On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 19:44 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> mikmod - Seriously, how many folks make it a habit to listen to .MOD
> music all the time? Even netlabels like Monotonik, which started *out*
> as .mod, make it harder to find their old .mod stuff.
Agree
> ldap - Punt for the same reasons k
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> I'm believe the primary reason is for release LiveCD's.
> They ship with evolution-exchange, and that requires
> evolution/evolution-data-server to be built with USE=kerberos
> They don't do /etc/portage business, so it's a global USE flag to get
> things like GRP packages to
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 19:22 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
> >> Michael Hammer wrote:
> >>> * Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]:
> If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap.
> >>> ++
> >
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
Michael Hammer wrote:
* Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]:
If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap.
++
I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely
approve of nukin
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
> Michael Hammer wrote:
> > * Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]:
> >> If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap.
> >
> > ++
>
> I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely
> approve of nuking
Michael Hammer wrote:
> * Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]:
>> If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap.
>
> ++
I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely
approve of nuking it.
-Joe
As announced beginning of September, the tetex virtual was finally
removed. See bug 222501 for details.
Ulrich
Hi,
I want to devote more time to the kernel project and other things, so
I'm looking for people or herds to take ebuild maintainership of the
following packages:
dev-dotnet/gsf-sharp
dev-dotnet/evolution-sharp
dev-util/rej
net-wireless/zd1211-firmware
sys-block/viaideinfo
sys-fs/udftools
x11
* Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]:
> If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap.
++
greets, mueli
p.S.: thx for the suggestion cardoe!
--
Michael Hammer|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Graz, AT
Gent
On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:41:26 Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> > On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote:
> >> Marius Mauch wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
> >>>
> >>> Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone remind me again
Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote:
>
>> Marius Mauch wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
>>>
>>> Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
In anticipation of getting GCC 4.3 stabilized sometime, I'd like to ask
maintainers check if their current stable packages build with 4.3, and
if not please stabilize a version that does in the near future if at
all possible. Stabilizing this version is going to be a huge job due
to the number of
On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
> >
> > Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
> >> default?
> >
> > AFAIK it was added so that the d
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
> Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
>> default?
>
> AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides
Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
> Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
>> default?
>>
>
> AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for
> joining a Windows domain
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
> default?
AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for
joining a Windows domain (same for the ldap flag).
> If no one oppose
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:18 +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
> Remember pkg_preinst is called after src_install.
Right, I'll change that back. It got in my way during unpack cycles.
> BTW: ROOT should be respected in pkg_postinst too.
I'll add that.
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
Description: Thi
* "Tony Vroon (chainsaw)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
> --- smstools-2.2.20.ebuild14 Jan 2008 16:13:37 - 1.1
> +++ smstools-2.2.20.ebuild31 Oct 2008 15:49:29 - 1.2
>
> -pkg_setup() {
> - enewgroup sms
> - enewuser smsd -1 -1 /var/spool/sms sms
> -}
Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
default? Especially after a long time of kerberos not having a
maintainer (thanks mueli for joining the Gentoo club and maintaining it
now). Our current maintainer is working his butt off to get it up to
speed but it's not there y
19 matches
Mail list logo
