holder
for at least one official Gentoo project, this is something that is
extremely relevant to me.
I'm also very interested to find out about this. I would be
disappointed to find that the Foundation has chosen to not fulfill or
neglect one of the key purposes for which it was created.
-Daniel
the
need for a quick install guide.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
as much as I'm trying to determine
whether there are still clearly-defined rules for Gentoo development
that are enforced in any meaningful or consistent way.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
tersely on a single page.
Make sense?
Maybe the solution is as simple as making the quick install guide the
default doc and pepper it with links into the handbook for additional
information. I think that could require relatively little work and do
the trick.
-Daniel
On 3/3/07, Simon Stelling [EMAIL
.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
for the long-term health of a volunteer-driven
free software project. If it's not pleasant, then no one has the will
to stick around and do the harder work that you speak of.
Regards,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
suggestions in this
email.
Let's take some quick and decisive action to get Gentoo and PMS going
in the right direction again, please.
*That* is what I have been trying to do, with the priority placed on
getting Gentoo going in the right direction.
-Daniel
On 3/4/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED
grounds to be banned from gentoo development IMO
and thus allow my suggestion to be put into action.
Really, I don't see any reason for any party to fight my suggestion,
as it would benefit everyone. If people are truly concerned about
productivity, then I would expect them to support it.
-Daniel
that your participation on this list
has been a waste of your time, I await an announcement of a separate
PMS list hosted on non-Gentoo infrastructure on which you will discuss
your work, as well as your timely unsubscription from this list.
-Daniel
On 3/4/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED
Will,
I appreciate the spirit of what you posted, but I want to be clear
that I do not expect or request any special treatment, so I don't
agree with you.
We should *always* have some level of respect of gentoo-dev,
regardless of who we're talking to.
-Daniel
On 3/4/07, William L. Thomson Jr
I never said I was informed :)
It was helpful to have some things confirmed by people other than Ciaran.
-Daniel
On 3/4/07, William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 19:23 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
What kind of response do you think anyone else would have
I agree, the post was well intentioned but as I said before I can't
agree with what was suggested.
On 3/4/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 04 March 2007, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
Would that project even exist if it weren't for Daniel's past efforts
and contributions?
Yep, I agree. Thanks everyone for being tolerant of my confusion and
disruption while I look for a way to remove Ciaran from gentoo-dev.
-Daniel
On 3/4/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:15:36 -0500 William L. Thomson Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I we can
That's actually a very good idea. I definitely don't want to be
associated with this project.
-Daniel
On 3/4/07, Fernando J. Pereda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:17:03PM -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote:
Yep, I agree. Thanks everyone for being tolerant of my confusion
C'mon, I am not calling you a liar. I just don't always take
everything you say at face value. Call it a trust issue.
-Daniel
On 3/4/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:14:14 -0700 Daniel Robbins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was helpful to have some things
at the moment and it would take a
tremendous amount of my time to get it to the point where I would
actually enjoy being here.
-Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
wasting a lot of his own time, even before my
stream of posts, so I don't consider removing him from the list as
being bad for him *or* Gentoo.
Just as a note, I've resigned as a Gentoo dev so I'm going to at some
point today unsubscribe from -dev and stop replying to -dev emails.
-Daniel
On 3/4/07
.
-Daniel
On 3/4/07, Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On 3/4/07, Daniel Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just as a note, I've resigned as a Gentoo dev so I'm going to at some
point today unsubscribe from -dev and stop replying to -dev emails.
-Daniel
Thanks for trying
Be careful, I'm now a Gentoo user, and you're on userrel. Userrel
shouldn't launch gratuitious insults at Gentoo users. Thank you for
not caring.
-Daniel
On 3/4/07, Alexander Færøy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 09:51:34PM +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
What do you plan
I already removed myself from Gentoo - no need. Will be unsubscribing
from -dev at the end of the day.
On 3/4/07, bret curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Robbins wrote:
Ciaran,
What I do know is that you should not be allowed to insult random
developers like Jakub when it suits you
of the download as being for
Windows/Mac.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
of other people's code
matter more. If you want to be taken really seriously, you have to make
constructive comments on other people's code. If your comments are
sufficiently technically correct, you can flame people and not be ignored.
-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank
, it hasn't been decided that Paludis
can't ever become the package manager of choice, and even while it isn't
the official package manager right now, it is already helping
significantly with areas like technical QA.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
to get solved before it goes stable.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Warwick Bruce Chapman wrote:
Will you be marking linux-headers-2.6.19 stable as well? I really think
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160381 needs some serious attention.
linux-headers isnt anything to do with me or the kernel herd. I can't
comment on when it will go stable.
Daniel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
these scenarios occur so that we can guarantee
quality in our stable tree.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
that never exists when people use in-kernel drivers. Maybe I
misunderstood your tone and actually you are supporting the changes I
have suggested?
Even so I'm not sure how this relates to Doug's problem? He didn't
provide any details here, and was not involved on that bug.
Thanks,
Daniel
them
very well.
Downstream kernel guys (i.e. Gentoo kernel herd)? No, we support the
sound subsystem and the ALSA drivers just like all other subsystems and
drivers in the kernel.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
% serious on the above. I challenge you to PROVE ME WRONG.
I secretly hope you do, since that means I'll get a couple of
interesting bugs to handle and I may even be able to solve them myself.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
and the portage one is not. This is
different from forcing someone to use in-kernel drivers.
I will add a clarification to the bug.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
doubts...
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
klive isn't that useful and I don't have enough time to maintain it.
There are several bugs kicking about.
If nobody takes over, I'll package.mask it on April 14th and remove it
on April 28th.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
snip
Er, no, I'm explaining why enforcing src_test for EAPI 1 will be
helpful for an awful lot of Gentoo developers.
except that you back the tree into a corner that it cannot come out of
Huh? Not at all. If a package can't use its test suite, the ebuild can
set RESTRICT=test.
snip
The *only* downside that I can see here is that by default the package
installation process gets a little longer. To get around this some
method of globally opting out of src_test should be provided to the end
user, however since it is an on by default feature someone at least has
the idea of what you are proposing.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
on x86 and amd64 on
May 17th. If important issues come up (which they may well do), this
will obviously be delayed, but do keep this date in mind.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
.
Also, as noted in my mail I anticipate this taking more than a week from
the point where we ask arch teams to consider stabling.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Duncan wrote:
I'm running (vanilla) rc7-git10 ATM, and have two possible regressions
remaining here
If reproducible on gentoo-soures-2.6.21, please file bug reports for
them or they will get lost.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
in the tree, but still masked
pending the unmasking of hal (which has one bug left, last I checked).
2.19.1 is going into the overlay slowly.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
in large capacity,
but would like to be able to have more time to spend on more aggressive
regression fixing and upstream kernel development.
Contact me offlist or on IRC if you are interested.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
necessary tests
- run only reasonable tests
- don't run tests at all
Again, is that list comprehensive?
Don't forget tests that have heavy requirements to run. Many gnome
tests, for example, need a virtual X to run, which puts a new set of
DEPENDS requirements on your system.
Daniel
want to do
this kind of work either.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 01:12 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 01 May 2007 19:46:56 -0400
Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is one serious problem with this: Who's going to do the work to
figure all this out for the 11,000 odd packages in the tree? This
seems like
Samuli Suominen schrieb:
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2 May 2007)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. See bug #176150.
# Use x11-misc/slim instead.
x11-misc/login-app
Thanks for reacting so fast and adding slim to the tree!
Regards,
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
+# Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] (3 May 2007)
+# It's now part of gnome-utils; bug #176864
+app-misc/baobab
Scheduled for removal June 2 2007
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
should revert this commit until discussion has settled
and the GLEP wording has been refined.
Corrections appreciated.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 01:11 +0200, Florian D. wrote:
Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
2.6.21 was released today. Testing muchly appreciated as usual -- please
file bugs and clearly mark them as 2.6.21 regressions if that is the case.
hello,
2.6.21 will break the current *stable* VMware
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 00:36 +0100, Mike Auty wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hiya,
Reading over the discussion on lkml, it appears that it only affects
x86_64 systems...
Mike 5:)
Mine is an x86_64 system...it also only seems to affect early adopters
of
that sounds fun.
I'd definitely throw in a few if there were some central place.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
under the realm
of core kernel. For example, eclass issues, bugs for the above
packages, tracking external package regressions, etc.
The kernel herd remains for handling bugs with the kernel itself. It's
about time we separated the 2...
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
it. (see End User
License Agreement.)
http://www.jetico.com/index.htm#/linux.htm (Additional Notes)
Is there a need for official policy here (and a bit of package removals)?
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpfekwYzQnoB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 23:18 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
I know this issue is not actually in the scope of this list, but
maybe some of you might be interested:
Lots of packages have optional parts which (IMHO) should/could be
their own packages, ie. GUI frontends to console
related since 2004, as far as I can see.
I suspect the kde team and the amd64 team need to get together to find
someone who can test KDE on amd64.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
?
- Samuli Suominen
++ from gnome
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
.ebuild
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
?
3. Mask 1.4 on the 19th with a descriptive message. That should have
the effect of 1 and 2, without breaking anything necessarily?
Sounds like we have a lose-lose situation here, and the best we can do
is make it not horrible.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 21:11 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:39:26AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Internet Explorer doesn't even *run* on Gentoo. If it did, it
would likely be in the tree since quite a few people would likely use
it, even if just for testing. I
Nothing in the tree depends on the, they don't currently build, and the
last upstream release was 2003.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 21:20 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
Nothing in the tree depends on the, they don't currently build, and the
last upstream release was 2003.
Daniel
Forgot: scheduled to be removed Jul 19; bug #182612
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:08 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 23:35 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:31:32 -0700
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 22:01 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The specific underlying question
Hello,
is anybody out there, who could help me developing a new profile for
embedded PowerPC (PPC405EP without floating point unit). I tried to
build one but it's very painful if you've never done it.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
.
Shall I give an absolute path?
Shall I bind /usr/portage/ to PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT/usr/portage or to
ROOT/usr/portage?
It's really confusing to me, how to handle it with another root, but I
have to, because I'm cross-compiling.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
glibc?
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
maintainer
to defend it.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
pgpXArHLtFMkt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 14:09 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Hi all,
I'm back for my yearly posting about creating a gentoo-dev-announce
list [1]. Fedora recently created a fedora-devel-announce list with a
great description of how it works, what's posted to it, etc [2], which
got me excited
help. Will log
on to irc tomorrow morning, as soon I've configured it on my workbox :-)
cu daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGfwSCLA0LfkMzpGMRAqw3AJ4yMemZHRChPFBBVin27g9rjKvGZQCcD+/G
no complaints so far.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
/etc/cron.monthly
I use fcron's capabilities to execute the files in
/etc/cron.{hourly,daily,weekly,monthly}/ once within each period.
Daniel Schömer
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi!
Ryan Reich wrote:
On 7/1/07, Daniel Schömer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ sudo fcrontab -l systab
[...]
%hourly 0-30 run-parts --report /etc/cron.hourly
%daily * * run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily
[...]
Thanks for sharing this. [...] This is a more elegant solution
than the run
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 01:39 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the new util-linux package has merged the setarch binary. for the upgrade
path, i figure we do:
- drop sys-apps/setarch from profiles
- add sys-apps/setarch to util-linux-2.12 based on arch?()
- add !sys-apps/setarch to
total-snip
One additional note, my proposal doesn't account for controlling
flaming, disrespect or general asshatery (discounting outright
ridiculous things like blatantly insulting people, that's a no-no). That
I am afraid is just one of the natures of communities our size. There is
no way we
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 13:24 -0700, Mike Doty wrote:
All-
We're going to change the -dev mailing list from completely open to where only
devs can post, but any dev could moderate a non-dev post. devs who moderate
in
bad posts will be subject to moderation themselves. in addition the
technical discussion.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
snip
Yeah, I tend to agree. Not-so-coincidentally, Gentoo's been invited to
join the Software Freedom Conservancy, which would provide just the sort
of 3rd-party management that you're suggesting. I put a write-up on my
blog detailing what we know so far:
splashutils *after* baselayout to keep fbsplash working.
Thanks for all your work on baselayout-2!
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
have to upgrade to a
recent device-mapper version which provides the device-mapper init
script. Then we must run:
# rc-update add device-mapper boot
If we don't, we get an unbootable system.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thursday I plan to request that the x86 and amd64 arch teams mark the
latest gentoo-sources-2.6.22 revision stable. We have no reported
regressions for this kernel release.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
, in a different form. I suggested some future
direction here:
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/pipermail/speakup/2007-July/044137.html
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
of it. I'm interested in helping
development again, but don't presently have enough time to do the
restructuring needed now.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
package grows bugs overnight. It's a continual challenge trying to
keep up, and it's a headache for me trying to poke you into action. Or,
if you really must do this, never mark your package stable (that way I
can ignore it).
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[2]
These are still available in the xeffects overlay for those who want them [3].
[1] http://www.xiaprojects.com/www/prodotti/kxdocker/main.php?action=download
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124159#c3
[3] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/userguide.xml
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL
if such a check already exists or is work in progress, i
have just found nothing comparable in repoman --help under QA keywords.
Any thoughts?
Regards,
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110443
Thanks!
It looks rather old! Why isn't it implemented?
Regards,
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
On Monday 27 August 2007, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110443
It looks rather old! Why isn't it implemented?
i bet if you posted a patch it'd get done quicker
-mike
I would do so if i had any python skills ;)
For me as a non
in their own files).
Could we modify the rules files installed by udev to include a comment
at the top warning that a default portage configuration will overwrite
any changes that the user makes?
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
is
removed which is still needed some kind of configuration file could be
used to prevent the deletion of shared groups/users. With contents like
group/user X needed by ebuild Y.
While writing this i have found GLEP-27. What is the current status
concerning this?
Regards,
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
On Saturday 08 September 2007, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
While writing this i have found GLEP-27. What is the current status
concerning this?
presumably you'd search bugzilla and come across 53269
-mike
I have searched bugzilla, but not for the specific glep
2010/9/5 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org:
if people have packages that dont work with bash-4.1, nows the time to file
blockers of Bug 3360373
-mike
Should be Bug #336037, I guess.
--
Daniel Pielmeier
this means my access will be removed at some point, although I'd
welcome the idea of it staying put in case I can find time in future.
Thanks to everyone who taught me something or helped with my projects. I
learned a huge amount through this distro and community.
Cya around!
Daniel
in the dev-spaces none is
aware of. I remember a thread here which tried to collect those and
place them somewhere public. Instead doing so why not adding them to
gentoolkit[-dev]. I guess most of them try to make Gentoo [development]
work easier.
--
Daniel Pielmeier
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) scarab...@gentoo.org:
scarabeus 10/11/04 14:33:59
Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog quassel-.ebuild
quassel-0.7.1.ebuild
Log:
Introduce logrotate useflag.
Please don't! See http://bugs.gentoo.org/198901
--
Daniel
2010/11/8 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org:
Here's a list of packages that depend on media-libs/jpeg, to make it
easier to scan for your packages and see if there's anything you
should do.
Easy would be if you had added the maintainers to that list :)
--
Daniel Pielmeier
Kacper Kowalik schrieb am 08.11.2010 19:30:
net-print/hplip
Done.
Thank you very much for the list.
--
Daniel Pielmeier
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
. Managing this as a distribution package will acheive a more consistant
rollover when this occurs compared to relying on users to manage their own
dnssec root download and operations.
Am I going about this the right way or is there a better way?
Daniel
/Google_Summer_of_Code_2011_ideas
--
Daniel Pielmeier
# Daniel Gryniewicz d...@gentoo.org (13 Apr 2011)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Functionality is merged into and maintained
in
# the upstream kernel. Use any kernel (e.g. gentoo-sources) instead.
sys-kernel/usermode-sources
Daniel
if the listed tarballs
exist? I am asking because for app-editors/bluefish [1] there are eleven
unpackaged versions listed but only sources for the three 2.0.3 releases
exist and there are no releases for 2.1.x and 2.2.x.
http://euscan.iksaif.net/package/app-editors/bluefish/
--
Daniel Pielmeier
On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Due afterstep and desktop-wm herds removal:
net-mail/asmail
x11-plugins/asapm
x11-plugins/asclock
x11-plugins/ascpu
x11-plugins/asmem
x11-plugins/asmon
x11-plugins/astime
x11-wm/afterstep - looks that was proxy-maintained
sys-libs/libixp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/19/2013 11:10 AM, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote:
On 10:43 Sat 19 Oct , Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: ...
x11-wm/fluxbox
I'm not a developer (but have a completed dev test that doesn't
know where
401 - 500 of 882 matches
Mail list logo
