Re: [gentoo-dev] Breakage and frustration

Rich Freeman wrote: > a big question is how to make it happen without just throwing > complaints on the folks who are trying their best to keep it all going. The answer to this is the same as it has always been: Demonstrate that you are capable and reliable and given social compatibility then

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

On 12/14/2015 04:00 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:20:01 +0300 > Andrew Savchenko wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:36:51 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote: >>> Oh hey. We're in the future. Let's try to commit something to >>> repo/gentoo.git! >>> >>> So

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] doebuild: Support finding lib* for ccache/distcc/icecc masquerade dir

Gentoo ccache used to historically swap between storing its masquerade in 'lib' and $(get_libdir). To prevent breakage with any version of it, and prevent future breakages when other tools change places randomly try all three of $(get_libdir), 'lib' and 'libexec' looking for masquerade dir and use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Use GLEP27!

Dnia 13 grudnia 2015 21:41:02 CET, "Robin H. Johnson" napisał(a): >On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 09:03:51PM +0300, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> We trying to use ldap for users @work, many of our workstations >running >> binary gentoo based distro called Calculate

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Add .git dir to excluded dirs in default PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 My apologies for the ambiguity. I didn't realize there was a bug on bugzilla regarding the original incident. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=567074 The .git directory was pushed out over rsync, portage refused to sync via rsync once it had

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: converting copyright/license information in OpenRC

On 11 Dec 2015 14:16, Patrick McLean wrote: > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:37:48 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:04:47PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, William Hubbs wrote: > > > > > Well, the OpenRC project is currently inconsistent about

Re: [gentoo-dev] Use GLEP27!

On 14 Dec 2015 21:22, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The spec seems incomplete. I cannot find a description of the user and > group files' format. (But in fact, there is a standard format which > suggests itself, namely that of the passwd(5) and group(5) files.) i recall going with xml at the time, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] [EAPI 7] Cross-compile improvements (BDEPEND, BROOT, sysroot)

On 02 Dec 2015 23:20, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On reflection, I'm now thinking that we should call it something less > generic. I also found that the Qt build uses SYSROOT for its own > purposes so you cannot rely on it in toolchain wrappers. ROOT is > probably just as unreliable. For that reason,

Re: [gentoo-dev] ncurses-5.9 -> ncurses-6.0 step-by-step?

On 14 Dec 2015 02:14, Joshua Kinard wrote: > I might've missed it, but do we have a step-by-step procedure to take a rootfs > that uses ncurses-5.9 and upgrade it to ncurses-6.0 WITHOUT breaking anything? > I, like others, ran into the problem of emerge yanking libncurses.so.5 libs > out when

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc c api (librc) usage

On 10 Dec 2015 10:32, William Hubbs wrote: > I want to start a discussion about the usage of OpenRC's C api as > defined in rc.h. very few projects ever picked up the API/libraries. probably for the best. > I have no idea which projectss out there are using it, or which > functions they are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Use GLEP27!

> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 14 Dec 2015 21:22, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> The spec seems incomplete. I cannot find a description of the user and >> group files' format. (But in fact, there is a standard format which >> suggests itself, namely that of the passwd(5) and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Use GLEP27!

Ulrich Mueller wrote: > (If directories are really needed, we could use the scheme foreseen > in [1] for package.* and use.* files.) So package.{users,group} ? > Also a mechanism how a subprofile could undefine a user or group > defined in its parent seems to be missing. Maybe set the id to -1

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How do we want to deal with Arfrever's bunch of patches?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thanks for cleaning up guys. It won't happen again. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWbr83AAoJENQqWdRUGk8BksEP/3PIkgDX0EM14qwhXeSnanLt

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Add .git dir to excluded dirs in default PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 14/12/15 04:08, NP-Hardass wrote: > like those that we recently experienced. I don't know what this is in reference too, so it should be explained better. I have no real objects on the patch, but defer the ACK to Brian. Could you have a look,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Use GLEP27!

On 12/14/15 12:06 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 07:49:42AM +0300, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Ok. Since there is GLEP27 we should make it reality. To do so i think we >> should >> 1. Have some list of system uid/gid (on wiki for example). Also we need >> to agree

Re: [gentoo-dev] Breakage and frustration

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > > The key point to remember is that it is NOT neccessary to be part of > the team in order to contribute solutions. You *first* contribute > solutions and only *then* have a chance of becoming part of the team. > > I for one am

Re: [gentoo-dev] Breakage and frustration

On 12/14/2015 02:58 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: >> The key point to remember is that it is NOT neccessary to be part of >> the team in order to contribute solutions. You *first* contribute >> solutions and only *then* have a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Use GLEP27!

On 12/14/15 3:22 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Dnia 13 grudnia 2015 21:41:02 CET, "Robin H. Johnson" > napisał(a): >>On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 09:03:51PM +0300, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: >>> Hi all! >>> >>> We trying to use ldap for users @work, many of our workstations >>running

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Add .git dir to excluded dirs in default PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS

On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 10:52:50 -0500 NP-Hardass wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > My apologies for the ambiguity. I didn't realize there was a bug on > bugzilla regarding the original incident. > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=567074 >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] doebuild: Support finding lib* for ccache/distcc/icecc masquerade dir

On 12/14/2015 07:18 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Gentoo ccache used to historically swap between storing its masquerade > in 'lib' and $(get_libdir). To prevent breakage with any version of it, > and prevent future breakages when other tools change places randomly > try all three of $(get_libdir),

Re: [gentoo-dev] Determenistic system group and user id

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 02:23:29PM -0800, Alec Warner wrote: > > 1) Why do you need deterministic uid / gid's? > > 2) If you do need deterministic uid / gid's, I would recommend storing > them > > all in the same

Re: [gentoo-dev] Use GLEP27!

> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Michał Górny wrote: > As far as I can see, this GLEP predates EAPI and does not meet > modern standards. It needs to be updated or killed with fire. > For a start, relation to EAPI needs to be defined. This will likely > require both profiles and ebuilds to use the new

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Why does the official documentation point me at gkeys-gen, which doesn't > work The documentation you linked is a project page for the Gentoo-Keys project. It represents one possible way to accomplish the goal of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Breakage and frustration

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 03:03:53PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: > If I had access to things I could help. But I don't, so I can't. The scripts of the git->rsync process are already open. https://gitweb.gentoo.org/infra/mastermirror-scripts.git/ (also in there are the related scripts for the other

Re: [gentoo-dev] News for Gentoo CI and pull request CI

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/11/2015 02:13 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I'd like to make a short announcement that in the last few days > I've been using my little free time to hack on my CI scripts, and > they had a few major improvements. Most notably: >

[gentoo-dev] Herd -> project migration & cleanup required for GLEP67

Hello, developers. Yesterday the Council has pre-approved GLEP 67 (Package maintenance structure) [1] and gave the green light to start official preparations for it. As outlined in the GLEP, the two preparatory steps for the migration are: | 1. all existing projects must be ensured to have

[gentoo-dev] RFC: MythTV Project

As part of the general herd migration we decided to create a mythtv project, keeping the same alias/etc. The project page is at: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:MythTV and I'll be updating the herd mapping shortly. I don't forsee any bold new direction for the team, and we have yet to elect

Re: [gentoo-dev] News for Gentoo CI and pull request CI

Dnia 14 grudnia 2015 09:23:40 CET, Daniel Campbell napisał(a): >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA256 > >On 12/11/2015 02:13 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> Hi, everyone. >> >> I'd like to make a short announcement that in the last few days >> I've been using my little