The following packages need some love and/or a new maintainer:
Previously maintained by Thierry Carrez (Koon):
- dev-embedded/gnap
- dev-embedded/gnap-dev
- dev-embedded/gnap-ext
Previously maintainer by Eric Sammer (esammer):
- net-nntp/udh
Previously maintained by Chris White (ChrisWhite):
-
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 19:51 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:44:03 -0400
>> "William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> To future devs and any new contributing users, they will see -dev as a
>>> ml for developer interaction. They wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Heim wrote:
> The following packages need some love and/or a new maintainer:
> - dev-lang/swig (lang-misc herd ?)
will take this if no-one else wants it,
Marijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using
Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yazmış:
> For many reasons, I'm choosing to take my leave from Gentoo at this
> time. While this was in part brought on by the recent discussions about
> the mailing lists, it's related to many other things as well. Mainly, I
> don't have the motivation that I used to
Christian Heim schrieb:
> - net-analyzer/mwcollect (net-mon herd ?)
Herd-absorbage ;)
-Jokey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 07:01:52PM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> Until now I haven't had time to actually think about accepting it, but
> i hope everything around me calms down a bit in the next days.
I hereby accept the nomination. I may write up a longer manifest some
time, but fwiw i will try
Christina Fullam wrote:
> I think everyone is overlooking the part included previously:
> "An additional method discussed was to have all non-dev emails on a
> timeout, pick a number of hours, and then the email if not moderated
> would be released. (non-dev sends his email, time period expires and
Alin Năstac wrote:
> Do you have a solution to filter flamefests out of a ml? If you do,
> please share it with the list.
Please give one example of a mailing list plagued by flamefests that
successfully solved their problems by adopting moderation without
completely alienating their communities.
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 10:16 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > so all
> you've done is made posts from non-dev accounts time delayed. Why?
Time delayed -dev doesn't make sense for anyone. IMHO this makes sense.
-core Internal Private List, Public R/O after period of time
-devInter
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> -core Internal Private List, Public R/O after period of time
> -core Internal Private List, Public R/O after period of time
No. -core should not ever be public. It's not for development anyway.
-core contains things like personal issues the developer
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 20:20 +1000, Will Briggs wrote:
>
> But -dev is where the substantial discussion takes place. -dev would
> still be the "inside loop." And a community based project simply should
> not exclude/reduce (even simply in perception) the community's
> involvement in that loop.
We
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 17:45 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> The recent development of council meetings and their
> summaries not being posted (or at least very late) to the list makes me
> think that there is some alienation between council and developers,
> which i hope i can change.
While any eff
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 10:25 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > -core Internal Private List, Public R/O after period of time
> > -core Internal Private List, Public R/O after period of time
>
> No. -core should not ever be public. It's not for
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 10:24 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Alin Năstac wrote:
>
> > Do you have a solution to filter flamefests out of a ml? If you do,
> > please share it with the list.
>
> Please give one example of a mailing list plagued by flamefests that
> successfully solved their problems by ad
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 01:29:35PM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> I don't thing they are intentionally alienating, or delaying in
> summaries.
Most likely not, but still something i'd like to change. ;-)
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org
Gentoo Fo
* William L. Thomson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/07/14 13:29 -0400]:
> Anyone notice no more GWNs?
Well, I noticed it. And I read the news from June 14 on
http://www.gentoo.org/
Unfortunately, all our GWN-Editors stop working on it after
some months. It's a really time-consuming job. Think abo
It's a joint pleasure for me and diox to introduce to you Pierre-Yves
"py" Rofes. Instead of the snake people he will be joining our security
team. Py originates from Paris, France, and has just finished his
studies in computer science. He'll be hired soon (or maybe already was?)
as a security net
On 7/14/07, Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's a joint pleasure for me and diox to introduce to you Pierre-Yves
"py" Rofes. Instead of the snake people he will be joining our security
team.
Please give him the usual flamy welcome.
PyWelcome!
--
Santiago M. Mola
Jabber ID: [EMAIL P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:13:53 -0400
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I should cut it, but I'm leaving it so you see what I'm responding
to.
Seemant, thanks.
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 10:33 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>
> > *sigh*
>
> I
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Py originates from Paris, France,
The French conspiracy is growing again :)
Bienvenue à toi :)
Rémi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 10:24 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
>> Alin N?stac wrote:
>>
>> > Do you have a solution to filter flamefests out of a ml? If you do,
>> > please share it with the list.
>>
>> Please give one example of a mailing list plagued by flamefests that
>>
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:16:36 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christina Fullam wrote:
> > I think everyone is overlooking the part included previously:
> > "An additional method discussed was to have all non-dev emails on a
> > timeout, pick a number of hours, and then the email if not
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 05:37:16PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> We are all required to subscribe to this mailing list... Should be easy
> enough to spot the thread.
You know, sometimes I get tired of all the flames and pointless
discussions and mark all mails as read. If something should be read b
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:05:51PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> Actually i am qmail maintainer and also been in the qmail herd for
> quite some time...
No, actually you're in the qmail herd and maintainer of the
net-mail/qmail-ldap package. This doesn't make you a netqmail (the
package I care ab
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> qmail-ldap will not be removed for sure, since i maintain it currently.
Okay, my status there was outdated. We were at least discussing it at
some point in history.
> > And as the netqmail ebuild maintainer, I want the ebuild to be
Christina Fullam wrote:
> I think everyone is overlooking the part included previously:
> (non-dev sends his email, time period expires and
> no one booted it, so the email rolls through)"
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Then what, exactly, is the damned point? The problem this is
>>suppos
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 21:48 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
>
> >
> You already have two lists. Your argument that core is for more private
> stuff, but not developer communication seems odd.
Well we need two development type of lists. The first question we ask
any new devs on our quizzes is
When is it
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:22:47AM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > > It seems like you aren't interested in communication with the
> > > maintainer, otherwise you would've CC'ed me.
> > Erm? This was completely uncalled for, I'd say?!
To Jakub: It was. Sending such things to a public lis
Christina Fullam wrote:
> I suppose the problem is high-volume and excessive flaming/trolling/OT.
> The proposed solution asks that every developer take an active role,
> yes, so that could easily equal more work - but I have little doubts
> that there are developers that will take an interest in
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> handball
Yay! Handball for the win!
V-Li
--
http://www.gentoo.org/
http://www.faulhammer.org/
http://www.gnupg.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here's one I should sleep on -- I didn't:
Not much.
Very few Comments.
I'll start them.
1. Council is just wrong. They are also just gone.
2. I am just wrong. Most likely.
3. Council blew it. They ignore what proctors were doing, ki
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:02:00 +0200
Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> > qmail-ldap will not be removed for sure, since i maintain it
> > currently.
>
> Okay, my status there was outdated. We were at least discussing it
Dnia 14-07-2007, sob o godzinie 14:03 -0700, Christina Fullam
napisał(a):
[ .. ]
> -core stays private. I really dont see the need to change IMO.
> -project (call it what you will) would be for the off topic, non
> development emails that we so commonly see. this list would be optional
> for all de
Mike Doty wrote:
All-
We're going to change the -dev mailing list from completely open to where only
devs can post, but any dev could moderate a non-dev post. devs who moderate in
bad posts will be subject to moderation themselves. in addition the
gentoo-project list will be created to take o
34 matches
Mail list logo
