Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Taking any of it out would be > removing things that are required to determine the cause of a bug.
I doubt that's true in most cases: The information needed to finding the bug is a (possibly small) subset of the whole. I don't see how additionally providing a stripped down version of paludis info hurts anybody, as the subset either holds what the wrangler needs or it doesn't, in which case they can still request more information for the reporter. I suggest that you take this as a usability request from the users of your software. Isn't that a great chance to make several people happier every day in the future by just a few lines of code on your end? Would they raise their voice if it did not matter? Sebastian
