Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread tomjbe
Quoting Duncan (2017-08-16 03:45:35) > tomjbe posted on Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:49:33 +0200 as excerpted: > > > think we can find a proper formulation for the use flag description in > > metadata.xml, e.g.: > > > > director - Installs the backup director additional to the default file > > daemon. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Revisions for USE flag changes

2017-08-15 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 08/14/2017 08:01 AM, Jason Zaman wrote: > > I'll give an example where revbumps are significantly inferior to > --changed-use. > > ... With --changed-use, only the people who need it (ie selinux > users) will rebuild and everyone is happy (selinux users because the > program now works and no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-forensics/* and other forensics@g.o packages

2017-08-15 Thread Gokturk Yuksek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Michał Górny: > Hi, > > Due to the Forensics project [1] being disbanded, the following > packages are now up for grabs. Please note that some of the > packages will probably be taken by former project members. > > app-admin/integrit app-foren

[gentoo-dev] Re: [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Duncan
tomjbe posted on Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:49:33 +0200 as excerpted: > think we can find a proper formulation for the use flag description in > metadata.xml, e.g.: > > director - Installs the backup director additional to the default file > daemon. > storage-daemon - Installs the storage daemon additi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 15/08/17 18:49, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: > I think we can find a proper formulation for the use flag description in > metadata.xml, e.g.: > > director - Installs the backup director additional to the default file daemon. > storage-daemon - Installs the storage daemon additional to the default fi

Re: [gentoo-dev] New item for sys-kernel/hardened-sources removal

2017-08-15 Thread Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
El 15/08/17 a las 18:08, Ulrich Mueller escribió: >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote: >> Updated the news item following comments from dilfridge, mrueg and >> floppym. Also made it display to users of hardened profiles. > Some very minor comments: > >> Autho

Re: [gentoo-dev] New item for sys-kernel/hardened-sources removal

2017-08-15 Thread Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
El 15/08/17 a las 17:50, R0b0t1 escribió: > Where was this decision discussed? https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/62ebc2e26d91e8f079197c2c83788cff And many other threads in that list for example, those are just blueness (the package maintainer) conclussions. > The last available k

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread tomjbe
Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 14:16:14) > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:19 AM, wrote: > > Quoting Michał Górny (2017-08-15 08:43:07) > >> On wto, 2017-08-15 at 06:55 +0200, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: > >> > Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19) > >> > > > >> > > I guess to make it a bit more ex

Re: [gentoo-dev] New item for sys-kernel/hardened-sources removal

2017-08-15 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote: > Updated the news item following comments from dilfridge, mrueg and > floppym. Also made it display to users of hardened profiles. Some very minor comments: > Author: Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) Format o

Re: [gentoo-dev] New item for sys-kernel/hardened-sources removal

2017-08-15 Thread R0b0t1
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to get this one up by Saturday so that we can proceed with > masking and removing of the hardened-sources after upstream stopped > releasing new patches. Where was this decision discussed? The la

Re: [gentoo-dev] New item for sys-kernel/hardened-sources removal

2017-08-15 Thread Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
El 15/08/17 a las 17:01, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) escribió: > Hi! > > I'd like to get this one up by Saturday so that we can proceed with > masking and removing of the hardened-sources after upstream stopped > releasing new patches. > > This is my first time writting a news item so

[gentoo-dev] New item for sys-kernel/hardened-sources removal

2017-08-15 Thread Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
Hi! I'd like to get this one up by Saturday so that we can proceed with masking and removing of the hardened-sources after upstream stopped releasing new patches. This is my first time writting a news item so all input will be appreciated. As for the rationale behind this, we need to clearly inf

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 08/15/2017 02:21 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> For example, could you say that a client-only install that still >> installs the X11 components is "minimal?" > > Its somewhat context dependent, for an X application this doesn't > neces

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 08/15/2017 02:21 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > For example, could you say that a client-only install that still > installs the X11 components is "minimal?" Its somewhat context dependent, for an X application this doesn't necessarily constitute additional dependencies for the system (think desktop

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 08/15/2017 11:33 AM, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: >> Quoting Kristian Fiskerstrand (2017-08-15 10:37:39) >>> On 08/15/2017 12:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On pon, 2017-08-1

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:19 AM, wrote: > Quoting Michał Górny (2017-08-15 08:43:07) >> On wto, 2017-08-15 at 06:55 +0200, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: >> > Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19) >> > > >> > > I guess to make it a bit more explicit, would it make sense to have 3 >> > > flags: >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 08/15/2017 11:33 AM, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: > Quoting Kristian Fiskerstrand (2017-08-15 10:37:39) >> On 08/15/2017 12:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > * 'bacula-clientonly'

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread tomjbe
Quoting Kristian Fiskerstrand (2017-08-15 10:37:39) > On 08/15/2017 12:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > >>> * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly' > >> This is still negative lo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread tomjbe
Quoting Michał Górny (2017-08-15 08:43:07) > On wto, 2017-08-15 at 06:55 +0200, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: > > Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19) > > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [FRC] News item: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula

2017-08-15 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 08/15/2017 12:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: >>> * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly' >> This is still negative logic in disguise. clientonly = noserver. Can the "minimum"-use