On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:27:32 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 21 July 2007, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21 Jul 2007)
> > # Last release from 1999, still using GTK+-1.2.
> > # Masked for removal in 30 days.
> > x11-misc/fsv
> in oth
On Saturday 21 July 2007, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21 Jul 2007)
> # Last release from 1999, still using GTK+-1.2.
> # Masked for removal in 30 days.
> x11-misc/fsv
in other words, you have no real reason for punting this package ?
-mike
signature.asc
Descri
Roy Marples wrote:
4) What baselayout will be used in the next release? (Maybe that's more
of a releng question.)
baselayout team just makes baselayout releases. If you mean the LiveCD
then ask releng.
It'll be whatever version of baselayout is stable at the time we take the
initial release
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 17:25 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
>> Archiving the handbook isn't possible.
>
> Why? Unless I'm missing something, it should be fairly trivial.
It ain't. It's an old issue.
Current networked (requires a net connection to install) handbooks go to
/doc/en/
Hey all,
Donnie wants to remove virtual/x11 (can ya blame him?) and since Josh_B
has retired (for now! ;) ) I wanted to help Donnie out a bit, since he
is busy and X is a massive undertaking... a "quick" grep of the tree
excluding ChangeLog files shows 3319 occurrences of virtual/x11 still in
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 17:25 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> Archiving the handbook isn't possible.
Why? Unless I'm missing something, it should be fairly trivial.
> What'd really be nice is if it goes stable for all arches (or at least
> all of the ones that matter, subjectively) either in time or a
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 11:48 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
>> (GDP): you give us the info, we'll document it for you. Or I will at least.
>
> Well, the changes are as outlined in my first email.
> The user changes are mainly a few variables in the /etc/conf.d/* files
> that basela
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:47:13 +0100
Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd particularly want to ensure that there is
> better communication between us (Gentoo) and projects such as Sabayon
> Linux and Ainkaboot, as I believe that we can all make use of each
> other's skills and ideas to provi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 17:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> indeed, that'd be sleeky and sexy ... go file a bug ;)
>
> Let bug #186156 [1] be henceforth known as the sleeky and sexy bug!
>
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cg
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 17:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> indeed, that'd be sleeky and sexy ... go file a bug ;)
Let bug #186156 [1] be henceforth known as the sleeky and sexy bug!
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186156
Thanks
Roy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Denis Dupeyron a écrit :
About the nscd issue we discussed on irc on friday (i.e. daemon not
playing nice with parallel startup), your patch worked. It stayed on
my work laptop, though, so I can't file a bug right now. But I'll do
so monday morning.
I'll add mine about the dhcdbd patch you gave
On Saturday 21 July 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 21:28 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 22:22 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > > Is there a common bug to report snags to? I've hit one:
> > > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 used to be a symlink to net.lo. After
> > > in
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 21:28 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 22:22 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > Is there a common bug to report snags to? I've hit one:
> > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 used to be a symlink to net.lo. After
> > installing, it was gone (I figure it went with baselayout
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 22:22 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Is there a common bug to report snags to? I've hit one:
> /etc/init.d/net.eth0 used to be a symlink to net.lo. After
> installing, it was gone (I figure it went with baselayout-1).
> Luckily, I have direct console access, otherwise the ma
Hi!
[... baselayout-2 is on the horizon ...]
Is there a common bug to report snags to? I've hit one:
/etc/init.d/net.eth0 used to be a symlink to net.lo. After
installing, it was gone (I figure it went with baselayout-1).
Luckily, I have direct console access, otherwise the machine
would have be
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 15:28 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i really think this bash vs POSIX issue is getting way more emphasis than it
> should. i'd make the claim the majority of people out there dont even know
> about /bin/sh, bash, dash, and friends, so most people out there will
> have /bi
On Saturday 21 July 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 11:48 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> >From our perspective, /etc/conf.d/* is quite well documented, so GDP
>
> could easily diff the files to see what has changed.
>
> > Of equal concern to me, however are a few issues:
> >
> > 1) H
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 11:48 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> (GDP): you give us the info, we'll document it for you. Or I will at least.
Well, the changes are as outlined in my first email.
The user changes are mainly a few variables in the /etc/conf.d/* files
that baselayout ships. For example a few
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 12:15 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> Roy Marples wrote:
>>> This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I
>>> plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and
>>> it will be removed from package.mask (keeping th
On 7/21/07, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now there are, as usual, some daemons and init scripts that probably
won't work. For those that don't, I have either fixed or there's patches
in our bugzilla. Here's a rough summary.
About the nscd issue we discussed on irc on friday (i.e. daem
Roy Marples kirjoitti:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 12:45 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> Roy Marples wrote:
>>> I don't actually know how to set those up or what the migration path
>>> would be. Maybe devzero and strerror could document this as I understand
>>> they do this.
>> I manage systems with a si
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 12:45 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote:
> > I don't actually know how to set those up or what the migration path
> > would be. Maybe devzero and strerror could document this as I understand
> > they do this.
>
> I manage systems with a single RAID 0 stripe (not
Roy Marples wrote:
I don't actually know how to set those up or what the migration path
would be. Maybe devzero and strerror could document this as I understand
they do this.
I manage systems with a single RAID 0 stripe (not dmraid) managed by
device-mapper. When upgrading baselayout, we also
# Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21 Jul 2007)
# Last release from 1999, still using GTK+-1.2.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
x11-misc/fsv
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Roy Bamford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On 2007.07.21 10:47, Peter Weller wrote:
>>
>> My main plans over the next few years would be to improve
>> communications (and (more importantly?) openness), not just between
>> developers, but also between herds, users, the Council, the Trustees,
>> u
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 12:15 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote:
> > This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I
> > plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and
> > it will be removed from package.mask (keeping the current alphas maske
Roy Marples wrote:
This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I
plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and
it will be removed from package.mask (keeping the current alphas masked
though). Arch teams will then be pinged on a bug to keyword
basel
This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I
plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and
it will be removed from package.mask (keeping the current alphas masked
though). Arch teams will then be pinged on a bug to keyword
baselayout-2.
Now there a
On 2007.07.21 10:47, Peter Weller wrote:
[snip]
>
> Yes, I will accept.
>
> My main plans over the next few years would be to improve
> communications (and (more importantly?) openness), not just between
> developers, but also between herds, users, the Council, the Trustees,
> upstream and so on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
>> gentoo-projects: This list is for... what exactly? I've not really
>> figured that one out just yet. I know it is supposed to be pretty much
>> anything that doesn't fit into gentoo-dev o
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:47:42 +0200
Markus Ullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..snip..]
> welp
[..snip..]
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:29:15 +0200
Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..snip..]
> - -welp
[..snip..]
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 16:06:34 +0100
George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..s
Here's the policy I wrote for -dev-announce. As mentioned elsewhere, the
automatic copy-to-dev isn't yet working so people need to send to both
lists. Reply-To is currently forced to -dev, but that may change as per
Chris's thread "New lists and their usage."
Useful input appreciated.
Thanks,
Don
32 matches
Mail list logo
