On 3 December 2012 03:30, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Dec 2, 2012 6:09 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Only question is now what is a sane soft limit, before you go on and
fix
stuff.
On 4 December 2012 17:19, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 01:18, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
In my opinion we should limit the amount of places where we document
policies and best practices. I suggest we keep only devmanual and PMS as
authoritative
On 5 December 2012 02:51, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 17:28, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 12/04/2012 12:06 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Or maybe we can just agree that common sense rules all, and we always
set the proxied
On 17 December 2012 18:26, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/12/17 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu:
On 17/12/2012 11:11, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Since we already have splitdebug for quite time (and I suppose quite
few of us are using it) how about making it to
On 17 December 2012 18:27, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/12/17 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu:
On 17/12/2012 11:19, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
I've always myself override these defaults in make.conf to point for
/var/portage/ (not /var/lib because I never
On 17 December 2012 18:55, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/12/17 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org:
Please don't. For most users this is a waste of resources.
On first look it seems like waste of resources.
On second hand it makes stuff easy wrt bugreports provided by users
On 27 December 2012 00:39, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we short cut the whole quiz process and have some Inbound repository
until we're full git, which people can fork/commit/pull and trusted people
can review submitted branches and apply them to CVS?
This is why I started
On 30 December 2012 00:13, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 16:42 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 27 December 2012 00:39, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we short cut the whole quiz process and have some Inbound repository
until we're full git, which
Happy New Year to all of you!
Looking back at 2012, I wonder what we consider our achievements for
this past year. What is the state of Gentoo? How have we brought it
forward and improved it this past year?
And what do we want to see in the coming year? How can we make Gentoo
more awesome in
On 5 January 2013 07:28, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
Coming to my mind:
There have been continued regular releases of genkernel integrating
patches from various people:
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/genkernel.git;a=tags
And there has been a constant stream of
On 9 January 2013 20:23, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 09/01/2013 13:20, Duncan wrote:
Are the git migration blockers at such a point that we can get an ETA
yet?
PLEASE ALL STOP DETOURING EVERY DAMN TOPIC OUT THERE WITH THE GIT
MIGRATION, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
And yes
On 9 January 2013 23:16, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:23:13 +0100 as excerpted:
On 09/01/2013 13:20, Duncan wrote:
Are the git migration blockers at such a point that we can get an ETA
yet?
PLEASE ALL STOP DETOURING EVERY DAMN TOPIC OUT
On 16 January 2013 22:16, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
We have a base profile, we have a desktop profile... wouldn't that make
the base the minimal profile that would likely be fit for a server? If
not, we really should move that way. Having a base, desktop, and server
Ideally we would have had a discussion here, and we could still have one.
On the other hand I have used libav and mplayer2 for a long time, and have
not run into any problems. The only thing missing is mencoder.
I'm not opposing this change, but I also don't know enough of the details
of
Hi guys,
Presently we already have a good number of split qt-* library packages
in x11-libs. With the arrival of Qt5 upstream has gone a lot further
in modularization, so we expect the number of packages to grow much
more. We, the Gentoo Qt team, are of the opinion that the time has
come to split
On 17 January 2013 22:05, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 17/01/2013 14:57, Ben de Groot wrote:
After some initial bikeshedding we came to the conclusion that naming
the category simply qt is the most elegant solution. We will then
also be dropping the qt- prefix in package
On 17 January 2013 22:09, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
chith...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ben de Groot schrieb:
This category is
to be used for the various modules and applications that belong to the
upstream Qt Framework only (these include e.g. assistant and
linguist). Third-party applications
On 19 January 2013 04:49, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
During the server profile discussion, it became clear that we could clean up
the base profiles a bit. This is unrelated to the profile versions, as the
change would affect all versions (well, at least without bigger
On 19 January 2013 08:01, Christopher Head ch...@chead.ca wrote:
I understand that enabling flags only affects packages if they’re
installed. I’m just saying that, in my opinion, sane-but-minimal should
have CUPS disabled because there are plenty of computers that would
want LibreOffice and/or
On 19 January 2013 18:26, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
People who do have printers can always enable it themselves. I don't
see any reason for cups to be enabled by default, especially not on a
minimal profile
On 17 January 2013 22:45, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
How many packages are we talking about? Especially if you don't want qwt
to join there, I assume we're way below 50? If so I would vote nay to
any new category at all, to be honest.
Roughly 40 is the current estimate.
On 19 January 2013 21:46, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
Maybe lib-qt ? dev-qt sounds confusing to me too, what's dev about it?
These are libraries and applications that are used by developers of
end-user applications.
If there is too much opposition to a simple qt category (at least
On 19 January 2013 23:38, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
We have a fixed number of exact 2 tags (foo and bar),
This limitation has proven it's usability in the past of Gentoo, but
there are reasons to break it up (Like making up funny points like regex
and it has always been this way).
On 20 January 2013 00:48, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
* In general, yes, I'm in favor of a dedicated qt-* category, but...
Good :-)
*** (VERY strongly!) Please avoid namespace pollution! Don't drop the
hyphenated qt-pkg names. As a user, most of the time I DO only refer to
the
On 20 January 2013 05:03, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
130119 Ben de Groot wrote:
On 19 January 2013 21:46, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
Maybe lib-qt ? dev-qt sounds confusing to me too, what's dev about it?
These are libraries and applications
that are used
On 20 January 2013 06:59, Francesco Riosa viv...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/1/19 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
Just a completely different idea -- how about putting those libraries
into different categories appropriate to the topic? We have a bunch of
categories like dev-libs, media-libs, etc. --
On 20 January 2013 15:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a user with a suggestion here. Since portage already has kde-base and
kde-misc, why not qt-base and qt-misc (and qt-something is the need arises.)
Qt5 will have standard core modules and extensions. qt-base and qt-misc
On 20 January 2013 17:09, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/01/13 10:39, Ben de Groot wrote:
There is no need for multiple qt categories. We want everything that
the upstream Qt Project considers to be part of the Qt Framework to be
in one category. Besides that there are only
On 20 January 2013 17:10, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Only one package is inside it:
net-misc/capi4hylafax
It should probably be moved to kingtaco (if he is still interested...
are you?) or maintainer-needed until any other steps up as maintainer.
What do you think about removing
On 20 January 2013 17:21, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Looks like it's still listed in herds.xml even being empty and with no
packages inside it. Probably it's time to safely remove it completely.
OK with that?
Best regards
Yes please
--
Cheers,
Ben | yngwin
Gentoo developer
Gentoo
On 20 January 2013 21:35, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Same here. I have had to re-emerge qt packages several times myself.
It seems that when I do, I have to do them all one at a time too.
In which case you're better off with something like:
emerge -a1 `eix --only-names -IC qt`
--
On 20 January 2013 23:22, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
chith...@gentoo.org wrote:
Andreas K. Huettel schrieb:
* move setting USE=dri from default/linux/make.defaults to
targets/desktop/make.defaults
I must say that I am unhappy about this. The packages in question should
not be built with
On 21 January 2013 10:42, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
So that's what I (and others, but less explicitly) propose, leaving
USE=dri where it is in the old and soon-to-be-deprecated 10.x profiles so
nobody gets broken, while in the new 13.0 profiles, USE=dri is moved from
base to desktop.
On 21 January 2013 12:16, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote:
I don't build server machines every day, others do and it would be
much appreciated if they could respond here.
I build catalyst stage4s. Any default profiles are kindof pointless
for me; I have
On 22 January 2013 03:28, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Dustin C. Hatch admiraln...@gmail.com
wrote:
The package defaults have gotten out of hand, in my opinion. I use
default/linux/amd64/10.0 on all my machines and my /etc/portage/package.use
On 22 January 2013 10:36, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
I think we may have to admit that one size does not fit all. There
are just too many individual scenarios. A truly minimal build should be
sufficient to boot to a text console, and have networking and portage to
be able to
On 28 January 2013 12:37, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sunday 27 January 2013 13:21:27 Pacho Ramos wrote:
The problem is that it doesn't work so well. If I have the following at
src_prepare (for example):
src_prepare() {
DOC_CONTENTS=You must create a symlink rom
On 29 January 2013 03:30, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El lun, 28-01-2013 a las 14:37 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió:
I've started using this eclass, but with README files, not the variable,
because this is currently the only way I can make sure it honours my
formatting.
Couldn't
On 30 January 2013 05:47, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El mar, 29-01-2013 a las 14:03 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió:
On 29 January 2013 03:30, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El lun, 28-01-2013 a las 14:37 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió:
I've started using this eclass
On 1 February 2013 02:59, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El dom, 27-01-2013 a las 18:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El dom, 27-01-2013 a las 15:00 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
Currently, when people uses DOC_CONTENTS variable to place their desired
messages, they are automatically
On 6 February 2013 04:19, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
The idea is the same as in autotools-multilib. The eclass
is a straightfoward wrapper for cmake-utils which inherits
multilib-build and runs cmake phase functions for all ABIs (using
out-of-source build).
The eclass uses the
On 7 February 2013 16:36, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 6 February 2013 04:19, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
The idea is the same as in autotools-multilib. The eclass
is a straightfoward wrapper for cmake-utils which inherits
multilib-build and runs cmake phase functions
On 8 February 2013 00:31, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like
On 10 February 2013 10:43, Douglas Freed dwfr...@mtu.edu wrote:
* all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable the same way
as
10.0 was
* all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc
* all 10.0 profiles have been deprecated
Suggestion: perhaps a news item should be
On 10 February 2013 20:11, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Otherwise, purpose-driven overlays just make sense - they allow a
different set of contributors who are more familiar/interested in a
set of packages to maintain them.
It makes more sense to let those people be proxy-maintainers
On 10 February 2013 23:02, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 15:15:43 schrieb Markos Chandras:
I suspect most people are interested in understanding what changed
(since deprecation means that the new thing is better than the old
one). Moreover, the
On 13 February 2013 15:07, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 02/13/2013 12:28 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:12:35AM +0100, Michael Weber wrote:
On 02/12/2013 10:14 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
If you have any questions on this, please feel free to let us
know.
What
On 14 February 2013 08:08, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 14.02.2013 00:07, schrieb Brian Dolbec:
Easy, just copy the ebuild and any patches in the files subdir to a
local overlay.
Which brings us back to the old discussion on what good it does for one
person to do the
On 14 February 2013 20:25, George Shapovalov geo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Um, what about the sunset overlay? IIRC, it was used/intended primarily for
this purpose. Is it still alive? (haven't heard it mentioned in a while and
layman seems to list onyl sunrise)
You probably mean kde-sunset, which
On 15 February 2013 22:34, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
(But I would still argue that spotting overlay usage is not always as
simple; at least in one case I got somebody who was trying to hide their
use of proaudio.)
Users editing the output of emerge --info and hiding they
The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!
==
The Gentoo Qt Project is a small team responsible for maintaining the Qt
libraries and associated applications within our beloved distro. Over time
the number of packages we maintain has grown. Not only is there quite
On 2 March 2013 22:35, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
I first thought it was a binary, but now that I see it is actually
compiled from source in the avidemux build process, we have control
over it. Therefore, I'll step up to be the primary maintainer.
Do you want me to keep the Qt herd
On 2 March 2013 15:57, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 02/03/2013 07:54, Ben de Groot wrote:
1. Get Qt5 ready for inclusion in the tree. This includes writing and
improving ebuilds and eclasses, testing to build those, filing bug reports
on failure, finding fixes for those
On 2 March 2013 20:26, Jauhien Piatlicki jpiatli...@gmail.com wrote:
02.03.13 07:54, Ben de Groot написав(ла):
app-admin/keepassx
app-text/goldendict
If these two packages need a maintainer, I could proxy-maintain them.
I'm not a developer, but I have some experience with ebuild writing
On 2 March 2013 20:33, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 02/03/13 08:54, Ben de Groot wrote:
The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!
sci-calculators/qalculator
This project died after the first betas. I propose treecleaning it. We have
plenty of more maintained calculators
On 6 March 2013 15:07, Maxim Koltsov maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
Currently there are 61 leechcraft packages in tree scattered across several
categories. We propose to move them to one new category to make maintaining
easy as well as rsync --exclude'ing.
So, two questions:
1) Do you agree
On 24 March 2013 09:17, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Samstag, 23. März 2013, 21:40:16 schrieb Markos Chandras:
Why not officially recommend SystemRescueCD instead?
Looks really bad to recommend another installation media (even if it
is based on Gentoo) to
On 24 March 2013 09:19, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/03/13 02:12, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 24 March 2013 00:02, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK, tvtime has no alternatives at all. If it goes, analog
TV
users can't watch TV anymore :-/
Nothing I can do.
On 24 March 2013 22:48, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/24/2013 12:40 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't mind adding that link to every package mask. Do
On 2 April 2013 19:01, Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
01.04.2013 11:52, Michael Palimaka пишет:
On 1/04/2013 04:29, Denis M. wrote:
I think it's a good idea to expand the categories' descriptions (found
in the corresponding metadata.xml files) with more accurate descriptions
of
On 6 Apr, 2013 4:46 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
libpng 1.6 is in portage, but temporarily without KEYWORDS, pending on
testign and this conversion, help would be much appericiated with
converting the tree to use automatic rebuilds for the upgrade
Because there is
On 22 April 2013 21:51, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:21:55 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
It should come as no surprise that I am not happy with this. While I
applaud your efforts to attempt to improve the multilib situation, I
don't think
On 3 May 2013 12:09, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
Most of the bugs filed on the gcc 4.8 tracker so far have been caused by
packages being built with -Werror. I just noticed one package where the
Makefile was being patched to remove -g from CXXFLAGS but -Werror on the same
line was
On 3 May 2013 16:36, Kacper Kowalik xarthis...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03.05.2013 10:06, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 3 May 2013 12:09, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
Most of the bugs filed on the gcc 4.8 tracker so far have been caused by
packages being built with -Werror. I just noticed one
On 1 May 2013 18:04, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
It looks like there is some consensus on the effort of making systemd
more accessible, while there are problems with submitting bugs about
new systemd units of the sort that maintainers just_dont_answer(tm).
In this case, I am just
On 8 May 2013 23:39, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 1 May 2013 18:04, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
It looks like there is some consensus on the effort of making systemd
more accessible, while
On 8 May 2013 23:49, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
chith...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ben de Groot schrieb:
On 1 May 2013 18:04, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
It looks like there is some consensus on the effort of making
On 12 May 2013 21:27, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Rich Freeman wrote:
The devmanual git repository[1] moved to github[2].
The only thing that isn't FOSS is github itself. Not sure if
others feel strongly about it.
I feel strongly against github.
Making something like github the
On 15 May 2013 21:41, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
Are we realizing that in order to keep systemd out of our way, we're
currently writing and maintaining drop-in replacements for the
features that systemd is already providing in an actively maintained
state? openrc-settingsd was the
I'm taking this from https://bugs.gentoo.org/412697 to the dev mailing
list, since this discussion doesn't really belong on bugzilla.
Some background copied from the bug report:
(In reply to comment #21)
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #15)
(In
On 26 May 2013 02:13, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/25/2013 05:14 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
But if a co-maintainer pushes through a change that I oppose, then
working together becomes quite difficult. In this case I opted
On 26 May 2013 01:00, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
We can now have long discussions about upstream decisions, how to handle
devrel problems... but I think it's much more easy: this kind of
boycott attitudes should stop in favor of common sense.
Common sense would be to recognize that
On 26 May 2013 00:48, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 26 May 2013 00:14:36 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Unless I am mistaken, we did NOT agree anywhere that Gentoo
maintainers MUST add systemd support when upstream does not ship such
files.
We did agree
On 26 May 2013 15:37, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 26 May 2013 00:14:36 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Systemd is diametrically opposed to the FreeBSD, customization,
extreme configurability, and top-notch developer community aspects of
that. Systemd upstream
On 26 May 2013 18:04, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 26 May 2013 15:23:44 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Where is this policy documented?
Nowhere, I think. I've seen it coming in the late
On 1 July 2013 22:41, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
### TL; DR ###
By introducing feature patches which menu options are disabled by
default to genpatches, we can deduplicate *-sources maintainers as well
as large groups of users work. By introducing a distribution section
in the
On 5 July 2013 06:36, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
What you want is the font path element catalog and /etc/X11/fontpath.d (bug
#185264) which I abandoned when I realized that no one actually uses fontpath
anymore, that it caused the startup time to drastically increase with the
On 4 August 2013 10:38, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM,
On 4 August 2013 09:56, Alex Xu alex_y...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Minor grammar/typographical errata:
On 04/08/13 12:53 AM, Mike Pagano wrote:
The Gentoo Kernel Team will no longer be providing stable vanilla-sources
kernels. All currently stabilized vanilla-sources versions will be dropped
to
On 7 August 2013 20:45, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
Greetings,
Gnome Herd decided to target stablilization of 3.8 [1] which requires
systemd.
What are the reasons to stable 3.8 and not 3.6, a version w/o this
restriction, enabling all non systemd users to profit from this
On 9 August 2013 21:57, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2013-08-09, o godz. 13:45:25
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:39:08 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/09/2013 07:26 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:31:22
On 13 August 2013 13:21, heroxbd hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear Fellows,
I would like to kick out a sub-project of Gentoo targeting smartphone
and tablets. It would be nice to find out a solution based on Gentoo for
desktop/smartphone hybrid *before* Canonical's release.
I would be
On 17 August 2013 01:12, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
gtk is a global use flag [1], gtk2 and gtk3 are used in metadata.xml [2].
Is there a consensus how to use these flags if an app provides gtk2
and gtk3 gui in parallel or exclusive?
Michael
[1]
On 21 August 2013 07:36, Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote:
Le mardi 20 août 2013 à 17:31 +0400, Sergey Popov a écrit :
16.08.2013 21:15, hasufell пишет:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420493
gtk2 and gtk3 useflags are discouraged and should only be used in
special
On 21 August 2013 04:12, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
[snip]
Ok, this one is ridiculous. The stable version of Rails is 2.3.18, and
3.0 was released almost exactly three years ago. Every time rails-3.x
gets bumped, I have to manually update the entire list above. I need
to do
On 21 August 2013 19:04, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
It's time of year again to consider moving a few arches to dev-only status.
I propose the following arches to lose their stable keywords
- s390
- sh
- ia64
- alpha
- m68k
- sparc
++
And consider adding ppc and
On 21 August 2013 23:03, Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
15.08.2013 12:12, Pacho Ramos пишет:
El mié, 14-08-2013 a las 15:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
Ah, looks like I was too optimistic and we are (again) with the usual
blocking (and blocker) issues -_- (PMS refusing to
On 22 August 2013 01:19, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is there an alternative? afaik a profile can be either stable,dev or
exp. I can't see how we can implement something between
stable and dev. And what
On 22 August 2013 18:01, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 22 August 2013 01:19, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org
wrote
On 28 August 2013 16:00, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello, all.
I think I'm finally ready to put all the breaking awesomeness that was
waiting for the git eclasses. However, I'm wondering what's the best
way of proceeding with it.
We've just lately finished the git-git-2 eclass
On 23 September 2013 08:14, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/09/13 08:21 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 09/21/2013 08:44 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 21-09-2013 a las 14:42 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
I don't have time
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 15:31 Sat 14 Mar , Ben de Groot (yngwin) wrote:
yngwin 09/03/14 15:31:28
Modified: qt4.eclass
Log:
Update qt4.eclass
comet $ cvs diff -r1.50 -r1.51 qt4.eclass | diffstat
qt4.eclass | 136
, reading documentation is an acquired taste... ;-)
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (lxde, media, qt, desktop-misc)
Gentoo Linux Release Engineering PR liaison
__
Thilo Bangert wrote:
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org said:
and what exactly are _you_ contributing?
i was trying to point out, that somebody was rather unhelpful, and all you
can come up with is being unhelpful? we can do better than that!
I thought I was helpful in pointing out that certain
on it.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
Gentoo Linux Release Engineering PR liaison
__
and unintuitive.
Except that we aren't talking about strange and unintuitive. All we are
saying is basically documenting current usage: put a line with EAPI=
near the top. That's very straighforward and intuitive. Plus, it works.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde
their time.
But I disagree on the maintainer-wanted thread. It's not that important
an issue. We have Sunrise already, so let's try to improve that.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
Gentoo Linux Release Engineering PR liaison
__
change?
Because he wants to push GLEP 55.
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
Gentoo Linux Release Engineering PR liaison
__
formats,
and it would probably be cleaner overall, while giving people the
freedom to experiment with whatever wild ideas they have for packages.
Ebuilds work well enough for us. I don't think there's a real need for
other formats.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
2009/5/17 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2009-05-17 18:37:32 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a):
On Sun, 17 May 2009 18:20:21 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to suggest
1 - 100 of 453 matches
Mail list logo
