On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:14:56 +0530
"Nirbheek Chauhan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 12:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Feature as opposed to release branches would still have to be
> > separate packages, especially if you need to depend upon a
> > particular f
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 07:18:26AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 20:31:46 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 18:57 Sun 09 Dec , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 19:45:27 +0100
> > > Jan Kundr??t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > What
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:26:21 -0800
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's two cases of branches I see (irrelevant of the names used):
> Major version branches - eg CVS "cvs-1.11.x" and "cvs-1.12.x"
> (those are the actual upstream branch names, I've seen other packages
> using the
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:24:27AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> mypkg-scm
One devil's advocate question for now.
Regardless of which suffix we pick, given that it is a well-known
suffix, what will be the expected behavior when PN = 'foo-scm'?
There's at least one package on Freshmeat with t
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:36:04 -0800
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:24:27AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > mypkg-scm
> One devil's advocate question for now.
> Regardless of which suffix we pick, given that it is a well-known
> suffix, what will be t
On 00:26 Mon 10 Dec , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> What I've got for my Xorg testing setup, is foo--rX, with a number
> of different -X values that I just select from via package.{un,}mask
> while testing - this saves altering everything else in the tree to pick
> some package that has a diffe
On Dec 10, 2007 10:21 AM, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 00:26 Mon 10 Dec , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > What I've got for my Xorg testing setup, is foo--rX, with a number
> > of different -X values that I just select from via package.{un,}mask
> > while testing - this saves
On Monday, 10. December 2007, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> Why not just have something like
> sys-devel/gcc-4.2.3_p20071127-scm_b${BRANCHNAME}-r1 ?
1) You cannot define a total order on those names:
Is
maa/moo-3-scm_bONECOOLFEATURE
<
maa/moo-3-scm_bOTHERCOOLFEATURE
?
2) It will break updati
On Dec 10, 2007 6:29 PM, Robert Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) You cannot define a total order on those names:
> Is
>maa/moo-3-scm_bONECOOLFEATURE
> <
>maa/moo-3-scm_bOTHERCOOLFEATURE
> ?
Why not have them block each other such that only one branch can be
installed at a time? T
Hello all,
Currently our Heimdal packages and MIT-KRB5 packages are woefully out of
date. I know Seemant tried for a while and I have been trying to recruit
maintainers for these packages but completely unsuccessfully. So I turn
to the mailing list to hopefully recruit someone. I don't use Heimdal
On Monday, 10. December 2007, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 6:29 PM, Robert Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) You cannot define a total order on those names:
> > Is
> >maa/moo-3-scm_bONECOOLFEATURE
> > <
> >maa/moo-3-scm_bOTHERCOOLFEATURE
> > ?
>
> Why not have them b
On 10:34 Mon 10 Dec , Santiago M. Mola wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 10:21 AM, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 00:26 Mon 10 Dec , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > What I've got for my Xorg testing setup, is foo--rX, with a number
> > > of different -X values that I just select
On Dec 10, 2007 8:44 PM, Robert Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would still mean everything relies on n ebuilds with mutual blocks.
> Even if that would work and it block upgrades, it is still not a
> solution in terms of how to display a list of ebuilds in one tree in an
> ordered list.
On Dec 11, 2007 1:14 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course this could be extended to apply only to branch ebuilds
> without a version number (where you know when the branch will be
> merged), etc.
s/you know/you don't know/
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
Doug Klima wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Currently our Heimdal packages and MIT-KRB5 packages are woefully out of
> date. I know Seemant tried for a while and I have been trying to recruit
> maintainers for these packages but completely unsuccessfully. So I turn
> to the mailing list to hopefully recru
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> vmmouse input driver (For X inside VMWare)
> vmware (For X inside VMWare)
I can take those two if nobody else wants them.
--
Tiziano Müller
Gentoo Linux Developer
Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, cpp, Python
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP : F327
On 09:42 Mon 10 Dec , Bjarke Istrup Pedersen (gurligebis) wrote:
> 1.1 net-wireless/hostapd/hostapd-0.6.1.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-wireless/hostapd/hostapd-0.6.1.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/vi
On 22:07 Mon 10 Dec , Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> > vmmouse input driver (For X inside VMWare)
> > vmware (For X inside VMWare)
> I can take those two if nobody else wants them.
They're all yours. Thanks! The nice thing about them is that there
aren't any open bugs
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 8:44 PM, Robert Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That would still mean everything relies on n ebuilds with mutual blocks.
>> Even if that would work and it block upgrades, it is still not a
>> solution in terms of how to display a list of ebuilds in
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Incidentally, I suspect the gcc example with _p is confusing people. The
normal use for an -scm suffix will be as follows:
Yeah I abused the _p suffix. My bad.
The whole _p thing only comes up for those very rare (or possibly
non-existent) projects that have patchset b
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 10:34 Mon 10 Dec , Santiago M. Mola wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 10:21 AM, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While we're getting a bit off the original topic here, it occurred to me
that using SLOTs for this, in combination with various SLOT deps and
SLOT bloc
On Monday 10 December 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> {
> ...
> echo "CONFIG_EAP_SAKE=y"
> ...
> } >> ${CONFIG}
cat <<-EOF >> ${CONFIG}
...
CONFIG_EAP_SAKE=y
...
EOF
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
22 matches
Mail list logo
