Richard Freeman posted 49e3d8dc.7090...@gentoo.org,
excerpted below, on Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:29:16 -0400:
> It does seem a bit odd to ask somebody to imitate the emerge formatting
> of the output just to say that it matches. If somebody wants to create
> a script to do it they can post it online
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
This isn't a usability request. Making the "use paludis --info cat/pkg"
text stand out more was a usability request, and I was happy to make
that change. This is a few noxious trolls whining in an attempt to cause
trouble.
For those who have concerns with the paludis out
On Monday 13 April 2009 17:17:36 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> So we are now a year later,
>
> some people are getting excited at getting rid of .la files again but no
> decent solution has been presented yet that I am aware of. We've had two
> situations recently:
> * https://bugs.gentoo.or
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:50:07 +0200
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Taking any of it out would be
> > removing things that are required to determine the cause of a bug.
>
> I doubt that's true in most cases: The information needed to
> finding the bug is a (possibly small) s
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Taking any of it out would be
> removing things that are required to determine the cause of a bug.
I doubt that's true in most cases: The information needed to
finding the bug is a (possibly small) subset of the whole.
I don't see how additionally providing a stripped do
So we are now a year later,
some people are getting excited at getting rid of .la files again but no
decent solution has been presented yet that I am aware of. We've had two
situations recently:
* https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264249 which got
reverted
* https://bugs.
В Чтв, 09/04/2009 в 15:32 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет:
> Please provide a list of packages that use custom configure scripts,
> that currently work with econf (including all the weird things it
> already passes), that would break with this change and whose ebuilds
> are using econf. I have yet to
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:21:37 +0200
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Just an idea without knowing all the details:
> Could
>
> - "--emerge-info" and "--emerge-info-verbose"
>options be added to paludis or
>
> - a converter script be written to convert
>paludis output to feel like emerge outpu
Just an idea without knowing all the details:
Could
- "--emerge-info" and "--emerge-info-verbose"
options be added to paludis or
- a converter script be written to convert
paludis output to feel like emerge output
to solves this issue? Would that technically
be possible? Is paludis ret