It's low maintenance; only thing needed is either to rebase to my
libtransform work, or add proper xz support.
Either way, any questions, let me know.
~brian
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
16.06.2013 13:49, Pacho Ramos пишет:
Due ferringb retirement
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:31:07PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Either way, I'm honestly not trying to piss folks off here nor stop
the efforts to dig us out of the python.eclass mess. That said, *this
time around
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:15:45PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
And in case anyone wondered, the output looks like this:
* PYTHON_TARGETS - USE_PYTHON inconsistency found. This may result
* in missing modules when trying to use Python packages. Please ensure
* that the same
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:50:24PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:15:45PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
And in case anyone wondered, the output looks like this:
* PYTHON_TARGETS - USE_PYTHON
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:54:45PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
This isn't quite what I'm asking for. I want y'all to literally
document thus:
1) What your finished solution is going to look like. Users control
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 10:35:01PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
2012-10-28 22:14:15 Mike Gilbert napisa??(a):
This library is used for processing Unicode text in several high-profile
packages, including Chromium and other Webkit browsers, PHP, boost, and
many more.
If folks haven't looked at python_generate_wrapper_scripts in
python.eclass, I'd suggest doing so. For examples of it's usage, grep
for 'python_generate_wrapper_scripts' in /usr/bin/; any place you see
it, look for that-script-name-${PYTHON_TARGETS} (for example,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:00:43PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Either way, thoughts?
It looks like you haven't looked at the python-r1 effort. That means
you probably also aren't subscribed to the gentoo-python
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 08:02:42AM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 02:15 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
On a related note; we currently install multiple versions of the same
script- the only difference being the shebang. If one ignores the
shebang, in some cases
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:28:59AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
If we are somehow going to eliminate the installation of a separate
script for each python version, then the symlink idea sounds like a
good solution
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 04:50:04PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:28:59AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Regarding your /usr/bin/python3.2 /usr/bin/sphinx-build example:
invoking python on a binary
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:54:21PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:15:43 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a trick to this; currently, those generated scripts hardcode
the allowed/known python versions for that package. We obviously have
, 30 Sep 2012 14:42:14 -0700 Brian Harring
ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
The second is that it starts the conceptual shift from
cat/pkg is a build dep, and cat/pkg is a run dep to
cat/pkg is a dep that is required for build and run.
Fairly weak argument at best; you're claiming that via
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:36:12AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 30-09-2012 14:47:17 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
In the worst case it returns Bad marshalling data.
Examples wanted for this. If this occurs, that's a python bug- one
exception... portage (figures). They install
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:13:49AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
x? ( build: a run: b ) *is* nested conflicting.
You're still failing to understand the point of labels parsing rules,
though: the point is to make uses like the above well defined and
consistent.
I understand them just fine;
Cross-posting to scm; responses should go to scm please (and the
people who whinge about cross posting should go promptly to hell if
I have any say in the matter).
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 05:58:43PM -0700, Diego Elio Petten?? wrote:
On 01/10/2012 17:51, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
Anyhow, I
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 05:05:09PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:46:14 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Fun fact; peoples usage of labels in exherbo is thus:
build+run:
set of deps
run:
set of deps/conditionals/etc
That's largely because
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:55:22AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:29:17 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:02:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:54:39 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 09:30:18PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:14:53 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
That's largely because there are a lot of former Gentoo developers
there who all said oh, yeah, I forgot we could do it the other way
when
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:58:06AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 30-09-2012 10:31:17 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Personally, I usually run:
- python_clean_py-compile_files - Clean py-compile files to disable
byte-compilation allowing us to drop all various ways of doing this that
:
On 09/19/2012 06:59 AM, Duncan wrote:
Ben de Groot posted on Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:22:06 +0800 as
excerpted:
On 16 September 2012 21:15, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com
wrote:
So... basically, people are already doing this manually with
their own intermediate vars
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:53:40PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
But here's the thing: when you sell something as pragmatic, what
you're really saying is it's wrong, I know it's wrong, and I'm going
to pretend that wrong is a good thing. Getting it wrong should be
something you do only after
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
The live version of the doc
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:30:21AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/27/2012 10:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 27/09/12 01:07 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/27/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function
must be disabled. Please review
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 07:25:11PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:02:57 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:38:02PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
IUSE_RUNTIME is optional for PMs, why does the UI matter at all ?
Also, the proposal
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:02:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:54:39 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:58:07PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:47:33 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
The live version of the doc
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:35:37AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:12:56 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:09:49AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
Hello,
Since my previous idea of DYNAMIC_SLOTS proved too complex to design
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:38:02PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:29:17 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:02:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:54:39 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:58:07PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:47:33 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
Based on the above I do expect the reference implementation would also
need to change. I expect, for instance, that the PM's
metadata-handling would
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:09:49AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
Hello,
Since my previous idea of DYNAMIC_SLOTS proved too complex to design
and implement, I would like to offer an another idea, based partially
on what Ciaran mentioned. Before I start getting into details, I'd like
to know
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:37:57PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:41:24 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello
This comes from:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260536
In that one, we try to use the following:
has vala ${IUSE//+/}
Pardon the delay; got busy with work, plus to actually address your
claims re: labels (or refute, as I intend to do)... data was
necessary.
So I went and got the data. :)
Analysis was done roughly 09/17 or so; just looping back and
commenting now however.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 05:59:21PM
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 07:19:09PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:05:41 -0700
Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 09:55 +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
Hello,
The current dependency syntax:
[VERSION-OP] PACKAGE-NAME [-
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:45:30PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/21/2012 12:08 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
This comes from this gentoo-dev thread:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260536
In that one, we try to use the following:
has vala ${IUSE//+/} ! use vala
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:25:51AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
test depends: to specifically mark those dependencies that are only
needed for when the pkg is being tested; effectively ephemeral
build/run time depends that go away once testing is completed.
Does that mean that USE=test is
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:35:42PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:45:22AM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
Almost all affected packages can be bumped straight to 4 anyway and
so use the improved syntax.
toolchain_src_compile: EAPI=0: count: 38
I'm not sure this
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 08:48:16AM +0200, hasufell wrote:
I am unsure if that does or could solve the problem why GLEP 62 was
created, meaning... would enabling the foo useflag after the package
has been emerged trigger a remerge in the following example?
DEPENDENCIES=
dep:run? (
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:04:51AM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
A potential dev-libs/dep package
I assume this is a hypothetical package; if this is something out of
your personal eapi/repo, please state so.
might have valid use case for USE flags related to
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 02:24:26 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:25:51AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
test depends: to specifically mark those dependencies that are
only needed
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:38:50AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Brian Harring wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:25:51AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
Also, could you please stop spreading FUD with your examples?
It's not FUD; it's rendered deps, and a demonstration
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:53:09AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:06:19 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:01:21 +0200
Micha?? G??rny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:37:19 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:45:22AM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 19:41:14 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:10:47PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 16 September 2012 03:51:04 Brian Harring wrote:
+ if ! has $EAPI
At this point, the functionality built_with_use provides should
be covered near or more likely, in full, but USE deps in EAPI2 and
EAPI4; thus warn on usage.
While this may be a bit annoying, this is the only major consumer
left at this point that knows about /var/db/pkg layout; once that's
gone,
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
But consider that for example Zac AxS (correct me if I recall it
correctly) considered making changing the meaning of RDEPEND to install
them before the build, thus effectively making 'build,run' useless.
I really am not trying
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
But consider that for example Zac AxS (correct me if I recall it
correctly
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:39:22PM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 16 September 2012 09:20, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Dumps are at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies-example/ .
Herds, if you want to see what your pkgs would look like, look at
http
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 02:02:24PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:49:21 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote
Folks-
Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
The live version of the doc is available at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependencies.html
Wording fixes will occur, but the core concept
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:39:49PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
The live version of the doc is available at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependencies.html
I think you're
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:10:47PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 16 September 2012 03:51:04 Brian Harring wrote:
+ if ! has $EAPI 0 1 2 3; then
+ eqawarn built_with_use should not be used in $EAPI; use USE
deps.
+ elif has $EAPI 2 3
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 07:32:39PM +0300, Alex Alexander wrote:
On Sep 16, 2012 4:55 PM, Brian Harring [1]ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks-
Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what
I'm
proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:06:01PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 14 September 2012 10:17, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
All you need is something in bash that can parse DEPENDENCIES and
populate *DEPEND , and the underlying guts could be done in
practically any language without
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:03:36AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:33:18 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
To demonstrate the gain of this, we basically take the existing
tree's deps, and re-render it into a unified DEPENDENCIES form.
But in order to do
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:53:21AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
Currently, there is a minor amount of ebuild/eclass usage of things
named __*; ~90% of it is 'import once' eclass code like the following
Hola.
CC'ing pms since obviously they should comment, although the
discussion should be on -dev (aka, public, not an alias).
Sorry, this is a long email; condensing it down into a glep is viable,
just my time is limited (it's telling I started the gentoo stuff at
2am, wrapping up likely at
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:24:27PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:39:19 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
1) We disallow '@' in USE flags (yes, a use flag can actually have
'@' in it's name according to PMS; someone was hitting the crack
pipe pretty damn
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:18:54AM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 11 September 2012 14:16, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 04:14:17PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Is there anything in particular in the spec/proposal for DEPENDENCIES
that would exclude
Hola folks.
Currently portage exposes a fair amount of it's internal
implementation via vars/funcs into the ebulid env; this frankly makes
it easier for ebuilds/eclasses to localize themselves to portage
(rather than PMS), leading to breakage.
Thus a proposal for EAPI5 has been made, banning
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:36:46PM -0400, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/06/2012 02:50 PM, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:49:13 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
One additional thought- re: the scenarios
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 01:11:45 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
A compatibility hack that stacks them is strongly advisable;
something akin to the following:
Literally, we do the following:
inherit
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 04:14:17PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Is there anything in particular in the spec/proposal for DEPENDENCIES
that would exclude the addition of individual build: app-cat/myatom
run: app-cat/myatom deps by an eclass or eclasses? I know the
goal here is to make things
Hola folks.
Currently, our if you needed to mask the use flag introspection
globally, but allow it to be used for say app-crypt/gcr, the profile
configuration would be the following:
use.mask:
introspection
package.use.mask:
app-crypt/gcr -introspection
Frankly, this is a bit of a pain in
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:28:23AM +, Duncan wrote:
Brian Harring posted on Sun, 09 Sep 2012 15:10:27 -0700 as excerpted:
[Current profile config to to mask the USE=introspection
globally, but unmask it for app-crypt/gcr]:
use.mask:
introspection
package.use.mask:
app
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:06:45AM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-08-2012 20:46, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
snip
Also, we're getting rather a lot of *DEPEND variables here... If
we're making people make major changes to their
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 10:54:15PM +0200, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
On Tuesday 28 of August 2012 02:15:40 hasufell wrote:
Is there a reason not to support static-libs in an ebuild if the package
supports it?
It seems some developers don't care about this option. What's the gentoo
policy
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:08:58PM +, Mark Bateman wrote:
Patrick Lauer patrick at gentoo.org writes:
On 06/23/12 21:21, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
There's been a move towards using slots for clever things that don't
fit the traditional way of how slots worked. Examples include the
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:07:22PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 13:00:05 +0200
Micha?? G??rny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I guess that's a pretty comprehensive we need to do this properly
then.
Did I say we don't need to? We have the two eclasses which need to do
Yes. The manager can still parallelize prefetching, only consuming a build
job slot post fetch.
On Sep 6, 2012 11:49 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:49:13 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
One additional thought- re: the scenarios where we don't
On Sep 6, 2012 10:18 AM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 09/05/2012 05:29 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
Yes, I stated it because I view it as useful/sane.
and isn't a compromise at all.
I think you're mistaken in assuming a compromise is the required
outcome
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:44:34PM +0200, hasufell wrote:
I am missing a replacement for PYTHON_USE_WITH.
Would the attached patch help in any way? Review? Other ideas?
--- python-distutils-ng.eclass
+++ python-distutils-ng.eclass
@@ -59,6 +59,25 @@
# Set to any value to disable
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:03:55PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 09/04/2012 05:06 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
As a compromise, it could be made policy that bump to EAPI=foo bugs
are valid. If someone would benefit from such a bump, he can file a bug
and know that it won't be closed
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 10:36:13AM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 09/02/2012 09:46 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org
wrote:
What I dont actually understand at all is why bumping the EAPI should be so
complicated or involved
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:49:43PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:58:00 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Of course an individual PM could choose to keep support for as long
as they want, but unless I'm missing something, that'd let PMs drop
support for
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:12:44AM -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:45:21 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:21:15 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
Coming back to this old topic [1]. Is there still consensus
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:32:00PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/07/12 02:52 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 07/24/2012 09:33 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:54:07PM +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:16:39 +0200
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Since there is again no response at all, it seems like everyone is ok
with this, so i will propose to add this to the next
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:34:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:26:55 +0200
Micha?? G??rny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm attaching a reStructuredText version of the spec. You can view it
rendered as a gist[1]. But please keep the replies on the list, rather
than
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:31:59PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
Hello,
A simple solution to a program long-unsolved. In GLEP form.
Both attached and published as a gist:
https://gist.github.com/2945569
(please note that github doesn't render GLEP headers correctly)
--
Best
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:25:55PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
A dependency atom will have optional SLOT and ABI_SLOT parts. Using
the dbus-glib depedency on glib:2 as an example [1], the dbus-glib
dependency will be
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:43:49PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 06/06/2012 12:23 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 21:16:05 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Well, I think reading this thread is more or less clear what it would
be supposed to do, also Zac suggested it
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 08:15:28PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:14:03 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
How is the case of something like libpng going to be handled, where we
only support one API (and so
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:18:01PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
with tests)?
I'd suggest a special ebuild phase to
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:04:33AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:57:53 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw, good catch on package.mask. Hhadn't thought of that, that
*will* be the most contentious point. That can be dealt w/ via
having git
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:27:10AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 09:48:26 +
Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 11:34:07AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
I means using separate proto for metadata, not necesarrily git. In
any case, if
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 03:49:31AM +, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 3 June 2012 09:46, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
If there are enough Alice developers, is it a possibility that Bob
will never have a chance to get his commit in?
All this requires, is that in the time it takes
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:45:42PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Anything we do has to be automated to be of any real value. ??Ideally
if something goes wrong it should be as detectable as possible.
Yeah, but you'd have
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 03:27:03PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing people need to keep in mind here is that when you sign the
commit, you're signing off on the history implicitly. ?Directly
addressing freeman's
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:36:04AM +0200, Michael Weber wrote:
On 06/04/2012 03:25 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
While I do grok the potential issue of someone being a hog
(specifically via blasting commit by commit rather than building up
work locally, then pushing it in chunks), frankly
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 09:25:43AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 08:31:43AM +, Duncan wrote:
Micha?? G??rny posted on Sun, 03 Jun 2012 09:22:04 +0200 as excerpted:
Even if only the files metatdata changes, that still adds a significant
cost to an rsync.
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:50:06PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 06/02/2012 02:31 PM, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 15:54:03 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
# @FUNCTION: redirect_alloc_fd
# @USAGE: var file [redirection]
# @DESCRIPTION:
(...and a lot of
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 06:41:22PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
# @FUNCTION: multijob_post_fork
# @DESCRIPTION:
# You must call this in the parent process after forking a child process.
# If the parallel limit has been hit, it will wait for one to finish and
# return the child's exit status.
, none of 'em do this *now*, thus my concern.
-mike
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: multiprocessing.eclass
# @MAINTAINER:
# base-sys...@gentoo.org
# @AUTHORS:
# Brian Harring ferri
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:53:53AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
After some Google-searching, I think I've figured out how to implement
automounting under mdev. I'd like to put in as much sanity-checking
into the script as possible. Right now I have 1 USB stick plugged in as
/dev/sdb. Th hard
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:36:17PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Thomas Sachau wrote:
Krzysztof Pawlik schrieb:
On 30/04/12 10:39, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
If the eclass doesn't work with FEATURES=collision-protect
then it needs to be fixed.
Long story short:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:41:03AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have a feature request for distutil-ng (or maybe it's already
possible but I don't know how).
I have a package that depends on
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 08:36:37PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:41:03AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:44:02AM +, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:06:18AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Looks then that there are several alternatives for portage tree, then,
maybe the option would be to add a note to Gentoo Handbook explaining
the cons of having
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:52:53AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300
Alex Alexander alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
@preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it
should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production
boxes
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 01:46:17PM +0300, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
Hi!
Well i have 2 arm lxc containers on amd64 machine. Its works good if
qemu support most of needed cross arch instructions
I'd be curious how much of that is native, vs emulated. The hybrid
approach of scratchbox/obs has
1 - 100 of 813 matches
Mail list logo
