Re: [gentoo-dev] Devconference archives

2005-08-15 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Monday 15 August 2005 05:25, Corey Shields wrote: Archive links for the complete morning and afternoon sessions are at http://devconference.gentoo.org -Corey Hi Corey (and IU), Thanks a lot! Is it possible to download the media-files instead of streaming? This makes it a lot easier to

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 14/08/2005-21:16:01(-0700): Stefan Jones types Stefan Jones wrote: So I have started making a small C program which does the Checking dynamic linking consistency... part of the revdep-rebuild program (I think this the the most time intensive part). This program can then be called

Re: [gentoo-dev] Devconference archives

2005-08-15 Thread Wernfried Haas
Corey Shields wrote: PS - For those who are emailing me about using the Real Media codec. Just for the record, i didn't, but the topic raises some questions for me. Really really not intended as a flamebait to raise a debate on principles. Just asking. Yes, I realize it is a proprietary

Re: [gentoo-dev] Devconference archives

2005-08-15 Thread Wernfried Haas
Fernando J. Pereda wrote: If it is that important to you then please organize it the next time or re-code all those audio files. Please re-read my previous mail: I wrote: Just for the record, i didn't, but the topic raises some questions for me. Really really not intended as a flamebait to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Devconference archives

2005-08-15 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:16:10AM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: That's very nice from IU for sure and especially if there are not many (read: one) options to choose from the outcome is pretty obvious. However, i'm not sure what our Social Contract says about it. It seems to deal with the

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Stefan Jones
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 17:18 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: On x86-64 the native ELFs do not use ld-linux.so.2, but ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 instead. Okey, thanks, using /usr/include/gnu/lib-names.h would soon sort out that problem at compile time! Stefan -- Stefan Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 15/08/2005-07:25:36(-0700): Stefan Jones types On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 17:18 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: On x86-64 the native ELFs do not use ld-linux.so.2, but ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 instead. Okey, thanks, using /usr/include/gnu/lib-names.h would soon sort out that problem at

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Stefan Jones
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 23:35 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: I hope you do intend to support both types of executables on amd64. After all the current method with ldd works fine for both and I guess you don't want any regression. A quick look at /usr/bin/ldd shows that is just goes though using

Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X porting howto

2005-08-15 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 13:41 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: If there's anything I can add to help you out, just let me know. What do I RDEPEND on if the app is statically linked, but requires a local X server to connect to, like many binary games require? -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-osx] Package testing -- Automated initiative

2005-08-15 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 14:22 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: multiple instances on a 128-node x86 cluster (1/node). There are one or two things I'd like to change in Catalyst, as they currently make it slightly dangerous for your system. If for some reason an ebuild goes wrong, the bind mounts

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-osx] Package testing -- Automated initiative

2005-08-15 Thread Grobian
Chris Gianelloni wrote: By the way, I am working to get catalyst running on OSX, so version 2.0 will definite suit your needs when it is released. If you need help on OSX specific things, be sure to contact us... -- Fabian Groffen eBuild Porting Gentoo for Mac OS X --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-osx] Package testing -- Automated initiative

2005-08-15 Thread Kito
On Aug 15, 2005, at 10:39 AM, Grobian wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: By the way, I am working to get catalyst running on OSX, so version 2.0 will definite suit your needs when it is released. Very cool. I had 1.x nearly working a while back...haven't looked at 2.0 yet. If you

Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X porting howto

2005-08-15 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Gianelloni wrote: | What do I RDEPEND on if the app is statically linked, but requires a | local X server to connect to, like many binary games require? xorg-server is the package providing the servers. Alternately, there's kdrive in the tree

Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X porting howto

2005-08-15 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 09:48 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | Chris Gianelloni wrote: | | What do I RDEPEND on if the app is statically linked, but requires a | | local X server to connect to, like many binary games

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-osx] Package testing -- Automated initiative

2005-08-15 Thread Kito
On Aug 15, 2005, at 12:07 PM, Chris Gianelloni wrote: I managed to get it to work once I made some dirty hacks to account for uname being different, and removing dependencies on /proc... once inside the chroot, it's Linux anyway, so none of the BSDism's are an issue. Ok, let me know if

Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X porting howto

2005-08-15 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Gianelloni wrote: | I was referring to games that require a local X server, which is pretty | much all of the binary games, especially OpenGL-based ones. For | anything non-OpenGL or source-based, the dependencies would be explicit | on the

Re: [gentoo-dev] flat profiles punted (and a note about x86/OpenBSD)

2005-08-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 15 August 2005 01:37 am, Alec Warner wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: as previously mentioned, i've punted all the flat profiles since the 2005.1 release since it seems like no one is using x86-obsd, can their team (if there is one) please create the proper cascading profiles

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 15 August 2005 10:49 am, Stefan Jones wrote: On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 23:35 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: I hope you do intend to support both types of executables on amd64. After all the current method with ldd works fine for both and I guess you don't want any regression. But

Re: [gentoo-dev] flat profiles punted (and a note about x86/OpenBSD)

2005-08-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 15 August 2005 04:52 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Monday 15 August 2005 04:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: since it seems like no one is using x86-obsd, can their team (if there is one) please create the proper cascading profiles x86-obsd keyword is now removed, also to avoid

Re: [gentoo-dev] flat profiles punted (and a note about x86/OpenBSD)

2005-08-15 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 15 August 2005 21:59, Mike Frysinger wrote: technically i warned of the impending flat-profile doom twice before and well in advance of the 2005.1 release :p I never read a x86-obsd is going to lose its just and only valid profile :P A bug is usually a better way to track this down,

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Stefan Jones
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 15:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: But first I have an idea to only use scanelf (but that may have issues with 32/64 combined userspaces) which I would want to implement. no, it doesnt ... scanelf can handle any ELF format regardless of endian/bitsize of the host

Re: [gentoo-dev] flat profiles punted (and a note about x86/OpenBSD)

2005-08-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 15 August 2005 04:14 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Monday 15 August 2005 21:59, Mike Frysinger wrote: technically i warned of the impending flat-profile doom twice before and well in advance of the 2005.1 release :p I never read a x86-obsd is going to lose its just and

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 15 August 2005 04:19 pm, Stefan Jones wrote: On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 15:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: But first I have an idea to only use scanelf (but that may have issues with 32/64 combined userspaces) which I would want to implement. no, it doesnt ... scanelf can handle

Re: [gentoo-dev] flat profiles punted (and a note about x86/OpenBSD)

2005-08-15 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 15 August 2005 22:23, Mike Frysinger wrote: so, in the end, we all suck :p You admitted! :P -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM) pgpTMYBWtxjH1.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: net-p2p/zuul

2005-08-15 Thread Renat Lumpau
net-p2p/zuul has been p.masked and will be removed this weekend. For details, see bug #74985. In short, upstream is dead, and the package doesn't work. -- Renat Lumpau all things web-apps GPG key id #C6A838DA on http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint = 04AF B5EE 17CB 1000 DDA5 D3FC 1338 ADC2 C6A8

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper commit messages

2005-08-15 Thread Aron Griffis
Markus Rothe wrote: [Tue Aug 09 2005, 07:36:18AM EDT] Personaly I find it a little bit annoying to write changes twise. One time in Changelog and one time in --commitmsg. How about using the commitmsg for Changelog as default, but if a Changelog entry already exists, then write nothing to