29 at 14:46 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote: Am Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:23:04 +0300 schrieb Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org: The magic number is often 5, this is 4 but it's only magic! When I hear ios I first think of Cisco's IOS rather than Apple's. Is this an issue? Yes, it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please enhance your USE descriptions!

2011-03-29 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On Ter, 2011-03-29 at 17:08 +0200, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: Excerpts from justin's message of Tue Mar 29 16:24:57 +0200 2011: the descriptions of USE flags should explain what the USE is good for. In my opinion some thing like Enables foo intergration or Enables support for foo

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk 3 preparation work

2011-03-05 Thread Angelo Arrifano
. I just realized that there was a bug in my script which caused the maintainer-sorted list to not group packages together. Attached is an updated list. Thanks for the list, things for gpe herd are done. -- Angelo Arrifano (miknix) Developer / GPE maintainer http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: .la files and their future on Gentoo

2010-10-05 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 05-10-2010 03:55, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno lun, 04/10/2010 alle 11.19 -0400, Richard Freeman ha scritto: That said, supporting this use case should not interfere with more mainstream use of the distro. I like the USE flag proposal because it lets us have our cake and eat it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: .la files and their future on Gentoo

2010-10-05 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 05-10-2010 12:03, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno mar, 05/10/2010 alle 09.52 +0200, Angelo Arrifano ha scritto: Like Richard said Gentoo is about choice... By removing .la files, you are taking away that choice from the user. For you they might be useless, for some user (or entire

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: .la files and their future on Gentoo

2010-10-05 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 05-10-2010 13:28, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno mar, 05/10/2010 alle 13.25 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò ha scritto: Definitely not from /usr/lib/libGL.la given that libGL is part of mesa and mesa did not use libtool for linking until very recently, Actually, scratch that, mesa IS NOT

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: .la files and their future on Gentoo

2010-10-05 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 05-10-2010 13:49, Luca Barbato wrote: On 10/5/10 9:52 AM, Angelo Arrifano wrote: By removing .la files, you are taking away that choice from the user. For you they might be useless, for some user (or entire software house) it can be its holly grail for library versioning and linking. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] .la files and their future on Gentoo

2010-10-03 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 03-10-2010 12:53, David Leverton wrote: On 2 October 2010 20:54, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: Given the recent activity around .la files and conflict about how to deal with them, I propose we discuss this issue in this mailing list, and take this issue to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] .la files and their future on Gentoo

2010-10-03 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 03-10-2010 15:29, Luca Barbato wrote: On 10/03/2010 01:53 PM, David Leverton wrote: While I do agree that the underlying problem we're trying to solve is worth solving, I do have a couple of small concerns about how it's being done. The first is that it seems people are judging whether a

[gentoo-dev] What the hell is going on here?

2010-09-17 Thread Angelo Arrifano
at Gentoo. But there is one thing I definitely got right, he has a lot of motivation to continue in Gentoo and *offer* his time and knowledge, otherwise he would just raise the middle finger and go away after all of this bashing. Best regards, -- Angelo Arrifano AKA MiKNiX Gentoo Embedded developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] What the hell is going on here?

2010-09-17 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 17-09-2010 17:33, Alex Alexander wrote: On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:52:03PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:51:52PM +0200, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: On Friday 17 of September 2010 12:41:51 Angelo Arrifano wrote: Every single QA commit review coming into my Inbox during

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improve devaway system

2010-08-31 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 31-08-2010 10:03, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:13:15PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote: Hello fellow developers. On 08/30/2010 04:20 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: Sounds good to me, but I'd actually be more interested in having something the other way around; i.e. monitoring

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding AdobeFlash-10{,.1} licenses to EULA group

2010-06-18 Thread Angelo Arrifano
Angelo Arrifano: On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Ramsay wrote: Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễnchith...@gentoo.org wrote: One notable section is 7.6 in which Adobe reserves the right to download and install additional Content Protection software on the user's PC. Not like anyone will actually *read

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tone in Gentoo

2010-06-18 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 19-06-2010 05:20, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: On 19-06-2010 02:25, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Hello. As some people seem to be interested in examples of out of the line tone in Gentoo I feel like sharing an example just happened a few minutes ago: In #gentoo-infra people are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tone in Gentoo

2010-06-17 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 17-06-2010 11:51, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 02:32:51 +0200 Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: I wouldn't feel to bad if Gentoo is widely recognized as the distribution with the most friendly community around in 2011. Wouldn't you rather it be recognised as the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tone in Gentoo

2010-06-17 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 17-06-2010 12:08, Angelo Arrifano wrote: On 17-06-2010 11:51, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 02:32:51 +0200 Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: I wouldn't feel to bad if Gentoo is widely recognized as the distribution with the most friendly community around in 2011

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tone in Gentoo

2010-06-17 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 17-06-2010 12:08, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:58:21 +0200 Auke Booij a...@tulcod.com wrote: Wouldn't you agree that unless you're a genius who can understand the entire system upfront with just the bit of documentation out there, the support given, in this case by the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tone in Gentoo

2010-06-17 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 17-06-2010 12:17, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:08:05 +0200 Angelo Arrifano mik...@gentoo.org wrote: I had some text written here. Why did you just remove it like this? Next time, please write some kind of marker (...) to tell you did crop some text. That choice can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding AdobeFlash-10{,.1} licenses to EULA group

2010-06-16 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Ramsay wrote: Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org wrote: I propose that this license be added to the EULA group. The previous AdobeFlash-10 license is similar in this regard, and could possibly also be added to that group. Agreed, on both points, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tone in Gentoo

2010-06-16 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 16-06-2010 18:39, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: On 6/16/10 5:33 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: As I have heard there are people not joining Gentoo because the atmosphere in Gentoo is lacking respect and empathy. You are not the only one hearing that. If we jump over our own fences, that will be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC][NEW] Utility to find orphaned files

2010-05-11 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 03-05-2010 15:34, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote: fre 2010-04-30 klockan 18:24 +0200 skrev Enrico Weigelt: * Daniel Pielmeier bil...@gentoo.org schrieb: What about searching the complete file system but using an exclude file where you can put directories and files which should not be searched.

[gentoo-dev] [RFC][NEW] Utility to find orphaned files

2010-04-25 Thread Angelo Arrifano
to be a finished program yet, I'm looking forward for your constructive commentaries. [Attached] Regards, -- Angelo Arrifano AKA MiKNiX Gentoo Embedded/OMAP850 Developer Linwizard Developer http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix http://miknix.homelinux.com find-orphaned-0.01.tar.bz2 Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC][NEW] Utility to find orphaned files

2010-04-25 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 25-04-2010 17:34, Yuri Vasilevski wrote: Hello, On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:18:25 +0200 Angelo Arrifano mik...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello developers developers and developers, Ever wondered how much crap is left in your X-years old Gentoo box? I just developed a python utility

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-04-13 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 13-04-2010 13:25, Peter Volkov wrote: В Втр, 06/04/2010 в 07:43 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan пишет: * It makes zero sense to manually manage ChangeLogs in git[1] Once I had stupid cutpaste mistake and entered wrong credits in ChangeLog. I don't see how to resolve this issue in case ChangeLog's

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-04-13 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 13-04-2010 18:12, Matti Bickel wrote: Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: From my PoV, editing ChangeLog is like editing history. Complete no-no. It is possible in all major SCMs for a reason. And I (as a user) would laugh at Changelog entries saying um, I got that bug number wrong, it is really

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-04-07 Thread Angelo Arrifano
First, I've been using git to hack Linux for some embedded devices. My development was in sync with upstream linux-omap to which I sent several patches. So, consider yourself that I have some experience with git. On 06-04-2010 08:41, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 06-04-2010 07:43:02 +0530, Nirbheek

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-04-07 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 07-04-2010 00:21, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:06:24AM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: Why not just get rid of the in-tree Changelogs entirely? The scm logs already document this information, so why have it in a file? The major concern with this is users that are NOT

Re: [gentoo-dev] bug-wranglers queue is large

2010-03-23 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 23-03-2010 19:15, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Given that the b-w queue is over 200 bugs and some have not been wrangled for 3 weeks... Could everyone spend 5 minutes wrangling 5 bugs? (or more if you are willing :) Thanks, Jeremy I'm going to grab this one and ask how is Gentoo going in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: Proxy-maintainer project

2010-03-18 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 18-03-2010 18:24, Sébastien Fabbro wrote: On Thursday 18 March, Markos Chandras wrote: 1) Should we use a new overlay? A new branch on sunrise? or work ebuilds in Gentoo bugzilla?I think the latter is the best 2) I think an email alias is not needed We can monitor maintainer-wanted/-

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] ebuild function to show package changelog

2010-03-12 Thread Angelo Arrifano
or at the end of emerge update (controlled through a FEATURES=show-changelog or something). I know we are all busy with a lot of things and I know what Gentoo don't really need right now is more cruft in the ebuilds (just think on QA!). Regards, -- Angelo Arrifano AKA MiKNiX Gentoo Embedded/OMAP850

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ebuild function to show package changelog

2010-03-12 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On Sex, 2010-03-12 at 09:33 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 04:16:05PM +0100, Angelo Arrifano wrote: Hello all, [Speaking as user] I find myself many times stumbling through package ChangeLogs to see what is new/changed after a emerge -u world. As some of you might

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ebuild function to show package changelog

2010-03-12 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On Sex, 2010-03-12 at 17:59 +0100, Matti Bickel wrote: Angelo Arrifano wrote: What do you people think on a new pkg_changelog function that would instruct the ebuild how to retrieve this kind of information from the package? No, please don't. I'm okay with it if your mean at the end

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-08 Thread Angelo Arrifano
? Sebastian * Missing/crappy ebuild USE flag description on metadata. That is something, I think, that always help users. There is nothing worse than rebuilding a entire package just because the USE flag purpose was not what we think it was. Regards, -- Angelo Arrifano AKA MiKNiX Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve circular deps

2010-03-06 Thread Angelo Arrifano
they will recognize the cups USE flag when they see it. Most everyone I know also have a printer (some with a pile of dust on it) so I think most of people will enable that USE flag anyway. -- Angelo Arrifano AKA MiKNiX Gentoo Embedded/OMAP850 Developer Linwizard Developer http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc stabilization todo

2009-12-04 Thread Angelo Arrifano
a gateway set? Regards, -- Angelo Arrifano AKA MiKNiX Gentoo Embedded/OMAP850 Developer Linwizard Developer http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix http://miknix.homelinux.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future

2009-09-20 Thread Angelo Arrifano
. -- Angelo Arrifano AKA MiKNiX Gentoo Embedded/OMAP850 Developer Linwizard Developer http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix http://miknix.homelinux.com

[gentoo-dev] gpe-games: new category

2009-07-14 Thread Angelo Arrifano
to help me with this oh-not-so-important decision. PS: Please but please, just don't tell me that adding another category will make a longer ls -l output in /usr/portage. -- Angelo Arrifano AKA MiKNiX Gentoo Embedded/OMAP850 Developer Linwizard Developer http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix http

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www category

2009-04-07 Thread Angelo Arrifano
j.romi...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:08:19AM -0600, Jacob Floyd wrote: Brasilian Portuguese below (potentially useful for portugal portuguese as well, though I have not been there and do not know if they'd use anything different) On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Ulrich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Category tags on packages (was: new categories:)

2009-02-08 Thread Angelo Arrifano
, Thanks all -- Angelo Arrifano mik...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux ARM/OMAP850 Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcement of The G Palmtop Environment ebuilds

2009-02-07 Thread Angelo Arrifano
# Copyright 2008 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: $ # # @ECLASS: gpe.eclass # @MAINTAINER: g...@gentoo.org # # Original Authors: # Rene Wagner r...@handhelds.org # Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org # Angelo Arrifano mik...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcement of The G Palmtop Environment ebuilds

2009-02-04 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On Qua, 2009-02-04 at 13:56 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: Angelo Arrifano wrote: Since we are maintaining this over half a year now, we think that its time to finally starting moving step-by-step the GPE suite into the portage tree - starting with the eclass and toplevel categories

[gentoo-dev] Announcement of The G Palmtop Environment ebuilds

2009-02-03 Thread Angelo Arrifano
tree - starting with the eclass and toplevel categories. Sincerely, /me in the name of the embedded team. -- Angelo Arrifano mik...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux ARM/OMAP850 Developer at Gentoo Embedded

Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcement of The G Palmtop Environment ebuilds

2009-02-03 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On Ter, 2009-02-03 at 11:28 -0500, Richard Freeman wrote: Angelo Arrifano wrote: We at -embedded would like to introduce GPE - The G Palmtop Environment. The GPE Palmtop Environment provides a user interface environment for palmtop/handheld computers running the GNU/Linux or any other UNIX

Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcement of The G Palmtop Environment ebuilds

2009-02-03 Thread Angelo Arrifano
, will this slow down portage sync/metadata-regen/loopkup in some way? Thank you, -- Angelo Arrifano mik...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux ARM/OMAP850 Developer