Hi!
As you can be noticed, Lua packages, just like Python, PHP or Ruby ones,
supports slotted behaviour (with some side notes).
As far as we have nice *_TARGETS for languages above (without standardised
naming syntax, although), we still do not have such for Lua.
Rafael's main argument is about
Sebastian Pipping posted on Thu, 26 Mar 2015 19:15:09 +0100 as excerpted:
Changes:
* Revision bump
This ^^..
* Add section on .php.inc
* Add thanks line
Title: Apache AddHandler vulnerability protection
Author:
# Bernard Cafarelli voyag...@gentoo.org (26 Mar 2015)
# Dead upstreams, not working in some use cases,
# compatibility with current net-misc/nx not guaranteed,
# some bundle old binary Xorg code that may be vulnerable,
# modern alternative exist:
# net-misc/x2go{client,server} and proprietary NX
On 03/26/2015 12:56 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Why this news entry?
The most important reason is missing =)
If you are relying on the AddHandler behavior to execute
secret_database_stuff.php.inc, then once the change is made, Apache will
begin serving up your database credentials in plain
All,
I'm seeing at least two ways of handling zsh completion files in the
tree.
The first is in a package I maintain and several others in the tree --
using the zsh-completion use flag along with an rdepend on
app-shells/zsh behind the use flag. The package I maintain that does
this is
x11-libs/libXaw3dXft is up for grabs, as the x11 team is not interested
in maintaining this package.
The only reverse dependency of this package is media-gfx/xpaint.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:17:02PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several
other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions
according to our
Hi!
In context of
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=538822
mjo and agreed that a portage news item would be a good idea.
Please review my proposal below. Thank you!
Best,
Sebastian
===
Title: Apache AddHandler vulnerability
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several
other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions
according to our small files installation practice and not reflecting
the rdepend
* Sebastian Pipping schrieb am 26.03.15 um 19:15 Uhr:
As of the momment, affected packages include:
^
Typo
--
0x35A64134 - 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317
3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 26.03.2015 18:02, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
The most important reason is missing =)
If you are relying on the AddHandler behavior to execute
secret_database_stuff.php.inc, then once the change is made, Apache will
begin serving up your database credentials in plain text.
Good point.
On 26.03.2015 20:50, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
* Sebastian Pipping schrieb am 26.03.15 um 19:15 Uhr:
As of the momment, affected packages include:
^ Typo
Thanks. Fixed in my local copy. No need to re-paste, I believe.
Best,
Sebastian
On 14.03.2015 23:25, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Trying to explain to a new user that the Portage tree refers to the
collection of ebuilds used by a PMS-compliant package manager (eg
Portage) is problematic.
Full ack. Let's limit portage to the piece of software, please.
Questions: 0. What
On 15.03.2015 10:48, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to
consider moving other repositories there -- at least the
official ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having
everything hosted on git.g.o as git.g.o/repo/${repo_name}.git.
Our bug queue has 101 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Questions:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
1. We have some namespaces in Git: proj, dev, priv, data, sites, exp;
should the tree be in one of those namespaces, a new namespace, or be
without a namespace?
On 27 March 2015 at 10:32, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
It would be great to logically separate ebuild repositories (main tree and
overlays) somehow logically from code, data, ...
How about adding an additional level repo for everything that contains
ebuild trees?
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 13:17:02 Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several
other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions
according to our small
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several
other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions
according to
19 matches
Mail list logo
