On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:07 AM Andreas K. Huettel
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for the package maintainers among you, here's the list of remaining EAPI=2
> packages. Please help getting the number down to zero soon!!!
>
> Cheers,
> Andreas
>
> media-fonts/culmus-0.120-r4
>
>
Done.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:19 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> Well, in that case recommendations for how to generate a key that
> complies in software would be helpful. There used to be a wiki
> article on it, but it is marked with various warnings saying it isn't
> recommended to follow it, and has seem
Upstream is dead.
Package does not support openssl-1.1, significant change to package.
Removal in 30 days.
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 1:33 AM Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
>
> Richard Yao schrieb:
>
> >> To make code behave differently it needs substantial amount of code
> >> to provide you an example. You need to him O2<->O3 behaviour delta
> >> after all. But I will try (for a different warning, i
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 1:14 AM Richard Yao wrote:
> > On Sep 14, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> >
> > On 15-09-2018 00:07:12 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps, if one persists on going this route, only do this for platforms
>
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 12:29 AM Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
> On 15-09-2018 00:07:12 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > >
> > > Perhaps, if one persists on going this route, only do this for platforms
> > > that upstream supports, such that arches which will suffer from
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 12:02 AM Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
> On 14-09-2018 16:29:43 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:20 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > >
> > > On 09/14/2018 03:58 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> No one has answered the question: what do you do when a
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 10:53 PM Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:40:13 +0300
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> >
> > No dependency of toolchain nor annotations.
> > A strict policy of no warnings will require changes as dependencies
> > including
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:53 PM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 20:48 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:33 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > > Let's do this the other way around and be react based on facts and not
> > &
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:33 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> > Let's do this the other way around and be react based on facts and not
> > speculations.
> > Let's change the policy for a year for selected packages as I
> > outlined, monitor bugs and after a year see response times, affected
> > users and
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:16 PM Richard Yao wrote:
>
> On 09/14/2018 12:40 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:34 AM Sergei Trofimovich
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:44:38 +0300
> >> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:34 AM Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:44:38 +0300
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> I'm personally in favour of not allowing -Werror
> to be in build system unconditionally.
>
> Maintainer is free to implement --enable-werror
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:20 PM Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > To illustrate harmless:
> > > warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> > > The warning message already has it in it that it's just a pure guess.
> >
> > One that exposed a lot of unintentional fallthoughs whi
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 6:51 PM Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
> On 12-09-2018 17:46:03 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:11 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> > With new GCC comes new warnings, and harmless as the vast majority are
> > they cause the build to break with Werror.
>
> To illus
Hi,
I was the one that (re)trigger this discussion, I thank bircoph for
opening this up.
First, let me apologize that I did not test the capi USE for long
time, as this option is not used for long time by users, I am also
apologize of treating bug from anyone (may it be user, developer or
even qa
I can take them.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 11:24 AM Jonas Stein wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The following packages are up for grabs:
>
> sys-apps/fakechroot
> sys-apps/fakeroot-ng
>
> after retirement of the proxied maintainer.
> It was defacto maintained by various gentoo devs.
>
> https://packages.ge
On 26 January 2018 at 00:21, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:55:58PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> I did not looked into the detailed implementation, however, please
>> make sure integrity check handles the same cases we have applied to
>> emerge
Hi,
On 25 January 2018 at 14:35, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Starting with sys-apps/portage-2.3.22, Portage enables cryptographic
> verification of the Gentoo rsync repository distributed over rsync
> by default. This aims to prevent malicious third parties from altering
> the contents of the ebuild
On 2 December 2017 at 23:08, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> W dniu sob, 02.12.2017 o godzinie 22∶43 +0200, użytkownik Alon Bar-Lev
> napisał:
> > Hi,
> > Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> > I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
>
Hi,
Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
Thanks,
Alon
[1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib
On 8 September 2017 at 22:44, R0b0t1 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > Complex build system, hard to maintain, no dependencies in tree, upstream
> > does not cooperate (Bug#630420).
> > Removal in 30 days.
> >
>
> I don't
Complex build system, hard to maintain, no dependencies in tree, upstream
does not cooperate (Bug#630420).
Removal in 30 days.
Upstream no longer maintain (Bug#628908).
Removal in 30 days.
Hello,
I am looking for someone that is using gentoo on sparc and is willing to
help out to resolve an issue[1] of gnutls-3.5 with sparc so that we can
drop gnutls-3.3 from tree.
I tried to create a bootable sparc qemu gentoo image and failed, so need
someone with a live system.
Regards,
Alon
[
On 18 May 2017 at 07:10, Marty Plummer wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:53:48AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> On 18 May 2017 at 06:54, Marty Plummer wrote:
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > As the subject states, compiling dev-libs/libressl for x86_64-w64-ming
On 18 May 2017 at 06:54, Marty Plummer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> As the subject states, compiling dev-libs/libressl for x86_64-w64-mingw32
> target via crossdev ends up calling wine to run checks, which fails with
> an access violation, and as such emerge cannot finish.
>
> Would it be an acceptable
On 18 May 2017 at 06:46, Matthias Maier wrote:
> [2] I had to manually disable libsanitizer for gcc-6.3.0. Just set
> EXTRA_ECONF="--disable-libsanitizer" via env/package.env for the
> cross-x86_64-w64-mingw32/gcc package.
Hi,
You should use the USE flags and not apply such workarounds, f
Hi,
You can emerge crossdev and then run crossdev -t x86_64-w64-mingw32 or
crossdev -t i686-w64-mingw32
Alon
On 18 May 2017 at 01:25, Marty Plummer wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> So, I'm a relatively new gentoo user (as of 2016-12) coming from arch,
> and one thing I've noticed is the relative diffic
Hello,
I would like to push gnutls-3.5 into stable per[1].
Below are known related issues we still have, please help to push these forward.
If anyone wishes to help testing before we progress, please move to
non-stable gnutls and report back any issue.
Please also emerge using the following set
Replaced by dev-libs/libp11 unmaintained by upstream.
Bug#609668. Removal in 30 days.
Hi,
I would like to start stabilizing gnutls-3.4.
If anyone is aware of an issue please speak up.
Thanks!
Alon
On 6 November 2016 at 12:52, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
> So, what are your comments?
Hi,
Just my 2 cents...
I kinda love the prefix nature of the expressions which is consistent
and easier to parse.
Using infix only for versions and leaving all the rest prefix will
create abnormalit
# Alon Bar-Lev (05 Nov 2016)
# Masked for removal in 30 days, bug#598982.
# Upstream does not publish releases, no tags, last publish is on
# google code, no dependencies.
dev-python/pssi
# No upstream, no maintainer (bug #592164)
# Package will be removed from Gentoo in 30 days.
app-crypt/scl011-bin
# Weak cryptography (bug #592114)
# Package will be removed from Gentoo in 30 days.
app-crypt/bcrypt
On 14 July 2016 at 23:15, Johannes Huber wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 14 Juli 2016, 21:47:10 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
>> I have only three: Application, Global, Web
>> Shouldn't it be integrated into Global?
>
> Maybe this helps:
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?
I have only three: Application, Global, Web
Shouldn't it be integrated into Global?
On 14 July 2016 at 21:44, Johannes Huber wrote:
> Please check systemsettings -> shortcuts -> 4th tab.
>
> Greetings,
> Johannes
>
> Am Donnerstag 14 Juli 2016, 21:26:04 schrieb A
Just tried to switch.
Print-Screen shortcut is not working, any idea why?
Saw some similar issues, but could not find out what is wrong as most
of the fixes are embedded.
Thanks!
On 14 July 2016 at 20:33, Johannes Huber wrote:
>
> # Johannes Huber (14 Jul 2016)
> # No longer released upstream. U
Can you please check it out?
I had no time nor setup.
On 12 June 2016 at 14:49, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> Cheers Alon,
>
> Michael.
> On 12/06/16 12:43, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've revbumped this package.
>> Regards,
>> Alon
>>
>> On 6 J
Hi,
I've revbumped this package.
Regards,
Alon
On 6 June 2016 at 03:23, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 05/06/16 22:55, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> dev-util/nsis curretly has no maintainer. It has a [critical security
>> bug filed against it]. Does anyone want to pick it up? if not we'll
>> start a
On 20 April 2016 at 18:52, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> Hi everyone:
>
> After doing some experimentation with a mingw crossdev, I found that I
> needed to do a lot of EXTRA_ECONF settings in combination with
> USE="aqua" in order to get packages supporting a win32 API to be
> configured appropriat
On 14 February 2016 at 22:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> udev: it's the default in every major distro that everyone tests and
> develops against.
>
> eudev: no one of any relevance outside of Gentoo runs it.
I honestly don't understand this argument that pops over and over.
No "major distro" using
On 9 February 2016 at 13:59, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Anthony G. Basile
> wrote:
> > On 2/8/16 10:09 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> How many of those 14 distros have more than 14 users?
> >
> > gentoo is very unpopular as a distro. however, it excels as a meta
> >
On 13 December 2015 at 19:30, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 13 December 2015 at 19:28, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>> Le dimanche 13 décembre 2015 à 18:25 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
>>> On 13 December 2015 at 18:20, Gilles Dartiguelongue
>>> wrote:
>>> >
On 13 December 2015 at 19:28, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le dimanche 13 décembre 2015 à 18:25 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
>> On 13 December 2015 at 18:20, Gilles Dartiguelongue
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I was trying to cleanup my local USE flag settings and st
On 13 December 2015 at 18:20, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>
> I was trying to cleanup my local USE flag settings and stumbled on the
> following three: smartcard, pcsc-lite and pkcs11.
>
> Knowing all 3 are related, I greped use.local.desc to see what each
> meant for different packages. To sum u
On 2 December 2015 at 21:52, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 21:48:24 +0200
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
>> On 2 December 2015 at 21:45, Brian Evans wrote:
>> >
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > On
On 2 December 2015 at 21:45, Brian Evans wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/1/2015 1:45 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > Yes, sorry my bad, repoman did not complain.
>
> This is still not working because some packages, i.e sys-fs/ntfs3g,
> have a dependency like
Yes, sorry my bad, repoman did not complain.
On 1 December 2015 at 08:44, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 06:16:40 + (UTC)
> "Alon Bar-Lev" wrote:
>
>> commit: 1519f072b810c69428badbe5fc54960f1a2a12b3
>> Author: Alon Bar-Lev gentoo org>
On 30 July 2015 at 19:15, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 30/07/15 01:55 AM, Duncan wrote:
> > Patrick McLean posted on Wed, 29 Jul 2015 15:35:02 -0700 as
> > excerpted:
> >
> >> On Thu, 30 Jul 20
On 30 July 2015 at 01:33, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:22:54PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:11:30AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> > On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs wrote:
>> > >
>> > > All,
>&g
On 30 July 2015 at 01:22, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:11:30AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs wrote:
>> >
>> > All,
>> >
>> > so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talkin
On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> All,
>
> so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the
> OpenRC github repository now has a mount-service branch.
Nice!
But I still trying to figure out why do we need to keep fstab around.
It is pure legacy.
There can
On 28 July 2015 at 01:26, William Hubbs wrote:
> The proposal in [3], on the other hand, is to create a mount script that
> works like netifrc. It would mount a single file system, which would be
> determined by the link it was called from, much like how netifrc
> determines which interface to wor
On 17 July 2015 at 15:36, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
>>
>> I don't know tbh, most are already signed, with the git migration, the
>> strongly recommended commit signing will become MANDATORY.
>>
>> So, we are at 50 devs with valid gpg keys now, wit
On 4 July 2015 at 23:28, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2015-07-05 at 02:16 +0700, C Bergström wrote:
> > 2) I don't understand your comment about signatures.
>
> Gpg commit signatures [1] which are a requirement for any gentoo git
> workflow. Rebasing breaks the author's signature afaict
On 15 May 2015 at 17:51, Michał Górny wrote:
> Please note that the current syncing code does not verify the OpenPGP
> signature to confirm the authenticity of fetched snapshots and deltas.
> This feature will be added as soon as gentoo-keys support in Portage is
> available.
These are great news
On 21 April 2015 at 20:40, James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>> "AB" == Alon Bar-Lev writes:
>
> AB> When using bugs.gentoo.org with dnsmasq and dnssec enabled, I cannot
> AB> access attachments.
>
> It works here using a local unbound.
>
>
aybe it is local issue of the dns I am using (I have no access to
it), but maybe there is a issue at infra.
Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
Hi,
I had some time to resolve the long outstanding issue I had with loosing
upower to systemd.
The only feature I personally had was the battery monitor stopped working,
yes, I did not install pm-utils either...
So after few times my battery went empty while I worked... decided that
enough is e
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> Do you really consider keeping a key open for machine signing
>> somewhat secure?
>
> You mean, as compared to manifests (or commits) signed by 250
> different developers' keys?
>
> Ulrich
Hi,
I do not know if this came up... glibc must be bumped first[1].
Alon
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504032
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> >> If we say we stick to upstream then we don't provide pkg-config files
>> >> at all (in these cases).
>>
>> > I think this is a sane default.
>>
>> Except having pkg-config is the only way to fix some of the build
>>
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:03 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 09:57:15PM +, David Leverton wrote:
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> > > The reason the split happened is pretty straight forward, and every other
> > > "justification" for continuing it was come up with after the fact.
Hi,
Long time since I done this... maybe something had been changed.
$ cvs commit -m "thirdpartymirrors: fixup gnupg mirros, bug#494842, thanks
to Ben Kohler"
cvs commit: cannot exec /var/cvsroot/CVSROOT/cvslogdate: Permission denied
cvs commit: cannot exec /var/cvsroot/CVSROOT/checkgroup.pl: Per
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:41 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> All,
>
> We got a request from Debian to rename the "rc" binary of OpenRC due to
> a naming conflict they have. They have a port of the at&t plan 9 shell,
> which has a binary named "rc" as well[1].
>
> My thought is to rename our "rc" to
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> >> It matters a whole lot if I have to wait for someone else to
>> >> unblock me, in practice that completely demotivates me to
>> >> contribute back, and I would simply work arou
ree?
Or do you want to join in as a developer?
Or something else?
Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le dimanche 11 août 2013 à 22:09 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> > On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:29:16 -0500
>> > William Hubbs wrote:
>> >
pected, as it is similar to how systemd/gnome is managed :)
Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> not must, but if I choose to run the official supported configuration,
>> well, then telling me to go to an unsupported state is quite confusing
>> and sends the wrong signal.
>>
>
> Th
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev schrieb:
>>> I think there may be a misunderstanding here. He only said that if you
>>> want to run Gnome 3.8, then switch to systemd. Because the Gnome team
>>> will not support any o
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev schrieb:
>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>>>> You just removed the upgrade path for users.
>>
lear stand, what will
developers (throughout the tree) will be maintaining. If a user
installs a component he does expect it to work and maintained. And we
cannot force all developers to support two different layouts, and we
cannot allow developers to support layout of their choice, as users
will get a totally broken solution, because of the aspirations of
developer/herd they get different level of support.
I don't care if systemd is worked on by people, however it must be
clearly mark as unstable as long as there is no decision to switch.
Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev
emd, and you hide your
intention in the argument of supporting multiple layouts, please do
not hide and state so clearly.
But do not claim that Gentoo with different layout than baselayout is
still formal Gentoo, and is supported by the Gentoo developers.
Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 08/08/13 21:23, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Samuli Suominen
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/08/13 20:57, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>>>
>>&g
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, 20:57:18 +0300
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
>> If from now on, a bug with systemd of new version of a package blocks
>> that package stabilization, it means that all developers must support
>> system
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 20:57:15 +0300
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> > Stability is about the quality of the ebuilds and the user
>> > experience in general
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 08/08/13 20:57, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>>
>>> Stability is about the quality of the ebuilds and the user experience
>>> in gener
ne solution for layout.
Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> Moreover, the lvm problem is caused by a very ancient and ill decision
> about doing what upstream tells you to avoid: have mdev in the
> initramfs and udev on the final pivot rooted system. This was just
> looking for troubles but the smart
, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > >> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs
> > > >> wrote:
> >
> > > >> OK... so gentoo-networking? or just c
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm splitting the thread because this is a separate subject.
>
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 12:59:56AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> I do understand why Roy refer this as oldnet... but why in Gentoo do
&g
out of
it? are we going to obsolete this huge work? If we don't I suggest to
remove the 'old' implication, to something like openrc-gentoo-net.
Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
Hello,
I guess I am tired of fighting with people here. I am too old for this crap.
There are few brutal developers here that make Gentoo a terrible place
to be. Well... I can handle few developers, but when devrel enters the
picture with arguments such as "volunteers can do crappy job as long
as
On 5/5/08, Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Enrico, it is usually a good idea to search through the Bugzilla before
> asking for some feature, chances are that it has been already requested (in
> this case, you're looking for bug 190102). FYI, at least some of qemu's
> features were por
On 4/30/08, Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think in that sense Cygwin is more Open Source, because how you get
> the primary shell/environment is available too. However, for me that
> doesn't matter, as the OS itself is inherently non-free in that sense,
> so that's what you have
On 4/30/08, Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30-04-2008 19:51:42 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On 4/30/08, Denis Dupeyron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It's my pleasure to introduce Markus Duft (mduft) as a new developer.
> > > He w
On 4/30/08, Denis Dupeyron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's my pleasure to introduce Markus Duft (mduft) as a new developer.
> He will go among us under the name of mduft, and will work in the
> Gentoo/Alt project porting Gentoo Prefix to Interix. Yes, people, that
> means Gentoo on Win32.
Wel
On 4/20/08, Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for what it's worth, as a gnome dev I didn't see any convincing
> arguments as to why it should be renamed. Gnome makes things optional
> for other to reuse (like xfce) but afaik no other "keyring" like
> programs are optional deps o
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd say we should convert it to a global use flag now with a good
> description and change it to gnome-keyring later in case we really have a
> package which needs 'keyring' for something else.
If we know there may be a f
2008/4/20 Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:32 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> > Alon Bar-Lev yazmış:
> > > I suggest gnome-something as it is gnome feature.
> >
> > How about gnome-keyring? :)
> >
>
> Why? All the ebuilds cur
This may be confusing with Linux key store.
I suggest gnome-something as it is gnome feature.
Alon
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless anyone has any objections, I'll magically turn 'keyring' into a
> global USE flag tomorrow evening:
>
> [EMAIL PROTE
On 3/24/08, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how much do we want to help the user ? if they have USE=filecaps, then dont
> perform any checking ? we'll need a kernel with file capabilities turned on,
> otherwise the prog wont work unless it's setuid ... so do we perform checking
>
On 3/24/08, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Diego and i were talking ... we're going to go with USE=filecaps because it's
> so new and doesnt require the libcap library in order to work at runtime.
> probably be worthwhile to put together a little eclass of functions to make
> people
On 3/23/08, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why? A simple USE flag should be enough, if set use caps, if not use
> > current.
>
>
> A user turns the use flag on, the ebuild creates files using caps
> rather than set*id, the package manager merges it by copying the file
> and the
On 3/23/08, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:21:29 +0200
> "Alon Bar-Lev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > linux-2.6.24 supports file based capabilities via:
> > CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES
> >
>
> >
Hello All,
linux-2.6.24 supports file based capabilities via:
CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES
This enables the use of filesystem attributes in order to store per
executable capabilities list, more information at [1].
This enables improved security level for people who don't wish to move
into S
Check out OpenRC it is baselayout successor and works great!
On 2/29/08, Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it dead..? Is anyone still working on it?
>
> I have had a lot of success using it for linux vservers and in an
> embedded build. Would really hate to see it stall though...?
>
> What
at hand,
> this topic does not matter i think.
The https solves man-in the middle for svn/git sync.
There is an option for rsync people (not to use it):
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130039
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
