# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (14 Aug 2013)
# Last release in 2009. ruby18-only. Uses deprecated
# ruby-gnome2 components that have been removed upstream
# quite some time ago. No maintainer.
# Also remove the deprecated ruby-gnome2 components.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
On 14:37 Tue 13 Aug , Rich Freeman wrote:
If a maintainer is holding something up for months by all means
escalate it if you think it is justified, but if a maintainer just
wants a few days to look into things, that
Now that portage-2.2 is in ~arch, we should now be able to add sets to
the tree.
How should we go about doing this? In some overlays, the repository root
has sets/{foo,bar,etc} and sets.conf which might look like this:
[gentoo sets]
class = portage.sets.files.StaticFileSet
multiset = true
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
Should everyone be free to add sets at will, or should each addition be
discussed first, similar to adding new global USE flags?
While I don't want to deter people from creating them, it probably
wouldn't hurt to at
14.08.2013 16:05, Rich Freeman пишет:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Right now, however,
it might be useful if only to get a sense for how they're being used,
trade ideas, etc.
Well, we can use sets as replacement for metapackages(for example,
Dnia 2013-08-14, o godz. 16:53:17
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
14.08.2013 16:05, Rich Freeman пишет:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Right now, however,
it might be useful if only to get a sense for how they're being used,
14.08.2013 17:02, Michał Górny пишет:
Dnia 2013-08-14, o godz. 16:53:17
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
14.08.2013 16:05, Rich Freeman пишет:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Right now, however,
it might be useful if only to get
On 14/08/2013 23:02, Michał Górny wrote:
No, we can't. Sets are portage-specific, the tree needs to follow PMS.
Are you saying we can't use sets at all in the tree, or we can't use
them to replace existing meta packages?
Dnia 2013-08-14, o godz. 23:12:08
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 14/08/2013 23:02, Michał Górny wrote:
No, we can't. Sets are portage-specific, the tree needs to follow PMS.
Are you saying we can't use sets at all in the tree, or we can't use
them to replace existing
Dear Duncan,
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net writes:
heroxbd posted on Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:45:56 +0900 as excerpted:
I have made a GLEP draft to standardize our recent effort on using our
own libc from portage inside Prefix.
At present only glibc on linux is supported.
The rst text are
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am all for the standarts, but as we did not brought sets to PMS
yet(when we updated it for EAPI changes), my question is: 'why?'. It
is one of the long-standing feature of quite experimental 2.2_alpha
branch, that
Daniel Campbell li...@sporkbox.us writes:
I'm not a developer but this project's existence would motivate me to
get a compatible smartphone and test this new Gentoo version on it,
assuming it's also capable of standard phone calls and texts, etc.
This assumption certainly holds firm. It is
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org writes:
Sounds good. Note that it doesn't need to be set up as against
Canonical. Just do the best thing for the users.
Thanks. I'd take your advice.
I would like to kick out a sub-project of Gentoo targeting smartphone
and tablets. It would be nice
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 22:59:49 +0200
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
anymore but default to English. The intention behind this is to
intention behind this is = rationale is
have a hard time analyzing localized builds.
analyzing localized builds = reading build logs in foreign
Sergey Popov posted on Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400 as excerpted:
Why [were sets] not added as a part of the PMS? Some implementation
flaws? Or maybe, architecture problems?
[TL;DR folks, skip to last paragraph summary.]
(As a user who has been using sets as they appear in the kde overlay
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:29:00 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Sergey Popov posted on Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400 as excerpted:
Why [were sets] not added as a part of the PMS? Some implementation
flaws? Or maybe, architecture problems?
[TL;DR folks, skip to last paragraph
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am all for the standarts, but as we did not brought sets to PMS
yet(when we updated it for EAPI changes), my question is: 'why?'. It
is one of the long-standing feature
On 08/14/2013 09:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Right now, however,
it might be useful if only to get a sense for how they're being used,
trade ideas, etc.
No, we can't. Sets are portage-specific, the tree needs to
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:41:03 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am all for the standarts, but as we did not brought sets to PMS
yet(when we updated it for
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:41:56 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 09:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka
kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: Right now, however,
it might be useful if only to get a sense for how they're being
used,
On 08/14/2013 11:43 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:41:03 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am all for the standarts, but as we did not
On 13/08/13 10:10, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
[3] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/gerrit
And all boils down to the fact gerrit needs to be fixed to take patches
from a mailing list or provide some sane alias to cope with it's
specific ways...
lu
On 08/14/2013 11:44 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:41:56 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 09:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka
kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: Right now, however,
it might be useful if only
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:50:36 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 11:43 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:41:03 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400
Sergey
On 08/13/2013 04:10 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
As per my comment in bugzilla [1] I said that the patch should be
submitted upstream prior having it in cvs.
Yet you decided to completely ignore my statement and just smash in the
patch anyway [2].
Please don't do this ever again. We had
On 14/08/13 01:40, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:13:13 +0200
Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 13/08/13 03:41, Ryan Hill wrote:
I don't see any reason to keep this masked other than bug #416069, which
needs to be fixed anyways. How does Friday sound?
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:50:56 -0400
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 11:41 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am all for the standarts, but as we did
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:53:09 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 11:44 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:41:56 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 09:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael
On 08/14/2013 11:54 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:50:36 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 11:43 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:41:03 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On 08/14/2013 11:41 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am all for the standarts, but as we did not brought sets to PMS
yet(when we updated it for EAPI changes), my question is:
On 14 August 2013 16:59, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 11:54 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:50:36 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 11:43 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:41:03 +0800
Patrick Lauer
The original maintainers of the package app-laptop/prey have decided[1]
they do no longer want to maintain this package; therefore it has been
assigned to maintainer-needed@g.o, if anyone is interested in
maintaining this package then feel free to pick it up. It only has two
bugs open at the
Luca Barbato wrote:
[3] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/gerrit
And all boils down to the fact gerrit needs to be fixed to take
patches from a mailing list
Usually Gerrit just needs an OpenID in order to accept git push via SSH.
That seems significantly better to me than
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:59:28 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
Uhm. Look at the class line.
https://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde.git;a=blob;f=sets.conf;h=1f4c4263f48e5360606c1acc97fbab64b03541b7;hb=HEAD
... a static identifier.
I would usually call that a
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:56:09 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Why it was not added as a part of the PMS? Some implementation
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:58:01 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:53:09 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 11:44 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:41:56 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
The discussion at stake here is Can we add sets to the tree? If so,
should everyone be able to do that free or by prior discussion? and I
don't think that any reply to this whole sub thread benefits anyone.
So, I already
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:54:40 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:56:09 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:07:32 +0400
Sergey Popov
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:09:40 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Er, look at the first post in the thread:
That was about the repository, not about the PMS; the question was
whether we need to respect the PMS and why it misses this _feature_,
for which no proposed
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:57:57 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:09:40 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Er, look at the first post in the thread:
That was about the repository, not about the PMS; the question was
whether we need to
On 08/14/2013 03:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-08-14, o godz. 16:53:17
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
14.08.2013 16:05, Rich Freeman пишет:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Right now, however,
it might be useful if only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/14/2013 09:28 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Using the conventional view of what a set is, the point is to
allow you to mask, say, kde7 using a single line, and then define
what kde7 is using a set. Then the user can unmask kde7 without
having
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:34:51 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 03:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-08-14, o godz. 16:53:17
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
14.08.2013 16:05, Rich Freeman пишет:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/14/2013 09:51 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Perhaps these basic notions of how Gentoo development works should
be added to the new developer quiz, so we can be sure people
understand the appropriate ways of making changes and where the
power
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:53:26 +0200
Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 09:51 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Perhaps these basic notions of how Gentoo development works should
be added to the new developer quiz, so we can be sure people
On 08/14/2013 09:51 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:34:51 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 03:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-08-14, o godz. 16:53:17
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
14.08.2013 16:05, Rich Freeman пишет:
On Wed, Aug
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/14/2013 09:28 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Using the conventional view of what a set is, the point is to
allow you to mask, say, kde7 using a single line, and then
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:28:02 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
[.. SNIP ..]
Thank you.
In order for sets to be added to the tree, we need a spec, we need
to decide where sets are allowed (package.mask?), and we need an
implementation.
Sets in
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:59:37 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
You're fundamentally misunderstanding how PMS and Gentoo development
works.
I think you are fundamentally misunderstanding. I think gentoo should
stop supporting downstreams IF supporting them means blocking
progress.
On 08/14/2013 10:07 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:59:37 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
You're fundamentally misunderstanding how PMS and Gentoo development
works.
I think you are fundamentally misunderstanding. I think gentoo should
stop supporting downstreams
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 22:03:38 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Using the conventional view of what a set is,
But what kind of view would that be, a mathematical set, a set from a
prior discussion or a completely different set? I assume the first
one.
The rather outdated GLEP 21
On 14 August 2013 21:13, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 22:03:38 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Using the conventional view of what a set is,
But what kind of view would that be, a mathematical set, a set from a
prior discussion or a
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general
progress in gentoo.
Perhaps these basic notions of how Gentoo development works
You certainly are not an authority when it comes to that
question...
Well no
exactly
Stop it. Now.
On 14 August 2013 21:17, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general
progress in gentoo.
Perhaps these basic notions of how Gentoo development works
You certainly are not an authority when it
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:16:18 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
My understanding is that the cvs tree should be PMS compatible and
since 'sets' are not part of PMS that means that it would be wise not
to use them yet.
It is unfortunate that nobody seems to have realized that all
I've always found those class = something.that.is.clearly.portage.specific
lines a bit of a bummer, since they're very tied to the internal
functioning of portage and not a generic standard for how things should be
defined.
Before we add sets to the tree, maybe there should be some discussion
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general
progress in gentoo.
Perhaps these basic notions of how Gentoo development works
You certainly are not an authority when it comes to that
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 22:41:02 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Why don't you respond to my technical points then? PMS is blocking
progress, again, because it does not reflect reality.
I don't even see a reason why we should keep up that effort.
PMS reflects the most recent Council
On 14 August 2013 21:41, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general
progress in gentoo.
Perhaps these basic notions of how Gentoo development works
Dnia 2013-08-14, o godz. 16:56:09
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com napisał(a):
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:50:56 -0400
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 11:41 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013
On 08/14/2013 10:56 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
If you want PMS to go away, and call portage the one-and-true PM for
Gentoo, then it's probably something for the Council to decide.
I think that would make sense. We don't have enough resources for such
fun and overcoming PMS burdens has been
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:19:40 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:56 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
If you want PMS to go away, and call portage the one-and-true PM for
Gentoo, then it's probably something for the Council to decide.
I think that would make sense. We
Dnia 2013-08-15, o godz. 00:19:40
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 08/14/2013 10:56 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
If you want PMS to go away, and call portage the one-and-true PM for
Gentoo, then it's probably something for the Council to decide.
I think that would make
On 08/15/2013 04:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 14 August 2013 21:17, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general
progress in gentoo.
Perhaps these basic notions of how Gentoo development works
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/15/2013 04:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 14 August 2013 21:17, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general
progress
On 08/15/2013 04:56 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 14 August 2013 21:41, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general
progress in gentoo.
Perhaps these
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2013 01:23 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-08-15, o godz. 00:19:40 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
napisał(a):
On 08/14/2013 10:56 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
If you want PMS to go away, and call portage the one-and-true
PM for Gentoo,
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:42:21 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/15/2013 04:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 14 August 2013 21:17, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:13:07 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I have no idea what that means. Global changes are _always_ discussed
in the community. PMS doesn't add anything to that process.
It puts the consensus and / or decisions in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2013 02:48 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Multiple cases like mandating bash 3.2 that we don't even have in
tree anymore,
There is =app-shells/bash-3.2_p51 in the Portage tree.
Fun facts: It is in unstable branch.
So while I write ebuilds
On 08/15/2013 02:52 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:13:07 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I have no idea what that means. Global changes are _always_ discussed
in the community. PMS doesn't add anything to that process.
It puts the consensus and / or decisions in
On 14/08/13 17:56, Peter Stuge wrote:
Luca Barbato wrote:
[3] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/gerrit
And all boils down to the fact gerrit needs to be fixed to take
patches from a mailing list
Usually Gerrit just needs an OpenID in order to accept git push via SSH.
That
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:50:16 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
Because if you want to allow multiple package managers as an option,
If - but why would we do that?
To give our users choice.
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/about.xml
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/philosophy.xml
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:56:18 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/15/2013 02:52 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:13:07 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I have no idea what that means. Global changes are _always_
discussed in the community. PMS doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:54:46 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/15/2013 02:48 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Multiple cases like mandating bash 3.2 that we don't even have in
tree anymore,
There is =app-shells/bash-3.2_p51 in the
From: W-Mark Kubacki wm...@hurrikane.de
Before this patch series Portage identified itself as
Gentoo Portage
Now it will be the output of ```emerge --version```, i.e.:
Gentoo Portage 2.1.13.7 (default/linux/amd64/13.0, gcc-4.6.2,
glibc-2.18, 3.9.0-rc8-mark-signed+ x86_64,
Intel(R) Core(TM)
From: W-Mark Kubacki wm...@hurrikane.de
The remote server logs will read like this:
2001:db8::4 - - [14/Aug/2013:20:58:02 +0200]
GET /Packages HTTP/1.1 304 0 -
Gentoo Portage 2.1.13.7 (default/linux/amd64/13.0, gcc-4.6.2,
glibc-2.18, 3.9.0-rc8-mark-signed+ x86_64)
This will enable
From: W-Mark Kubacki wm...@hurrikane.de
Signed-off-by: W-Mark Kubacki wm...@hurrikane.de
---
pym/portage/util/_urlopen.py | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/pym/portage/util/_urlopen.py b/pym/portage/util/_urlopen.py
index 768ccb8..798e7b4 100644
---
From: W-Mark Kubacki wm...@hurrikane.de
It will read like this:
Portage 2.1.13.7 (default/linux/amd64/13.0, gcc-4.6.2, glibc-2.18,
3.9.0-rc8-mark-signed+ x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770T CPU @ 2.50GHz)
That new fifth element will be the CPU model name of the host
running Portage. It is not
79 matches
Mail list logo
